Upper airway surgery for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) offers an alternative to CPAP, but its impact on weight changes is poorly studied.

To systematically review published literature on the relationship between surgical intervention for OSA and changes in body mass index (BMI).

A literature search was conducted from 2013-2024 in five databases. Full-text English articles which examined BMI changes in adults with OSA pre- and post-surgery were included. The quality of each study was assessed independently by two researchers using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. This study was reported according to the PRISMA-ScR.

Eleven studies, involving 406 patients from six countries were included. Most patients were males (88.4%) with a mean age of 40 years old. The pre-operative BMI were higher [27.8 kg/m2 (SD = 2.6)] compared to a BMI of 27.7 kg/m2 (SD = 1.3) at 21.0 months post-operation. The pre-operative Epworth Sleepiness Score was 13.28 (SD = 6.36), while the apnea-hypopnea index was 41.2 (SD = 16.88), indicating that most patients were diagnosed with severe OSA. The average oxygen desaturation index was 35.63 (SD = 11.17). The meta-analysis showed no significant BMI changes after surgery (mean difference:-0.29; 95% CI:-0.80 to 0.21; I2 = 30%). Findings were consistent with no publication bias found.

Upper airway surgery for OSA does not significantly affect BMI. The authors propose closer monitoring of weight changes following upper airway surgery, as weight fluctuations can impact the outcomes of surgery. Unchanged weight post-surgery may be attributed to suboptimal OSA treatment.

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), comprising obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and central sleep apnea (CSA), could promote left ventricular (LV) remodeling and systolic dysfunction.

The authors tested the hypothesis, in the ADVENT-HF (Adaptive Servo-ventilation for Sleep-disordered Breathing in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction) trial, that SDB is associated with reversible impairment of LV structure and function.

Participants underwent echocardiography (ejection fraction ≤45%) and polysomnography. They were classified as no-SDB (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] <15/h); OSA (AHI ≥15/h with ≥50% of events obstructive), or CSA (AHI ≥15 with >50% of events central). Those with SDB were randomized to a control group or to peak-flow-triggered adaptive servo-ventilation (ASVPF) to treat SDB and, in them, echocardiography was repeated 6 months later.

Subjects with OSA (n = 543) had similar LV structure and function to those without SDB (n = 56). Subjects with CSA (n = 201) had greater LV mass index and lower LV ejection fraction than the other groups. LV volumes were higher in the CSA than in the OSA group (P < 0.05 for all). ASVPF abolished SDB, but had no significant effect, whether evaluated by allocation or adherence, 6 months post-randomization on LV structure or function for the entire cohort (n = 549), or either subgroup.

Among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, those with OSA had similar LV structure and function to those without SDB. Patients with CSA had greater LV remodeling and systolic dysfunction than those with OSA or without SDB. Six months of SDB suppression of OSA and CSA by ASVPF had no impact on LV structure or function. (Adaptive Servo-ventilation for Sleep-disordered Breathing in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction [ADVENT-HF]).

Central sleep apnea (CSA) significantly impacts cardiovascular health, linking it to left atrial enlargement, atrial fibrillation, and impaired cardiac function in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF). However, the relationship between CSA and left atrial size in individuals with preserved EF remains underexplored.

This study aims to examine the relationship between left atrial size and CSA in snoring patients with preserved EF.

An observational study was conducted involving 341 consecutive snoring patients from a cardiology department who underwent overnight polysomnography (PSG) and echocardiography. Patients with EF below 50%, pulmonary diseases or neuromuscular disorders were excluded. CSA was defined as a central apnea-hypopnea index (CAHI) of five or more events per hour. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and logistic regression models were employed to evaluate the relationship between CSA and left atrial size.

Among the 341 patients, 33 (9.68%) were diagnosed with CSA, with a higher prevalence in males (10.0%) than females (8.91%). Left atrial enlargement (LAE) was observed in 172 patients (50.44%), predominantly in females (71.29%). CSA patients demonstrated significantly higher apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (49.2/h vs 26.75/h, p < 0.01) and oxygen desaturation index (ODI) (44.9 vs 22.85, p < 0.01), alongside more sleep time with oxygen saturation < 90% (6.6% vs 2.35%, p = 0.01). Echocardiographic evaluations revealed that CSA patients had a greater left atrial anterior-posterior diameter(LAD-ap 42.73 ± 13.01 mm vs 38.15 ± 4.58 mm, p < 0.01) and a higher frequency of LAE (69.7% vs 48.38%, p = 0.02). Males with CSA had a significantly increased risk of LAE (OR: 4.54; 95% CI: 1.45-14.2) after IPTW adjustment, with significant associations persisting among those with risk factors such as smoking and dyslipidemia.

This study highlights a significant association between CSA and left atrial enlargement in males with preserved EF, suggesting that CSA may contribute to atrial remodeling even without reduced ejection fraction.

Central sleep apnea, a rare polysomnographic finding in the general population, is prevalent in certain cardiovascular conditions including systolic and diastolic left ventricular dysfunction, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, carotid artery stenosis, stroke, and use of certain cardiac-related medications. Polysomnographic findings of central sleep apnea with adverse cardiovascular impacts include nocturnal hypoxemia and arousals, which can lead to increased sympathetic activity both at night and in the daytime. Among cardiovascular diseases, central sleep apnea is most prevalent in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction; a large study of more than 900 treated patients has shown a dose-dependent relationship between nocturnal desaturation and mortality. Multiple small randomized controlled trials have shown mitigation of sympathetic activity when central sleep apnea is treated with nocturnal oxygen, continuous positive airway pressure, and adaptive servoventilation. However, two early randomized controlled trials with positive airway pressure devices have shown either a neutral effect on survival or excess premature mortality in the active treatment arm, compared to untreated central sleep apnea. In contrast, the results of the most recent trial using an advanced adaptive servoventilation device showed improved quality of life and no signal for mortality suggesting that treatment of central sleep apnea was at least safe. In addition to positive airway pressure devices, multiple medications have been shown to improve central sleep apnea, but no long-term trials of pharmacologic therapy have been published. Currently, phrenic nerve stimulation is approved for the treatment of central sleep apnea, and the results of a randomized controlled trial showed significant improvement in sleep metrics and quality of life.

Central sleep apnea (CSA) is commonly encountered among patients with sleep-disordered breathing; however, its clinical consequences are less well-characterized. The senior author (A.M.) therefore convened an expert panel to discuss the common presentations of CSA, as well as challenges and knowledge gaps in the diagnosis and management of CSA. The panel identified several key research priorities essential for advancing our understanding of the disorder. Within the diagnostic realm, panel members discussed the utility of multinight assessments and importance of the development and validation of novel metrics and automated assessments for differentiating central vs obstructive hypopneas, such that their impact on clinical outcomes and management may be better evaluated. The panel also discussed the current therapeutic landscape for the management of CSA and agreed that therapies should primarily aim to alleviate sleep-related symptoms, after optimizing treatment to address the underlying cause. Most importantly, the panel concluded that there is a need to further investigate the clinical consequences of CSA, as well as the implications of therapy on clinical outcomes, particularly among those who are asymptomatic. Future research should focus on endo-phenotyping central events for a better mechanistic understanding of the disease, validating novel diagnostic methods for implementation in routine clinical practice, as well as the use of combination therapy and comparative effectiveness trials in elucidating the most efficacious interventions for managing CSA.

Kundel V, Ahn A, Arzt M, et al. Insights, recommendations, and research priorities for central sleep apnea: report from an expert panel. J Clin Sleep Med. 2025;21(2):405-416.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is more prevalent in men and older adults. Few studies have explored variations in pathological endotypic traits by age and sex using a large patient sample, offering insights into the development of the disease. Our study aims to examine how endotype characteristics of OSA vary across ages in different sex.

A cross-sectional study was conducted, enrolling 2296 adult patients referred for in-laboratory diagnostic polysomnography at a single sleep center in Taiwan. Among them, 1374 had an apnea-hypopnea index ≥5. Using the "Phenotyping Using Polysomnography" method, we estimated four endotypic traits-arousal threshold, upper airway collapsibility, loop gain, and upper airway muscle compensation. Demographic and polysomnographic characteristics were compared between sexes and age groups. Generalized linear regression and generalized additive models were employed to explore the associations of sex and age with endotypic traits.

Men with OSA exhibited higher collapsibility and lower compensation than women (difference: 4.32 %eupnea and 4.49 %eupnea, respectively). Younger patients with OSA had a higher prevalence of obesity, more snoring symptoms, and lower loop gain compared to older patients. For men, age was correlated with increased collapsibility, increased loop gain, and decreased arousal threshold after 37 years old. Whereas in women, endotypic traits were not associated with age, except for an increase in loop gain with advancing age.

Personalized treatment options for OSA should take into consideration age and sex. Reducing loop gain could be a treatment objective for older patients with OSA.

Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is considered a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) can be treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and central sleep apnoea (CSA), in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), by peak flow-triggered adaptive servo-ventilation. Presently, there is equipoise as to whether treating SDB prevents cardiovascular events. Some propose treatment for this indication, based on observational data, while others argue against because of the lack of randomised trial evidence. This review evaluates literature concerning the cardiovascular effects of treating SDB with PAP devices in individuals with and without CVDs. Nine observational studies report significantly lower cardiovascular event rates in those treated, than in those not treated, for SDB. Conversely, 12 randomised trials in which excessive daytime sleepiness was generally an exclusion criterion showed no reduction in cardiovascular event rates. The SERVE-HF trial showed an increase in mortality with use of minute ventilation-triggered adaptive servo-ventilation for CSA in patients with HFrEF. In the ADVENT-HF trial, treating HFrEF patients with coexisting OSA or CSA using peak flow-triggered adaptive servo-ventilation was safe and improved sleep structure and heart failure-related quality of life but did not reduce all-cause mortality or cardiovascular events. More evidence is required to determine whether treating CSA in patients with HFrEF prevents cardiovascular events and improves survival. Presently, the rationale for treating SDB with PAP remains improving sleep structure and quality of life, as well as relieving excessive daytime sleepiness, but not reducing cardiovascular events.

Both obstructive and central sleep apnea (CSA) may contribute to nocturnal cardiac arrhythmias (NCAs). Data are scarce regarding the prevalence of clinically important nocturnal atrial and ventricular arrythmias in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and OSA or CSA.

In a cohort of patients with HFrEF, how does the prevalence of NCA compare among those with OSA, CSA, and those with no to mild sleep apnea? Is the severity of OSA or CSA associated with atrial and ventricular NCAs?

This cross-sectional analysis is an ancillary study of the Effect of Adaptive Servo Ventilation on Survival and Hospital Admissions in Heart Failure (ADVENT-HF) trial. We compared the prevalence of NCAs (excessive supraventricular ectopic activity [ESVEA], defined as premature atrial complexes ≥ 30/h or supraventricular tachycardia ≥ 20 beats); atrial fibrillation/flutter [AF]; and > 10 premature ventricular complexes [PVCs/h]) on ECGs from polysomnograms of patients with HFrEF between those with OSA (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI ≥ 15 events/h]), those with CSA (AHI ≥ 15 events/h), and those with no to mild sleep apnea (AHI < 15 events/h [control]).

The prevalence of ESVEA was higher in patients with OSA (n = 430) and CSA (n = 150) compared with control participants (n = 76): 0%, 9%, and 12%, respectively. The prevalence of AF in the control, OSA, and CSA groups was 9%, 17%, and 27%; the prevalence of > 10 PVCs/h was 45%, 59%, and 63%. In multivariable regression analyses, premature atrial complexes/h was associated with OSA severity (obstructive AHI: 22.4% increase per 10 events/h [95% CI, 5.2-42.3; P = .009), although neither obstructive nor central AHI was associated with AF or > 10 PVC/h.

In patients with HFrEF, the prevalences of nocturnal ESVEA, AF, and PVC > 10/h were higher in those with OSA or CSA than in those without OSA or CSA, and OSA severity was related to the burden of nocturnal atrial ectopy. Severity of OSA or CSA was not significantly related to AF or > 10 PVC/h.

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01128816; URL: www.

gov.

Background: Impairment in autonomic activity is a prognostic marker in patients with heart failure (HF), and its involvement has been suggested in cardiovascular complications of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR). This prospective observational study aims to investigate the implications of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) on hemodynamic regulation and autonomic activity in chronic HF patients. Methods: Chronic HF patients, providing confirmation of reduced ejection fraction (≤35%), underwent polysomnography, real-time hemodynamic, heart rate variability (HRV), and baroreceptor reflex sensitivity (BRS) assessments using the Task Force Monitor. BRS was assessed using the sequencing method during resting conditions and stress testing. Results: Our study population (n = 58) was predominantly male (41 vs. 17), with a median age of 61 (±11) yrs and a median BMI of 30 (±5) kg/m2. Patients diagnosed with CSR were 13.8% (8/58) and 50.0% (29/58) with OSAS. No differences in the real-time assessment of hemodynamic regulation, heart rate variability, or baroreceptor reflex function were found between patients with OSAS, CSR, and patients without SDB. A subgroup analysis of BRS and HRV in patients with severe SDB (AHI > 30/h) and without SDB (AHI < 5) revealed numerically reduced BRS and increased LF/HF-RRI values under resting conditions, as well as during mental testing in patients with severe SDB. Patients with moderate-to-severe SDB had a shorter overall survival, which was, however, dependent upon age. Conclusions: Chronic HF patients with severe SDB may exhibit lower baroreceptor function and impaired cardiovascular autonomic function in comparison with HF patients without SDB.

Medication-induced central sleep apnea (CSA) is one of the eight categories of causes of CSA but in the absence of awareness and careful history may be misclassified as primary CSA. While opioids are a well-known cause of respiratory depression and CSA, non-opioid medications including sodium oxybate, baclofen, valproic acid, gabapentin, and ticagrelor are less well-recognized. Opioids-induced respiratory depression and CSA are mediated primarily by µ-opioid receptors, which are abundant in the pontomedullary centers involved in breathing. The non-opioid medications, sodium oxybate, baclofen, valproic acid, and gabapentin, act upon brainstem gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors, which co-colonize with µ-opioid receptors and mediate CSA. The pattern of ataxic breathing associated with these medications is like that induced by opioids on polysomnogram. Finally, ticagrelor also causes periodic breathing and CSA by increasing central chemosensitivity and ventilatory response to carbon dioxide. Given the potential consequences of CSA and the association between some of these medications with mortality, it is critical to recognize these adverse drug reactions, particularly because discontinuation of the offending agents has been shown to eliminate CSA.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is characterized by the absence of p-waves on ECG and irregular rhythm. It often presents with palpitations either palpitations may occur acutely over a short period or intermittently over several years. Other cardinal symptoms of atrial fibrillation include fatigue, dyspnea, and lightheadedness; it is important however to note that most affected individuals are asymptomatic. Concurrently, sleep disorders such as obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), insomnia, narcolepsy, and circadian rhythm disorders which are a group of conditions associated with the body's internal clock that affect the timing of sleep and alertness, are raising concerns due to their potential associations to arrhythmias. This review explores the bidirectional relationship between AF and sleep disorders, highlighting their implications for risk stratification and management strategies.

The narrative approach of this review synthesizes evidence from numerous studies obtained through meticulous literature searches. Specific sleep disorders with a bidirectional relationship with AF are the focus, with scrutiny on the prevalence of this connection. The examination delves into the pathophysiology of sleep-related autonomic dysregulation and inflammation, emphasizing potential management modalities. Various meta-analysis cohorts have highlighted a strong connection between sleep disorders and atrial fibrillation (AF). Patients with sleep disorders, especially OSA, have a higher likelihood of developing AF, and conversely, those with AF are more prone to sleep disorders. This impact is not limited to development, as sleep disorders also contribute to the progression of AF, with AF, in turn, negatively impacting sleep duration and quality. Sleep disorders may play an important role in atrial remodeling as well as electrophysiological abnormalities, rendering the atrial tissue more susceptible to arrhythmogenesis. The narrative review suggests that treating sleep disorders could not only improve sleep quality but also reduce risk factors associated with atrial fibrillation. The effective management of sleep disorders emerges as a potential challenge in preventing and treating atrial fibrillation.

In conclusion, this narrative study highlights the bidirectional relationship between sleep disorders and atrial fibrillation. There is a positive correlation, affecting the development, progression, and management of atrial fibrillation. The detrimental impact of sleep disorders on atrial remodeling and electrophysiological abnormalities underscores the significance of their diagnosis and treatment. Education about the importance of sleep and the benefits of sleep disorder treatment becomes imperative for patients with AF and sleep disorders.

Sleep is an important component of cardiovascular (CV) health. This review summarizes the complex relationship between sleep and CV disease (CVD). Additionally, we describe the data supporting the treatment of sleep disturbances in preventing and treating CVD.

Recent guidelines recommend screening for obstructive sleep apnea in patients with atrial fibrillation. New data continues to demonstrate the importance of sleep quality and duration for CV health. There is a complex bidirectional relationship between sleep health and CVD. Sleep disturbances have systemic effects that contribute to the development of CVD, including hypertension, coronary artery disease, heart failure, and arrhythmias. Additionally, CVD contributes to the development of sleep disturbances. However, more data are needed to support the role of screening for and treatment of sleep disorders for the prevention of CVD.

Desaturation area-based parameters derived from oximetry have recently emerged as novel predictors of cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in the context of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Various published calculation methods exist for event desaturation transient area calculation. The published methods differ in how they calculate the sampling window, and how they calculate the baseline. This study aims to evaluate the six possible combinations of baseline (event-specific, record-specific, or fixed) and sampling window (record-specific or fixed) to find an easy-to-calculate yet effective method area for predicting CVD mortality. The Sleep Heart Health Study data and corresponding CVD mortality outcomes were utilized. The predictive performance of each method was assessed by Cox proportional hazard regression analysis with adjustment for relevant covariates. Results show that an area method using a record-specific baseline and a fixed sampling window and an area method using a record-specific baseline and sampling window performed the best.

The field of biomedical radar has witnessed significant advancements in recent years, paving the way for innovative and transformative applications in clinical settings. Most medical instruments invented to measure human activities rely on contact electrodes, causing discomfort. Thanks to its non-invasive nature, biomedical radar is particularly valuable for clinical applications. A significant portion of the review discusses improvements in radar hardware, with a focus on miniaturization, increased resolution, and enhanced sensitivity. Then, this paper also delves into the signal processing and machine learning techniques tailored for radar data. This review will explore the recent breakthroughs and applications of biomedical radar technology, shedding light on its transformative potential in shaping the future of clinical diagnostics, patient and elderly care, and healthcare innovation.

Central sleep apnea (CSA) is a sleep-related breathing disorder in which the effort to breathe is intermittently diminished or absent. CSA is a common disorder among patients with different cardiovascular disorders, including heart failure. In addition, a growing number of medications have been shown to induce CSA and CSA can emerge after initiation of treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. Accumulating evidence shows that CSA is a heterogeneous disorder with individual differences in clinical and biological characteristics and/or underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.

This narrative review offers an overview of the diagnostic aspects and classification of CSA, with an emphasis on heart failure patients, patients with CSA due to a medication and treatment-emergent CSA. The importance of evaluation of prognostic biomarkers in patients with different types of CSA is discussed. This narrative review synthesizes literature on CSA sourced from the PubMed database up to February 2024.

CSA presents a remarkably diverse disorder, with treatment modalities exhibiting potentially varied efficacy across its various phenotypes. This highlights the imperative for tailored management strategies that are rooted in phenotype classification.

To review dental sleep medicine in older adults based on the literature.

This narrative review focuses on sleep physiology, common sleep disorders, and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in older adults and their management.

Sleep physiology differs between older and younger adults, with sleep disturbances occurring more frequently in older adults. The prevalence of insomnia increases in older adults due to age-related changes in sleep physiology. Insomnia, sleep-disordered breathing, periodic limb movement disorder, restless legs syndrome, and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder are common sleep disorders in older adults. OSA is more prevalent in older adults, and its effects on them are considered more substantial than those on younger adults. The treatment of older patients with mandibular advancement devices may be less effective and more complex owing to potential impairments in oral and dental health. Furthermore, the prevalence of edentulism in older adults is decreasing while life expectancy is increasing.

As older adults have comorbidities that affect sleep quality, dentists should consider the effects of sleep physiology and sleep disorders in these patients. OSA may decrease the quality of life and increase the risk of developing other diseases. Therefore, dentists proposing treatment with mandibular advancement devices need to inform patients of their potential lack of efficacy and the requirement for careful follow-up owing to known and unknown side effects.

The presence of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in congestive heart failure (CHF) is associated with poor prognosis and is underdiagnosed despite advances in CHF management. The prevalence of SDB in CHF remains understudied in South East Asia.

A prospective, observational single-centre study was conducted where 116 consecutive patients in a specialised heart failure clinic underwent level 1, attended polysomnography (PSG).

The prevalence of SDB was 78% using the apnoea-hypopnea index (AHI), AHI ⩾ 5/h threshold, and 59% with the AHI ⩾ 15/h threshold. Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) was the predominant type of SDB and was associated with increased body mass index and neck circumference. STOP-BANG was predictive of SDB, especially in men. Central sleep apnoea (CSA) patients had worse sleep indexes and lower awake arterial carbon dioxide. SDB was also homogenously present in preserved ejection fraction (EF) CHF.

Most of the CHF patients were found to have SDB with the utility of PSG. Local CHF guidelines should include sleep testing for all patients with CHF.The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05332223) as 'The Epidemiological Characteristics of SDB in Patients with Reduced or Preserved EF CHF'.

Sleep apnea is more common in patients with heart failure (HF) than in the general population, but little is known about its association with clinical outcomes in various HF phenotypes or how it might modify the effect of HF therapy.

To examine the prevalence of sleep apnea, its association with outcomes and the effects of dapagliflozin in patients with HF with and without sleep apnea in a pooled analysis of 2 trials comparing dapagliflozin to placebo in HFrEF (DAPA-HF trial) and HFmrEF/HFpEF (DELIVER trial).

A history of sleep apnea was investigator-reported. The primary outcome was a composite of worsening HF or cardiovascular death.

The prevalence of sleep apnea was 5.7% and 7.8% in patients with HFrEF and HFmrEF/HFpEF, respectively. The primary outcome occurred at a rate of 16.0 in participants with sleep apnea compared to 10.6 per 100 person-years in those without (adjusted HR 1.29 [95%CI, 1.10-1.52]). Compared with placebo, dapagliflozin reduced the risk of the primary endpoint to the same extent in patients with (HR 0.78 [95% CI, 0.59-1.03]) and without sleep apnea (HR 0.79 [0.72-0.87]) [Pinteraction = 0.93]. The beneficial effects of dapagliflozin on other clinical outcomes and symptom burden, physical function, and quality of life were consistent in participants with and without sleep apnea.

In DAPA-HF and DELIVER, the true prevalence of sleep apnea was likely underestimated. An investigator-reported history of sleep apnea was associated with higher rates of worsening HF events. The benefits of dapagliflozin on clinical outcomes were consistent in patients with and without sleep apnea.

Unique identifiers: NCT01920711 CONDENSED ABSTRACT: In a pooled analysis of the DAPA-HF and DELIVER trials of more than 11,000 patients with heart failure (HF) across the range of ejection fractions, an investigator-reported history of sleep apnea was associated with higher rates of worsening HF events but not mortality. The beneficial effects of dapagliflozin on clinical outcomes were consistent in patients with and without sleep apnea. These findings provide further evidence for dapagliflozin as a new treatment option for patients with heart failure across the range of ejection fractions.

Objectives: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent sleep disorder that can increase the risk of hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and cardiovascular diseases. Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) is an alternative therapy for OSA in patients who cannot tolerate continuous positive airway pressure. Understanding the impact of HGNS on blood pressure, hemoglobin A1C (A1C), and body mass index (BMI) currently remains limited. Methods: A retrospective review study of HGNS outcomes at a single practice from January 2020 to November 2022 was conducted. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were based on HGNS eligibility and postoperative titration study. Statistical analysis and data management were performed using statistical software, R (v.4.2.1; R Core Team). Paired Student's T test, Fisher's exact test, and McNemar's exact test were utilized for statistical analysis. P values less than .05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Sixty-three patients were included in this study. A significant decrease in mean apnea-hypopnea index was noted following HGNS (mean change -28; P < .0001). Similar significant decreases were also seen in mean arterial pressures (mean change -8.4, P < .0001). There was a significant change in overall antihypertensive medication requirements and in requirements ≥3 medications (P < .0005, P = .03). There was a trend toward reduction in A1C; however, there was no change in BMI or number of diabetes medications taken. Conclusions: Our results reinforce previous findings that HGNS is an effective treatment option for carefully selected patients with OSA. In addition, our findings suggest that HGNS may improve patients' quality of life while minimizing OSA associated morbidity.

Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is highly prevalent and may be linked to cardiovascular disease in a bidirectional manner. The Taiwan Society of Cardiology, Taiwan Society of Sleep Medicine and Taiwan Society of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine established a task force of experts to evaluate the evidence regarding the assessment and management of SDB in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), hypertension and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The GRADE process was used to assess the evidence associated with 15 formulated questions. The task force developed recommendations and determined strength (Strong, Weak) and direction (For, Against) based on the quality of evidence, balance of benefits and harms, patient values and preferences, and resource use. The resulting 11 recommendations are intended to guide clinicians in determining which the specific patient-care strategy should be utilized by clinicians based on the needs of individual patients.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF); however, it is unclear whether AF increases the risk of OSA. Furthermore, sex differences among patients with both AF and OSA remain unclear. We aimed to determine the association between an increased AF burden and OSA and investigate the differences in clinical characteristics between women and men with AF and OSA.

This was a descriptive, cross-sectional analysis from a prospective cohort study. Patients with non-valvular AF were recruited from the cardiac electrophysiology clinic of a tertiary center; they underwent a home sleep apnea test and 14-day ambulatory electrocardiography. Moderate-to-severe OSA was defined as an apnea-hypopnea index of ≥15.

Of 320 patients with AF, 53.4% had moderate-to-severe OSA, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 25.6 kg/m2. Less women (38.2%) had moderate-to-severe OSA than men (59.3%) (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, age, being a man, and BMI were significantly associated with moderate-to-severe OSA. AF burden was associated with moderate-to-severe OSA only in men (odds ratio: 1.008; 95% confidence interval: 1.001-1.014). Women and men with OSA had similar BMI (p = 0.526) and OSA severity (p = 0.754), but women were older than men (70.1 ± 1.3 vs. 63.1 ± 0.9 years, p < 0.001). Women with moderate-to-severe OSA had a lower AF burden than men did (27.6 ± 7.1 vs. 49.5 ± 3.9%, p = 0.009).

AF burden is a sex-specific risk factor for OSA and is limited to men. In contrast, women with both AF and OSA have a lower AF burden than men, despite being older and having similar OSA severity and body habitus. Thus, AF may develop later in women with OSA than in men.

In patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, sleep-disordered breathing, comprising obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and central sleep apnoea (CSA), is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and sleep disruption. We hypothesised that treating sleep-disordered breathing with a peak-flow triggered adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) device would improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.

We conducted a multicentre, multinational, parallel-group, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial of peak-flow triggered ASV in patients aged 18 years or older with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45%) who were stabilised on optimal medical therapy with co-existing sleep-disordered breathing (apnoea-hypopnoea index [AHI] ≥15 events/h of sleep), with concealed allocation and blinded outcome assessments. The trial was carried out at 49 hospitals in nine countries. Sleep-disordered breathing was stratified into predominantly OSA with an Epworth Sleepiness Scale score of 10 or lower or predominantly CSA. Participants were randomly assigned to standard optimal treatment alone or standard optimal treatment with the addition of ASV (1:1), stratified by study site and sleep apnoea type (ie, CSA or OSA), with permuted blocks of sizes 4 and 6 in random order. Clinical evaluations were performed and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and New York Heart Association class were assessed at months 1, 3, and 6 following randomisation and every 6 months thereafter to a maximum of 5 years. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of the composite of all-cause mortality, first admission to hospital for a cardiovascular reason, new onset atrial fibrillation or flutter, and delivery of an appropriate cardioverter-defibrillator shock. All-cause mortality was a secondary endpoint. Analysis for the primary outcome was done in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01128816) and the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register (ISRCTN67500535), and the trial is complete.

The first and last enrolments were Sept 22, 2010, and March 20, 2021. Enrolments terminated prematurely due to COVID-19-related restrictions. 1127 patients were screened, of whom 731 (65%) patients were randomly assigned to receive standard care (n=375; mean AHI 42·8 events per h of sleep [SD 20·9]) or standard care plus ASV (n=356; 43·3 events per h of sleep [20·5]). Follow-up of all patients ended at the latest on June 15, 2021, when the trial was terminated prematurely due to a recall of the ASV device due to potential disintegration of the motor sound-abatement material. Over the course of the trial, 41 (6%) of participants withdrew consent and 34 (5%) were lost to follow-up. In the ASV group, the mean AHI decreased to 2·8-3·7 events per h over the course of the trial, with associated improvements in sleep quality assessed 1 month following randomisation. Over a mean follow-up period of 3·6 years (SD 1·6), ASV had no effect on the primary composite outcome (180 events in the control group vs 166 in the ASV group; hazard ratio [HR] 0·95, 95% CI 0·77-1·18; p=0·67) or the secondary endpoint of all-cause mortality (88 deaths in the control group vs. 76 in the ASV group; 0·89, 0·66-1·21; p=0·47). For patients with OSA, the HR for all-cause mortality was 1·00 (0·68-1·46; p=0·98) and for CSA was 0·74 (0·44-1·23; p=0·25). No safety issue related to ASV use was identified.

In patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction and sleep-disordered breathing, ASV had no effect on the primary composite outcome or mortality but eliminated sleep-disordered breathing safely.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Philips RS North America.

Central sleep apnea (CSA) is common in patients with heart failure. Recent studies link ticagrelor use with CSA. We aimed to evaluate CSA prevalence in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and whether ticagrelor use is associated with CSA. We reviewed consecutive patients with CHD who underwent a polysomnography (PSG) test over a 5-year period from 3 sleep centers. We sampled patients who were on ticagrelor or clopidogrel during a PSG test at a 1:4 ticagrelor:clopidogrel ratio. Patients with an active opioid prescription during PSG test were excluded. Age, left ventricle (LV) dysfunction, and P2Y12 inhibitor use were included in a multivariate logistic regression. A total of 135 patients were included with 26 on ticagrelor and 109 on clopidogrel (age 64.1 ± 11.4, 32% male). High CSA burden (12%) and strict CSA (4.4%) were more common in patients on ticagrelor than in those on clopidogrel (27% vs. 8.3% and 10.0% vs. 1.8%). Ticagrelor use (vs. clopidogrel) was associated with high CSA burden (OR 3.53, 95% CI 1.04-12.9, P = 0.039) and trended toward significance for strict CSA (OR 6.32, 95% CI 1.03-51.4, P = 0.052) when adjusting for age and LV dysfunction. In an additional analysis also adjusting for history of atrial fibrillation, ticagrelor use and strict CSA became significantly associated (OR 10.0, 95% CI 1.32-117, P = 0.035). CSA was uncommon in patients with CHD undergoing sleep studies. Ticagrelor use (vs. clopidogrel) was associated with high CSA burden and trended toward significance for strict CSA.

Sleep apnea is a serious comorbid condition affecting patients with heart failure. Present in 50% to 75% of heart failure patients, it is often underrecognized, underdiagnosed, and undertreated. Patients with sleep apnea and heart failure are at increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events and sudden death. Treatment of sleep apnea has shown mixed results in reduction of adverse outcomes by sleep apnea type and intervention strategy. Evolving home-based technologies and device therapies present an exciting frontier for patients with sleep apnea and heart failure and an opportunity to improve outcomes. This article reviews novel approaches to sleep apnea in heart failure.

Sleep disorders are a common concomitant comorbidity in patients with heart failure. The aims of our study are to determine the incidence and phenotypic characteristics of sleep apnea in overweight patients with exacerbated heart failure and to assess the degree of involvement of systolic and diastolic function impairment in the individual group. From 100 screened patients with heart failure in our department from 2015 to 2017, 61 met the inclusion criteria and participated in the study. 82% (n = 50) of the patients had obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and 18% (n = 11) had central sleep apnea (CSA). The CSA group had a significantly lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) than the OSA group (EF% 49.6 ± 8.5 vs 41.8 ± 11.4; p = 0.013). A negative correlation was found between LVEF and the number of central apnea events (r = -0.52; p < 0.001). More frequent hospitalizations for heart failure (HF) and higher mortality rate were found in the CSA group. Screening for sleep apnea in patients with exacerbated heart failure and obesity is necessary for the complex treatment of these patients.

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is common in individuals with established cardiovascular disease (CVD), particularly those with heart failure (HF). There are two main types of SDB, central sleep apnoea (CSA) and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) which frequently overlap as mixed SDB. Investigating for SDB could be considered in patients with excessive daytime sleepiness, male sex, high body mass index, low ejection fraction, atrial fibrillation (AF), in patients with no dipping blood pressure pattern, recurrent paroxysms of nocturnal dyspnoea or when an apnoea is witnessed. Excessive daytime sleepiness is less likely to be reported by patients with HF than by the general population. In patients with CVD and OSA, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) ventilation for over 4 hours daily reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, but there was no reduction in mortality. In patients with AF and OSA treated with AF ablation, CPAP use was associated with a reduced risk of recurrence of AF. In patients with HF and OSA, small studies have demonstrated that CPAP improves symptoms, brain natriuretic peptide levels and ejection fraction, but data on survival are lacking. Treatment remains unclear in patients with HF and CSA. The presence of CSA may be a defensive adaptive response to HF, and effectively treating CSA as demonstrated in a randomised clinical trial of adaptive servo-ventilation caused more harm than benefit when compared to optimal medical therapy. Thus, the focus of treating CSA should remain on improving the underlying HF by optimising medical therapy and, if indicated, cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a sleep disorder with repetitive collapse of the upper airway during sleep, which leads to intermittent hypoxic events overnight, adverse neurocognitive, metabolic complications, and ultimately an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The standard diagnostic parameter for OSA, apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI), is inadequate to predict CVD morbidity and mortality, because it focuses only on the frequency of apnoea and hypopnoea events, and fails to reveal other physiological information for the prediction of CVD events. Novel parameters have been introduced to compensate for the deficiencies of AHI. However, the calculation methods and criteria for these parameters are unclear, hindering their use in cross-study analysis and studies. This review aims to discuss novel parameters for predicting CVD events from oximetry signals and to summarise the corresponding computational methods.

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), i.e., central sleep apnea (CSA) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), affects the prognosis of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The study assessed the relationships between heart chamber size or function and respiratory parameters in patients with HFrEF and various types of SDB. The 84 participants were patients aged 68.3 ± 8.4 years (80% men) with an average left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 25.5 ± 6.85% who qualified for cardioverter-defibrillator implantation with or without cardiac resynchronization therapy. SDB, defined by an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ five events/hour, was diagnosed in 76 patients (90.5%); SDB was severe in 31 (36.9%), moderate in 26 (31.0%), and mild in 19 (22.6%). CSA was the most common type of SDB (64 patients, 76.2%). A direct proportional relationship existed only in the CSA group between LVEF or stroke volume (SV) and AHI (p = 0.02 and p = 0.07), and between LVEF or SV and the percentage of total sleep time spent with hemoglobin oxygen saturation < 90% (p = 0.06 and p = 0.07). In contrast, the OSA group was the only group in which right ventricle size showed a positive relationship with AHI (for basal linear dimension [RVD1] p = 0.06), mean duration of the respiratory event (for RVD1 p = 0.03, for proximal outflow diameter [RVOT proximal] p = 0.009), and maximum duration of respiratory event (for RVD1 p = 0.049, for RVOT proximal p = 0.006). We concluded that in HFrEF patients, SDB severity is related to LV systolic function and SV only in CSA, whereas RV size correlates primarily with apnea/hypopnea episode duration in OSA.

The high prevalence of sleep apnea and the limitations of polysomnography have prompted the investigation of strategies aimed at automated diagnosis using a restricted number of physiological measures. This study aimed to demonstrate that thoracic (THO) and abdominal (ABD) movement signals are useful for accurately estimating the severity of sleep apnea, even if central respiratory events are present. Thus, we developed 2D-convolutional neural networks (CNNs) jointly using THO and ABD to automatically estimate sleep apnea severity and evaluate the central event contribution. Our proposal achieved an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.75 and a root mean square error (RMSE) = 10.33 events/h when estimating the apnea-hypopnea index, and ICC = 0.83 and RMSE = 0.95 events/h when estimating the central apnea index. The CNN obtained accuracies of 94.98%, 79.82%, and 81.60% for 5, 15, and 30 events/h when evaluating the complete apnea hypopnea index. The model improved when the nature of the events was central: 98.72% and 99.74% accuracy for 5 and 15 events/h. Hence, the information extracted from these signals using CNNs could be a powerful tool to diagnose sleep apnea, especially in subjects with a high density of central apnea events.

Central sleep apnea (CSA) is associated with increased mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Treatment of CSA with a certain type of adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) device that targets minute ventilation (ASVmv) was found to be harmful in these patients. A newer generation of ASV devices that target peak flow (ASVpf) is presumed to have different effects on ventilation and airway patency. We analyzed our registry of patients with HFrEF-CSA to examine the effect of exposure to ASV and role of each type of ASV device on mortality.

This is a retrospective cohort study in patients with HFrEF and CSA who were treated with ASV devices between 2008 and 2015 at a single institution. Mortality data were collected through the institutional data honest broker. Usage data were obtained from vendors' and manufacturers' servers. Median follow-up was 64 months.

The registry included 90 patients with HFrEF-CSA who were prescribed ASV devices. Applying a 3-h-per-night usage cutoff, we found a survival advantage at 64 months for those who used the ASV device above the cutoff (n = 59; survival 76%) compared to those who did not (n = 31; survival 49%; hazard ratio 0.44; CI 95%, 0.20 to 0.97; P = 0.04). The majority (n = 77) of patients received ASVpf devices with automatically adjusting end-expiratory pressure (EPAP) and the remainder (n = 13) received ASVmv devices mostly with fixed EPAP (n = 12). There was a trend towards a negative correlation between ASVmv with fixed EPAP and survival.

In this population of patients with HFrEF and CSA, there was no evidence that usage of ASV devices was associated with increased mortality. However, there was evidence of differential effects of type of ASV technology on mortality.

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease (CDV). Patients with CVD often have multiple comorbidities, including obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), potentially affecting their ability to participate and achieve functional improvement during CR. We aimed to test the hypothesis that OSA reduces peak exercise capacity (EC) in patients undergoing CR and to explore if OSA treatment modifies this relationship.

Data from a retrospective cohort of CR patients was analyzed. OSA was defined as a respiratory event index > 5/h or physician diagnosis. Patients with OSA were considered "treated" if using continuous positive airway pressure regularly during the CR period. Change in METs was the primary study outcome.

Among 312 CR patients, median age of 67 years, 103 (33%) had known OSA (30 treated, 73 untreated). Patients with OSA vs. those with no OSA were more likely to be obese and male; otherwise, groups were similar. Compared with the no OSA group, patients with OSA had lower pre-CR METs (3.3 [2.9-4.5] vs. 3.9 [3.1-5], P = .01) and lower post-CR METs (5.3 [4-7] vs. 6 [4.6-7.6], P = .04), but achieved a similar increase in METs post-CR (1.8 [0.6-2.6] vs. 2.0 [0.9-3], P = .22). Furthermore, compared to no OSA, pre-CR and post-CR METs tended to be similar in patients with treated OSA, but lower in untreated patients, with similar increases in METs across all groups, even when adjusting for covariates via multivariable regression.

OSA is prevalent in patients with CVD undergoing CR. CR substantially improves exercise capacity independent of OSA status, but screening for-and treatment of-OSA may improve the absolute exercise capacity achieved through CR.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is exceedingly common but often under-treated. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has long been considered the gold standard of OSA therapy. Limitations to CPAP therapy include adherence and availability. The 2021 global CPAP shortage highlighted the need to tailor patient treatments beyond CPAP alone. Common CPAP alternative approaches include positional therapy, mandibular advancement devices, and upper airway surgery. Upper airway training consists of a variety of therapies, including exercise regimens, external neuromuscular electrical stimulation, and woodwind instruments. More invasive approaches include hypoglossal nerve stimulation devices. This review will focus on the approaches for modifying upper airway muscle behavior as a therapeutic modality in OSA.

Evaluation and interpretation of the literature on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) allows for consolidation and determination of the key factors important for clinical management of the adult OSA patient. Toward this goal, an international collaborative of multidisciplinary experts in sleep apnea evaluation and treatment have produced the International Consensus statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (ICS:OSA).

Using previously defined methodology, focal topics in OSA were assigned as literature review (LR), evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBR-R) formats. Each topic incorporated the available and relevant evidence which was summarized and graded on study quality. Each topic and section underwent iterative review and the ICS:OSA was created and reviewed by all authors for consensus.

The ICS:OSA addresses OSA syndrome definitions, pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors for disease, screening methods, diagnostic testing types, multiple treatment modalities, and effects of OSA treatment on multiple OSA-associated comorbidities. Specific focus on outcomes with positive airway pressure (PAP) and surgical treatments were evaluated.

This review of the literature consolidates the available knowledge and identifies the limitations of the current evidence on OSA. This effort aims to create a resource for OSA evidence-based practice and identify future research needs. Knowledge gaps and research opportunities include improving the metrics of OSA disease, determining the optimal OSA screening paradigms, developing strategies for PAP adherence and longitudinal care, enhancing selection of PAP alternatives and surgery, understanding health risk outcomes, and translating evidence into individualized approaches to therapy.