Marzoog BA, Kopylov P. Volatilome and machine learning in ischemic heart disease: Current challenges and future perspectives. World J Cardiol 2025; 17(4): 106593 [DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i4.106593]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Basheer Abdualah Marzoog, MD, Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare, Sechenov University, 8-2 Trubetskaya Street, Moscow 119991, Moskva, Russia. marzug@mail.ru
Research Domain of This Article
Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems
Article-Type of This Article
Letter to the Editor
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Cardiol. Apr 26, 2025; 17(4): 106593 Published online Apr 26, 2025. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i4.106593
Volatilome and machine learning in ischemic heart disease: Current challenges and future perspectives
Basheer Abdualah Marzoog, Philipp Kopylov
Basheer Abdualah Marzoog, Philipp Kopylov, World-Class Research Center (Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare), I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 8-2 Trubetskaya Street, 119991 Moscow, Russia
Author contributions: Marzoog BA wrote the manuscript, conducted research, collected and analyzed data, interpreted the results, and revised the final version of the manuscript; Kopylov P revised the final version of the manuscript and contributed to the conceptualization and development; all authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript to be published.
Supported by The government assignment, No. 1023022600020-6; The Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation Within The Framework of State Support for The Creation and Development of World-Class Research Center “Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare,” No. 075-15-2022-304; and RSF grant, No. 24-15-00549.
Conflict-of-interest statement: No competing interests regarding the publication.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Received: March 3, 2025 Revised: March 14, 2025 Accepted: April 1, 2025 Published online: April 26, 2025 Processing time: 50 Days and 20.1 Hours
Abstract
Integrating exhaled breath analysis into the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases holds significant promise as a valuable tool for future clinical use, particularly for ischemic heart disease (IHD). However, current research on the volatilome (exhaled breath composition) in heart disease remains underexplored and lacks sufficient evidence to confirm its clinical validity. Key challenges hindering the application of breath analysis in diagnosing IHD include the scarcity of studies (only three published papers to date), substantial methodological bias in two of these studies, and the absence of standardized protocols for clinical implementation. Additionally, inconsistencies in methodologies—such as sample collection, analytical techniques, machine learning (ML) approaches, and result interpretation—vary widely across studies, further complicating their reproducibility and comparability. To address these gaps, there is an urgent need to establish unified guidelines that define best practices for breath sample collection, data analysis, ML integration, and biomarker annotation. Until these challenges are systematically resolved, the widespread adoption of exhaled breath analysis as a reliable diagnostic tool for IHD remains a distant goal rather than an imminent reality.
Core Tip: Exhaled breath analysis offers a non-invasive, cost-effective alternative to traditional ischemic heart disease diagnostics, with superior accuracy (84% vs 60%–70% for stress electrocardiography). To enhance reliability, standardized protocols for breath collection and the integration of machine learning are essential. Collaborative efforts among clinicians, chemists, and data scientists are key to unlocking its full clinical potential.