Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Biol Chem. Jun 5, 2026; 17(2): 121467
Published online Jun 5, 2026. doi: 10.4331/wjbc.v17.i2.121467
Published online Jun 5, 2026. doi: 10.4331/wjbc.v17.i2.121467
Table 1 Proposed validation and implementation checklist for single-cell and single-molecule analysis for deoxyribonucleic acid identification-like forensic workflows
| Validation domain | Proposed minimum deliverable or benchmark for intended use |
| Cell recovery and sampling | Report the probability of recovering at least one target minor-contributor cell under casework-like conditions; if the workflow is used to support absence-sensitive reasoning, the validated capture probability for the claimed scenario should be explicitly stated |
| Cell-type classification | Publish sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and misclassification rates by substrate, staining condition, and sample age; do not use phenotype labels to support source-level wording without validated error rates |
| Minimum pooling and consensus | Validate the minimum number of cells needed to reach the laboratory’s pre-specified completeness target; current evidence supports at least small diploid pools, and approximately 15 sperm cells to exceed 90% inferred autosomal diploid completeness in one validated DEPArray setting |
| Dropout and stutter | Publish locus-specific dropout and stutter distributions by cell type and workflow; define no-call rules for loci that fail consensus or replicate criteria |
| Contamination and drop-in | Quantify stage-specific unexpected-allele and drop-in rates; require no interpretable human profile in reagent blanks for routine release and pre-define batch action limits for recurrent exogenous signal |
| Reproducibility and robustness | Demonstrate reproducibility across operators, instruments, days, substrates, and biologically realistic mixtures; include degraded, aged, and background-rich samples rather than only clean artificial mixtures |
| Concordance with reference methods | Demonstrate concordance of recovered contributor genotypes against known reference samples and against bulk STR where comparison is informative |
| Database compatibility | Validate upload eligibility separately from evidential usefulness; document whether resulting profiles meet local locus-count, allele-count, and statistical requirements for database searching |
| Reporting boundaries | Pre-define permissible outputs at sub-source and limited source level; state that cellular resolution does not by itself resolve transfer, persistence, prevalence, recovery, or timing |
- Citation: Evangelou K, Angeli P, Polydorou A, Petropoulou T. Single-cell deoxyribonucleic acid typing for forensic mixtures and trace evidence: Opportunities, validation requirements, and reporting limits. World J Biol Chem 2026; 17(2): 121467
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8454/full/v17/i2/121467.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4331/wjbc.v17.i2.121467