Porto AG, Zappulla P, Sgarito G, Conti S. High-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: There is still a country for “old men”. World J Cardiol 2026; 18(7): 120973 [DOI: 10.4330/wjc.120973]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Sergio Conti, MD, PhD, FHRS, FESC, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, University of Iowa Health Care Center, 200 Hawkins Dr, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States. sergioconti.md@gmail.com
Research Domain of This Article
Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems
Article-Type of This Article
review-article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Share the Article
Porto AG, Zappulla P, Sgarito G, Conti S. High-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: There is still a country for “old men”. World J Cardiol 2026; 18(7): 120973 [DOI: 10.4330/wjc.120973]
World J Cardiol. Jul 26, 2026; 18(7): 120973 Published online Jul 26, 2026. doi: 10.4330/wjc.120973
High-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: There is still a country for “old men”
Andrea Giuseppe Porto, Paolo Zappulla, Giuseppe Sgarito, Sergio Conti
Andrea Giuseppe Porto, Division of Cardiology, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania 95021, Sicilia, Italy
Paolo Zappulla, Division of Cardiology, University Hospital a Policlinico “G. Rodolico-San Marco”, Catania 95123, Sicilia, Italy
Giuseppe Sgarito, Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, IRCCS ISMETT-UPMC Heart Center, Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies, Palermo 90127, Italy
Sergio Conti, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, University of Iowa Health Care Center, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States
Co-first authors: Andrea Giuseppe Porto and Paolo Zappulla.
Author contributions: Porto AG and Sgarito G contributed to conceptualization; Porto AG and Zappulla P contributed to methodology and investigation, writing - original draft preparation, and they contributed equally to this manuscript as co-first authors; Conti S and Sgarito G contributed to writing - review and editing.
AI contribution statement: AI was not used.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Corresponding author: Sergio Conti, MD, PhD, FHRS, FESC, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, University of Iowa Health Care Center, 200 Hawkins Dr, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States. sergioconti.md@gmail.com
Received: March 12, 2026 Revised: June 18, 2026 Accepted: June 30, 2026 Published online: July 26, 2026 Processing time: 127 Days and 17.6 Hours
Abstract
High-power short-duration (HPSD) and very-HPSD (vHPSD) radiofrequency (RF) ablation have emerged as important advances in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). By delivering higher power over shorter durations, these approaches aim to improve lesion quality, procedural efficiency, and clinical outcomes while maintaining procedural safety. The recent introduction of pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has challenged the role of thermal energy sources and raised questions regarding the future position of HPSD RF ablation in AF treatment. This narrative review summarizes the current evidence regarding the biophysical principles, procedural characteristics, efficacy, and safety of HPSD and vHPSD RF ablation. Data from mechanistic studies, randomized controlled trials, observational studies, meta-analyses, and contemporary consensus documents were reviewed, with particular focus on pulmonary vein isolation, posterior wall isolation, linear ablation, and comparisons with emerging PFA technologies. HPSD and vHPSD ablation generate lesions predominantly through resistive heating, producing broader and more homogeneous lesions while reducing RF application time. Randomized trials and meta-analyses consistently demonstrate shorter procedure duration, reduced RF delivery time, improved first-pass pulmonary vein isolation, and non-inferior or superior arrhythmia-free survival compared with conventional low-power long-duration RF ablation. Safety outcomes are generally comparable, although concerns regarding steam pops and cerebral embolic events remain dependent on catheter technology and procedural protocols. While PFA offers a non-thermal, tissue-selective alternative with promising safety and efficiency profiles, emerging evidence suggests that clinical efficacy remains largely comparable between PFA and HPSD/vHPSD strategies. HPSD and vHPSD RF ablation represent mature, effective, and efficient approaches for AF ablation, supported by extensive mechanistic and clinical evidence. Despite the rapid adoption of PFA, current data do not support the replacement of HPSD RF ablation. Rather, HPSD is likely to remain an important component of contemporary AF ablation, complementing emerging non-thermal technologies and providing a versatile strategy across a broad range of clinical scenarios.
Core Tip: High-power short-duration (HPSD) is the latest development in radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation. HPSD has redefined the RF ablation landscape, offering proven advantages over low-power long-duration RF ablation in both safety and efficacy. However, there are still safety issues related to RF thermal effects. In addition, even when following standardized protocols, HPSD RF ablation remains operator-dependent. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an innovative, non-thermal ablation technique that employs pulsed electric fields to ablate myocardial tissue selectively, sparing adjacent non-cardiac structures. PFA seems more reproducible, reducing procedural time while maintaining non-inferior efficacy. In the era of PFA, HPSD RF ablation should therefore be viewed not as a technology being replaced, but rather as a mature and efficient strategy that will likely coexist with emerging non-thermal ablation modalities.