BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Case Control Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Biol Chem. Jun 5, 2026; 17(2): 118440
Published online Jun 5, 2026. doi: 10.4331/wjbc.v17.i2.118440
Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics, n (%)
Characteristics
Total (n = 192)
T2DM (n = 96)
Control (n = 96)
Age group (years)
    30-4427 (14.1)11 (11.5)16 (16.7)
    45-5964 (33.3)34 (35.4)30 (31.3)
    ≥ 60101 (52.6)51 (53.1)50 (52.0)
Gender
    Female72 (37.5)36 (37.5)36 (37.5)
    Male120 (62.5)60 (62.5)60 (62.5)
Educational status
    No formal18 (9.4)10 (10.4)8 (8.3)
    Primary75 (39.1)38 (39.6)37 (38.5)
    Secondary70 (36.5)32 (33.3)38 (39.6)
    Tertiary29 (15.1)16 (16.7)13 (13.5)
Residence
    Rural36 (18.8)15 (15.6)21 (21.9)
    Semi-urban95 (49.5)35 (36.5)60 (62.5)
    Urban61 (31.8)46 (47.9)15 (15.6)
Marital status
    Married17 (8.9)13 (13.5)4 (4.2)
    Single110 (57.3)51 (53.1)59 (61.5)
    Separated65 (33.9)32 (33.3)33 (34.4)
Occupation
    Unemployment77 (40.1)31 (32.3)46 (47.9)
    Self-employment73 (38.0)33 (34.4)40 (41.7)
    Formal employed42 (21.9)32 (33.3)10 (10.4)
Table 2 Comparison of measured anthropometric and biochemical parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and healthy controls in Buea Regional Hospital, mean ± SD
Variable
T2DM (n = 96)
Control (n = 96)
t test
P value
Weight (kg)76.29 ± 16.375.2 ± 14.31.700.34
Height (m)1.61 ± 0.11.43 ± 2.10.450.55
BMI (kg/m2)29.45 ± 6.627.38 ± 5.82.300.023
WC (cm)101.27 ± 18.398.23 ± 15.60.320.64
SBP (mm/Hg)126 ± 24.1119 ± 14.20.030.99
DBP (mm/Hg)84.34 ± 1.481.29 ± 3.60.330.32
HbA1c (%)7.65 ± 0.854.83 ± 0.5127.80< 0.001
HDL-C (mg/dL)44.04 ± 11.2956.98 ± 5.57-10.00< 0.001
LDL-C (mg/dL)130.08 ± 14.98120.9 ± 9.9116.00< 0.001
TG (mg/dL)138.60 ± 25.14107.42 ± 11.2511.40< 0.001
TC (mg/dL)200.13 ± 15.15175.85 ± 9.6613.30< 0.001
MDA (nmol/mL)1.45 ± 0.620.75 ± 0.2610.03< 0.001
FPG (mg/dL)181.37 ± 89.2389.00 ± 80.0010.03< 0.001
CAT (U/L)49.23 ± 13.1758 ± 14.2312.200.04
Table 3 Comparison of biochemical parameters of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus at Limbe Regional Hospital based on glycemic status, mean ± SD
Parameter
Good glycemic control (n = 19)
Poor glycemic control (n = 77)
t test
P value
HbA1c (%)6.40 ± 0.388.02 ± 0.67-9.1< 0.001
HDL-C (mg/dL)58.69 ± 4.7839.98 ± 9.277.7< 0.001
LDL-C (mg/dL)107.06 ± 6.04136.60 ± 11.42-9.9< 0.001
TG (mg/dL)102.25 ± 12.60145.08 ± 20.52-7.8< 0.001
TC (mg/dL)184.88 ± 6.87204.06 ± 16.14-4.6< 0.001
MDA (nmol/mL)0.78 ± 0.141.61 ± 0.58-6.0< 0.001
Catalases (U/L)54.58 ± 17.1933.26 ± 12.06-6.3< 0.001
Table 4 Correlation between oxidative stress markers and markers of glycemic control
HbA1c (%)
MDA
FPG
Catalase
r
P value
r
P value
r
P value
r
P value
HbA1c (%)1
MDA (nmol/mL)0.846< 0.0011
FPG (mg/dL)-0.1290.21-0.1230.2331
Catalase (U/L)-0.567< 0.001-0.568< 0.0010.080.4371
Table 5 Association between antioxidant enzyme (catalase) with lipid peroxidation and diabetes control, n (%)
CharacteristicsCatalase activity
χ2 testP value
Low
Normal
MDA10.480.001
    Normal5 (18.5)22 (81.5)
    Abnormal (high)38 (55.1)31 (44.9)
Diabetes control (HbA1c concentration)5.3980.002
    Good control4 (21.1)15 (78.9)
    Poor control39 (50.6)38 (49.4)


Write to the Help Desk