Benefits of statin therapy in reducing the long-term risk of ischemic stroke are well-established, but the immediate protective effect of statin therapy on risks of early stroke recurrence after an initial ischemic event are not established.

In this secondary analysis of POINT data, we evaluated the effects of statins on early stroke recurrence (within 7 days) and recurrence over 90 days. We also examined the effect of early statin initiation in the subgroup of subjects not on statins prior to the index event, using logistic and proportional hazards models.

In the POINT trial, 175 of 267 (65.5 %) of ischemic stroke recurrences were early (within 7 days). Baseline statin treatment at the time of study entry was associated with decreased odds of early ischemic stroke recurrence in adjusted logistical regression analysis (OR 0.70, 95 % CI 0.50-0.99, P = 0.04), an effect only marginally significant in adjusted Cox proportional hazard analyses (HR 0.72, 95 % CI 0.52-1.01, P = 0.05). In the subset of subjects not taking statin medications at baseline, initiation of statin treatment had no significant protective effect against early stroke recurrence (adjusted HR 0.80, 95 % CI 0.54-1.20, P = 0.28).

In the POINT trial population, prior treatment with statin was marginally associated with decreased odds of early recurrence of stroke. However initiating statin treatment had no detectable effect in reducing risk of early stroke recurrence. The POINT trial provides no evidence for an immediate protective effect of statin initiation against early stroke recurrence.

Saffron, the dried stigma of the flower Crocus sativus L., has been shown to have therapeutic effects on cardiovascular diseases. Several studies have explored the impact of saffron on atherosclerosis. However, the mechanism underlying the plaque-stabilizing and antiatherosclerotic effects of saffron has not been widely studied. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the mechanism of the antiatherosclerotic and plaque-stabilizing effects of saffron ethanolic extract in experimentally induced atherosclerotic rabbits.

New Zealand White rabbits were fed a 1% high-cholesterol diet (HCD) for 8 weeks to induce established atherosclerosis. The rabbits were then treated with 50 or 100 mg/kg/day saffron ethanolic extract (SAF), simvastatin (2.5 mg/kg/day) or placebo for another 8 weeks. Body weight, lipid profile, percentage of atherosclerotic lesions, immunohistochemical analysis, and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction were performed at baseline, after high-cholesterol diet feeding, and after the intervention.

The results showed that SAF had no significant effect on body weight. However, treatment with both doses of SAF markedly attenuated the levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and total cholesterol (TC) in atherosclerotic rabbits. Higher doses of SAF markedly reduced atherosclerotic lesions in rabbit aortas. Additionally, SAF suppressed the tissue and gene expression of adhesion molecules and pro-inflammatory biomarkers in the aorta. SAF also reduced MMP-9 tissue expression in the aortas of atherosclerotic rabbits, thereby increasing plaque stability.

Our findings suggest that saffron ethanolic extract exhibits therapeutic potential in rabbits with HCD-induced atherosclerosis. This effect may be associated with the modulation of inflammatory pathways, leading to reduced expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, endothelial activation markers, and matrix metalloproteinases. The observed reduction in vascular inflammation and endothelial activation may contribute to improved lipid profiles, decreased atherosclerotic lesion severity, and enhanced plaque stability. While these findings highlight the potential of saffron ethanolic extract as an adjunctive treatment for atherosclerosis, further studies are warranted to clarify its direct effects on lipid metabolism and underlying molecular mechanisms.

Not applicable.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is one of the largest global disease burdens. Despite guidelines and recommendations and the proven advantages of lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) in preventing CVD, achieving treatment targets remains disappointing. A key barrier to optimal LLT is therapy discontinuation. To be widely adopted in clinical practice, new lipid-lowering therapies must both prevent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and exhibit cost effectiveness to ensure widespread utilization by patients, physicians, and insurers. While non-statin LLTs have shown cardiovascular value, their cost effectiveness is controversial. This review highlights the LLTs that are currently widely adopted and summarizes the available evidence on their cost effectiveness.

Diabetes is associated with increased atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk, a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Disordered lipid metabolism is a major contributor to ASCVD risk in diabetes. Dyslipidemia in type 2 diabetes is characterized by hypertriglyceridemia, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and the presence of small, dense low-density lipoprotein particles. Statins have demonstrated longstanding benefit for reducing ASCVD risk in individuals with diabetes. Newer agents for add-on therapies to statins are now available for additional cardiovascular risk reduction. In this clinical overview, we review the pathogenesis of dyslipidemia in both type 1 and 2 diabetes and provide an update on the management of lipids in the individual with diabetes. We discuss the importance of appropriate risk stratification and individualized treatment selection and the need to avoid therapy inertia to mitigate cardiovascular risk. We also address lipid-related effects of glycemic-lowering therapies.

Adults with Type 1 diabetes (T1DM) have increased cardiovascular risk. Most of the Polish general population fails to meet lipid goals. Recent data on the effectiveness of dyslipidemia treatment in T1DM population is lacking. We aimed to investigate which part of adults with T1DM met the dyslipidemia treatment goals according to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) 2016 and 2019 guidelines.

We recruited adult people with T1DM, for whom a cross-sectional assessment of disease progression was performed. Anthropometric measurements and a basic panel of laboratory tests were conducted for each person. We assessed cardiovascular risk and lipid goals according to the ESC/EAS dyslipidemia guidelines from 2016 to 2019. Among the n = 233 participants, only 34.3 % met the lipid goal according to the 2016 guidelines, while for the 2019 guidelines, merely 13.3 %. Only 12.8 % of individuals with very high cardiovascular risk met the LDL cholesterol goals according to ESC/AES 2016, and 4.9 % when ESC/EAS 2019 guidelines were considered. The median difference between the LDL cholesterol value and the target value was 18.0 (-16.0 to 49.0) mg/dl [20.4 % (-19.8 %-41.2 %)], when considering the 2016 ESC/EAS guidelines, whereas for the 2019 guidelines, it was 36.0 (11.0-60.0) mg/dl [36.3 % (13.9 %-48.0 %)].

Therapeutic inertia results in the failure to meet the lipid goals according to the ESC/EAS guidelines for 2016 and 2019 in most Polish adults with T1DM. Many adults with T1DM may require intensification of lipid-lowering interventions.

In contrast to the substantial body of clinical trial evidence, the real-world evidence regarding the efficacy of statins in the prevention of cardiovascular events among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is relatively limited. Therefore, we assessed the effectiveness of atorvastatin for the primary prevention of CV events in patients with T2DM, using a population-based data in South Korea.

This retrospective cohort study was conducted using the National Health Insurance Service Customized Database (2008-2018) in South Korea. We identified atorvastatin users and statin non-users with T2DM without history of cancer or CV events. The two groups were matched using propensity scores. The association between CV events and atorvastatin was estimated using an extended Cox model with the Heaviside function (split at 3 years). We identified 41 024 atorvastatin users and 41 024 statin non-users (mean age: 58.1 and 58.2 years, respectively). The incidence rate and case fatality rate of CV events were higher in statin non-users than in atorvastatin users. Atorvastatin significantly reduced the risk of CV events after 3 years of treatment (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.98 (95 % confidence interval: 0.90-1.05) and 0.76 (0.72-0.80) within and after 3 years, respectively). The HR for stroke was lower than that for coronary heart disease.

In real-world patients with T2DM without a history of CV events, atorvastatin was associated with a decreased risk of CV events after 3 years of treatment.

Increasing evidence indicates that statins may increase the risk of developing diabetic nephropathy (DN). As the gut-kidney axis concept gains traction, it remains unclear whether statins contribute to the onset and progression of DN by modulating gut microbiota.

To investigate the association between statins and DN and the proportion of this association mediated through gut microbiota.

This study utilized a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach and a cross-sectional observational design to investigate the causal relationships among statins, 473 gut microbiota, and DN. Furthermore, mediation MR analysis was employed to explore the potential mediating effects of gut microbiota in the statins-DN relationship.

HMGCR inhibitors were causally linked to the increased incidence of DN (odds ratio [OR]: 0.732, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.647, 0.828, PFDR = 0.000004). Supporting results from a cross-sectional study based on the Medical Information Marketplace in Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) database also indicated this association (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.61, 0.91, P = 0.004). Among the 473 identified gut microbiota species, 13 (PFDR < 0.05) were causally associated with DN. The mediation MR analysis revealed that 10 gut microbiota mediated the relationship between statins and DN, acting as either protective or risk factors (P < 0.05). In addition, HMGCR and related proteins may be involved in lipid metabolism, insulin resistance, and AMPK signaling pathway.

Statins may become a risk factor for DN by increasing or decreasing the abundance of specific gut microbiota. These specific gut bacteria have the potential to become a new indicator for guiding the clinical use of statins in diabetic patients.

Little is known about the cardiovascular benefit of statin use against ambient air pollution among older adults who are at higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) potentially owing to age-related declines in cardiovascular functions along with other risk factors.

This retrospective, population-based cohort study consisted of adults aged 60 years and older free of CVD at baseline identified from the National Health Insurance Service database linked to the National Ambient Air Monitoring Information System for average daily exposure to PM10 and PM2.5 in 2015 in the major metropolitan areas in the Republic of Korea. The follow-up period began on 1 January 2016 and lasted until 31 December 2021. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the association of cardiovascular benefit with statin use against different levels of air pollutant exposure. Of 1 229 444 participants aged 60 years and older (mean age, 67.4; 37.7% male), 377 076 (30.7%) were identified as statin users. During 11 963 322 person-years (PYs) of follow-up, a total of 86 018 incident stroke events occurred (719.0 events per 100 000 PYs). Compared to statin non-users exposed to high levels of PM10 (>50 µg/m3) and PM2.5 (>25 µg/m3), statin users had 20% [adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 0.80; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.75-0.85] and 17% (adjusted HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.80-0.86) lower adjusted risk of incident stroke for PM10 and PM2.5, respectively. A similar risk reduction for incident CVD was also found among statin users exposed to low or moderate levels of PM10 (≤50 µg/m3) and PM2.5 (≤25 µg/m3) exposure.

Among adults aged 60 years and older with high and low or moderate levels of exposure to PM10 and PM2.5, statin use was associated with a significantly lower risk of stroke.

Statin therapy serves a crucial role as a primary preventive strategy against atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Even though diabetes poses a significant and growing health concern in Sri Lanka, there is a lack of information regarding the prevalence and intensity of statin prescriptions and the achievement of recommended LDL-C targets in diabetic patients for the primary prevention of ASCVD within the nation. We aimed to assess the prevalence and intensity of statin prescriptions, target LDL-C achievement, and factors associated with target LDL-C achievement for the primary prevention of ASCVD in T2DM patients across several tertiary care facilities in Sri Lanka.

A multi-centered, cross-sectional study was conducted among T2DM patients without clinical ASCVD attending six tertiary care medical clinics in Sri Lanka. Data on ASCVD risk factors and statin prescription were collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. ASCVD risk was calculated using the WHO charts. Atorvastatin 20 mg/ rosuvastatin 10 mg was defined as high-intensity statins and target LDL-C was defined as < 70 mg/dL for moderate to high and < 100 mg/dL for low-risk groups of ASCVD according to the NICE guideline. The independent sample t test, one-way ANOVA and chi-square test were used for data analysis as appropriate. Factors linked to achieving LDL-C targets were determined through multiple logistic regression analysis. Level of significance was considered as 0.05.

Of the 2013 participants studied, 46.7% were at moderate-high risk and the rest were at low risk of ASCVD. All were eligible for statin therapy, and 84.1% were prescribed statins. High-intensity statins had been prescribed only for 38.5% of moderate-high-risk patients. Nonetheless, high-intensity statins have also been prescribed for 30.7% of low-risk patients. LDL-C target achievement was studied in a randomly selected subsample of 683 and 65.4% (70.7% in low-risk patients and 60.3% in moderate-high-risk patients) achieved LDL-C targets. Of moderate-high-risk patients, 46.3% had not achieved target LDL-C even with high-intensity statin therapy. Female gender (OR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.03-2.24, p = 0.036), poor adherence to statins (OR = 1.67, 95% CI 1.18-2.37, p = 0.004), poor glycemic control (OR = 2.27, 95% CI 1.41-3.65, p = 0.001), and inadequate physical activity (OR = 1.48, 95% CI 1.04-2.10, p = 0.031) were significantly associated with failing to achieve LDL-C targets.

Only about one third of diabetes patients with moderate-high ASCVD risk received high-intensity statins. Even with high-intensity statin therapy, nearly half of the treated patients failed to meet recommended LDL-C targets.

Statins are widely utilized to reduce cholesterol levels, particularly in cardiovascular diseases. They interface with cholesterol synthesis by inhibiting the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-A (HMG-CoA) reductase enzyme. Besides their primary effect, statins demonstrate anti-inflammatory and immune-modulating properties in various diseases, highlighting the pleiotropic effect of these drugs. The CD40:CD40L signaling pathway is considered a prominent inflammatory pathway in multiple diseases, including autoimmune, inflammatory, and cardiovascular diseases. The findings from clinical trials and in vitro and in vivo studies suggest the potential anti-inflammatory effect of statins in modulating the CD40 signaling pathway and downstream inflammatory mediator. Accordingly, as its classic ligand, statins can suppress immune responses in autoimmune diseases by inhibiting CD40 expression and blocking its interaction with CD40L. Additionally, statins affect intracellular signaling and inhibit inflammatory mediator secretion in chronic inflammatory diseases like asthma and autoimmune disorders such as myasthenia gravis, multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erymanthus, and cardiovascular diseases like atherosclerosis. However, it is essential to note that the anti-inflammatory effect of statins may vary depending on the specific type of statin used. In this study, we aim to explore the potential anti-inflammatory effects of statins in treating inflammatory diseases by examining their role in regulating immune responses, particularly their impact on the CD40:CD40L signaling pathway, through a comprehensive review of existing literature.

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

The extent of the performance and utility of scores for the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in persons with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) largely remains unclear.

The purpose of this study was to synthesize data on the performance of CVD risk scores in people living with T1DM.

This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed and EMBASE were searched through December 31, 2023. The included studies: 1) were retrospective, prospective, or cross-sectional in design; 2) included persons with T1DM; 3) assessed CVD outcomes; and 4) had data on at least on CVD risk score. Measures of calibration and discrimination qualitatively summarized. Measures of discrimination were combined using random-effects models stratified by type of risk model.

In a meta-analysis of observational studies of CVD risk scores in T1DM individuals, including 11 studies and 73,664 participants (mean age of 34 years, mainly White individuals and male [55%]), we evaluated 12 CVD risk prediction models (7 T1DM-specific, 1 type 2 diabetes-specific, and 4 general population models). Most risk scores had a moderate to excellent discrimination (C-statistic: 0.73-0.85) and predicted CVD risk well when compared to actual clinical events. CVD risk scores specifically developed in T1DM individuals exhibited a higher discriminative performance-pooled C-statistic of 0.81 vs 0.75 for risk scores developed in the general population or those with type 2 diabetes and also showed a better calibration.

Among individuals with T1DM, CVD risk models had a moderate to excellent discrimination, with a better discrimination and accuracy for T1DM-specific scores.

The effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on lipid components are unclear. We aim to quantify the lipid lowering effects of GLP1-RAs.

A comprehensive database search for placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on GLP-1RA treatment was conducted until January 2023. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed, and outcomes were analyzed using a random-effects model to calculate weighted mean differences (MDs) in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary endpoint was the mean difference in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Secondary endpoints included total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides, high density lipoprotein-C (HLD-C), and very low-density lipoprotein-C (VLDL-C). Subgroup analyses and meta-regression accounted for covariates.

GLP-1RAs modestly reduced LDL-C (MD -2.93, 95% CI (-5.01, -0.85), p = 0.01), consistent across treatment durations: ≤12 weeks (MD: -5.39, 95% CI (-10.36, -0.42), p = 0.03) and >12 weeks (MD: -2.39, 95% CI (-4.70, -0.007), p = 0.04). GLP-1RA reduced TC by ∼7 mg/dl. There was no significant reduction in triglycerides (MD = -7.19, 95% CI (-15.01, 0.62), p = 0.07) or VLDL-C (MD = -3.99, 95%, CI (-8.73, 0.75), p = 0.10). GLP-1RA did not increase HDL-C (MD = -0.12, 95% CI (-0.73, 0.49), p = 0.69). Weight change did not influence LDL-C (tau2 = 28.38, I2 = 99.83, R2 = 0.0, p = 0.67) or TC (tau2 = 93.6, I2 = 99.86, R2 = 0.0, p = 0.92).

GLP-1RA treatment modestly decreased LDL-C and TC but did not significantly affect triglycerides, VLDL-C, or HDL-C.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is one of the most common causes of death globally and the leading one in the US. Elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol is one of the main modifiable disease risk factors and statin therapies have been extensively studied in that regard. The present work presents the clinical trials derived evidence supporting the use of statins in primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention.

Statins are a major moderator of hepatic LDL cholesterol output, effectively reducing serum LDL cholesterol concentrations, in a dose-dependent manner. Their use as a single agent or in combination with other treatment modalities (ezetimibe, PCSK9 inhibitors etc.) has been proven to prevent ASCVD events and reduce cardiovascular disease incidence and mortality substantially. Their use is warranted as a first line agent in all secondary prevention patients, as well as those in primary prevention at high or very high risk for ASCVD events and based on the presence of specific modifiers, even in selected cases at moderate ASCVD risk. Their potency and dose should be tailored to the individual's cardiovascular risk and the tolerance to their potential adverse effects in order to achieve the guidelines-directed LDL goals. Statin therapies are the mainstay of therapy for ASCVD risk reduction and should be initiated in all patients at high enough of a risk, to reduce event rates, morbidity and mortality.

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is the most central component of the neurovascular unit (NVU) and is crucial for the maintenance of the internal environment of the central nervous system and the regulation of homeostasis. A multitude of neuroprotective agents have been developed to exert neuroprotective effects and improve the prognosis of patients with ischemic stroke. These agents have been designed to maintain integrity and promote BBB repair. Statins are widely used as pharmacological agents for the treatment and prevention of ischemic stroke, making them a cornerstone in the pharmacological armamentarium for this condition. The primary mechanism of action is the reduction of serum cholesterol through the inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, which results in a decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and an increase in cholesterol clearance. Nevertheless, basic and clinical research has indicated that statins may exert additional pleiotropic effects beyond LDL-C reduction. Previous studies on ischemic stroke have demonstrated that statins can enhance neurological function, reduce inflammation, and promote angiogenic and synaptic processes following ischemic stroke. The BBB has been increasingly recognized for its role in the development and progression of ischemic stroke. Statins have also been found to play a potential BBB protective role by affecting members of the NVU. This review aimed to provide a comprehensive theoretical basis for the clinical application of statins by systematically detailing how statins influence the BBB, particularly focusing on the regulation of the function of each member of the NVU.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is increasingly recognized as a possible consequence of statin therapy. Secondary analysis of randomized clinical trials and limited observational cohort analyses have suggested that women may be more likely than men to experience statin-associated DM. No analyses of real-world drug safety data addressing this question have been published.

This was a retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis of spontaneously reported adverse drug events (ADEs) submitted to the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System between January 1997 through December 2023. We analyzed cases that mentioned atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pitavastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, or simvastatin in aggregate as well as cases reporting atorvastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, simvastatin individually. DM events were identified using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. We used the proportional reporting ratio to identify increased rates of statin-associated DM events in women and men compared with all other medications, and the reporting OR to compare reporting rates in women versus men.

A total of 18,294,814 ADEs were reported during the study period. Among statin-associated ADEs, 14,874/519,209 (2.9%) reports mentioned DM in women compared with 7,411/489,453 (1.5%) in men, which were both significantly higher than background (0.6%). Statins were the primary-suspected or secondary-suspected cause of the ADE significantly more often in women than men (60 vs 30%), and reporting rates were disproportionately higher in women than in men for all statins. (reporting OR 1.9 (95% CI 1.9 to 2.0)). The largest difference in reporting of statin-associated DM between women and women was observed with atorvastatin.

Analysis of post-marketing spontaneous ADE reports demonstrated a higher reporting rate of DM-associated with statin use compared with other medications with a significantly higher reporting rate in women compared with men. Future studies should consider mechanisms of statin-associated DM moderated by sex.

Whether the cardiovascular treatment benefits of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) differ by baseline use of statins/lipid lowering therapy is unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated whether baseline statin use (users vs non-users) influences the cardiovascular and kidney benefits of SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

We identified relevant cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) and observational cohort studies from MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and bibliographic searches up to March 2024. The analysis pooled study-specific hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for outcomes, categorized by baseline statin use status. We also assessed the interactions between these medications and baseline statin use by calculating and pooling the ratio of HRs (RHRs) within each trial.

Twenty-five articles (13 articles comprising 6 unique CVOTs and 12 articles comprising 9 unique cohort studies) were eligible. In CVOTs of SGLT-2is, the HRs (95 % CIs) of MACE; composite of CVD death or hospitalisation for heart failure; stroke; and kidney events in statin users were 0.90 (0.82-1.00), 0.78 (0.60-1.02), 1.00 (0.77-1.31), and 0.60 (0.53-0.69), respectively. The corresponding estimates were similar in non-statin users. In CVOTs of GLP-1RAs, the HRs (95 % CIs) for MACE in statin and non-statin users were 0.81 (0.73-0.90) and 0.92 (0.77-1.11), respectively. In observational cohort studies, SGLT-2is similarly reduced the risk of several cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in both statin and non-statin users. The estimated RHRs and p-values for interaction indicated that baseline statin use status did not significantly modify the cardio-kidney benefits of SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs.

Aggregate analyses of intervention and real-world evidence show that SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs provide comparable cardio-kidney benefits in patients with T2D, regardless of baseline statin use status. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42024498939.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) poses a substantial global health concern. Statins are widely used among T2DM patients for managing dyslipidemia, preventing cardiovascular disease (CVD), and offering renal protection. However, the extent to which their renal protective effects contribute to reducing the incidence of severe renal complications, including chronic kidney disease (CKD) and renal failure, is not well-defined.

This investigation scrutinizes the impact of simvastatin versus placebo on renal outcomes among T2DM patients utilizing data from the ACCORD trial. It encompasses incidence rate comparisons, Kaplan-Meier estimates, Cox proportional hazards models, and mediation analyses.

The study consisted of 3,619 individuals diagnosed with T2DM, among which 2,753 were treated routinely with simvastatin, while 866 did not receive any statin therapy. After adjusting for baseline characteristics and time-dependent covariates, simvastatin treatment was associated with a 71% reduction in the risk of CKD (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.27-0.31, p < 0.01) and a 47% reduction in the risk of renal failure (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.44-0.65, p < 0.01) compared to the statin-free group. Further subgroup analysis, accounting for the initial lipid and kidney profiles, indicated variable impacts of simvastatin on CKD and renal failure outcomes. Nevertheless, a consistent reduction in CKD risk was observed across all subgroups within the statin-treated population. Additional mediation analysis revealed that the reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) may be a potential mediator in the association between simvastatin and CKD, with a mediation effect of 14.9%, (95% CI 0.11-0.19, p < 0.01).

Administering statins, specifically simvastatin, to T2DM patients at elevated risk for CVD, is likely to offer augmented renal advantages, notably in lowering the occurrence of CKD and renal failure. This protective effect against CKD manifests regardless of initial lipid profiles, albuminuria, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels. The association between simvastatin and CKD may be partially mediated by LDL-C reduction.

Background: Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (pEF) has lacked effective treatments for reducing mortality. However, previous studies have found an association between statin use and decreased mortality in patients with HFpEF. The aim of this study was to analyse whether statin therapy is associated with a reduction in mortality in these patients and whether the effect differs according to the presence or absence of ischaemic heart disease (IHD). Methods: We analysed data from the National Registry of Heart Failure, a prospective study that included patients admitted for HF in Internal Medicine units nationwide. Patients with HFpEF were classified according to the use of statins, and the differences between the two groups were analysed. A multivariable analysis was performed using Cox regression to assess factors independently related to mortality. Results: A total of 2788 patients with HFpEF were included; 63% of them were women with a mean age of 80.1 (±7.8) years. The statin-treated group (40.2%) was younger, with better functional status, and had a more common diagnosis of vascular disease and lower frequency of atrial fibrillation. The most frequent aetiology of HF in both groups was the hypertensive one. Nevertheless, ischaemic HF was more common in those who received statins (24.8% vs. 9.6%; p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed lower mortality at the 1-year follow-up in statin-treated patients (OR: 0.74; 95%CI: 0.61-0.89; p = 0.002). This association was observed in patients without IHD (p < 0.001) but not in those with IHD (p = 0.11). Conclusions: Statins are associated with a decrease in total mortality in patients with HFpEF. This benefit occurs mainly in those without IHD.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a public health crisis that requires adequate knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) by health care providers to prevent or delay the progression of the disease. This study aimed to assess the KAP regarding T2DM among primary care providers (PCPs) in Central China.

This multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted among 971 PCPs using self-employed KAP questionnaires. Questionnaires were designed to evaluate KAP regarding T2DM among PCPs, and was measured with SPSS software. Descriptive statistics, the Pearson correlation coefficients and multiple regression models used to analyze the data.70%, 80% and 70% of total values were considered as the cut-off point for defining good knowledge, positive attitude and correct practice.

A total of 971 PCPs with a mean age of 44.0 ± 10.2 years were evaluated. 620 (63.9%) PCPs worked at village clinic and 605 (62.3%) PCPs have been working more than 20 years. Only 26.3% of the respondents participated in Continued Medical Education (CME) programs regarding diabetes in the past year due to Covid-19 pandemic. Overall, despite positive attitudes toward diabetes, there were substantial gaps in knowledge and practices. The PCPs scored 7.25 out of 14 points on the knowledge subscales, 7.13 out of 8 on the attitude subscales, and 4.85 out of 11 on the practice subscales. Gender, age, practice setting, professional titles, duration of practice and CME attendance were significant predictors of knowledge; Age, practice setting and duration of practice were significant predictors of attitudes; and family history of diabetes affected PCP practices.

Despite positive attitudes toward diabetes, there were substantial gaps in knowledge and practices. These findings call for action from relevant health authorities and policy makers to improve PCPs' KAP regarding diabetes in Central China.

Diabetes is a significant independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), with dyslipidemia playing a critical role in the initiation and progression of ASCVD in diabetic patients. In China, the current prevalence of dyslipidemia in diabetes is high, but the control rate remains low. Therefore, to enhance lipid management in patients with diabetes, the Endocrinology and Metabolism Physician Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association, in collaboration with the Experts' Committee of the National Society of Cardiometabolic Medicine, has convened experts to develop a consensus on the management of dyslipidemia in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. The development of this consensus is informed by existing practices in lipid management among Chinese diabetic patients, incorporating contemporary evidence-based findings and guidelines from national and international sources. The consensus encompasses lipid profile characteristics, the current epidemiological status of dyslipidemia, ASCVD risk stratification, and lipid management procedures in diabetic patients. For the first time, both low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol have been recommended as primary targets for lipid intervention in diabetic patients. The consensus also includes a summary and recommendations for lipid management strategies in special diabetic populations, including children and adolescents, individuals aged 75 years and older, patients with chronic kidney disease, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease, and those who are pregnant. This comprehensive consensus aims to improve cardiovascular outcomes in diabetic patients by contributing to the dissemination of key clinical advancements and guiding clinical practice.

We present an in-depth analysis of dyslipidemia management strategies for patients with diabetes mellitus in Taiwan. It critically examines the disparity between established guideline recommendations and actual clinical practices, particularly in the context of evolving policies affecting statin prescriptions. The focus is on synthesizing the most recent findings concerning lipid management in patients with diabetes mellitus, with a special emphasis on establishing consensus regarding low-density lipoprotein cholesterol treatment targets. The article culminates in providing comprehensive, evidence-based recommendations tailored to the unique needs of those living with diabetes mellitus in Taiwan. It underscores the criticality of personalized care approaches, which incorporate multifaceted factors, and the integration of novel therapeutic options to enhance cardiovascular health outcomes.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in people who have diabetes. Racial and ethnic minorities with diabetes have suboptimal management of cardiovascular risk factors, leading to higher mortality. Social and structural determinants of health are external factors that influence an individual's ability to choose positive health behaviors. In this review, we will discuss cardiovascular complications in people who have diabetes and their relationship to social determinants of health (SDOH).

Recent innovations in diabetes treatment, including new devices and medications, have improved care and survival. However, disparities in the availability of these treatments to racial and ethnic minorities may contribute to continued inequities in CVD outcomes. Racial/ethnic disparities in CVD relate to inequities in economic opportunity, education and health literacy, neighborhoods and social cohesion, and health care access and quality driven by structural racism.

Statins were regarded as a main medication for managing hypercholesterolemia. Administration of statin therapy could reduce the incidence of cardiovascular disease in individuals diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), which was recognized by multipal clinical guidelines. But previous studies had conflicting results on whether the long-term use of statins could benefit the renal function in diabetic patients.

To evaluate the association between statin treatment and Chronic Kidney Disease in DM patients.

This is a retrospective disproportionality analysis and cohort study based on real-world data. All DM cases reported in US Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system (FAERS) between the first quarter of 2004 and the fourth quarter of 2022 were included. Disproportionality analyses were conducted by estimating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the information component (IC). We further compared the CKD odds ratio (OR) between the statins group and the other primary suspected drug group among the included diabetes mellitus cases.

We finally included 593647 DM cases from FAERS, 5113 (5.31%) CKD cases in the statins group and 8810 (1.77%) CKD cases in the control group. Data analysis showed that the statins group showed a significant CKD signal (ROR: 3.11, 95% CI: 3.00-3.22; IC: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.07-1.29). In case group with two or more statins treatment history, the CKD signal was even stronger (ROR: 19.56, 95% CI: 18.10-21.13; IC: 3.70, 95% CI:3.44-3.93) compared with cases with one statin treatment history.

The impact of statin therapy on the progression of renal disease in individuals diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) remains inconclusive. After data mining on the current FAERS dataset, we discovered significant signals between statin treatment and CKD in diabetic patients. Furthermore, the incidence rate of CKD was higher among DM patients who used statins compared to those who did not.

In this editorial, we commented on the article published in the recent issue of the World Journal of Diabetes. Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) is characterized by myocardial fibrosis, ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction in diabetic patients, which can cause heart failure and threaten the life of patients. The pathogenesis of DCM has not been fully clarified, and it may involve oxidative stress, inflammatory stimulation, apoptosis, and autophagy. There is lack of effective therapies for DCM in the clinical practice. Statins have been widely used in the clinical practice for years mainly to reduce cholesterol and stabilize arterial plaques, and exhibit definite cardiovascular protective effects. Studies have shown that statins also have anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects. We were particularly concerned about the recent findings that atorvastatin alleviated myocardial fibrosis in db/db mice by regulating the antioxidant stress and anti-inflammatory effects of macrophage polarization on diabetic myocardium, and thereby improving DCM.

Little is known about the benefits of lipid-lowering medications in those age ≥ 75 years. We assessed the effect of lipid-lowering medications on progression to severe atherosclerosis in patients age > 75.

Data was retrospectively obtained from the Stroke Prevention & Atherosclerosis Research Centre, Canada. Atherosclerosis burden was measured as carotid total plaque area (TPA), a powerful predictor of cardiovascular risk. Survival time free of severe atherosclerosis (SFSA) was defined as the period when TPA remained <1.19 cm2. Kaplan-Meier, multiple Cox proportional hazard and hierarchical mixed-effect models were used to determine the effects of lipid-lowering medications on progression to severe atherosclerosis.

In total 1404 cases (mean age 81 ± 4 years; women 52%) were included. Those taking lipid-lowering medications were more likely to have a history of diabetes and a higher burden of atherosclerosis at baseline. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, the SFSA was significantly longer in those receiving lipid-lowering therapy. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, those not receiving lipid lowering therapy (irrespective of their vascular disease at baseline) were more likely to have TPA > 1.19 cm2 (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09,0.71). Similar findings were observed in mixed effects models when plaque progression was defined as any change >0.05 cm2 per year (odds ratio (OR):2.17, 95% CI:1.38,3.57).

Lipid-lowering therapy is effective in controlling the burden of atherosclerosis among older adults with and without vascular disease. The measurement of plaque burden can guide selection and follow-up of those who may benefit from treatment.

Background: People with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are at greater risk of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) due to multiple comorbidities and polypharmacy. IMPACT2DM (Inappropriate Medication Prescribing Assessment Criteria for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) is a tool designed to identify PIP for adults with T2DM. Objectives: To assess PIP for adults with T2DM in Ethiopia using the IMPACT2DM and to test the face validity and clinical validity of the tool. Methods: A cross-sectional study was undertaken using data extracted retrospectively from the medical records of adults being managed for T2DM at Debretabore Hospital. PIP was assessed using IMPACT2DM. Some items/item components of IMPACT2DM were modified to increase the tool's applicability for the outpatient setting, to clarify content or to use the terms most common in this particular setting. Multivariant logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with PIP. Results: More than 90% of medical records had at least 1 PIP. Prescribing omission (80.9%) was the most commonly identified type of PIP. Adults with prescribing omissions are more likely to be ≥40 years old or to be prescribed with <5 medications. Adults with dosing problems were more likely ≥50 years old, or have had a fasting blood sugar (FBS) level out of the target range (80-130 mg/dL). Conclusions: IMPACT2DM is a clinically valid PIP identification tool for application in an Ethiopian outpatient setting. Health professionals should be alert to check for potential prescribing omissions for adults ≥40 years old and dosing problems for adults with an FBS level out of the target range or >50 years.

According to previous studies, astaxanthin exerts various biological effects due to its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant capabilities; however, its effects on liver enzymes have not yet been well elucidated. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess astaxanthin's effects on liver enzymes. A systematic literature search was conducted using scientific databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane databases, and Google Scholar up to February 2023 to find relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effects of astaxanthin supplementation on alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP). A random-effects model was used for the estimation of the pooled weighted mean difference (WMD). Overall, we included five trials involving 196 subjects. The duration of the intervention was between 4 and 48 weeks, and the dose was between 6 and 12 mg/day. ALT levels increased in the intervention group compared to the control group following astaxanthin supplementation (WMD: 1.92 U/L, 95% CI: 0.16 to 3.68, P=0.03), whereas supplementation with astaxanthin had a non-significant effect on AST (WMD: 0.72 U/L, 95% CI: -0.85 to 2.29, P=0.36), GGT (WMD: 0.48 U/L, 95% CI: -2.71 to 3.67, P=0.76), and ALP levels (WMD: 2.85 U/L, 95% CI: -7.94 to 13.63, P=0.60) compared to the placebo group. Our data showed that astaxanthin supplementation increases ALT concentrations in adults without affecting the levels of other liver enzymes. Further long-term and well-designed RCTs are necessary to assess and confirm these findings.

Cardiovascular, renal and metabolic (CaReMe) diseases are individually among the leading global causes of death, and each is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. However, as these conditions commonly coexist in the same patient, the individual risk of mortality and morbidity is further compounded, leading to a considerable healthcare burden. A number of pathophysiological pathways are common to diseases of the CaReMe spectrum, including neurohormonal dysfunction, visceral adiposity and insulin resistance, oxidative stress and systemic inflammation. Because of the shared pathology and common co-occurrence of the CaReMe diseases, the value of managing these conditions holistically is increasingly being realized. A number of pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches have been shown to offer simultaneous metabolic, cardioprotective and renoprotective benefits, leading to improved patient outcomes across the CaReMe spectrum. In addition, increasing value is being placed on interdisciplinary team-based and coordinated care models built on greater integration between specialties to increase the rate of early diagnosis and adherence to practice guidelines, and improve clinical outcomes. This interdisciplinary approach also facilitates integration between primary and specialty care, improving the patient experience, optimizing resources, and leading to efficiencies and cost savings. As the burden of CaReMe diseases continues to increase, implementation of innovative and integrated care delivery models will be essential to achieve effective and efficient chronic disease management and to ensure that patients benefit from the best care available across all three disciplines.

Systemic inflammation and coronary microvascular endothelial dysfunction are essential pathophysiological factors in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) that support the use of statins. The pleiotropic properties of statins, such as anti-inflammatory, antihypertrophic, antifibrotic, and antioxidant effects, are generally accepted and may be beneficial in HF, especially in HFpEF. Numerous observational clinical trials have consistently shown a beneficial prognostic effect of statins in patients with HFpEF, while the results of two larger trials in patients with HFrEF have been controversial. Such differences may be related to a more pronounced impact of the pleiotropic properties of statins on the pathophysiology of HFpEF and pro-inflammatory comorbidities (arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, chronic kidney disease) that are more common in HFpEF. This review discusses the potential mechanisms of statin action that may be beneficial for patients with HFpEF, as well as clinical trials that have evaluated the statin effects on left ventricular diastolic function and clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF.

Metabolic targets are controversial in older people with type 2 diabetes due to functional heterogeneity and morbidity burden. Tight blood pressure and metabolic control appears beneficial in fit individuals who are newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and have fewer comorbidities. The benefits of low blood pressure and tight metabolic control is attenuated with the development of comorbidities, especially frailty. Guidelines consider frail older people as one category and recommend relaxed targets. However, sarcopenic obese frail individuals may benefit from tight targets and intensification of therapy due to their unfavourable metabolic profile, accelerated diabetes trajectory and high cardiovascular risk. In addition, the early use of sodium glucose transporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonists may be beneficial in this frailty phenotype due to their cardio-renal protection, which is independent of glycaemic control, provided they are able to engage in resistance exercise training to avoid loss of muscle mass. In the anorexic malnourished frail individual, early use of insulin, due to its weight gain and anabolic properties, is appropriate. In this phenotype, targets should be relaxed with deintensification of therapy due to significant weight loss, decelerated diabetes trajectory and increased risk of medication side effects.

The etiology of diabetic kidney disease is complex, and the role of lipoproteins and their lipid components in the development of the disease cannot be ignored. However, phospholipids are an essential component, and no Mendelian randomization studies have yet been conducted to examine potential causal associations between phospholipids and diabetic kidney disease.

Relevant exposure and outcome datasets were obtained through the GWAS public database. The exposure datasets included various phospholipids, including those in LDL, IDL, VLDL, and HDL. IVW methods were the primary analytical approach. The accuracy of the results was validated by conducting heterogeneity, MR pleiotropy, and F-statistic tests. MR-PRESSO analysis was utilized to identify and exclude outliers.

Phospholipids in intermediate-density lipoprotein (OR: 0.8439; 95% CI: 0.7268-0.9798), phospholipids in large low- density lipoprotein (OR: 0.7913; 95% CI: 0.6703-0.9341), phospholipids in low- density lipoprotein (after removing outliers, OR: 0.788; 95% CI: 0.6698-0.9271), phospholipids in medium low- density lipoprotein (OR: 0.7682; 95% CI: 0.634-0.931), and phospholipids in small low-density lipoprotein (after removing outliers, OR: 0.8044; 95% CI: 0.6952-0.9309) were found to be protective factors.

This study found that a higher proportion of phospholipids in intermediate-density lipoprotein and the various subfractions of low-density lipoprotein, including large LDL, medium LDL, and small LDL, is associated with a lower risk of developing diabetic kidney disease.

Adherence to medications presents a significant challenge in healthcare. Statins, used in primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, are of particular importance for public health. The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in additional healthcare system-related barriers impeding the execution of therapies. This study aimed to assess the use of as well as adherence and persistence to statins in a national cohort of 38 million of Polish citizens during pandemic.

A retrospective analysis of prescription and dispensation data for all statins users from the national payer organization covering the years 2020-2022 was conducted. Medication adherence was assessed using the Medication Possession Ratio, for persistence the 30-day cut-off was accepted. National data on COVID-19 cases and COVID-19 related deaths were obtained from ECDC.

The analysis identified 7,189,716 Polish citizens (approximately 19% of Polish population) who were dispensed at least 1 pack of statins within the study period. Over that time, there was a continuous significant increasing trend in prescribing and dispensing of statins. Despite a total increase of 18.9% in the number of prescribed tablets, the percentage of tablets dispensed remained similar, averaging 86%. Overall percentage of adherent patients was 48.2%. For a random sample of 100,000 patients, the mean period of continuous therapy in 2022 was 6.2+/- 5.3 months. During the lockdown period, the mean number of prescribed and dispensed tablets was lower by 6.8% and 5.9%, respectively (p < 0.05). However, fluctuations in the number of COVID-19 cases or COVID-19-related deaths per week had no major impact on the prescribing and dispensing of statins.

Over the time of pandemic, there was a continuous increase in the number of statin tablets prescribed and dispensed in Poland. This suggests that, despite the potential limitations posed by COVID-19, access to statins remained easy, which may be attributed to the mass-scale implementation of the national e-prescription system. However, it is crucial to realise that approximately 1/7 of prescribed statin doses were never dispensed, and the overall levels of adherence and persistence were low. This underscores the necessity for concerted efforts to change this scenario in Poland.

According to traditional medicine, Melissa officinalis L., (lemon balm) has been known to remove harmful substances from the blood and is considered a cardiac tonic. Therefore, its use as a cardiovascular remedy may explain the lipid-lowering effects of lemon balm. Dyslipidemia can be considered as a significant preventable risk factor for atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease and type 2 diabetes. The present study is the first meta-analysis to investigate the effects of M. officinalis administration on serum levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), triglyceride (TG) and total cholesterol (TC).

From inception to October 2023, a thorough search through literature was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The inclusion criteria of this study were randomized controlled trials, with or without blinding which provided adequate data for each group at the beginning and end of the follow-up period. Meta-analysis was performed on randomized controlled trials using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) V4 software. Risk of bias in the selected studies was examined according to the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. Begg's funnel plot symmetry status, Begg's rank correlation, and Egger's weighted regression tests were employed to evaluate potential publication bias.

The meta-analysis comprised of 5 randomized controlled trials with a total of 302 patients. The findings of the meta-analysis indicated that the consumption of lemon balm had a significant decrease in TG (SMD (95% CI): -0.396(-0.620, -0.173), p-value = 0.001), TC (SMD (95% CI): -0.416 (-0.641, -0.192), p-value < 0.001) and LDL (SMD (95% CI): -0.23(-0.45, -0.008), p < 0.05) levels compared to the placebo group. While it had no statistically significant effect on HDL level (SMD (95% CI): 0.336(-0.091, 0.767), p-value = 0.123). No significant and detectable publication bias was found in the meta-analysis. Additionally, all included clinical studies demonstrated a low risk of bias for missing outcome data and selection of the reported results. The robustness of the results was demonstrated by a sensitivity analysis using the one-study remove method.

The findings of this meta-analysis provide evidence that lemon balm may be administered as a safe and beneficial herbal medicine for reducing TC, TG and LDL levels. According to the pooled results of 5 studies with a total of 302 patients, lemon balm intake had no significant effect on HDL level. This study reinforces the notion that lemon balm may have a substantial impact on serum lipid profile as a potential remedy in cases of dyslipidemia. The main concern of our research is the limited number of eligible studies and the relatively small population size of each individual study. The patients of these studies had different types of diseases and metabolic syndromes. However, the meta-analysis was sufficiently powered to detect the considerable effects of lemon balm in the combined population regardless of type of diseases.

This guideline is the first Iranian guideline developed for the diagnosis, management, and treatment of hyperlipidemia in adults. The members of the guideline developing group (GDG) selected 9 relevant clinical questions and provided recommendations or suggestions to answer them based on the latest scientific evidence. Recommendations include the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) threshold for starting drug treatment in adults lacking comorbidities was determined to be over 190 mg/dL and the triglyceride (TG) threshold had to be >500 mg/dl. In addition to perform fasting lipid profile tests at the beginning and continuation of treatment, while it was suggested to perform cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) risk assessment using valid Iranian models. Some recommendations were also provided on lifestyle modification as the first therapeutic intervention. Statins were recommended as the first line of drug treatment to reduce LDL-C, and if its level was high despite the maximum allowed or maximum tolerated drug treatment, combined treatment with ezetimibe, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors, or bile acid sequestrants was suggested. In adults with hypertriglyceridemia, pharmacotherapy with statin or fibrate was recommended. The target of drug therapy in adults with increased LDL-C without comorbidities and risk factors was considered an LDL-C level of <130 mg/dl, and in adults with increased TG without comorbidities and risk factors, TG levels of <200 mg/dl. In this guideline, specific recommendations and suggestions were provided for the subgroups of the general population, such as those with CVD, stroke, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, elderly, and women.

Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder that often predisposes to cardiovascular diseases (CVD). CVD is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in diabetes. The typical diabetic dyslipidaemia is characterized by low HDL cholesterol, high triglycerides with mildly increased or even normal LDL. This attenuated rise in LDL is due to the more atherogenic small dense LDL particles. Genetic factors, obesity, lack of physical activity, alcohol abuse, poorly controlled glucose levels are some of the common risk factors for dyslipidaemia. Non-pharmacological management of dyslipidaemia is important and includes modification in the diet, increase in physical activity and efforts to reduce weight. Statins remain the mainstay of pharmacotherapy for dyslipidaemia in diabetes. Due to the small dense LDL, even patients with diabetes who have normal LDL cholesterol, achieve reduction in cardiovascular risk with statin therapy. Those patients who do not achieve acceptable LDL reductions with statin alone can be treated with combination therapy of ezetimibe with statins. Many novel therapies have also emerged such as bempedoic acid and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors. The targets for LDL cholesterol depend upon the patients underlying cardiovascular risk category. The use of pharmacotherapy for lowering triglycerides in patients with mild to moderate hypertriglyceridemia and diabetes is still a matter of debate. Proper management of dyslipidaemia is critical component of treatment of diabetes mellitus.