Published online Dec 26, 2020. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v12.i12.615
Peer-review started: June 18, 2020
First decision: September 18, 2020
Revised: October 15, 2020
Accepted: November 5, 2020
Article in press: November 5, 2020
Published online: December 26, 2020
Processing time: 182 Days and 0.9 Hours
The increasing prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) has caused significantly higher rates of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Thus, percutaneous coronary intervention, a revascularization modality to treat CAD, restores blood supply to myocardial tissues. Antiproliferative drugs in second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) inhibit mammalian target of rapamycin and affect stent restenosis. However, EverProTM, an approved second-generation everolimus-eluting coronary stent system (EES) with a biodegradable polymer facilitates a reduction in intra-arterial injury.
Sirolimus has a longer half-life, lower bioavailability and does not directly affect stent restenosis. However, everolimus outperforms sirolimus and can decrease vascular inflammation and promote rapid endothelialization. These findings indicate the potential of EES to replace second-generation DES and impart benefits to patients with CAD.
The objectives of this study were to determine the safety and performance of EverProTM EES in a real-world scenario and to translate its use in the real world as an effective alternative to DES for the treatment of CAD. The EverProTM EES could offer various benefits in addition to reduced stent restenosis and rapid endothelialization.
This single-center, observational study enrolled patients who completed a 1-year follow-up period after being implanted with the EverProTM stent (between June 1, 2018 and January 31, 2019). As no hypothesis was tested in the study, we did not perform a formal sample size calculation and included patients who met the eligibility criteria during the stipulated time.
Of the 102 lesions detected in the included patients, 98 lesions were treated by implantation of the EverProTM stent. De novo stenting was performed in 96.9% of patients and 3% were treated for in-stent restenosis. Procedural success was attained in all patients with no in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) or stent thrombosis observed throughout the follow-up period. However, the results were limited by the study’s observational nature, retrospective data analysis and a shorter follow-up period.
The results showed that EverProTM EES is a safe and effective treatment alternative as no MACE or stent thrombosis was observed during the 1-year study period in patients with CAD.
The data on the use of the EverProTM stent in the treatment of CAD are very promising. However, if future studies can overcome the study limitation by conducting well-designed studies with a larger sample size and a longer follow-up duration, EverProTM EES can be used as an alternative to contemporary DES for treating CAD.