BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review Open Access
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Biol Chem. Jun 5, 2026; 17(2): 121685
Published online Jun 5, 2026. doi: 10.4331/wjbc.v17.i2.121685
Phytosterols in human health: Biochemical mechanisms of action and disease-modulating effects
Doha Mohamed, Asmaa A Ramadan, Hoda B Mabrok, Ibrahim Hamed, Department of Nutrition and Food Science, Food Industries and Nutrition Institute, National Research Centre, Cairo 12622, Egypt
ORCID number: Doha Mohamed (0000-0003-0606-9378); Asmaa A Ramadan (0000-0003-2626-0006); Hoda B Mabrok (0000-0002-3839-0062); Ibrahim Hamed (0000-0002-1995-4811).
Author contributions: Mohamed D, Ramadan AA, Mabrok HB, and Hamed I contributed equally to the review; All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript to be published.
AI contribution statement: We would like to respectfully clarify that the manuscript was not generated by AI. The scientific content, literature review, interpretation of evidence, and conclusions were prepared by the authors. The manuscript was also professionally edited by a native English language editor, and the editing certificate was uploaded during submission. All reviewer responses, scientific explanations, literature interpretation, and revisions were prepared and evaluated by the authors. AI tools were not used to independently generate scientific responses or academic content. Limited AI-assisted language tools were occasionally used to improve grammar, sentence clarity, readability, and general language expression. All figures and images were prepared by the authors and were not generated using AI tools.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors declare no conflict of interest in publishing the manuscript.
Corresponding author: Doha Mohamed, PhD, Professor, Department of Nutrition and Food Science, Food Industries and Nutrition Institute, National Research Centre, 33 El Buhouth Street, Dokki, Cairo 12622, Egypt. dohaabdomohamed@gmail.com
Received: March 30, 2026
Revised: May 3, 2026
Accepted: May 25, 2026
Published online: June 5, 2026
Processing time: 66 Days and 13.6 Hours

Abstract

Phytosterols are plant-derived sterols structurally similar to cholesterol and present in vegetable oils, seeds, legumes, and whole grains. Their best-established health effect is lowering circulating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, mainly through inhibition of intestinal cholesterol absorption. Beyond this classical role, recent studies suggest that phytosterols may influence biological processes relevant to human health. Proposed mechanisms include changes in membrane lipid organization, modulation of nuclear receptors such as liver X receptors and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors, activation of AMP-activated protein kinase, and regulation of metabolic and inflammatory signaling pathways. Experimental and human evidence indicates possible effects on adipose tissue function, hepatic lipid accumulation, insulin sensitivity, inflammation, oxidative stress, and immune responses. These findings have increased interest in the relevance of phytosterols to obesity, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, type 2 diabetes, and immune-mediated disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis. Interactions with the gut microbiota and bile acid metabolism may provide additional pathways linking phytosterol intake with systemic effects, although human evidence remains limited. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory actions have also been linked to neuroprotective and anticancer effects, but current support is mainly from preclinical studies. This review critically summarizes mechanistic and translational evidence, with emphasis on bioavailability, interindividual variability, safety, and remaining research gaps.

Key Words: Phytosterols; Lipid metabolism; Cholesterol absorption; Molecular mechanisms; Inflammation; Oxidative stress; Metabolic disorders; Cardiovascular disease; Functional foods

Core Tip: Phytosterols are well-established cholesterol-lowering agents, but emerging evidence highlights their broader biological roles. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of molecular mechanisms underlying phytosterol action, including modulation of liver X receptors, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors, and AMP-activated protein kinase signaling, membrane lipid organization, and gut microbiota-bile acid interactions. These integrated pathways contribute to improved lipid and glucose metabolism, reduced inflammation, and enhanced cardiometabolic health, supporting the potential of phytosterols as multifunctional dietary bioactives beyond lipid lowering.



INTRODUCTION

Phytosterols are naturally occurring plant sterols that closely resemble cholesterol in structure and are widely found in plant-based foods such as vegetable oils, nuts, seeds, legumes, and whole grains[1-3]. The main dietary phytosterols – β-sitosterol, campesterol, and stigmasterol – contribute most of total phytosterol intake in humans and retain biological activity despite limited systemic absorption[4]. Because of their structural similarity to cholesterol, phytosterols compete with cholesterol for incorporation into intestinal micelles, reducing cholesterol absorption and lowering circulating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). This cholesterol-lowering effect is well established and has been consistently demonstrated in randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and experimental studies, supporting the use of phytosterol-enriched foods in cardiovascular risk-reduction strategies[5-8].

In addition to their lipid-lowering properties, phytosterols are increasingly recognized as multifunctional bioactive compounds with broader physiological significance. Experimental and clinical studies demonstrate that phytosterols influence pathways related to lipid and glucose metabolism, inflammatory signaling, oxidative stress, immune regulation, and cellular homeostasis[9-12]. The underlying mechanisms include alterations in membrane lipid organization, regulation of nuclear receptors such as liver X receptors (LXRs) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), and modulation of downstream signaling pathways[13,14].

These molecular actions may account for the potential roles of phytosterols in conditions beyond dyslipidemia. Current evidence indicates involvement in adipose tissue function, hepatic lipid accumulation, and insulin sensitivity, highlighting relevance to obesity and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)[11,15]. Additionally, phytosterols exhibit immunomodulatory properties, influencing both innate and adaptive immune responses by suppressing pro-inflammatory signaling and modulating immune–metabolic interactions, with potential implications for inflammatory disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA)[16,17].

Interactions between phytosterols and the gut microbiota further broaden their biological relevance. Because absorption is limited, substantial amounts reach the colon, where they may influence microbial composition, bile acid (BA) metabolism, and gut barrier function, thereby contributing to systemic metabolic and immune effects[11,18]. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of phytosterols have also been linked to neuroprotective and anticancer effects reported mainly in preclinical studies[19-21].

Despite extensive investigation, important questions remain regarding phytosterol bioavailability, interindividual variability, circulating phytosterol levels, long-term safety, and translational relevance beyond cholesterol lowering. This narrative review provides a critical synthesis of current evidence on the biochemical and molecular mechanisms underlying phytosterol action, with emphasis on linking mechanistic pathways to physiological and clinical outcomes. It examines the coordinated roles of membrane lipid modulation, LXR and PPAR signaling, AMPK activation, and the gut microbiota-BA axis in mediating the pleiotropic effects of phytosterols. In addition, it highlights circulating phytosterol levels as emerging biomarkers linking dietary exposure with metabolic responses and clinical outcomes. By integrating findings from in vitro studies, animal models, and human investigations, this review aims to provide a clinically contextualized perspective while identifying priorities for future research.

METHODOLOGY

Given the narrative and integrative nature of this review, a structured but non-systematic literature search strategy was adopted to capture multidisciplinary evidence across nutrition science, food science, and bioactive compound research, with supportive insights from biotechnology and related health fields.

Peer-reviewed literature was identified through searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar conducted through February 2026. Publications from January 2000 to February 2026 were prioritized, while earlier seminal studies were included where relevant to foundational concepts.

Searches combined keywords and Boolean operators such as: (1) Phytosterols AND human health; (2) Phytosterols AND absorption; (3) Phytosterols AND metabolism; (4) Phytosterols AND bioavailability; (5) Phytosterols AND molecular mechanisms; (6) Phytosterols AND gut microbiota; (7) Phytosterols AND inflammation; (8) Phytosterols AND oxidative stress; and (9) Phytosterols AND cardiometabolic health.

Studies were selected based on scientific relevance, methodological quality, recency, and contribution to the mechanistic or translational themes of the review. Priority was given to randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and well-designed experimental studies. Relevant regulatory or institutional reports published in English were also considered.

As a narrative review, this work does not aim to provide exhaustive systematic coverage of all available literature, and some degree of selection bias inherent to qualitative synthesis cannot be fully excluded.

STRUCTURE AND BIOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF PHYTOSTEROLS

Phytosterols are triterpenoid compounds belonging to the sterol family and share a common cyclopentanoperhydrophenanthrene ring structure with cholesterol. This core structure consists of four fused rings featuring a hydroxyl group at the C3 position and a double bond between C5 and C6, which are essential for their sterol-like behavior within biological membranes[13,22]. The primary structural distinction between phytosterols and cholesterol lies in the aliphatic side chain at the C17 position. Most phytosterols contain additional methyl or ethyl groups at C24, which significantly influence their physicochemical properties, intestinal handling, and biological activity[18]. Phytosterols share the core sterol nucleus of cholesterol but differ mainly in side-chain substitutions and unsaturation patterns, structural features that influence their intestinal absorption, membrane behavior, and biological activity.

Among dietary phytosterols, β-sitosterol, campesterol, and stigmasterol are the most abundant and biologically relevant. The β-sitosterol contains an ethyl group at C24, campesterol contains a methyl group at the same position, while stigmasterol additionally possesses a double bond between C22 and C23. Despite their apparent subtlety, these structural variations markedly affect sterol solubility, membrane affinity, and interaction with sterol transporters and nuclear receptors[11,13]. Compared with cholesterol, phytosterols display lower aqueous solubility and reduced affinity for intestinal micelles, contributing to their limited absorption and rapid efflux back into the intestinal lumen[23].

At the biochemical level, phytosterols incorporate into cellular membranes, where they influence membrane fluidity, lipid raft formation, and cholesterol distribution. Experimental studies demonstrate that phytosterols can partially replace cholesterol in phospholipid bilayers, altering membrane order and modulating the function of membrane-associated proteins, including receptors and transporters involved in lipid metabolism and inflammatory signaling[11,16].

These membrane-level effects are increasingly recognized as a key mechanism underlying the pleiotropic biological actions of phytosterols beyond cholesterol displacement.

Beyond their membrane-related properties, phytosterols modulate key molecular regulators of lipid and metabolic homeostasis. Structural similarities to cholesterol allow phytosterols to serve as ligands or modulators of nuclear receptors such as LXRs and PPARs, thereby influencing gene expression related to cholesterol efflux, fatty acid oxidation, and inflammatory responses[13,17]. These biochemical properties provide a mechanistic basis for the diverse metabolic and anti-inflammatory effects attributed to phytosterols in experimental and clinical settings.

ABSORPTION, METABOLISM, AND BIOAVAILABILITY OF PHYTOSTEROLS

The absorption and systemic availability of phytosterols are tightly regulated and significantly lower than those of cholesterol, which reflects specialized intestinal and hepatic transport mechanisms. Under normal dietary conditions, less than 5% of ingested phytosterols are absorbed vs approximately 50%-60% of dietary cholesterol[11,18]. This limited absorption determines their biological behavior and safety profile.

In the intestinal lumen, phytosterols and cholesterol are incorporated into mixed micelles in the presence of BAs. Due to their lower solubility within micelles, phytosterols are less efficiently transported across the brush-border membrane of enterocytes[23]. Uptake of sterols into enterocytes is mediated primarily by Niemann-Pick C1-Like 1 (NPC1 L1), a transmembrane transporter that facilitates sterol internalization. Although NPC1 L1 can transport both cholesterol and phytosterols, it exhibits a higher affinity for cholesterol. This contributes to preferential cholesterol absorption over plant sterols[13,24,25].

Inside the enterocytes, phytosterols are rapidly released back into the intestinal lumen by the ATP-binding cassette transporters ABCG5 and ABCG8, which function as a heterodimer and serve as a critical protective mechanism against excessive phytosterol accumulation[18,26]. These transporters also operate in hepatocytes, where they mediate biliary secretion of phytosterols, which limits systemic exposure. Genetic defects in ABCG5 or ABCG8 result in sitosterolemia, a rare disorder characterized by markedly elevated plasma phytosterol levels and premature atherosclerosis, which shows the importance of these transporters in sterol homeostasis[25].

Phytosterols that escape efflux undergo limited esterification by acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase 2 and are incorporated into chylomicrons with much lower efficiency than cholesterol. Consequently, plasma phytosterol concentrations remain low under normal physiological conditions[18]. Recent mechanistic studies further indicate that phytosterols may modulate the expression and activity of sterol transporters and metabolic regulators, including NPC1 L1, ABCG5/ABCG8, and LXRs. This suggests feedback mechanisms affecting both phytosterol and cholesterol metabolism[11,17].

Beyond physiological determinants, the extraction and processing methods used to obtain phytosterols can influence their composition, bio-accessibility, and subsequent metabolic handling. Conventional solvent extraction, supercritical fluid extraction, and enzymatic approaches differ in their ability to preserve native phytosterol structures and to limit the formation of oxidized phytosterol derivatives, which may exhibit altered absorption and biological activity[16]. Variations in phytosterol preparation may affect solubility, micellar incorporation, and interactions with intestinal transporters, thereby contributing to differences in absorption efficiency and systemic exposure[18]. These factors may partly account for variability in experimental and clinical outcomes and should be considered when interpreting studies on phytosterol bioavailability and metabolic effects.

Phytosterol bioavailability is influenced by multiple dietary and host-related factors, including food matrix, fat content, chemical form (free sterols vs esterified sterols), gut microbiota composition, and genetic variability in sterol transporters[16,25]. Advances in formulation strategies, such as esterification, nanoemulsions, and encapsulation technologies, have been explored to enhance bioavailability and functional efficacy. However, their long-term physiological implications remain to be fully clarified[11]. Clinical responses may also differ according to formulation, food matrix, emulsification system, and delivery technology, which underscores the need for standardized comparisons across studies.

Given the tightly regulated absorption and systemic handling of phytosterols, understanding their circulating levels and clinical implications is essential for interpreting their biological effects in humans.

CIRCULATING PHYTOSTEROLS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Based on these pharmacokinetic characteristics, the assessment of circulating phytosterol levels provides information about their systemic effects and clinical relevance.

While dietary intake of phytosterols has been widely studied, their circulating concentrations and clinical implications remain less clearly defined. Under normal physiological conditions, plasma phytosterol levels are extremely low, typically representing less than 1% of circulating sterols. This is due to highly efficient efflux mechanisms mediated by ATP-binding cassette transporters ABCG5 and ABCG8[18,13,27,28]. These transporters actively limit systemic accumulation by promoting the return of absorbed phytosterols to the intestinal lumen and enhancing biliary excretion[18,27].

Importantly, circulating phytosterol concentrations do not directly reflect dietary intake but rather indicate individual differences in sterol absorption efficiency and transporter activity[8,18]. Elevated plasma phytosterol levels have been observed in individuals with increased intestinal absorption of sterols. They have also been more markedly found in patients with sitosterolemia, a rare genetic disorder caused by mutations in ABCG5 or ABCG8[25,29]. This condition is characterized by excessive accumulation of phytosterols in plasma and tissues and is associated with premature atherosclerosis, which highlights the importance of tightly regulated sterol homeostasis[13,30].

In clinical and epidemiological studies, the relationship between circulating phytosterol levels and cardiovascular risk is controversial. Some studies suggest a positive correlation between elevated plasma phytosterols and cardiovascular risk. Other reports show neutral or even protective associations[17,18,31]. These discrepancies likely reflect differences in study design, population characteristics, and the interpretation of phytosterols as biomarkers of cholesterol absorption rather than direct causal agents[8].

From a methodological perspective, accurate quantification of circulating phytosterols requires sensitive analytical techniques, such as gas chromatography – mass spectrometry or liquid chromatography – mass spectrometry, which enable discrimination between cholesterol and structurally similar plant sterols[13,18]. Despite their importance, such measurements are not normally found in many clinical trials investigating phytosterol supplementation[8,32].

Overall, consideration of circulating phytosterol levels provides important insight into interindividual variability in response to phytosterol intake and may improve the interpretation of clinical outcomes. Future studies should incorporate standardized measurement of plasma phytosterols to better define their role as biomarkers and to clarify their long-term clinical significance[17,11,33].

MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF ACTION OF PHYTOSTEROLS

Phytosterols exert diverse biological effects through complementary molecular mechanisms that regulate cellular signaling and metabolic homeostasis. These actions involve both membrane-level processes and intracellular pathways, including modulation of lipid raft organization and regulation of key transcription factors and kinases such as PPARs, AMPK, and LXRα. Through these interconnected networks, phytosterols influence cholesterol transport, lipid metabolism, inflammatory responses, and glucose homeostasis, providing a mechanistic basis for their potential roles in metabolic and inflammatory disorders.

Membrane-mediated signaling and lipid raft modulation

Phytosterols exert important effects at the level of cellular membranes. Due to their structural similarity to cholesterol, they can partially replace cholesterol within phospholipid bilayers, which alters membrane fluidity and the organization of lipid rafts – cholesterol-rich microdomains that function as signaling platforms[16]. Incorporation of phytosterols into the plasma membrane disrupts lipid packing order and modifies membrane mechanical properties, which may interfere with translocation of the p67 subunit and suppress NADPH oxidase (NOX) activation, leading to reduced reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation. Attenuation of ROS signaling may subsequently downregulate the NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 inflammasome, supporting a membrane-mediated anti-inflammatory mechanism[34]. Remodeling of lipid rafts may also influence membrane-associated receptors and signaling molecules involved in inflammation, immune cell activation, and cell proliferation, potentially contributing to anti-inflammatory and antiproliferative effects[11].

Regulation of LXRs

LXRs (LXRα and LXRβ) are cholesterol-sensing nuclear receptors that regulate genes involved in cholesterol efflux, BA synthesis, and lipid transport. They have therefore attracted interest as therapeutic targets in neurodegenerative and cardiometabolic diseases characterized by disturbed sterol homeostasis and inflammation[35-37].

Phytosterols and some oxidized derivatives have been reported to interact with LXR signaling, directly or indirectly, leading to upregulation of ATP-binding cassette transporters such as ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 and ABCG1, which promote cholesterol efflux from peripheral tissues[13,18]. LXR-responsive sterols may also enhance ApoE-mediated lipid trafficking between astrocytes and neurons and promote neuronal cholesterol turnover through upregulation of CYP46A1[38]. In the liver, phytosterol derivatives have been shown to increase expression of LXRα and cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase, thereby increasing fecal BA excretion[39]. Collectively, these findings suggest that the LXRα-cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase-BA pathway may contribute to the cholesterol-lowering effects of phytosterols. However, excessive LXR activation has also been linked to hepatic lipogenesis, underscoring the importance of context-dependent regulation[11].

Activation of AMPK

AMPK is a central regulator of cellular energy homeostasis that responds to changes in the AMP/ATP ratio. Experimental studies suggest that phytosterols can activate AMPK signaling, either directly or through upstream kinases, resulting in suppression of lipogenesis and stimulation of fatty acid oxidation[11]. β-sitosterol and stigmasterol have been reported to interact with the allosteric site of AMPK in computational or experimental models[40]. In preclinical studies, β-sitosterol modulated AMPK signaling and reduced hepatic lipid accumulation in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease models[41], while stigmasterol attenuated neuroinflammation in APP/PS1 mice and suppressed microglial responses to Aβ42 oligomers through the AMPK/nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) pathway[42].

Phytosterols may also regulate hepatic lipid metabolism through AMPK-dependent downregulation of sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c and fatty acid synthase. This suppresses de novo lipogenesis and promotes fatty acid oxidation[11]. Similarly, stigmasterol combined with gastrodin reduced lipid accumulation and modulated genes related to lipid metabolism via the AMPK/sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c pathway in high-fat diet rat models[43]. These findings support AMPK as a plausible mediator of the metabolic effects of phytosterols, although confirmation in humans remains limited.

Modulation of PPARs

PPARα, PPARγ, and PPARδ are transcription factors that regulate lipid oxidation, adipogenesis, glucose metabolism, and inflammatory responses. Experimental evidence indicates that phytosterols can modulate PPAR activity, particularly PPARα and PPARγ, leading to enhanced fatty acid oxidation, improved insulin sensitivity, and attenuation of inflammatory signaling[17,44]. β-sitosterol has also been proposed as a candidate modulator of PPARγ2 and NLR family pyrin domain containing 3-dependent pyroptosis in experimental models of ischemic cardiovascular injury[45].

These effects are relevant to metabolic disorders in which impaired PPAR signaling contributes to insulin resistance and lipid accumulation. By influencing PPAR-dependent gene expression, phytosterols may help restore metabolic homeostasis in tissues such as liver, adipose tissue, and skeletal muscle. PPARγ activation can also enhance expression of ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 and promote cholesterol efflux from macrophages through induction of LXRα signaling[46]. Additional studies suggest that phytosterols may improve glucose metabolism through coordinated effects involving AMPK activation, modulation of PPARγ signaling, and suppression of inflammation that impairs insulin action[11]. Computational analyses further predict interactions with AMPK-related and PPAR-related targets, including PPARγ, PPARδ, AMPK, and LXRα[47]. These in silico observations are useful for generating hypothesis, but they do not alone confirm pathway activation or metabolic efficacy.

The overall physiological response to phytosterol intake likely reflects integration of these pathways rather than a single mechanism. Recent advances have also highlighted the gut microbiota as an additional mediator of phytosterol biological activity.

ROLE OF PHYTOSTEROLS IN THE GUT–METABOLISM AXIS
Phytosterols and gut microbiota: A bidirectional relationship

Phytosterols – particularly β-sitosterol, campesterol, and stigmasterol – are plant-derived sterols structurally similar to cholesterol and widely consumed through plant-based foods and fortified products[48,49]. Their best-established action is the reduction of intestinal cholesterol absorption through displacement from mixed micelles and modulation of the NPC1 L1 transporter. This strategy is recognized in dietary approaches for hypercholesterolemia management[18,50]. Beyond this effect, growing evidence suggests interactions between phytosterols and the gut microbiota, although current support is derived predominantly from preclinical studies.

Animal studies have reported that phytosterol supplementation can alter microbial composition, including shifts in the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio and changes in specific taxa such as Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria[51]. Experimental microbiota-depletion and fecal microbiota transplantation models further suggest that part of the lipid-lowering response to phytosterols may depend on microbiota[52]. In addition, microbial metabolism of phytosterols may generate secondary sterol metabolites with potential biological activity, although these pathways remain incompletely characterized[53]. While these findings are informative, their direct relevance to humans remains uncertain and should be interpreted cautiously.

BA signaling and hepatic metabolic regulation

One proposed mechanism linking phytosterols, gut microbiota, and host metabolism involves BA transformation and enterohepatic signaling. Gut microbes convert primary BAs into secondary BAs through bile salt hydrolase and related enzymatic activities. The influences signaling pathways mediated by the farnesoid X receptor and Takeda G protein-coupled receptor 5[54,55]. In preclinical models, phytosterol intake has been associated with alterations in BA composition and hepatic pathways related to lipid metabolism and cholesterol disposal[51,52].

These observations suggest that microbiota-dependent BA signaling may contribute to the systemic effects of phytosterols on hepatic lipid handling and glucose regulation. However, evidence in humans remains limited. Therefore, the gut microbiota – BA axis should currently be viewed as a promising but still emerging mechanism that requires further clinical validation[56,57].

Translational perspectives and interindividual variability

Despite encouraging evidence, translation of phytosterol-microbiome interactions into human health outcomes remains incomplete. Human intervention studies have produced less consistent findings than animal models, with some reporting modest or selective changes in microbiota composition after plant sterol or stanol supplementation[58,59]. These discrepancies likely reflect substantial interindividual variability in baseline microbiota composition, habitual diet, metabolic status, genetics, intervention duration, and phytosterol formulation or bioavailability[50].

Host factors affecting sterol transport, including ABCG5/ABCG8 activity, may further modify circulating phytosterol levels and physiological responses. Rare disorders such as sitosterolemia illustrate the importance of tightly regulated sterol handling and demonstrate that responses to phytosterol exposure can be variable[60]. Emerging evidence also suggests possible associations between phytosterol intake, microbial diversity, and short-chain fatty acid production. These relationships require confirmation using adequate clinical studies[61].

Future research should prioritize standardized human trials integrating microbiome profiling, metabolomics, circulating phytosterol measurements, and clinically meaningful cardiometabolic outcomes. A systems-level approach that considers dietary exposure, microbial ecology, host genetics, and metabolic phenotype will be essential to define which individuals are most likely to benefit from phytosterol interventions.

Collectively, these interconnected pathways illustrate how phytosterols may influence metabolic and inflammatory processes at molecular and systemic levels, although the strength of evidence differs substantially between preclinical and human studies. The principal mechanisms through which phytosterols modulate metabolic and inflammatory pathways are summarized in Figure 1.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Molecular mechanisms underlying the metabolic and anti-inflammatory effects of phytosterols. Phytosterols regulate multiple cellular signaling pathways involved in metabolic homeostasis and inflammation. These mechanisms include activation of liver X receptors, which enhances cholesterol efflux through ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 and ABCG1 and promotes reverse cholesterol transport; modulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (α/γ), which improves fatty acid oxidation and insulin sensitivity; and activation of AMP-activated protein kinase, resulting in suppression of lipogenesis and stimulation of energy metabolism. In addition, phytosterols alter membrane lipid raft organization, influencing receptor-mediated signaling and inflammatory pathways. Emerging evidence also indicates that phytosterols modulate gut microbiota composition and bile acid signaling through pathways involving the farnesoid X receptor and Takeda G protein-coupled receptor 5, contributing to improved metabolic regulation. Collectively, these mechanisms lead to reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, decreased hepatic lipid accumulation, improved insulin sensitivity and glucose uptake, and attenuation of systemic inflammation, ultimately supporting cardiometabolic health. ABCA1: ATP-binding cassette transporter A1; ACC: Acetyl-CoA carboxylase; AMPK: AMP-activated protein kinase; FXR: Farnesoid X receptor; LDL-C: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LXR: Liver X receptors; PPAR: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors; SREBP-1c: Sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c; TGR5: Takeda G protein-coupled receptor 5.
ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AND ANTIOXIDANT ACTIONS

Chronic low-grade inflammation and oxidative stress are central features of many metabolic, cardiovascular, and neurodegenerative disorders. Increasing evidence indicates that phytosterols exert anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects that contribute to their broader health benefits beyond cholesterol lowering. These actions are mediated through modulation of inflammatory signaling pathways, regulation of redox homeostasis, and stabilization of cellular membranes.

At the molecular level, phytosterols suppress activation of key pro-inflammatory transcription factors, particularly NF-κB, which regulates the expression of cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules involved in inflammatory responses[11,16]. In vitro and animal studies demonstrate that phytosterol treatment reduces the production of inflammatory mediators, including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-6, and C-reactive protein, while promoting anti-inflammatory cytokine profiles. These effects are partially attributed to interference with membrane-associated signaling events and attenuation of toll-like receptor-mediated pathways[62,63].

Phytosterols also exhibit antioxidant properties by modulating oxidative stress pathways and improving cellular redox balance. Experimental evidence suggests that phytosterols reduce ROS and lipid peroxidation. They also enhance the activity of endogenous antioxidant enzymes, including superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase (GPx)[6,16,17,64]. These effects may involve activation of the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 pathway and suppression of NOX activity[63,65,66].

Experimental studies indicate that phytosterols promote nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 signaling, which leads to increased expression of antioxidant enzymes such as heme oxygenase-1, superoxide dismutase, catalase, and GPx. This effect can limit oxidative damage and improve redox balance[65,67]. In parallel, phytosterols may attenuate NOX activation by modifying membrane lipid organization and lipid raft assembly, which results in reduced superoxide production and downstream oxidative signaling[51,66]. These complementary mechanisms provide a basis for protective effects against endothelial dysfunction, hepatic steatosis, insulin resistance, and chronic inflammation, although most evidence remains preclinical[68,69].

In addition to direct antioxidant actions, phytosterols may indirectly reduce oxidative stress by improving lipid profiles and decreasing the susceptibility of low-density lipoprotein particles to oxidative modification. Reduced LDL oxidation represents a key mechanism linking phytosterol intake to attenuation of atherosclerotic processes and endothelial dysfunction[70]. Clinical and observational studies further support these findings, reporting associations between higher phytosterol intake and lower circulating markers of inflammation and oxidative stress in populations at risk of cardiometabolic disease[17].

Collectively, the anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties of phytosterols complement their metabolic actions and provide a mechanistic basis for protective effects in chronic inflammatory conditions such as RA. These pleiotropic actions underscore the potential of phytosterols as dietary modulators of inflammation and oxidative stress in disease prevention strategies.

Molecular docking analyses have reported predicted interactions between avocado-derived bioactive compounds and proteins associated with inflammation, oxidative stress, metabolic regulation, and apoptosis, including cyclooxygenase-2, GPx, α-glucosidase, and Bcl-xL[71]. These findings suggest candidate molecular targets for further study, but they require experimental validation.

ROLES IN CARDIOVASCULAR AND METABOLIC DISEASES

Cardiovascular and metabolic diseases remain to be the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide and are driven by interconnected processes including dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, chronic inflammation, and oxidative stress. Phytosterols have been extensively investigated in this regard because of their well-established cholesterol-lowering effects and broader metabolic actions. Many of these responses involve shared pathways such as AMPK activation, PPAR modulation, and anti-inflammatory signaling, as previously discussed. These interconnected molecular and metabolic pathways converge to influence cardiometabolic health at the systemic level, as summarized in Figure 2. The principal biological mechanisms, relative strength of evidence, and reported health outcomes associated with phytosterols across major disease domains are summarized in Table 1.

Figure 2
Figure 2 Integrated effects of phytosterols in cardiometabolic health. Dietary phytosterols derived from plant-based foods act across multiple target tissues, including the liver, intestine, adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, and immune cells, to exert coordinated metabolic effects. These actions lead to reduced intestinal cholesterol absorption, decreased hepatic lipid accumulation, improved insulin sensitivity, enhanced glucose utilization, and attenuation of systemic inflammation. Collectively, these integrated physiological and clinical outcomes contribute to improved cardiometabolic health and reduced risk of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. LDL-C: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Table 1 Summary of principal biological mechanisms, evidence strength, and reported health outcomes of phytosterols across major disease domains.
Domain
Main mechanisms
Evidence strength
Reported outcomes
Cardiovascular healthReduced intestinal cholesterol absorption; LDL-C lowering; improved endothelial functionStrong (randomized controlled trials/meta-analyses)Lower LDL-C; improved vascular markers
Diabetes/glucose metabolismAMP-activated protein kinase activation; peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors modulation; reduced inflammation; improved insulin signalingModerateImproved insulin sensitivity; better glycemic markers
Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease/fatty liverReduced lipogenesis; enhanced fatty acid oxidation; anti-inflammatory effectsModerate (mainly preclinical)Reduced hepatic lipid accumulation
ObesityAdipocyte metabolism modulation; anti-inflammatory effectsLimited-moderateImproved metabolic profile; uncertain weight loss
Gut–metabolism axisMicrobiota shifts; bile acid signaling (farnesoid X receptor/Takeda G protein-coupled receptor 5); short-chain fatty acid-related effectsEmerging (mainly preclinical)Potential metabolic benefits
Antioxidant/inflammationNuclear factor kappa B suppression; nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor 2 activation; reduced NADPH oxidase activityModerate (mostly experimental)Reduced oxidative stress and inflammation
AnticancerCell-cycle arrest; apoptosis; membrane signaling effectsPreliminary (preclinical)Mechanistic potential only
NeuroprotectionAnti-inflammatory and antioxidant actions; lipid signalingPreliminary (preclinical)Mechanistic potential only
Cardiovascular evidence: Strongest clinical support

The most robust evidence for phytosterol efficacy against cardiovascular risk is through lowering circulating LDL-C. Randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses consistently show that intake of approximately 2 g/day significantly reduces LDL-C, regardless of diet or statin therapy[23,32,43]. Improvements in vascular markers, including endothelial function and arterial stiffness, have also been reported[18].

Additional benefits may include reduced LDL oxidation, favorable changes in lipoprotein subfractions, and attenuation of inflammatory or oxidative pathways relevant to atherogenesis[11,16,70]. However, despite consistent lipid-lowering effects, direct evidence from long-term randomized trials showing reductions in major cardiovascular events remains limited. Therefore, current support for phytosterols in cardiovascular prevention is strongest for validated risk markers rather than clear clinical outcomes[68].

Metabolic disorders: Emerging but less definitive evidence

Compared with cardiovascular outcomes, evidence for disease-specific metabolic benefits remains vague and is supported only by observational or short-term intervention studies. While these findings are promising, clinical evidence is lower than LDL-C reduction.

Phytosterols and fatty liver disease

MASLD is characterized by hepatic lipid accumulation, insulin resistance, oxidative stress, and chronic inflammation. Because these pathways overlap with known actions of phytosterols, interest has grown in their potential hepatic benefits[69,72].

Animal studies consistently show reductions in hepatic lipid accumulation and improvements in inflammatory and oxidative markers following phytosterol supplementation[11,73-76]. Limited human data suggests possible improvements in liver enzymes and metabolic parameters, but adequate liver-specific clinical trials with long-term outcomes are lacking[75,77]. Accordingly, evidence for MASLD remains promising but preliminary.

Phytosterols and obesity

Obesity involves excess adipose tissue expansion, low-grade inflammation, and metabolic dysregulation[78,79]. Experimental studies indicate that phytosterols may influence adipocyte metabolism, reduce adiposity, and improve inflammatory status in preclinical models[11,62,80]. Observational human studies report associations between higher phytosterol intake and improved metabolic markers; however, direct and sustained effects on body weight or adiposity in controlled clinical trials are still uncertain[9,63,81]. Thus, phytosterols should be viewed as supportive dietary components for metabolic health rather than primary agents for weight-loss.

Phytosterols and diabetes

Type 2 diabetes is characterized by impaired insulin sensitivity, altered glucose metabolism, and chronic inflammation. Experimental evidence suggests that phytosterols may enhance insulin signaling, improve glucose utilization, and modulate inflammatory pathways in six studies[67,82-86]. Potential indirect effects through lipid improvement and gut microbiota interactions have also been proposed[51,87].

Human evidence is encouraging but still limited. Some studies associate higher phytosterol intake with improved glycemic parameters and lower diabetes risk, particularly in metabolically vulnerable populations. Well-designed trials specifically targeting glycemic outcomes remain scarce[17,88,89]. Therefore, evidence for diabetes-related benefits should currently be considered inconclusive.

Overall perspective

Collectively, phytosterols provide their strongest and most consistent clinical benefit through LDL-C lowering and improvement of validated cardiovascular risk markers. By contrast, evidence for MASLD, obesity, and diabetes is biologically supportive, but remains less definitive and requires larger, longer-term, disease-specific human trials. Long-term safety and cardiovascular outcome studies also remain important priorities for future research[6,68,90].

ANTICANCER AND CELL-REGULATORY EFFECTS

Beyond their established cardiometabolic benefits, phytosterols have attracted interest for potential anticancer and cell-regulatory properties. Experimental studies indicate that phytosterols may influence cellular processes relevant to tumor biology, including proliferation, apoptosis, cell-cycle regulation, inflammation, and oxidative stress. These findings have been reported mainly in cell culture and animal models involving colorectal, breast, prostate, and liver cancers[21,91,92].

At the cellular level, phytosterols – particularly β-sitosterol – have been shown to reduce cancer cell proliferation and induce cell-cycle arrest at the G0/G1 or G2/M phases, depending on model system and exposure conditions[93,94]. Proposed mechanisms include modulation of cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinases, and regulatory proteins such as p21 and p27. Phytosterols have also been reported to promote apoptosis through mitochondrial pathways, caspase activation, and regulation of Bcl-2 family proteins[95]. However, these observations are derived primarily from experimental systems and should not be interpreted as evidence of clinical anticancer efficacy.

Anti-inflammatory and antioxidant actions may further contribute to these effects. In preclinical models, phytosterols can suppress NF-κB signaling, reduce pro-inflammatory cytokine production, and decrease oxidative stress markers, which creates a less favorable environment for tumor progression[11,62]. Membrane-related mechanisms have also been proposed. Altered cholesterol content and lipid raft organization may influence growth factor signaling pathways such as epidermal growth factor receptor and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B[21,96]. These mechanisms remain biologically sound but incompletely validated in humans.

Human evidence remains limited. Observational studies suggest possible inverse associations between dietary phytosterol intake and risk of some cancers, particularly colorectal and breast cancer, but findings are inconsistent and subject to residual confounding[17,97,98]. At present, phytosterols should be viewed as promising bioactive compounds for further investigation rather than established anticancer interventions. Well-designed translational and clinical studies are needed to clarify dose-response relationships, tissue specificity, and potential interactions with standard therapies.

NEUROPROTECTIVE EFFECTS AND GUT-BRAIN INTERACTIONS

Interest has also expanded to the potential neuroprotective effects of phytosterols. Neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases involve neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and altered lipid metabolism – pathways that may theoretically be influenced by phytosterols[99]. However, current evidence is derived predominantly from in vitro and animal studies.

Experimental studies suggest that phytosterols may modify membrane lipid organization, influence neuronal cholesterol homeostasis, and affect signaling pathways related to synaptic function and cell survival[99-101]. Additional preclinical work indicates that phytosterols can reduce microglial activation, suppress inflammatory mediators such as TNF-α and IL-1β, and enhance antioxidant defenses in neural tissues[42,65,102,103]. These findings support biological plausibility but do not yet establish therapeutic efficacy in humans.

Some studies further suggest that phytosterols may affect amyloid-related pathways by modulating cholesterol-rich lipid rafts or interacting with liver X receptor signaling, potentially influencing amyloid precursor protein processing and cholesterol efflux[37,104,105]. Likewise, gut microbiota modulation has been proposed as an indirect route linking phytosterols to neural function through systemic inflammation and gut-brain signaling[102,106-108]. These mechanisms remain exploratory and require substantial validation.

Although the emerging evidence is encouraging, there is currently insufficient clinical evidence to support phytosterols as established agents for prevention or treatment of neurodegenerative disease. Future human studies should determine bioavailability, blood-brain barrier relevance, effective doses, long-term safety, and clinically meaningful neurological outcomes.

EMERGING BIOLOGICAL ROLES AND IMMUNOMODULATORY EFFECTS
Immunomodulatory properties of phytosterols

The immune system is closely influenced by lipid metabolism, membrane composition, and redox balance, all of which may be affected by dietary sterols. Beyond their metabolic actions, phytosterols have attracted interest as potential modulators of innate and adaptive immune responses through anti-inflammatory signaling, regulation of immune cell activation, and effects on lipid-dependent immune pathways[109-111]. However, current evidence is derived predominantly from experimental studies, and human confirmation remains limited.

At the cellular level, phytosterols may alter membrane lipid organization and lipid raft composition. Because receptors such as toll-like receptors, T-cell receptors, and cytokine receptors are localized within cholesterol-rich microdomains, partial replacement of cholesterol with phytosterols could influence receptor clustering and downstream signaling, which may attenuate inflammatory activation[16,66,112]. Phytosterols have also been reported to suppress NF-κB signaling and reduce production of mediators such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β and also improve redox balance[11,112]. In addition, modulation of LXR and PPAR pathways has been proposed as a mechanism linking sterol metabolism with inflammatory gene regulation in immune cells[13,66]. These findings are promising but should not be interpreted as established clinical immunomodulatory effects.

Some studies further suggest that phytosterols may influence adaptive immunity, including T-cell activation and differentiation, although these effects appear to be insufficiently characterized in humans[16]. Indirect effects through gut microbiota composition and intestinal barrier function have also been proposed[11,105].

Available human data are limited to small intervention or observational studies reporting reductions in systemic inflammatory markers and improved metabolic profiles. Overall, phytosterols should be regarded as promising dietary modulators of immune homeostasis rather than established immunotherapeutic agents[11,17,113].

Effects on innate and adaptive immune responses

Innate and adaptive immune responses depend on membrane organization and intracellular metabolic signaling. Because of their structural similarity to cholesterol, phytosterols may influence both arms of the immune system through membrane-related, metabolic, and anti-inflammatory mechanisms[66].

Innate immune responses: Experimental studies indicate that phytosterols can attenuate inflammatory signaling in macrophages, dendritic cells, and related innate immune cells by modifying lipid raft organization and suppressing NF-κB or MAPK pathways[16,111,112,114]. Reductions in oxidative burst activity and ROS generation have also been reported in preclinical models[11,67].

Adaptive immune responses: In vitro findings suggest that phytosterols may modulate T-cell activation, proliferation, and cytokine profiles, with possible effects on T-helper polarization and regulatory immune responses[3,115,116]. Evidence regarding B-cell function remains sparse and largely indirect[96,117].

At present, these mechanisms should be viewed as experimentally supported but not yet clinically established, as robust human immunology studies remain scarce[113].

Phytosterols and RA

RA is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by synovial inflammation, immune dysregulation, oxidative stress, and progressive joint damage[118,119]. Given their anti-inflammatory and metabolic properties, phytosterols have been explored as potential supportive agents in pathways relevant to RA[120,121].

Experimental evidence suggests that phytosterols can suppress NF-κB activation, reduce pro-inflammatory cytokine production, and attenuate oxidative stress – mechanisms relevant to synovial inflammation[16,112,122]. Modulation of membrane signaling and nuclear receptor pathways such as LXR and PPAR may also contribute to altered immune responses in preclinical systems[13,34,64,123,124]. Docking studies have proposed possible interactions with immune-regulatory targets such as PTPN22, although these findings remain exploratory and require experimental validation[125]. However, these results are hypothesis-generating and should not be interpreted as evidence of therapeutic efficacy.

Human evidence remains limited. Some observational data suggest that plant-based dietary patterns rich in phytosterols are associated with lower inflammatory burden, but these associations cannot be attributed to phytosterols alone and may reflect broader dietary effects[126]. Therefore, phytosterols should currently be considered supportive dietary components of interest rather than proven therapeutic agents for RA.

Overall, available evidence supports a biologically plausible role for phytosterols in immune and inflammatory pathways relevant to RA, but further mechanistic studies and well-designed clinical trials are required before firm conclusions can be drawn.

SAFETY, TOXICOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS, AND LIMITATIONS

Phytosterols are generally regarded as safe and have a long history of consumption through plant-based foods. Their safety profile is supported by clinical trials, regulatory evaluations, and widespread use in fortified foods, particularly at doses commonly used for cholesterol lowering (approximately 1.5-3 g/day)[18,23,96]. In healthy adults, intake within this range is generally well tolerated and not associated with clinical adverse effects on the short or the medium term. However, evidence regarding long-term exposure and hard clinical outcomes remains comparatively limited, and extended follow-up studies are needed.

A central safety consideration is the low systemic absorption of phytosterols, which is tightly controlled by intestinal and hepatic efflux transporters ABCG5 and ABCG8. These mechanisms restrict excessive accumulation of phytosterols in plasma and tissues under normal physiological conditions[27,28]. In contrast, individuals with rare genetic defects in these transporters, such as sitosterolemia, exhibit markedly elevated circulating phytosterol levels and increased risk of premature atherosclerosis[25,29,30]. Although uncommon, this condition underscores the importance of considering sterol metabolism disorders when recommending supplementation or fortified products.

Another area of ongoing debate concerns the relationship between circulating phytosterol concentrations and cardiovascular risk. Some observational studies report positive associations, whereas others describe neutral or even protective relationships[18,31,88]. Importantly, plasma phytosterol levels primarily reflect sterol absorption efficiency and transporter activity rather than dietary intake alone. Accordingly, they may function more as biomarkers of cholesterol metabolism than as independent causal risk factors. Current randomized trials do not indicate harm from recommended dietary phytosterol intake, but robust long-term cardiovascular outcome trials remain limited.

Phytosterols may also modestly reduce intestinal absorption of fat-soluble vitamins and carotenoids because of competition within mixed micelles. Clinical studies report small reductions in circulating β-carotene and, to a lesser extent, vitamins A and E; these effects are usually considered nutritionally manageable and can be minimized by adequate consumption of fruits and vegetables[23,33].

Another consideration is the oxidized phytosterol derivatives (oxyphytosterols), which can form during food processing, heating, or storage. Experimental studies suggest that some oxidized sterol derivatives may exert pro-oxidant, cytotoxic, or pro-inflammatory effects under certain conditions. However, their real-world dietary exposure, bioavailability, and clinical significance in humans remain insufficiently defined. Further research is needed to determine whether food matrix, processing conditions, or formulation strategies influence oxyphytosterol generation and biological relevance.

Safety responses may also vary across populations. Potentially susceptible groups include individuals with sitosterolemia or altered sterol transport, those with severe metabolic dysfunction, older adults with multimorbidity, and populations insufficiently studied in intervention trials such as children, pregnant or lactating women, and patients with chronic liver or kidney disease. Given this, individualized clinical conclusions should be considered until stronger evidence becomes available.

Despite substantial progress, several limitations continue to constrain understanding of phytosterol safety and efficacy. These include heterogeneity in study design, variability in formulations and doses, inconsistent measurement of circulating phytosterols, and incomplete characterization of interindividual variability related to genetics, gut microbiota composition, baseline diet, and metabolic phenotype.

Overall, phytosterols appear safe for the general population when consumed at recommended levels, but further research is needed to clarify long-term exposure effects, optimize formulations, identify susceptible subgroups, and support more personalized dietary recommendations.

FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

Phytosterols are well-established bioactive dietary constituents with a proven ability to reduce intestinal cholesterol absorption and lower circulating LDL-C. Beyond this classical effect, growing evidence suggests that their biological actions extend to broader metabolic and cellular processes, including modulation of inflammatory signaling, oxidative stress, glucose and lipid metabolism, and cellular homeostasis. At the mechanistic level, these effects involve coordinated regulation of LXRs, PPARs, AMPK, membrane lipid organization, and related downstream signaling networks.

The strongest and most consistent clinical evidence supports the use of phytosterols in cardiovascular risk management through LDL-cholesterol reduction and improvement of validated cardiometabolic risk markers. Additional benefits in conditions such as MASLD, obesity, and type 2 diabetes are biologically plausible and increasingly supported by experimental and early clinical findings, although the overall evidence base remains less definitive than for lipid lowering. Likewise, emerging data suggest potential anticancer, neuroprotective, and immunomodulatory properties, but current support is derived mainly from preclinical studies and should be interpreted cautiously.

Phytosterols are generally considered safe for the general population when consumed at recommended intake levels. Nevertheless, several issues remain important, including limited long-term exposure data, possible formation of oxidized phytosterol derivatives during processing, interindividual variability in response, and rare inherited disorders of sterol transport such as sitosterolemia. These factors support a context-specific rather than uniform approach to phytosterol use.

Despite substantial progress, important knowledge gaps remain. Long-term randomized controlled trials with hard clinical endpoints are still limited, and causal relationships between phytosterol intake and health outcomes beyond cholesterol reduction require further clarification. Future research should prioritize rigorously designed human intervention studies integrating molecular biomarkers, metabolomics and other omics platforms, circulating phytosterol measurements, and clinically meaningful outcomes. Greater attention should also be given to dose-response relationships, food matrix effects, gut microbiota interactions, genetic variability in sterol transporters, and identification of populations most likely to benefit.

CONCLUSION

Advances in food technology, delivery systems, and nutraceutical formulation may further improve phytosterol bioavailability, stability, and functional efficacy while preserving safety. By linking mechanistic insights with translational and clinical research, future studies can support more precise and personalized nutrition strategies. Overall, phytosterols remain a compelling example of multifunctional dietary bioactives with established cardiometabolic value and promising, though still evolving, applications beyond lipid lowering.

References
1.  Zaloga GP. Phytosterols, Lipid Administration, and Liver Disease During Parenteral Nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2015;39:39S-60S.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 61]  [Cited by in RCA: 61]  [Article Influence: 5.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Miras-Moreno B, Sabater-Jara AB, Pedreño MA, Almagro L. Bioactivity of Phytosterols and Their Production in Plant in Vitro Cultures. J Agric Food Chem. 2016;64:7049-7058.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 61]  [Cited by in RCA: 63]  [Article Influence: 6.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Zio S, Tarnagda B, Tapsoba F, Zongo C, Savadogo A. Health interest of cholesterol and phytosterols and their contribution to one health approach: Review. Heliyon. 2024;10:e40132.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 20]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Li X, Xin Y, Mo Y, Marozik P, He T, Guo H. The Bioavailability and Biological Activities of Phytosterols as Modulators of Cholesterol Metabolism. Molecules. 2022;27:523.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in RCA: 90]  [Article Influence: 22.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
5.  De Smet E, Mensink RP, Plat J. Effects of plant sterols and stanols on intestinal cholesterol metabolism: suggested mechanisms from past to present. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2012;56:1058-1072.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 193]  [Cited by in RCA: 187]  [Article Influence: 13.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Mohamed D, Mohammed S, Hamed I. Chia seeds oil enriched with phytosterols and mucilage as a cardioprotective dietary supplement towards inflammation, oxidative stress, and dyslipidemia. J Herbmed Pharmacol. 2021;11:83-90.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in RCA: 11]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Ruscica M, Loh WJ, Sirtori CR, Watts GF. Phytosterols and phytostanols in context: From physiology and pathophysiology to food supplementation and clinical practice. Pharmacol Res. 2025;214:107681.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in RCA: 13]  [Article Influence: 13.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Stellaard F, Lütjohann D. Phytosterol-Enriched Dietary Supplements for Lowering Plasma LDL-Cholesterol: Yes or No? Nutrients. 2025;17:654.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Vezza T, Canet F, de Marañón AM, Bañuls C, Rocha M, Víctor VM. Phytosterols: Nutritional Health Players in the Management of Obesity and Its Related Disorders. Antioxidants (Basel). 2020;9:1266.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in RCA: 60]  [Article Influence: 10.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Laka K, Makgoo L, Mbita Z. Cholesterol-Lowering Phytochemicals: Targeting the Mevalonate Pathway for Anticancer Interventions. Front Genet. 2022;13:841639.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in RCA: 27]  [Article Influence: 6.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Shen M, Yuan L, Zhang J, Wang X, Zhang M, Li H, Jing Y, Zeng F, Xie J. Phytosterols: Physiological Functions and Potential Application. Foods. 2024;13:1754.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 37]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Nandi S, Nag A, Khatua S, Sen S, Chakraborty N, Naskar A, Acharya K, Calina D, Sharifi-Rad J. Anticancer activity and other biomedical properties of β-sitosterol: Bridging phytochemistry and current pharmacological evidence for future translational approaches. Phytother Res. 2024;38:592-619.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 35]  [Article Influence: 17.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Calpe-Berdiel L, Escolà-Gil JC, Blanco-Vaca F. New insights into the molecular actions of plant sterols and stanols in cholesterol metabolism. Atherosclerosis. 2009;203:18-31.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 199]  [Cited by in RCA: 176]  [Article Influence: 9.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Martens N, Zhan N, Voortman G, Leijten FPJ, van Rheenen C, van Leerdam S, Geng X, Huybrechts M, Liu H, Jonker JW, Kuipers F, Lütjohann D, Vanmierlo T, Mulder MT. Activation of Liver X Receptors and Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors by Lipid Extracts of Brown Seaweeds: A Potential Application in Alzheimer's Disease? Nutrients. 2023;15:3004.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 11]  [Article Influence: 3.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Miszczuk E, Bajguz A, Kiraga Ł, Crowley K, Chłopecka M. Phytosterols and the Digestive System: A Review Study from Insights into Their Potential Health Benefits and Safety. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024;17:557.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 27]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Othman RA, Moghadasian MH. Beyond cholesterol-lowering effects of plant sterols: clinical and experimental evidence of anti-inflammatory properties. Nutr Rev. 2011;69:371-382.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 134]  [Cited by in RCA: 102]  [Article Influence: 6.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Liu B, Chen K, Chen X, Wang J, Shu G, Ping Z, Zhang S. Health outcomes associated with phytosterols: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. Phytomedicine. 2024;122:155151.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Gylling H, Simonen P. Phytosterols, Phytostanols, and Lipoprotein Metabolism. Nutrients. 2015;7:7965-7977.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 79]  [Cited by in RCA: 90]  [Article Influence: 8.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Awad AB, Fink CS, Williams H, Kim U. In vitro and in vivo (SCID mice) effects of phytosterols on the growth and dissemination of human prostate cancer PC-3 cells. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2001;10:507-513.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 119]  [Cited by in RCA: 109]  [Article Influence: 4.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Prasad M, Jayaraman S, Eladl MA, El-Sherbiny M, Abdelrahman MAE, Veeraraghavan VP, Vengadassalapathy S, Umapathy VR, Jaffer Hussain SF, Krishnamoorthy K, Sekar D, Palanisamy CP, Mohan SK, Rajagopal P. A Comprehensive Review on Therapeutic Perspectives of Phytosterols in Insulin Resistance: A Mechanistic Approach. Molecules. 2022;27:1595.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 50]  [Cited by in RCA: 44]  [Article Influence: 11.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Shahbaz M, Momal U, Perween A, Naeem H, Hussain M, Imran M, Mohamed GA, Ibrahim SRM, Alsagaby SA, Al Abdulmonem W, Al Jbawi E, Abdelgawad MA, Selim S, Al Jaouni SK, Mohamed HM. Anticancer Molecular Mechanisms of Phytosterols: An Updated Review on Clinical Trials. Food Sci Nutr. 2026;14:e71505.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Ostlund RE Jr. Phytosterols in human nutrition. Annu Rev Nutr. 2002;22:533-549.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 466]  [Cited by in RCA: 379]  [Article Influence: 15.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Plat J, Mensink RP. Plant stanol and sterol esters in the control of blood cholesterol levels: mechanism and safety aspects. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96:15D-22D.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 203]  [Cited by in RCA: 168]  [Article Influence: 8.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Martín-Campos JM. Genetic Determinants of Plasma Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels: Monogenicity, Polygenicity, and "Missing" Heritability. Biomedicines. 2021;9:1728.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Nakano T, Takashima E, Yu L. Factors Affecting Circulating Phytosterol Levels: Toward an Integrated Understanding of Atherogenicity and Atheroprotection by Dietary and Circulating Phytosterols. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2025;27:104.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Wang HH, Liu M, Portincasa P, Wang DQ. Recent Advances in the Critical Role of the Sterol Efflux Transporters ABCG5/G8 in Health and Disease. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1276:105-136.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in RCA: 20]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Sabeva NS, Liu J, Graf GA. The ABCG5 ABCG8 sterol transporter and phytosterols: implications for cardiometabolic disease. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2009;16:172-177.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in RCA: 38]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Lee MH, Lu K, Hazard S, Yu H, Shulenin S, Hidaka H, Kojima H, Allikmets R, Sakuma N, Pegoraro R, Srivastava AK, Salen G, Dean M, Patel SB. Identification of a gene, ABCG5, important in the regulation of dietary cholesterol absorption. Nat Genet. 2001;27:79-83.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 499]  [Cited by in RCA: 456]  [Article Influence: 18.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Yoo EG. Sitosterolemia: a review and update of pathophysiology, clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and management. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2016;21:7-14.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 90]  [Cited by in RCA: 125]  [Article Influence: 12.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Tada H, Kojima N, Takamura M, Kawashiri MA. Sitosterolemia. Adv Clin Chem. 2022;110:145-169.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 15]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Qiao W, Feng H, Zhang YF, Zhang Z, Yang J, Wu M, Xie J, Huang J, Zhou T, Zhang Y. Protective association between dietary phytosterol intake and cardiovascular health: an analysis of the UK Biobank cohort. Food Funct. 2025;16:1157-1168.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 7]  [Article Influence: 7.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Wang L, Feng L, Prabahar K, Hernández-Wolters B, Wang Z. The effect of phytosterol supplementation on lipid profile: A critical umbrella review of interventional meta-analyses. Phytother Res. 2024;38:507-519.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 10]  [Article Influence: 5.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Zhang YF, Qiao W, Feng H, Jiang K, Yang J, Zhou T, Zhang Y. Effects of phytosterol supplementation on lipid profiles and apolipoproteins: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103:e40020.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Wang X, Liu Y, Du F, Zong A, Xu T. Phytosterol-mediated disturbance of the lipid packing order in the plasma membrane regulates inflammatory response. Food Funct. 2025;16:6150-6159.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Wang X, Lu K, Luo H, Liang D, Long X, Yuan Y, Wu C, Bao J. In silico identification of small molecules as novel LXR agonists for the treatment of cardiovascular disease and cancer. J Mol Model. 2018;24:57.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in RCA: 14]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Guo S, Li L, Yin H. Cholesterol Homeostasis and Liver X Receptor (LXR) in Atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc Hematol Disord Drug Targets. 2018;18:27-33.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in RCA: 38]  [Article Influence: 5.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Mouzat K, Chudinova A, Polge A, Kantar J, Camu W, Raoul C, Lumbroso S. Regulation of Brain Cholesterol: What Role Do Liver X Receptors Play in Neurodegenerative Diseases? Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:3858.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 37]  [Cited by in RCA: 61]  [Article Influence: 8.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Zhan N, Wang B, Martens N, Liu Y, Zhao S, Voortman G, van Rooij J, Leijten F, Vanmierlo T, Kuipers F, Jonker JW, Bloks VW, Lütjohann D, Palumbo M, Zimetti F, Adorni MP, Liu H, Mulder MT. Identification of Side Chain Oxidized Sterols as Novel Liver X Receptor Agonists with Therapeutic Potential in the Treatment of Cardiovascular and Neurodegenerative Diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:1290.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 15]  [Reference Citation Analysis (4)]
39.  He WS, Wang MG, Pan XX, Li JJ, Jia CS, Zhang XM, Feng B. Role of plant stanol derivatives in the modulation of cholesterol metabolism and liver gene expression in mice. Food Chem. 2013;140:9-16.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in RCA: 18]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Anggreini P, Kuncoro H, Sumiwi SA, Levita J. Molecular Docking Study of Phytosterols in Lygodium microphyllum Towards SIRT1 and AMPK, the in vitro Brine Shrimp Toxicity Test, and the Phenols and Sterols Levels in the Extract. J Exp Pharmacol. 2023;15:513-527.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Anggreini P, Kuncoro H, Sumiwi SA, Levita J. Lygodium microphyllum Inhibits de Novo Lipogenesis Activity in the Hepatocytes of High-Fat High-Fructose-Induced Rats by Increasing the Levels of SIRT1 and AMPK. J Exp Pharmacol. 2024;16:351-364.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
42.  Jie F, Yang X, Yang B, Liu Y, Wu L, Lu B. Stigmasterol attenuates inflammatory response of microglia via NF-κB and NLRP3 signaling by AMPK activation. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022;153:113317.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 97]  [Article Influence: 24.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Zhang H, Sun Y, Zou Y, Chen C, Wang S. Stigmasterol and gastrodin, two major components of banxia-baizhu-tianma decoction, alleviated the excessive phlegm-dampness hypertension by reducing lipid accumulation. J Ethnopharmacol. 2024;319:117193.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 7]  [Article Influence: 3.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Christofides A, Konstantinidou E, Jani C, Boussiotis VA. The role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) in immune responses. Metabolism. 2021;114:154338.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 601]  [Cited by in RCA: 517]  [Article Influence: 103.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
45.  Wu Z, Huang N, Li C, Lin M, Chen Z, Li W, Zhou H. β-Sitosterol suppresses NLRP3 Inflammasome activation and Pyroptosis in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury via inhibition of PPARγ2. Int Immunopharmacol. 2025;154:114543.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 11]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
46.  Chawla A, Boisvert WA, Lee CH, Laffitte BA, Barak Y, Joseph SB, Liao D, Nagy L, Edwards PA, Curtiss LK, Evans RM, Tontonoz P. A PPAR gamma-LXR-ABCA1 pathway in macrophages is involved in cholesterol efflux and atherogenesis. Mol Cell. 2001;7:161-171.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1062]  [Cited by in RCA: 1087]  [Article Influence: 43.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (10)]
47.  Sharma S, Choudhary M, K J, Sharma O, Kishan H, Mittal A. β-sitosterol potential against chronic hyperglycemia induced diabetic nephropathy: A dual approach using computational and in-vivo studies. J Ethnopharmacol. 2026;357:120934.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
48.  Berger A, Jones PJ, Abumweis SS. Plant sterols: factors affecting their efficacy and safety as functional food ingredients. Lipids Health Dis. 2004;3:5.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 192]  [Cited by in RCA: 158]  [Article Influence: 7.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
49.  Katan MB, Grundy SM, Jones P, Law M, Miettinen T, Paoletti R; Stresa Workshop Participants. Efficacy and safety of plant stanols and sterols in the management of blood cholesterol levels. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78:965-978.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 145]  [Cited by in RCA: 245]  [Article Influence: 10.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
50.  Ostlund RE Jr, Racette SB, Stenson WF. Inhibition of cholesterol absorption by phytosterol-replete wheat germ compared with phytosterol-depleted wheat germ. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77:1385-1389.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 81]  [Cited by in RCA: 65]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
51.  Zhang S, Huang Z, Wang X, Lu X, Xie Q, Su Z, Xie J, Chen J, Chen L. Ergosterol and β-sitosterol exert cholesterol-lowering effects by enhancing gut microbiota-mediated cholesterol sulfonation and total bile acid excretion in mice. Food Funct. 2026;17:1568-1587.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
52.  Tang L, Feng Y, Bian Y, Sun Z, Ding Q, Chen D, Wang JR, Mei X. Bile Acid-based Microcapsule-Like Cocrystals of Phytosterols with Enhanced Solubility, Bioavailability, and Bioactivity. Mol Pharm. 2025;22:6907-6919.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
53.  Huang C, Wu Q, Wang J, Cai J, Wang Z, You L, Zhu Z, Ding Y. Regulation of sterol metabolism by gut microbiota and its relevance to disease. Gut Microbes. 2025;17:2589493.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
54.  Collins SL, Stine JG, Bisanz JE, Okafor CD, Patterson AD. Bile acids and the gut microbiota: metabolic interactions and impacts on disease. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2023;21:236-247.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 922]  [Cited by in RCA: 775]  [Article Influence: 258.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (5)]
55.  Ridlon JM, Gaskins HR. Another renaissance for bile acid gastrointestinal microbiology. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024;21:348-364.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in RCA: 114]  [Article Influence: 57.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
56.  Ganamurali N, Sabarathinam S. β-Sitosterol targets the gut-brain-clock axis to ameliorate circadian disruption and metabolic dysfunction: A herb-pharmacomicrobiomic perspective. Chronobiol Int. 2025;42:1633-1643.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
57.  Ma J, Li Y, Yang Y, Zhao L, Jiang Y, Wong TW, Zhang D. Gut-liver axis mechanisms of Hippophae rhamnoides L. in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease prevention. Phytomedicine. 2025;149:157517.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
58.  Pagliai G, Baldi S, Tristan Asensi M, Giangrandi I, Lotti S, Bertelli A, Cei F, Bertorello S, Bartolucci G, Borghi S, Amedei A, Becatti M, Fiorillo C, Gori AM, Marcucci R, Colombini B, Sofi F. Effects of a Probiotic Formulation Based on SF68, Phytosterols, and 6S-5-Methyltetrahydrofolic Acid on Body Composition, Biochemical Parameters, Gut Microbiota, and Gastrointestinal and General Symptoms of Overweight/Obese Subjects: The PrObesity Study. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2025;69:e70198.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
59.  Mohammadi F, Rudkowska I. Dietary Lipids, Gut Microbiota, and Their Metabolites: Insights from Recent Studies. Nutrients. 2025;17:639.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 12]  [Article Influence: 12.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
60.  Berge KE, Tian H, Graf GA, Yu L, Grishin NV, Schultz J, Kwiterovich P, Shan B, Barnes R, Hobbs HH. Accumulation of dietary cholesterol in sitosterolemia caused by mutations in adjacent ABC transporters. Science. 2000;290:1771-1775.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1367]  [Cited by in RCA: 1141]  [Article Influence: 43.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
61.  Jiang J, Zhang H, Hussain M, Abdullah, Feng F, Guan R, Zhong H. Novel Approaches in Glucose and Lipid Metabolism Disorder Therapy: Targeting the Gut Microbiota-Bile Acid Axis. Biology (Basel). 2025;14:802.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in RCA: 7]  [Article Influence: 7.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
62.  Plat J, Kerckhoffs DA, Mensink RP. Therapeutic potential of plant sterols and stanols. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2000;11:571-576.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 63]  [Cited by in RCA: 47]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
63.  Kopylov AT, Malsagova KA, Stepanov AA, Kaysheva AL. Diversity of Plant Sterols Metabolism: The Impact on Human Health, Sport, and Accumulation of Contaminating Sterols. Nutrients. 2021;13:1623.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in RCA: 24]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
64.  Vivancos M, Moreno JJ. beta-Sitosterol modulates antioxidant enzyme response in RAW 264.7 macrophages. Free Radic Biol Med. 2005;39:91-97.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 190]  [Cited by in RCA: 193]  [Article Influence: 9.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
65.  Bakrim S, Benkhaira N, Bourais I, Benali T, Lee LH, El Omari N, Sheikh RA, Goh KW, Ming LC, Bouyahya A. Health Benefits and Pharmacological Properties of Stigmasterol. Antioxidants (Basel). 2022;11:1912.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in RCA: 182]  [Article Influence: 45.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
66.  Calpe-Berdiel L, Escolà-Gil JC, Benítez S, Bancells C, González-Sastre F, Palomer X, Blanco-Vaca F. Dietary phytosterols modulate T-helper immune response but do not induce apparent anti-inflammatory effects in a mouse model of acute, aseptic inflammation. Life Sci. 2007;80:1951-1956.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 33]  [Cited by in RCA: 40]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
67.  El Omari N, Bakrim S, Khalid A, Abdalla AN, Iesa MAM, El Kadri K, Tang SY, Goh BH, Bouyahya A. Unveiling the molecular mechanisms: dietary phytosterols as guardians against cardiovascular diseases. Nat Prod Bioprospect. 2024;14:27.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in RCA: 17]  [Article Influence: 8.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
68.  Ge Q, Yan Y, Luo Y, Teng T, Cao C, Zhao D, Zhang J, Li C, Chen W, Yang B, Yi Z, Chang T, Chen X. Dietary supplements: clinical cholesterol-lowering efficacy and potential mechanisms of action. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2024;75:349-368.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
69.  Dua A, Kumari R, Singh M, Kumar R, Pradeep S, Ojesina AI, Kumar R. Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD): the interplay of gut microbiome, insulin resistance, and diabetes. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025;12:1618275.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in RCA: 17]  [Article Influence: 17.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (4)]
70.  Machado VA, Santisteban ARN, Martins CM, Damasceno NRT, Fonseca FA, Neto AMF, Izar MC. Effects of phytosterol supplementation on lipoprotein subfractions and LDL particle quality. Sci Rep. 2024;14:11108.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in RCA: 6]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
71.  Mohamed DA, Ibrahim G, Mabrok HB, Hamed I. In-vitro, In-vivo and Molecular Docking Studies on Dietary Supplement Containing Polar and Non-Polar fractions of Persea Americana for Management of Diet-related Chronic Diseases. Curr Pharm Biotechnol.  2025.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
72.  Mejía-Guzmán JE, Belmont-Hernández RA, Chávez-Tapia NC, Uribe M, Nuño-Lámbarri N. Metabolic-Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: Molecular Mechanisms, Clinical Implications, and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26:2959.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 35]  [Cited by in RCA: 44]  [Article Influence: 44.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (6)]
73.  Song L, Qu D, Zhang Q, Jiang J, Zhou H, Jiang R, Li Y, Zhang Y, Yan H. Phytosterol esters attenuate hepatic steatosis in rats with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease rats fed a high-fat diet. Sci Rep. 2017;7:41604.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 42]  [Cited by in RCA: 54]  [Article Influence: 6.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
74.  Shi L, Liu Y, Yan Y, Bian D, Jin J, Jin Q, Yan J, Wang X. Hepatic Lipidomics Unravels the Lipid-Lowering and Anti-Obesity Efficacy of Diacylglycerol Oil: Mechanistic Insights From High-Fat Diet-Induced Obese Mice. Food Sci Nutr. 2025;13:e70395.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
75.  Frasinariu O, Serban R, Trandafir LM, Miron I, Starcea M, Vasiliu I, Alisi A, Temneanu OR. The Role of Phytosterols in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Nutrients. 2022;14:2187.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in RCA: 31]  [Article Influence: 7.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
76.  Lu B, Xiao F, Zhang Q, Xie Y, Wang M, Simal-Gandara J, Liu Y, Efferth T, Huang W, Shen J, Xiao J. Stigmasterol attenuates atherosclerosis by inhibiting inflammatory signaling and foam cell formation. IMetaOmics. 2025;2:e70056.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
77.  Liu F, Lv J, Chen Y, Wang L, Liu Z, Li X. Lipoic acid in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a review. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2025;22:56.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
78.  Zatterale F, Longo M, Naderi J, Raciti GA, Desiderio A, Miele C, Beguinot F. Chronic Adipose Tissue Inflammation Linking Obesity to Insulin Resistance and Type 2 Diabetes. Front Physiol. 2019;10:1607.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 954]  [Cited by in RCA: 814]  [Article Influence: 135.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (4)]
79.  Kong Y, Yang H, Nie R, Zhang X, Zuo F, Zhang H, Nian X. Obesity: pathophysiology and therapeutic interventions. Mol Biomed. 2025;6:25.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 33]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
80.  Gao Y, Pan D, Xia J, Xia H, Wang S, Liao W, Yang L, Sun G. Phytosterols and Phospholipids Synergistically Improve Lipid Metabolism and Oxidative Stress: Evidence From Animal Model and Human Randomized Controlled Trials. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2025;69:e70248.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
81.  Li YC, Li CL, Li R, Chen Y, Zhang M, Guo PP, Shi D, Ji XN, Feng RN, Sun CH. Associations of dietary phytosterols with blood lipid profiles and prevalence of obesity in Chinese adults, a cross-sectional study. Lipids Health Dis. 2018;17:54.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in RCA: 23]  [Article Influence: 2.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
82.  Ansari P, Khan JT, Chowdhury S, Reberio AD, Kumar S, Seidel V, Abdel-Wahab YHA, Flatt PR. Plant-Based Diets and Phytochemicals in the Management of Diabetes Mellitus and Prevention of Its Complications: A Review. Nutrients. 2024;16:3709.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 21]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
83.  Chen X, Memory Kunda LS, Li X, Wang N, Huang Y, Hao Y, He Q, Liao W, Chen J. A Comprehensive Review of Beneficial Effects of Phytosterols on Glycolipid Metabolism and Related Mechanisms. J Agric Food Chem. 2025;73:3826-3841.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 12]  [Article Influence: 12.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
84.  Randeni N, Luo J, Xu B. Unveiling the Molecular Mechanisms of Natural Triterpenoids From Mushrooms Against Type 2 Diabetes: A Critical Review. Phytother Res. 2025;39:3466-3485.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
85.  Babu S, Krishnan M, Rajagopal P, Periyasamy V, Veeraraghavan V, Govindan R, Jayaraman S. Beta-sitosterol attenuates insulin resistance in adipose tissue via IRS-1/Akt mediated insulin signaling in high fat diet and sucrose induced type-2 diabetic rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 2020;873:173004.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 100]  [Cited by in RCA: 75]  [Article Influence: 12.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
86.  Yang XF, Shang DJ. The role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ in lipid metabolism and inflammation in atherosclerosis. Cell Biol Int. 2023;47:1469-1487.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 39]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
87.  Lv WJ, Huang JY, Lin J, Ma YM, He SQ, Zhang YW, Wang TZ, Cheng K, Xiong Y, Sun FG, Pan ZC, Sun JB, Mao W, Guo SN. Phytosterols Alleviate Hyperlipidemia by Regulating Gut Microbiota and Cholesterol Metabolism in Mice. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2023;2023:6409385.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 19]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
88.  Lee YM, Haastert B, Scherbaum W, Hauner H. A phytosterol-enriched spread improves the lipid profile of subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus--a randomized controlled trial under free-living conditions. Eur J Nutr. 2003;42:111-117.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 48]  [Cited by in RCA: 41]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
89.  Wien M, Oda K, Sabaté J. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of incorporating peanuts into an American Diabetes Association meal plan on the nutrient profile of the total diet and cardiometabolic parameters of adults with type 2 diabetes. Nutr J. 2014;13:10.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 41]  [Cited by in RCA: 41]  [Article Influence: 3.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
90.  Poli A, Marangoni F, Corsini A, Manzato E, Marrocco W, Martini D, Medea G, Visioli F. Phytosterols, Cholesterol Control, and Cardiovascular Disease. Nutrients. 2021;13:2810.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in RCA: 88]  [Article Influence: 17.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
91.  Zhang X, Wang J, Zhu L, Wang X, Meng F, Xia L, Zhang H. Advances in Stigmasterol on its anti-tumor effect and mechanism of action. Front Oncol. 2022;12:1101289.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 53]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
92.  Parida R, Kumar Panda M, Kumar Behera S. Phytosterols: Natural compounds with multifaceted therapeutic potentials – A review. Pharmacol Res - Nat Prod. 2026;10:100586.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
93.  Moon DO, Kim MO, Choi YH, Kim GY. beta-Sitosterol induces G2/M arrest, endoreduplication, and apoptosis through the Bcl-2 and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways. Cancer Lett. 2008;264:181-191.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 59]  [Cited by in RCA: 58]  [Article Influence: 3.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
94.  Wang H, Wang Z, Zhang Z, Liu J, Hong L. β-Sitosterol as a Promising Anticancer Agent for Chemoprevention and Chemotherapy: Mechanisms of Action and Future Prospects. Adv Nutr. 2023;14:1085-1110.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 74]  [Article Influence: 24.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
95.  Grattan BJ Jr. Plant sterols as anticancer nutrients: evidence for their role in breast cancer. Nutrients. 2013;5:359-387.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 71]  [Cited by in RCA: 59]  [Article Influence: 4.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
96.  Mollinedo F, Gajate C. Lipid rafts as signaling hubs in cancer cell survival/death and invasion: implications in tumor progression and therapy: Thematic Review Series: Biology of Lipid Rafts. J Lipid Res. 2020;61:611-635.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 246]  [Cited by in RCA: 224]  [Article Influence: 37.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
97.  Shahzad N, Khan W, Md S, Ali A, Saluja SS, Sharma S, Al-Allaf FA, Abduljaleel Z, Ibrahim IAA, Abdel-Wahab AF, Afify MA, Al-Ghamdi SS. Phytosterols as a natural anticancer agent: Current status and future perspective. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;88:786-794.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 137]  [Cited by in RCA: 161]  [Article Influence: 17.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
98.  Salehi B, Quispe C, Sharifi-Rad J, Cruz-Martins N, Nigam M, Mishra AP, Konovalov DA, Orobinskaya V, Abu-Reidah IM, Zam W, Sharopov F, Venneri T, Capasso R, Kukula-Koch W, Wawruszak A, Koch W. Phytosterols: From Preclinical Evidence to Potential Clinical Applications. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:599959.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 131]  [Cited by in RCA: 169]  [Article Influence: 33.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
99.  Sharma N, Tan MA, An SSA. Phytosterols: Potential Metabolic Modulators in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:12255.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in RCA: 59]  [Article Influence: 11.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
100.  Rui X, Wenfang L, Jing C, Meng C, Chengcheng D, Jiqu X, Shuang R. Neuroprotective effects of phytosterol esters against high cholesterol-induced cognitive deficits in aged rat. Food Funct. 2017;8:1323-1332.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 32]  [Cited by in RCA: 28]  [Article Influence: 3.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
101.  Ricci RP, Foo CX, Ronacher K, Cullen CL. Oxysterol signaling in the central nervous system: cellular mechanisms and implications for neurodegeneration. Front Mol Neurosci. 2026;19:1709065.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
102.  Shen Y, Liu F, Zhang M. Therapeutic potential of plant-derived natural compounds in Alzheimer's disease: Targeting microglia-mediated neuroinflammation. Biomed Pharmacother. 2024;178:117235.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in RCA: 19]  [Article Influence: 9.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
103.  Karim N, Khan I, Abdelhalim A, Halim SA, Khan A, Al-Harrasi A. Stigmasterol can be new steroidal drug for neurological disorders: Evidence of the GABAergic mechanism via receptor modulation. Phytomedicine. 2021;90:153646.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in RCA: 36]  [Article Influence: 7.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
104.  Spinedi M, Clark C, Zullo L, Kerksiek A, Pistis G, Castelao E, von Gunten A, Preisig M, Lütjohann D, Popp J. Cholesterol-metabolism, plant sterols, and long-term cognitive decline in older people - Effects of sex and APOEe4. iScience. 2024;27:109013.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
105.  Zhang R, Wuerch E, Yong VW, Xue M. LXR agonism for CNS diseases: promises and challenges. J Neuroinflammation. 2024;21:97.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 23]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
106.  Rahman MA, Dash R, Sohag AAM, Alam M, Rhim H, Ha H, Moon IS, Uddin MJ, Hannan MA. Prospects of Marine Sterols against Pathobiology of Alzheimer's Disease: Pharmacological Insights and Technological Advances. Mar Drugs. 2021;19:167.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 26]  [Article Influence: 5.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
107.  Ganamurali N, S B V, Sabarathinam S. Phytosterols as modulators of gut-brain axis and neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease: A novel therapeutic avenue in aging research. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2025;254:106836.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
108.  Mohamed DA, Mohamed RS, Fouda K, Mabrok HB. Dietary supplements for prevention of Alzheimer's disease: In vivo and in silico molecular docking studies. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2025;28:170-180.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
109.  Bouic PJ. The role of phytosterols and phytosterolins in immune modulation: a review of the past 10 years. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2001;4:471-475.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 160]  [Cited by in RCA: 136]  [Article Influence: 5.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
110.  Hu Q, Zhuo Z, Fang S, Zhang Y, Feng J. Phytosterols improve immunity and exert anti-inflammatory activity in weaned piglets. J Sci Food Agric. 2017;97:4103-4109.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 30]  [Cited by in RCA: 29]  [Article Influence: 3.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
111.  Garcia C, Andersen CJ, Blesso CN. The Role of Lipids in the Regulation of Immune Responses. Nutrients. 2023;15:3899.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 93]  [Cited by in RCA: 78]  [Article Influence: 26.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
112.  Yuan L, Zhang F, Shen M, Jia S, Xie J. Phytosterols Suppress Phagocytosis and Inhibit Inflammatory Mediators via ERK Pathway on LPS-Triggered Inflammatory Responses in RAW264.7 Macrophages and the Correlation with Their Structure. Foods. 2019;8:582.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 29]  [Cited by in RCA: 83]  [Article Influence: 11.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
113.  Plat J, Baumgartner S, Vanmierlo T, Lütjohann D, Calkins KL, Burrin DG, Guthrie G, Thijs C, Te Velde AA, Vreugdenhil ACE, Sverdlov R, Garssen J, Wouters K, Trautwein EA, Wolfs TG, van Gorp C, Mulder MT, Riksen NP, Groen AK, Mensink RP. Plant-based sterols and stanols in health & disease: "Consequences of human development in a plant-based environment?". Prog Lipid Res. 2019;74:87-102.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 55]  [Cited by in RCA: 91]  [Article Influence: 13.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
114.  Jayawardena TU, Sanjeewa KKA, Lee HG, Nagahawatta DP, Yang HW, Kang MC, Jeon YJ. Particulate Matter-Induced Inflammation/Oxidative Stress in Macrophages: Fucosterol from Padina boryana as a Potent Protector, Activated via NF-κB/MAPK Pathways and Nrf2/HO-1 Involvement. Mar Drugs. 2020;18:628.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in RCA: 31]  [Article Influence: 5.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
115.  Awad AB, Fink CS. Phytosterols as anticancer dietary components: evidence and mechanism of action. J Nutr. 2000;130:2127-2130.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 378]  [Cited by in RCA: 294]  [Article Influence: 11.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
116.  Raeisi M, Yousefi M, Motavalli R, Hassanzadeh A, Seddighi N, Mehri M, Ebrahimi S, Mehdizadeh A, Abbasi K. Unpacking the lipid-immune axis in health and disease. Immunol Cell Biol. 2026;104:208-233.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
117.  Liu Y, Li W, Qian J, Wu M, Du H, Xu L, Liu S, Yi J, He G. Serum phytosterols associate with T helper 1 cytokine concentration in pregnant women. Food Sci Nutr. 2020;8:3893-3899.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
118.  Zhu Q, Wu J, Li J, Wang S, He D, Lian X. Effects of phytosterols' intake on systemic and tissue-specific lipid metabolism in C57BL/6J mice. Front Nutr. 2022;9:924236.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
119.  Monteleone G, Moscardelli A, Colella A, Marafini I, Salvatori S. Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: Common and different pathogenic and clinical features. Autoimmun Rev. 2023;22:103410.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 64]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
120.  Liang Y, Liu M, Cheng Y, Wang X, Wang W. Prevention and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis through traditional Chinese medicine: role of the gut microbiota. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1233994.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 32]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
121.  Bouic PJ, Lamprecht JH. Plant sterols and sterolins: a review of their immune-modulating properties. Altern Med Rev. 1999;4:170-177.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
122.  Navarro A, De las Heras B, Villar A. Anti-inflammatory and immunomodulating properties of a sterol fraction from Sideritis foetens Clem. Biol Pharm Bull. 2001;24:470-473.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 113]  [Cited by in RCA: 95]  [Article Influence: 3.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
123.  Gabay O, Sanchez C, Salvat C, Chevy F, Breton M, Nourissat G, Wolf C, Jacques C, Berenbaum F. Stigmasterol: a phytosterol with potential anti-osteoarthritic properties. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010;18:106-116.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 195]  [Cited by in RCA: 201]  [Article Influence: 12.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
124.  Mohamed DA, Mohamed RS, Fouda K. Anti-inflammatory potential of chia seeds oil and mucilage against adjuvant-induced arthritis in obese and non-obese rats. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2020;31:20190236.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in RCA: 18]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
125.  Mohamed DA, Ramadan AA, Mabrok HB, Ibrahim GE, Mohammed SE. Persea americana Peel: A Promising Source of Nutraceutical for the Mitigation of Cardiovascular Risk in Arthritic Rats Through the Gut-Joint Axis. Biomolecules. 2025;15:590.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
126.  Alwarith J, Kahleova H, Rembert E, Yonas W, Dort S, Calcagno M, Burgess N, Crosby L, Barnard ND. Nutrition Interventions in Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Potential Use of Plant-Based Diets. A Review. Front Nutr. 2019;6:141.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 43]  [Cited by in RCA: 78]  [Article Influence: 11.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
Footnotes

Peer review: Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Biochemistry and molecular biology

Country of origin: Egypt

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific quality: Grade A, Grade B, Grade E

Novelty: Grade B, Grade B, Grade E

Creativity or innovation: Grade A, Grade B, Grade E

Scientific significance: Grade B, Grade B, Grade E

P-Reviewer: Corso G, MD, PhD, Professor, Italy; Singh PK, PhD, Post Doctoral Researcher, United States; Wang JY, China S-Editor: Luo ML L-Editor: Filipodia P-Editor: Zhao YQ

Write to the Help Desk