Stress cardiac imaging is the current first line investigation for coronary artery disease diagnosis and decision making and an adjunctive tool in a range of non-ischaemic cardiovascular diseases. Exercise cardiovascular magnetic resonance (Ex-CMR) has developed over the past 25 years to combine the superior image qualities of CMR with the preferred method of exercise stress. Presently, numerous exercise methods exist, from performing stress on an adjacent CMR compatible treadmill to in-scanner exercise, most commonly on a supine cycle ergometer. Cardiac conditions studied by Ex-CMR are broad, commonly investigating ischaemic heart disease and congenital heart disease but extending to pulmonary hypertension and diabetic heart disease. This review presents an in-depth assessment of the various Ex-CMR stress methods and the varied pulse sequence approaches, including those specially designed for Ex-CMR. Current and future developments in image acquisition are highlighted, and will likely lead to a much greater clinical use of Ex-CMR across a range of cardiovascular conditions.

Exercise echocardiography is a reliable routine test in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. However, in ∼15% of all patients, stress echocardiography leads to false-positive stress echocardiography results. We aimed to investigate the impact of hypertension on stress echocardiographic results.

We performed a retrospective study of patients with suspected or known stable coronary artery disease who underwent a bicycle exercise stress echocardiography. Patients with false-positive stress results were compared with those with appropriate results.

126 patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease were included in this retrospective study. 23 patients showed false-positive stress echocardiography results. Beside comparable age, gender distribution and coronary artery status, hypertension was more prevalent in patients with false-positive stress results (95.7% vs. 67.0%, p = 0.0410). Exercise peak load revealed a borderline-significance with lower loads in patients with false-positive results (100.0 (IQR 75.0/137.5) vs. 125.0 (100.0/150.0) W, p = 0.0601). Patients with false-positive stress results showed higher systolic (2.05 ± 0.69 vs. 1.67 ± 0.39 mmHg/W, p = 0.0193) and diastolic (1.03 ± 0.38 vs. 0.80 ± 0.28 mmHg/W, p = 0.0165) peak blood pressure (BP) per wattage. In a multivariate logistic regression test, hypertension (OR 17.6 [CI 95% 1.9-162.2], p = 0.0115), and systolic (OR 4.12 [1.56-10.89], p = 0.00430) and diastolic (OR 13.74 [2.46-76.83], p = 0.00285) peak BP per wattage, were associated with false-positive exercise results. ROC analysis for systolic and diastolic peak BP levels per wattage showed optimal cut-off values of 1.935mmHg/W and 0.823mmHg/W, indicating false-positive exercise echocardiographic results with AUCs of 0.660 and 0.664, respectively.

Hypertension is a risk factor for false-positive stress exercise echocardiographic results in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Presence of hypertension was associated with 17.6-fold elevated risk of false-positive results.

There is interest in using pharmacological stress testing (PST) as a substitute for exercise stress testing (EST) to evaluate cardiac function in horses.

To compare the effect of PST and EST on right ventricular pressure dynamics and stress echocardiography.

Five horses completed a PST and EST in a randomised crossover design. High fidelity pressure transducers were placed in the right ventricle. Continuous pressure signals were digitally collected and stored, and dP/dtmax, dP/dtmin and tau calculated from these measurements. ECGs were recorded continuously for 20 h. Echocardiography was performed prior to EST and PST, during and after PST, and immediately post EST. Plasma cardiac troponin I concentrations were measured pre- and 3-4 h post stress testing. For PST, 5 microg/kg bwt glycopyrrolate i.v. followed after 10 min by 5 microg/kg bwt/min dobutamine infusion over 10 min was given. EST consisted of a 2 min gallop at 110% speed required to elicit VO2max.

Both EST and PST resulted in a significant increase in right-ventricular dP/dtmax and dP/dtmin over baseline (P<0.05) and a significant decrease in tau compared with baseline (P<0.05). EST dP/dtmax and dP/dtmin were significantly greater than PST dP/dtmax and dP/dtmin (P<0.05) and EST tau was significantly less than PST tau (P<0.05). Two minutes post EST and 5 min post PST dP/dtmax were not significantly different, but were significantly less than end-EST and during PST. Tau was also not significantly different between post EST and post PST, but was significantly decreased end-EST compared with during PST. FS were not significantly different between PST and post EST, but during PST and post EST all FS were significantly higher than baseline. Cardiac troponin I concentrations were significantly elevated post PST and were greater than post EST. The clinical relevance of this is unknown.

PST had a similar, although less marked effect on the cardiac parameters related to right-ventricular pressure dynamics and a similar effect on echocardiography as exercise stress testing.

PST deserves further evaluation in normal horses and those with cardiac disease, and may be complementary to EST to better identify exercise-induced cardiac dysfunction.

Stress echocardiography is a widely applied technique for the evaluation of individuals with known or suspected coronary artery disease. The technique combines echocardiographic imaging with exercise testing or pharmacologic stress. Advances in digital image acquisition and harmonic imaging have substantially improved the quality of echocardiographic images, and have therefore increased general applicability of stress echocardiography.

Stress echocardiography was initially developed in 1979 and has seen substantial success in the evaluation of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. It has proven applicable to clinical questions of diagnosis, prognosis and follow-up. It has been heavily dependent on technologic advancements, initially digital capturing for side-by-side visualization and, more recently, developments in detailed methods of evaluating myocardial mechanics and contrast echocardiography for perfusion.

The relative performance of alternative stressors for stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) is not well established.

All studies published between 1981 to December 2001 who met inclusion criteria were included in this analysis. We performed a summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) analysis and calculated weighted mean of the likelihood ratio and sensitivity/specificity. A covariate analysis using meta-regression methods was also performed.

Forty-four studies presented data on Exercise, 11 on Adenosine, 80 on Dobutamine, 40 on Dipyridamole, 16 on transatrial pacing transesophageal echocardiography (Tap-TEE), and 7 on transatrial pacing transthorasic echocardiography (Tap-TTE). SROC analysis showed that the following order of most discriminatory to least: Tap-TEE, Exercise, Dipyridamole, Dobutamine and Adenosine. Weighted means sensitivity/specificity were Exercise: 82.6/84.4%, Adenosine: 68.4/80.9%, Dobutamine: 79.6/85.1%, Dipyridamole: 71.0/92.2%, Tap-TTE: 90.7/86.1%, and Tap-TEE: 86.2/91.3%. Covariate analysis showed that the discriminatory power of Exercise decreased with increasing mean age.

Tap-TEE is a very accurate test for both ruling in and ruling out CAD although its invasiveness may limit its clinical acceptability. Exercise is a well-balanced satisfactory test for both ruling in and ruling out but performance might be lower for the elderly. Dobutamine offers a reasonable compromise for Exercise. Dipyridamole might be good for ruling in but not for ruling out CAD. The incapability in ruling-out CAD was a major problem in clinical application of the stress. Adenosine was the least useful stressor in diagnosing CAD.

Echocardiography provides information regarding cardiac morphology, function and hemodynamics non-invasively. It is the most frequently performed cardiovascular examination after electrocardiography and chest X-ray. In less than half a century, this technique has evolved to a mainstay of cardiovascular medicine. The historical evolution of echocardiography is succinctly described including that of M-mode, two-dimensional, Doppler, stress, transesophageal, intraoperative, contrast, digital, three-dimensional and intracardiac echocardiography.

The prognostic value of stress echocardiography to predict future cardiac events using the extent and severity of wall motion abnormalities is not well defined. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a prognostic model for interpretation of stress echocardiographic studies by using the extent and severity of wall motion abnormalities. We evaluated 1,500 patients (59 +/- 13 years old; 51% men) who underwent stress echocardiography (34% on the treadmill exercise and 66% on dobutamine). Left ventricular regional wall motion was assessed by consensus of 2 experienced echocardiographers. Follow-up periods (mean 2.7 +/- 1.0 years) for confirmed myocardial infarction (n = 31) and cardiac death (n = 44) were identified. Multivariate regression analysis identified 2 independent predictors of cardiac events: the number of left ventricular wall segments with new wall motion abnormalities (an index of the extent of ischemia) and the maximal magnitude of new wall motion abnormalities (an index of the severity of ischemia). The ischemic extent (chi-square 48.7, p <0.0001) and maximal severity (chi-square 52.0, p <0.0001) were exponentially correlated with an increase in event rate. On the basis of these data, a prognostic model was defined that uses ischemic extent and maximal severity as stress-dependent orthogonal variables. With this 3-dimensional model, the predicted event rate ranged over sevenfold, from a low of 0.9%/year in patients without any wall motion abnormalities to a high of 6.7%/year in patients with extensive and severe wall motion abnormalities. The extent and severity of wall motion abnormalities by stress echocardiography are independent and cumulative predictors of prognosis in patients who have suspected or known ischemic heart disease.

Peak-and post-exercise stress echocardiography were compared with respect to ability to detect coronary artery disease in 138 consecutive patients undergoing supine bicycle stress echocardiography. Sixty of these patients had single-vessel disease; 37, double-vessel disease; and 19, triple-vessel disease. Exercise was performed in the 20- to 30-degree left decubitus position on an echo-bed with an ergometer. Exercise started at 50 watts and was increased in 25-watt every 3 minutes and to a maximum of 150 watts. Two-dimensional echocardiographic images were digitized and assigned in a quad-screen format for nonbiased interpretation. Total wall motion score (TWMS) was the sum of the wall motion score, from normokinesis (0) to dyskinesis (4), of 16 segments. Image quality score index (IQSI) was the mean of the image quality scores in all views. All of the patients underwent coronary arteriography. Significant coronary stenosis was defined as≧75% stenosis of the large coronary arteries. Two-dimensional echocardiographic studies were adequate for analysis in 133 patients during the peak-exercise stage (peak-exercise) and in 137 patients 30 to 60 seconds after the end of exercise (post-exercise). TWMS at peak-exercise was higher than at post-exercise, while IQSI at peak-exercise was lower than at post-exercise. Sensitivity at peak-exercise versus that at post-exercise was 91% versus 79% (p<0.05); specificity, 76% versus 85%; and diagnostic accuracy, 88% versus 80% (p<0.05), respectively. We conclude that despite poor image quality on exercise echocardiography, better diagnostic accuracy was attained by assessing wall motion changes at peak-exercise than at post-exercise.

Digital acquisition is a technique for storing echocardiographic data that offers advantages over conventional videotape (VT); however, limited information is available on its accuracy for the evaluation of valvular regurgitation.

We evaluated 102 patients with at least 1 regurgitant lesion. Data were obtained on VT and in 1 cardiac cycle stored digitally (1C). To assess for incremental improvement with acquisition of multiple cycles, digital images were also acquired with 2 (2C) or 3 cardiac cycles (3C). Both digital and VT images were graded for regurgitant severity as absent, trivial, mild, moderate, or severe. Kappa statistics were used to assess agreement.

A total of 171 valvular regurgitant lesions (mild or greater) were evaluated. The overall agreement between 1C and VT images was kappa = 0.61. With multiple cycle acquisition, there was no improvement in agreement (kappa = 0.56 and 0.57 for 2C and 3C, respectively). When subgrouped, the level of agreement between 1C and VT was slightly lower for the aortic valve than for the mitral or tricuspid valves (kappa = 0.49, 0.63, 0.64, respectively).

The 1C technique has substantial agreement and correlation with standard VT for the evaluation of regurgitant lesions with the use of color flow Doppler. The acquisition of multiple cardiac cycles does not provide incremental improvement over single beat acquisition.

We sought to characterize patients with a hypertensive response during exercise echocardiography and its effect on results of the test.

A hypertensive response to exercise has been shown to cause false-positive results in perfusion imaging, radionuclide angiography and exercise electrocardiography, but its influence on exercise echocardiography has not been reported.

We identified 548 of 6,686 patients who had coronary angiography within four weeks after exercise echocardiography from 1992 through 1996. Echocardiographic results from 132 patients (24%) with a hypertensive response to exercise, defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) >220 mm Hg for men and SBP >190 mm Hg for women or as an increase in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >10 mm Hg or DBP >90 mm Hg during exercise echocardiography, were compared with those from 416 patients without a hypertensive response.

Of 132 patients with a hypertensive response to exercise, 108 patients had exercise echocardiographic results positive for ischemia. Of these patients, 24 (22%) were found to have no significant coronary artery disease (CAD). In contrast, of 320 patients with positive exercise echocardiographic results without a hypertensive response, 39 (12%) patients did not have significant CAD. Among the false-positive results, new wall motion abnormalities were extensive in 15 of 24 (63%) hypertensive responders involving >25% of segments compared with 14 of 39 non-hypertensive responders (36%, p = 0.012).

An excessive rise in blood pressure during exercise is associated with a greater likelihood of new or worsening abnormalities with exercise, which may be observed in the absence of angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis.

Visual and quantitative assessments of percent diameter stenosis on coronary angiography correlate poorly with functional testing, particularly in intermediate-severity (40%-70%) lesions, yet are frequently relied on to make decisions regarding revascularization. Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) and relative CFVR (RCFVR) are promising methods for on-line functional assessment of lesion severity in the catheterization laboratory. We sought to determine the agreement between maximal, mean, and relative CFVR and stress echocardiography in intermediate-severity stenoses. The results of exercise or dobutamine stress echocardiography and CFVR measured by intracoronary Doppler were compared in 28 patients referred for assessment of intermediate-severity stenoses, using 15 patients with either angiographically normal coronary arteries or diameter stenoses > 70% as reference groups. CFVR was measured at least three times in response to a bolus of adenosine in the target vessel distal to the stenosis. RCFVR (target/normal vessel CFVR) was also measured in 27 patients. Maximal, mean (of three measures), and relative CFVR were calculated. CFVR > or = 2.0 and RCFVR > or = 0.75 were accepted as normal. A minority (29%) of patients in the intermediate-severity stenosis group had a positive test by either method. There was good to very good agreement between stress echocardiography and maximal CFVR (84%, kappa = 0.62, P < 0.0001) and RCFVR (81%, kappa = 0.59, P < 0.001) across the entire patient cohort, though in the intermediate subgroup concordance was only fair. Using the mean (of three measures of) CFVR for the same comparison improved the agreement in the intermediate subgroup to good (86%, kappa = 0.58, P = 0.002), and in the entire cohort the agreement was very good (88%, kappa = 0.74, P < 0.0001). There was only fair correlation between measures of CFVR and percent coronary stenosis. CFVR improved from 1.8 +/- 0.8 to 2.7 +/- 0.7 after percutaneous intervention (n = 12, P < 0.0001). These results suggest that there is good agreement between CFVR and stress echocardiography across a wide range of coronary lesion severity. The mean of three CFVR measurements distal to the target vessel stenosis increases diagnostic accuracy. Intracoronary Doppler flow velocity measurements at the time of cardiac catheterization may facilitate improved decision-making by providing the ability to assess the functional significance of coronary stenoses on-line.

Stress echocardiography (SE) is currently a widely accepted method for the diagnostic and prognostic assessment of coronary artery disease. This article reviews new concepts in SE, such as new stress techniques, new methods of endocardial border detection, strain, tissue Doppler velocities, and others. Although some of these techniques are in their infancy, we believe that they will become widely accepted.

The addition of nuclear imaging techniques to basic exercise electrocardiography (ECG) has provided significant diagnostic and prognostic information in the evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. During the last decade, new classes of isotopes (technetium-and rubidium-based perfusion agents) and refinements in single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) have become better accepted. These new studies have added to the diagnostic armamentarium available to physicians, but at considerable costs with an estimated 4.8 million procedures performed this year. Nuclear imaging techniques can assess myocardial blood flow (perfusion imaging) or function (ventriculography). Another imaging modality, stress echocardiography, has also achieved widespread acceptance with clinical guidelines for its use published in 1997. This review addresses these imaging techniques in diagnostic evaluation of the patient with suspected coronary artery disease.

Stress echocardiography has evolved into a widely practiced and accepted method for the noninvasive assessment of the status of the coronary anatomy. Furthermore, this modality incorporates the ability to assess left ventricular function, valvular structure and function, intracardiac masses, the pericardium, and hemodynamics. The extent to which this tool can reliably provide useful clinical information is dependent, in part, on optimal performance. The purpose of this report is to provide an overview of those technical considerations that can contribute to the successful operation of a stress echocardiography laboratory. Consideration is given to personnel qualifications, functional requirements of the digital acquisition/storage/replay system, functional integration of the various hardware components, characteristics of the software, physical layout of the facility, and alternatives to treadmill exercise as the stressor. A thorough understanding of the physiologic basis of stress echocardiography, coupled with optimization of resources used in its performance, enable this tool to be an extraordinarily useful and cost-efficient method for comprehensive cardiovascular assessment.

Exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) is a more recent form of totally non-invasive stress testing which like exercise thallium SPECT scintigraphy (ETS) was developed to overcome the known limitations of ECG stress testing, namely the limited diagnostic accuracy and the inability of ECG stress testing to site the region of coronary artery disease (CAD) induced ischaemia.

To determine the sensitivity and specificity (and overall accuracy) of ESE in a group of patients referred for ETS imaging and compare the relative costs of each technique.

One hundred and fifteen patients referred for ETS consented to a simultaneous ESE. Of this group, 59 patients underwent coronary angiography which was utilised as the gold standard.

The feasibility of ESE was 97% (112 of 115 patients of the total study population and 57 of the 59 patients who underwent coronary angiography). Of the 59 patients undergoing coronary angiography, the sensitivity of ESE and ETS were not significantly different (84.1% versus 91.3% respectively). However, despite the apparent marked difference in specificity (92.3% versus 61.5% respectively), p = NS (Fisher's exact test) as there were only 13 normals in the group who underwent coronary angiography. Overall accuracy was also closely similar (86.0% versus 84.7% respectively) and therefore also not significantly different. By contrast, agreement with coronary angiography as measured by the kappa statistic (kappa +/- SEk) was good for ESE (0.66 +/- 0.11) but only moderate for ETS (0.54 +/- 0.13). Moreover, there was a cost saving of at least $594.00 per patient in favour of ESE.

ESE is a totally non-invasive, sensitive, specific and cost-effective imaging modality for the detection and localisation of CAD.

The diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography is limited in patients with poor transthoracic acoustic windows. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) overcomes these limitations and thus may increase the clinical usefulness of dobutamine stress echocardiography. The present study was designed to compare the diagnostic accuracies of transesophageal and transthoracic dobutamine stress echocardiography for the identification of coronary artery disease (CAD) in a cohort of patients with a higher incidence of poor acoustic windows. Forty-two male patients (mean age, 66 +/- 9 years) underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography with simultaneous transesophageal and transthoracic imaging. Coronary arteriography was performed in 28 patients (67%). Transesophageal imaging adequately visualized 99.6% of left ventricular segments compared with 76.2% visualized by transthoracic imaging (P < 0.0001). There was substantial agreement between the two techniques for segmental wall motion analysis at baseline (kappa 0.76; 95% CI, 0.70-0.82); however, at peak dobutamine dose, agreement was significantly reduced (kappa 0.62; 95% CI, 0.55-0.69). The sensitivity (88% vs 75%), specificity (100% vs 75%), and positive predictive value (100% vs 80%) for the identification of CAD were all superior for transesophageal imaging. Transesophageal imaging correctly identified 11 of the 12 patients (92%) with multivessel disease compared with 5 patients (42%) identified by transthoracic imaging (P < 0.03). There were no major complications. Transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography is a safe, feasible, and accurate technique for the identification and risk stratification of patients with CAD. Transesophageal imaging appears to be superior to transthoracic imaging for identifying both the presence and extent of CAD, specifically in patients with poor acoustic windows.

The association of aortic regurgitation with left ventricular size, hypertrophy, and abnormal coronary flow may influence the accuracy of stress testing techniques for the diagnosis of coronary disease. We examined the diagnostic accuracy of treadmill exercise echocardiography to predict coronary artery disease in 76 patients with moderate to severe aortic regurgitation. Rest and poststress images were interpreted by 2 experienced observers, and accuracy was defined by comparison with stenoses >/=50% diameter at coronary angiography. Results were compared with accuracy in a control group of previously published studies in patients without valvular heart disease. After 6 patients were excluded because of a submaximal heart rate response (<85% age-predicted maximal heart rate), 70 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients with aortic regurgitation were of comparable age to the control group and exercised to similar workload. In 16 (23%) patients with significant coronary artery disease and significant aortic regurgitation, the sensitivity of exercise echocardiography was 56% compared with 83% in the control group (P =.03). The specificity in 54 patients with aortic regurgitation but no significant coronary artery disease was 67% compared with 83% in the control group (P =.02). Accuracy was 64% in aortic regurgitation compared with 83% in the control group (P =.02). In patients with aortic regurgitation, accuracy in the left anterior descending artery territory (76%) marginally exceeded that in the posterior (right + circumflex coronary artery) circulation (70%). Thus the presence of significant aortic regurgitation affects the regional wall motion of the left ventricle during exercise and adversely affects the accuracy of exercise echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

In the current literature, pharmacologic stress techniques are the focus of interest and excitement regarding new technologies and new indications such as the diagnosis of viable myocardium. In contrast, exercise echocardiography has evolved less and is less amenable to the introduction of new technologies. This article reviews the indications for exercise echocardiography (especially in contrast to pharmacologic stress), its accuracy relative to other testing, and application to clinical decision making. Exercise echocardiography remains to be well accepted as a diagnostic and risk-assessment technique, and in some clinical situations it provides valuable data that are not available during pharmacologic stress testing.

The diagnosis of coronary heart disease in women has been thought to be more difficult than in men, owing to the overall lower prevalence and severity of disease in women, as well as more subtle clinical presentations. Exercise electrocardiography is associated with a high rate of false-positive results. In contrast, exercise and pharmacologic stress echocardiography have been shown to have high sensitivity, specificity, and prognostic value in women, comparable to that obtained in a male population. Although exercise thallium provides high f disease accuracy, due to its cost, availability, and radiation exposure, it may not be the ideal initial test in women. Thus, compared with other modalities, the advantages of stress echocardiography include its lower cost, availability, and high diagnostic accuracy. In the evaluation of women with chest pain, the initial step should involve clinical stratification into low, moderate, or high-probability groups based on symptoms, age, and cardiovascular risk factors. In women with atypical chest pain and a low probability of coronary heart disease, further testing should be avoided because any positive result is likely to be falsely positive. In those women with a moderate likelihood of disease, the most efficient and cost-effective strategy includes stress echocardiography as the initial test. This approach avoids the high rate of false-positive results with subsequent unnecessary angiography generated by exercise electrocardiography, as well as minimalizing false-negative results, which would lead to delays and potential increase in morbidity and mortality from untreated coronary heart disease. The optimal strategy for women at high clinical risk may be either exercise echocardiography or cardiac catheterization as the initial test. Although the diagnosis of CAD in women is different than in men, it is not necessarily more difficult. Astute clinical evaluation, in conjunction with judicious use of diagnostic testing, yields excellent results.

Pharmacologic stress testing is an important noninvasive method for evaluating patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease who are unable to adequately exercise. Pharmacologic stress echocardiography using dobutamine has been developed over the last 10 to 15 years as an alternative to vasodilator stress testing using nuclear perfusion imaging. As experience has grown, digital subtraction echocardiogram has been shown to be a safe, convenient, and reliable method for stress testing in a variety of patient populations. Digital subtraction echocardiogram has comparable sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy when compared to other stress testing methods which employ cardiac imaging and is superior to the exercise echocardiogram. It has certain advantages over nuclear perfusion imaging in terms of cost and convenience. The recent addition of arbutamine echocardiography (which has been shown to be comparable to digital subtraction echocardiogram) provides another alternative method for pharmacologic stress testing. Continued improvement in echocardiographic image quality and the development of new technologies such as tissue harmonic imaging and contrast echocardiography will hopefully improve the echocardiographic evaluation of wall motion therefore increasing the diagnostic accuracy of echocardiographic stress testing.

Stress echocardiography is composed of a family of examinations in which various forms of cardiovascular stress are combined with echocardiographic imaging to assist in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Exercise cardiography has evolved over the past 20 years into a routinely available clinical tool employed in both university and community hospital settings. This article discusses advantages and disadvantages of using exercise echocardiography.

The feasibility of using echocardiography to identify stress induced wall motion abnormalities was first demonstrated with M-mode recordings. The practical use of such a test had to await the development of 2-dimensional echocardiography whereby more wall segments could be analyzed. From the early days of 2-dimensional echocardiography there have been a succession of technological and clinical advances which have made stress echocardiography a very clinically useful tool in the management of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. These developments included the realization that stress-induced wall motion abnormalities produce stunned myocardium permitting immediate posttreadmill echoes to be clinically useful, the use of pharmacologic stress, the introduction of digital recording techniques so that rest and stress images could be viewed side-by-side, and more recently the advent of new imaging technologies, such as harmonic imaging of tissue to provide higher quality of stress echocardiograms.

The diagnostic value of echocardiography hinges on the reader's ability to adequately visualize the endocardium of the left ventricle. This study was designed to evaluate the potential benefit of noncontrast harmonic imaging to enhance endocardial visualization. Eighty consecutive outpatients who underwent treadmill stress echocardiography were randomly assigned to either fundamental or harmonic imaging. The echoes were interpreted by 2 experienced readers. Compared with fundamental imaging, harmonic imaging of tissue improved the overall endocardial visualization score by 35% and 21% for readers 1 and 2, respectively (P <.001). Harmonic imaging also reduced the percentage of nondiagnostic segments by one half (P <.01). In patients undergoing treadmill stress echo, harmonic imaging offers a clinically significant improvement in endocardial visualization.

Stress echocardiography, both pharmacologic and physiological, is an established noninvasive diagnostic method of detecting coronary artery disease. It also has a role in the assessment of patients with chest pain, the assessment of cardiovascular risk before noncardiac surgery, the assessment of patients after a myocardial infarction, the detection of viability in dysfunctional myocardium, and the prediction of functional recovery. The prognostic value of stress echocardiography is emerging. In this article, we discuss the methodology, diagnostic accuracy, and various clinical applications of stress echocardiography. We also review its limitations and compared it with other noninvasive methods of assessing patients with coronary artery disease.

Measures of left ventricular function during exercise provide information that is more accurate than the exercise ECG in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease, supportive of the data provided by myocardial perfusion studies, and of great prognostic significance. We review basic methods for evaluating left ventricular function during exercise and responses to various types of exercise, including incremental exercise and exercise training conditions. Additionally, we review changes in both incremental exercise test responses and responses to training in various pathological conditions. Case reports are included to illustrate the utility of measuring left ventricular function during exercise.

To assess the diagnostic value of exercise echocardiography in patients with complete left bundle branch block and clinical suspicion of coronary artery disease.

Among 1,176 exercise echocardiograms performed from May of 1994 to November of 1996, 92 showed complete left bundle branch block in the resting electrocardiogram. We retrospectively analyzed data of 23 patients who had coronary angiography performed within 6 weeks of the exercise echo (19 males and 4 females, age 62 +/- 8, resting ejection fraction 52 +/- 10%). Previous acute myocardial infarction was demonstrated in 8 of them. The development of new or worsening regional dysfunction was considered an ischaemic response on exercise echo; whereas we assumed that there was significant coronary artery disease on the coronariography whether there was > or = 1 vessel disease in patients without previous myocardial infarction or > or = 2 vessel disease in patients with previous infarction.

Ten patients showed multivessel disease (> or = 2 vessels, 6 with previous infarction); 5 one-vessel disease; and 8 non significant coronary artery disease. Exercise echocardiography sensitivity for ischaemia detection in the entire group was 86% (95% confidence interval 67-100%); the specificity was 67% (36-98%), predictive value of a positive test was 80% and predictive value of a negative test was 75%. Sensitivity for the detection of > 50% stenosis in the left anterior descending coronary territory was 92% (76%-100%) and specificity 64% (35%-92%); for right coronary artery sensitivity was 80% (55%-100%) and specificity 77% (54%-100%); and for left circumflex artery sensitivity was 70% (42%-98%) and specificity 69% (44%-94%).

Exercise echocardiography may be useful in the evaluation of patients with left bundle branch block and clinical suspicion of coronary artery disease; with good sensitivity and low specificity.

Cardiovascular diseases are the most common causes of morbidity and mortality in individuals with peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Among patients who have undergone lower extremity amputation as a result of PVD, the prevalence of concomitant cardiovascular disease may be as high as 75%. Comorbid heart disease may complicate the postamputation course of recovery, delay initiation of rehabilitation training, and inhibit the achievement of maximal functional independence. A variety of methods have been used to assess cardiac status and risk in amputation patients undergoing physical training; these have included clinical evaluation, resting electrocardiography, and continuous dynamic electrocardiography during either standard physical therapy exercise or adapted ergometry. Several conditioning training programs have been developed to improve the cardiovascular fitness of patients with dysvascular amputation, the results of which have been favorable. These assessment and intervention strategies have extensive applicability in the clinical management of patients with dysvascular amputation.

Cardiovascular stress testing remains the mainstay of provocative evaluation for patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Stress echocardiography has become a valuable means of cardiovascular stress testing. It plays a crucial role in the initial detection of coronary disease, in determining prognosis, and in therapeutic decision making. The purpose of this document is to outline the recommended methodology for stress echocardiography with respect to personnel and equipment as well as the clinical use of this recently developed technique. Specific limitations will also be discussed.

It was the purpose of the present study to prove the feasibility and reliability of quantitative stress-echocardiography as an alternative method to radionuclide angiography (RNA) in chronic regurgitant valvular lesions. Echocardiography and RNA are most commonly used to obtain various left ventricular (LV) morphometric and functional parameters that have been postulated to predict long-term prognosis in patients with aortic and mitral valvular regurgitation. Supine bicycle ergometry with a workload ranging from 25-250 Watts was used to evaluate stress dependent LV volumes and ejection fractions (EFs) in patients with pure aortic (n = 18) and mitral regurgitation (n = 14). Most patients (23/32) underwent simultaneous right heart catheterization. Echocardiographic EFs were validated by RNA with good correlations (r = 0.81, P < 0.01). Patients with aortic regurgitation and functional class I/II (9), had a significant increase in EF during exercise (60%-67%, P < 0.001) and a reduction in end-systolic volume (71-52 mL, P < 0.01). In comparison, patients with class III symptoms (9), had a drop in EF (53%-49%, P < 0.01), had larger baseline end-systolic volume (104 mL, P = NS), which did not decrease during stress (104 vs 107 mL, P = NS). In patients with chronic mitral regurgitation baseline and exercise EF did not differ between class I/II (6) and class III (8), however, mildly symptomatic patients increased from 57%-67%, (P < 0.01) versus patients in class III (65% vs 69%, P = NS). Stroke volume index was not different at baseline (44 vs 33 mL/m(2), P = NS); however, there were significant differences during exercise (70 vs 41 mL/m(2), P = 0.05). Quantitative stress-echocardiography is a noninvasive and safe alternative method to RNA, which allows reliable calculation of stress dependent LV volumes and EF. Determination of end-systolic volumes may be of additional prognostic value. The combination of a high baseline EF and low stroke volume index with the inability to improve during exercise might reflect early stages of impaired LV function in patients with severe mitral regurgitation.

The use of exercise echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) has been validated in pilot studies but is not documented in clinical practice and in women comparatively with men. The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of sex and of test verification bias on the diagnostic performance of exercise echocardiography.

Three thousand six hundred seventy-nine consecutive patients (1714 women, 1965 men) who underwent an exercise echocardiographic study were studied; the observed sensitivity, specificity, and correct classification rate were calculated among 340 patients (244 men, 96 women) who underwent angiography; to study the effect of test verification bias, sensitivity and specificity were estimated for all patients who underwent exercise echocardiography including those not referred to angiography. In the angiographic group, the prevalence of CAD was 60% in women and 80% in men. The observed sensitivity and specificity of exercise echocardiography was 78% and 44% in men and 79% and 37% in women. After adjustment for test verification bias, the estimated sensitivity was lower in women (32% versus 42% in men), whereas specificity was similar in both sexes. The positive predictive value was lower in women (66%) compared with men (84%).

In clinical practice, test verification bias results in a lower observed specificity and a higher sensitivity of exercise echocardiography. In women, positive predictive value and adjusted sensitivity are lower compared with that in men.

We compared the effectiveness and practicability of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and treadmill exercise electrocardiographic testing (TMT) for detecting coronary artery disease. Ninety-six patients (mean age 58.8 +/- 9.0 years) who presented for coronary angiography underwent both DSE and symptom-limited TMT. Two-dimensional echocardiography was performed to detect ischemia-induced wall motion abnormalities during incremental dobutamine infusion (5-40 micrograms/kg per min administered in 5 min steps). The sensitivity of detecting ischemia was 63% for TMT and 79% for DSE (p < 0.05); the specificity was 61% for TMT and 88% for DSE (p < 0.05). The accuracy of TMT was 63% and of DSE 82% (p < 0.01). In patients in whom both tests gave true-positive results, the maximum ST depression was evaluated during DSE and TMT (n = 31). The ST segment depressions detected by DSE were significantly smaller than those detected by TMT (0.04 +/- 0.04 mV vs 0.17 +/- 0.07 mV, p < 0.01), and 10 patients had no evidence of ST segment depression despite the presence of new wall motion abnormalities. DSE took significantly longer to perform than TMT (26.0 +/- 5.0 min vs 5.5 +/- 2.0 min, p < 0.01). Thus, DSE is more sensitive, specific and accurate than TMT in detecting coronary artery disease and can detect ischemia at an earlier stage. However, it takes longer to perform than TMT and thus may be less suitable for routine clinical use.

Arbutamine is a new beta-adrenergic agonist with potent chronotropic and inotropic properties developed to pharmacologically induce stress. A prospective trial was conducted in five centers with a total enrolment of 45 patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease. The primary purpose of the trial was to compare the efficacy of arbutamine with symptom-limited exercise in provoking clinical (angina), electrocardiographic (> or = 0.1 mV ST depression) and echocardiographic (induced wall motion abnormality) evidence of transient stress-induced ischemia. The secondary purpose was to assess the safety of arbutamine in patients with coronary artery disease. Ischemia was induced at a lower heart rate, systolic blood pressure and pressure-rate product during arbutamine infusion than during exercise. Using angina and/or electrocardiographic evidence of ischemia, arbutamine was more sensitive than exercise in detecting myocardial ischemia (77 vs. 58%, P = 0.021). Using echocardiography, the sensitivity for inducing wall motion abnormalities was 88% with arbutamine and 79% with exercise (P = not significant). Echocardiography in combination with angina and/or electrocardiographic evidence increased the sensitivity to 94% using arbutamine and to 88% with exercise. For the patients with multivessel disease, the sensitivity was 97% and 91%, respectively. No serious adverse events, either cardiac or noncardiac, were associated with arbutamine, and no patient had prolonged ischemia. Although exercise is the preferred method of stress for patients who are able to exercise adequately, arbutamine is at least as sensitive as exercise for the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia, and appears to be a safe and effective alternative to exercise testing in patients unable to exercise adequately.

Exercise echocardiography is a sensitive, specific, and highly accurate method for detecting coronary restenosis and progressive compromise of untreated arterial segments in patients who have undergone percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. It is far more reliable in predicting the status of the coronary anatomy in such patients than exercise electrocardiography or symptomatic status.

The mechanism by which dobutamine increases the contraction of chronically dysfunctional myocardium and its effects on metabolism are still unknown. The aim of this study was to assess regional myocardial metabolism at rest and during an intracoronary dobutamine infusion in patients with hibernating myocardium. Eleven asymptomatic patients with single proximal stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery and persistent left ventricular dysfunction at rest (undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [PTCA]) were studied prospectively. Regional left ventricular function was assessed by two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography and regional perfusion by thallium-201 single-proton-emission computed tomography. Great cardiac vein and aortic blood samples were obtained for measurements of lactate and plasma free fatty acid (FFA) concentrations. Inotropic challenge, obtained by using intracoronary dobutamine infusion, increases regional left ventricular function. However, the arteriovenous AV lactate difference was 0.206 = 0.070 mmol/L at rest, and it decreased to 0.018 = 0.069 mmol/L (p < 0.05 vs baseline) and 0.066 = 0.068 mmol/L (p < 0.05 vs baseline) at 4 and 10 minutes of dobutamine infusion, respectively. Thus the hibernating myocardium does not produce lactate at rest. However, when regional contraction is stimulated, dobutamine-induced inotropic challenge may cause a perfusion-contraction mismatch with an activation of anaerobic glycolysis.