Hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (HR+/HER2-mBC) is incurable, but recent progress has been made in developing new treatment options and the treatment landscape is rapidly shifting. There are published recommendations for treatment choices and sequencing to help guide oncologists in treating HR+/HER2-mBC, but little evidence has been published regarding real-world practice patterns. The REal-world TReatment patterns And Considerations of Toxicity in HR+/HER2-mBC (RETRACT) survey was designed to evaluate real-world practice patterns in the testing and management of this disease by US oncologists. The survey questions were answered via an online platform and the data were anonymized before analysis. A total of 150 oncologists practicing at academic and community centers completed the survey. The results showed this sample of oncologists largely followed recommended best practices for testing biomarkers, selecting treatments, and managing adverse events. However, several items did show substantial minorities of oncologists not in alignment with recommendations in areas including the definition and treatment of visceral crisis, ideal treatment for patients with endocrine resistance, the routine use of next-generation sequencing for biomarker testing, and the use of prophylactic measures for treatment-related adverse events in patients receiving alpelisib.

This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors with endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone in treating advanced or metastatic estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor (ER/PR) + breast cancer.

We conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing mTOR inhibitors plus endocrine therapy with endocrine therapy alone up to September 2024.

This analysis included 10 RCTs comprising 3,337 patients. Relative to endocrine therapy alone, the combination of mTOR inhibitors and endocrine therapy significantly improved the clinical benefit rate (RR = 1.41, p < 0.001), overall response rate (RR = 1.40, p = 0.006), progression-free survival (PFS; HR = 0.67, p < 0.001), and overall survival (OS; HR = 0.86, p = 0.056), although the improvement in OS was not statistically significant. Subgroup analyses indicated a more pronounced PFS advantage in patients under 65 years of age (HR = 0.55, p = 0.013) and those who had previously received chemotherapy (HR = 0.51, p = 0.001). However, the incidence of adverse events was higher in the combination therapy group, notably stomatitis (p < 0.001), elevated aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase (p = 0.04), and diarrhea (p = 0.01).

The combination of mTOR inhibitors with endocrine therapy offers superior efficacy with manageable toxicities in patients with advanced or metastatic ER/PR+ breast cancer.

The randomized, double-blind UNIRAD trial evaluating the addition of 2 years of everolimus to endocrine therapy in patients with high-risk, early luminal breast cancer failed to demonstrate a benefit. We report the subgroup analyses.

We randomly assigned 1278 patients in a 1 : 1 ratio to receive 2 years of placebo or everolimus, added to endocrine therapy for up to 4 years after initiation. Randomization was stratified by endocrine therapy agent, prior adjuvant versus neoadjuvant therapy, progesterone receptor expression, and lymph node involvement. Subgroup analyses by each stratification factor were pre-specified. Post hoc analyses were carried out according to menopausal status and age. Treatment adherence was also analyzed.

We observed a limited trend toward more favorable prognostic features in tamoxifen-treated patients, with more frequent estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive tumors (88.5% versus 84.1%, P = 0.026) and less frequent pN2-positive status (39.8% versus 46.0%, P = 0.032). In premenopausal women, we observed a numerical benefit of everolimus: 3-year disease-free survival was 86% in the placebo group and 90% in the everolimus group (hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.43-1.34). In premenopausal patients treated with tamoxifen (n = 153; 12.3%), we observed an even stronger trend in favor of everolimus as 3-year DFS was 84% in the placebo group and 91% in the everolimus group (hazard ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.28-1.02). Early discontinuation of either everolimus or placebo was less frequent in the tamoxifen group than in the aromatase inhibitor group: 48.0% versus 56.9% (P = 0.028).

The present post hoc analyses generate hypotheses regarding the interaction between menopausal status, tamoxifen, and everolimus in patients with high-risk, ER-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-negative early breast cancer. They suggest that tamoxifen alone is an underpowered endocrine treatment in high-risk premenopausal patients.

Endocrine therapy is the backbone of treatment for HR + /HER2- MBC. The introduction of novel endocrine-based therapies has changed the landscape of metastatic breast cancer care, with even more promising agents on the horizon. Given the consistent success in prolonging PFS and OS, CDK4/6 inhibitors should be used as first-line treatment. Once secondary resistance eventually develops after use of a CDK4/6 inhibitor, use of monotherapy with either AI or fulvestrant has shown poor outcome. For example, in the control group of the EMERALD trial, in which all the patients were required to have previously received a CDK4/6 inhibitor, median progression-free survival with endocrine therapy was only 1.9 months. Based on the emerging evidence, molecular profiling of tissue or liquid biopsy at progression of disease is crucial to select future therapy. For patients whose tumors harbor ESR1 mutations, oral SERDs are the preferred option. For those with PIK3CA or AKT1 mutation or PTEN inactivation, combination therapy with the AKT pathway inhibitor capivasertib is recommended. Alpelisib, the first AKT1 inhibitor approved in combination therapy with fulvestrant in PIK3CA mutated tumors only, is now less in favor given its challenging side effect profile. When mutations are not present, options include combination therapy with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus or changing endocrine therapy and continuing a CDK 4/6 inhibitor. In patients with short response to CDK4/6 inhibitors suggesting endocrine resistant disease, chemotherapy or antibody-drug conjugates should be considered. With better understanding of the mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors, additional mutations could be identified and potentially targeted in order to provide individualized treatment options. Optimal sequencing of treatment options depends on several factors: (1) the presence of specific molecular aberrations; (2) previous treatment history, duration of response and patient's performance status; (3) balance between maximizing survival benefits with quality of life/toxicities; (4) disease burden. In the upcoming years, we anticipate FDA approvals for more of the SERD molecules both in monotherapy and in combination therapy which will continue to expand the options available for HR + /HER2- MBC patients.

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignant tumor in women and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women. As one of the most common subtypes of breast cancer, patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer usually experience disease progression over an extended period of time, triggering the search for therapeutic strategies other than endocrine therapy. In recent years, continuous research on various targets has led to dramatic changes in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients, resulting in prolonged clinical survival. With the redefinition of human epidermal growth factor-2 (HER2) expression, more precise and individualized treatment is possible. This review comprehensively reviews targeted therapies and critical clinical trials for HR+ breast cancer and tracks the latest advances. It also provides valuable insights into the future direction of targeted therapies.

Resistance to endocrine therapy (ET) is common in estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer. Multiple studies have demonstrated that upregulation of MAPK signaling pathways contributes to ET resistance. Herein we show that vandetanib treatment enhances sensitivity to ET in ET-sensitive and -resistant ER+ breast cancer models. Vandetanib treatment alters the gene expression program of ER+ breast cancer cells resulting in a less proliferative and more estrogen responsive Luminal-A like character. Tyrosine kinase network reprogramming was assessed using multiplexed kinase inhibitor beads-mass spectrometry (MIB/MS) assay to identify adaptive resistance mechanisms to vandetanib treatment, including upregulation of HER2 activity. Co-treatment to inhibit HER2 with lapatinib enhanced sensitivity to vandetanib, demonstrating biologic activity of HER2 upregulation. Using a CRISPR knockout model, we demonstrate that vandetanib effects are partially mediated by RET receptor tyrosine kinase. Finally, we use our operating room-to-laboratory assay that measures drug response in individual primary tumor cells in short term cultures to demonstrate conserved gene expression changes, including increased HER2 activity signatures, in vandetanib treated cells, and identify features associated with vandetanib response. These results support future investigation of RET targeting strategies considering reprogrammed networks, such as activated HER2, in patients with ET resistant ER+ breast cancer.

Breast cancer, characterized by unique epidemiological patterns and significant heterogeneity, remains one of the leading causes of malignancy-related deaths in women. The increasingly nuanced molecular subtypes of breast cancer have enhanced the comprehension and precision treatment of this disease. The mechanisms of tumorigenesis and progression of breast cancer have been central to scientific research, with investigations spanning various perspectives such as tumor stemness, intra-tumoral microbiota, and circadian rhythms. Technological advancements, particularly those integrated with artificial intelligence, have significantly improved the accuracy of breast cancer detection and diagnosis. The emergence of novel therapeutic concepts and drugs represents a paradigm shift towards personalized medicine. Evidence suggests that optimal diagnosis and treatment models tailored to individual patient risk and expected subtypes are crucial, supporting the era of precision oncology for breast cancer. Despite the rapid advancements in oncology and the increasing emphasis on the clinical precision treatment of breast cancer, a comprehensive update and summary of the panoramic knowledge related to this disease are needed. In this review, we provide a thorough overview of the global status of breast cancer, including its epidemiology, risk factors, pathophysiology, and molecular subtyping. Additionally, we elaborate on the latest research into mechanisms contributing to breast cancer progression, emerging treatment strategies, and long-term patient management. This review offers valuable insights into the latest advancements in Breast Cancer Research, thereby facilitating future progress in both basic research and clinical application.

Tamoxifen, a common adjuvant therapy for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, is associated with an increased risk of endometrial pathologies, such as hyperplasia, polyps, and carcinoma. This study investigates rapamycin, an mTOR inhibitor, as a potential novel strategy for preventing tamoxifen-induced endometrial proliferation. This in vitro study utilised endometrial stromal cells isolated from infertile women. The cells were treated with tamoxifen alone or in combination with rapamycin, and proliferation was assessed using the CCK-8 assay. The activation of the mTOR pathway, as well as apoptosis and cell cycle markers, was evaluated by Western blotting to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying these effects. The study design emphasised simulating clinically relevant exposure levels. Tamoxifen significantly increased endometrial cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. Rapamycin effectively inhibited this proliferation, even at concentrations lower than those typically observed in clinical settings. Quantitative analysis by Western blotting showed activation of the mTOR pathway and cell cycle in the tamoxifen group, and inhibition of these pathways in the tamoxifen plus rapamycin combination group, whereas there was no change in apoptosis. In conclusion, rapamycin shows promise as a prophylactic agent against tamoxifen-induced endometrial pathologies, with potential implications for fertility preservation and endometrial protection in breast cancer patients.

The complex signaling network within the breast tumor microenvironment is crucial for its growth, metastasis, angiogenesis, therapy escape, stem cell maintenance, and immunomodulation. An array of secretory factors and their receptors activate downstream signaling cascades regulating breast cancer progression and metastasis. Among various signaling pathways, the EGFR, ER, Notch, and Hedgehog signaling pathways have recently been identified as crucial in terms of breast cancer proliferation, survival, differentiation, maintenance of CSCs, and therapy failure. These receptors mediate various downstream signaling pathways such as MAPK, including MEK/ERK signaling pathways that promote common pro-oncogenic signaling, whereas dysregulation of PI3K/Akt, Wnt/β-catenin, and JAK/STAT activates key oncogenic events such as drug resistance, CSC enrichment, and metabolic reprogramming. Additionally, these cascades orchestrate an intricate interplay between stromal cells, immune cells, and tumor cells. Metabolic reprogramming and adaptations contribute to aggressive breast cancer and are unresponsive to therapy. Herein, recent insights into the novel signaling pathways operating within the breast TME that aid in their advancement are emphasized and current developments in practices targeting the breast TME to enhance treatment efficacy are reviewed.

Everolimus was the first orally targeted therapy for certain cancers. It was introduced before CDK4/6 inhibitors and is widely used to treat advanced hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer. This study presents comprehensive findings including updated data and long-term survival analyses focusing on patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer who received everolimus-based treatment. The objectives were to assess the impact of everolimus on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) by treatment line, and to evaluate its role in therapeutic strategies in a real-world setting.

We included 299 women aged over 20 years with histologically confirmed HR+/HER2- breast cancer who received everolimus-based treatment from multiple medical centers in Taiwan. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with the log-rank test for comparisons. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Adverse effects were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.

The median PFS was 5.6 months, and the median OS was 60.1 months. Patients receiving everolimus treatment in three or more lines and those who underwent chemotherapy before everolimus-based treatment had a significantly shorter PFS but longer OS. Patients with liver and central nervous system metastases had significantly shorter PFS and OS. The disease control rate was 51.5%, and the overall response rate was 8.0%.

These findings support current guidelines and advocate for the inclusion of everolimus in treatment plans for patients with metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer, particularly in late-line treatment, with careful consideration of the benefit-risk profile for each patient.

Everolimus is beneficial for patients with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). However, some patients developed drug resistance and the well-established predictor for everolimus efficacy was limited.

The study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of everolimus in different treatment lines and identify several clinicopathological markers to estimate everolimus efficacy in patients with HR+/HER2- ABC.

This was a retrospective and multicenter study.

Between 2014 and 2022, more than 2000 patients with tumors who received everolimus were collected from multiple cancer centers in China (National Cancer Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute). A training cohort and two validation cohorts were developed.

The training cohort included 338 patients. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for everolimus was 5.6 months, with an objective response rate of 25.1% and a clinical benefit rate of 54.4%. PFS was significantly worse from first-line (1L) to second-line (2L) to third-line (3L), with PFS1L for 13.5 months, PFS2L for 6.1 months, and PFS3L for 4.1 months (p = 2.9e-6, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.61-0.82). The clinicopathological characteristics, including post-1L everolimus treatment, Ki67 index of more than 40%, more than two metastatic sites at first recurrence, and receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, were independent risk factors for PFS. A predictive model for everolimus efficacy was established using these four factors. In the low-risk group, patients achieved a median PFS of 12.6 months, significantly longer compared to 2.7 months for those in the high-risk group (p = 2.4e-64, HR = 9.41, 95% CI = 7.05-12.56). The area under the curve was 0.96, 0.95, and 0.94 for 6-month, 1-year, and 3-year PFS, respectively. Internal validation cohort (PFS 18.4 vs 3.1 months, p = 3.6e-11, HR = 3.78, 95% CI = 2.49-5.74) and external validation cohort (PFS 13.5 vs 3.1 months, p = 2.9e-10, HR = 11.53, 95% CI = 4.68-28.37) confirmed its power for estimating clinical benefits of everolimus.

A predictive model was successfully established to predict survival outcomes for everolimus in patients with HR+/HER2- ABC, which may provide references for the management of everolimus in Chinese patients with HR+/HER2- ABC.

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) and everolimus (EVE) are effective for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the efficacy of different sequences of CDK4/6i and EVE are largely unknown. The study aimed to explore the efficacy of different sequences in China.

146 patients with HR+/HER2- MBC who received both CDK4/6i and EVE in salvage setting were collected. Objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were investigated.

56 patients received CDK4/6i prior to EVE (Group A), 90 patients received CDK4/6i subsequent to EVE (Group B). The median PFS of CDK4/6i and EVE in Group A vs Group B were 8.4m and 2.5m vs 4.6m and 6.1m respectively. The total PFS of first-line and second-line endocrine therapy were not different between Group A and Group B [13.1m vs 17.7m (P = 0.330, HR = 0.738, 95%CI: 0.399-1.365)]. The 5y OS of patients in Group A or Group B were 62.0 % vs 57.4 %, P = 0.569.

We found that no matter CDK4/6i or EVE was used first, the survival were not significantly different between Group A and Group B. Both can be clinical options.

Background: Trastuzumab resistance is associated with overexpressing the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2), which results from the altered phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway in breast cancer patients. Objective: We quantified the frequency of PI3K enzyme single and double-point mutations in Mexican patients with HER-2 overexpressing breast cancer and its association with clinical-pathological variables. Methods: We embedded HER-2 breast samples in paraffin from 60 patients, extracted their DNA, and evaluated PI3K mutations in 49 HER-2-positive breast tumors. We focused on mutations for one exon 20 (H1047R) and two exon 9 PI3K (E545K, E542K) hotspots and characterized them as single and double-point mutations. The mean patient follow-up was 86 months. Results: Of 49 patients who tested positive for HER-2 breast cancer, 14.28% showed mutations in PI3K, 71.42% single-point, and 28.56% double-point mutations. We found single-point mutations in H1047R (42.85%) and E545K (28.57%). Only two patients exhibited double-point mutations: one in E542K/E545K and another in H1047R/E545K (14.28% each). Although we observed lower survival in patients with mutations in PI3K, we did not find a significant association between these factors (p = 0.191). However, single and double-point mutations in PI3K were significantly associated with the clinical stages of diagnosis and tumor size (p = 0.027 and p = 0.04, respectively). Conclusion: Single and double-point mutations in PI3K are related to tumor size and advanced clinical-pathological traits in Mexican patients with HER-2 overexpression, and future molecular studies are necessary to understand these findings.

Drug combination therapy, involving the use of two or more drugs, has been widely employed to treat complex diseases such as cancer. It enhances therapeutic efficacy, reduces drug resistance, and minimizes side effects. However, traditional methods to identify effective drug combinations are time-consuming, costly, and less efficient than computational methods. Therefore, developing computational approaches to predict drug combinations has become increasingly important. In this paper, we developed the Random Walk with Restart for Drug Combination (RWRDC) model to predict effective drug combinations for cancer therapy. The RWRDC model offers a quantitative mathematical method for predicting the potential effective drug combinations. Cross-validation results indicate that the RWRDC model outperforms other predictive models, particularly in breast, colorectal, and lung cancer predictions across various performance metrics. We have theoretically proven the convergence of its algorithm and provided an explanation for the algorithm's rationality. A targeted case study on breast cancer further highlights the capability of RWRDC to identify effective drug combinations. These findings highlight our model as a novel and effective tool for discovering potential effective drug combinations, offering new possibilities in therapy. Additionally, the graph-based framework of RWRDC holds potential for predicting drug combinations in other complex diseases, expanding its utility in the medical field.

Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT-serine threonine kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway abnormalities contribute to endocrine resistance. Everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, improved progression-free survival in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (BC) when combined with endocrine therapy (ET). In this phase III randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we assessed the efficacy of everolimus + ET as adjuvant therapy in high-risk, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative BC after adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to physician's choice ET and 1 year of everolimus (10 mg orally once daily) or placebo stratified by risk group. The primary end point was invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) evaluated by a stratified log-rank test with the hazard ratio (HR) estimated by Cox regression. Subset analyses included preplanned evaluation by risk group and exploratory analyses by menopausal status and age. Secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and safety. Everolimus did not improve IDFS/OS when added to ET in patients with early-stage high-risk, hormone receptor-positive BC.

One thousand and nine hundred thirty-nine patients were randomly assigned with 1,792 eligible for analysis. Overall, no benefit of everolimus was seen for IDFS (HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.14]) or OS (HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.75 to 1.26]). The assumption of proportional hazards was not met suggesting significant variability in the HR over time since the start of treatment. In an unplanned subgroup analysis among postmenopausal patients (N = 1,221), no difference in IDFS (HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.86 to 1.36]) or OS (HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 0.89 to 1.60]) was seen. In premenopausal patients (N = 571), everolimus improved both IDFS (HR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.44 to 0.94]) and OS (HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.86]). Treatment completion rates were lower in the everolimus arm compared with placebo (48% v 73%) with higher grade 3 and 4 adverse events (35% v 7%).

One year of adjuvant everolimus + ET did not improve overall outcomes. Subset analysis suggests mTOR inhibition as a possible target for patients who remain premenopausal after chemotherapy.

Everolimus in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) was formerly approved as 2nd-line therapy in HR(+)/HER2(-) advanced breast cancer (aBC) patients (pts) progressing during or after a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI). Since this approval, the treatment landscape of aBC has changed dramatically, particularly with the arrival of CDK 4-6 inhibitors. Endocrine monotherapy after progression to CDK4/6 inhibitors has shown a limited progression-free survival (PFS), below 3 months. Evidence of the efficacy of everolimus plus ET after CDK4/6 inhibitors is scarce.

A retrospective observational study of patients with aBC treated with everolimus and ET beyond CDK4/6-i progression compiled from February 2015 to December 2022 in 4 Spanish hospitals was performed. Clinical and demographic data were collected from medical records. The main objective was to estimate the median progression-free survival (mPFS). Everolimus adverse events (AE) were registered. Quantitative variables were summarized with medians; qualitative variables with proportions and the Kaplan-Meier method were used for survival estimates.

One hundred sixty-one patients received everolimus plus ET (exemestane: 96, fulvestrant: 54, tamoxifen: 10, unknown: 1) after progressing on a CDK4/6 inhibitor. The median follow-up time was 15 months (interquartile range: 1-56 months). The median age at diagnosis was 49 years (range: 35-90 years). The estimated mPFS was 6.0 months (95%CI 5.3-7.8 months). PFS was longer in patients with previous CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy lasting for > 18 months (8.7 months, 95%CI 6.6-11.3 months), in patients w/o visceral metastases (8.0 months, 95%CI 5.8-10.5 months), and chemotherapy-naïve in the metastatic setting (7.2 months, 95%CI 5.9-8.4 months).

This retrospective analysis cohort of everolimus plus ET in mBC patients previously treated with a CDK4/6 inhibitor suggests a longer estimated mPFS when compared with the mPFS with ET monotherapy obtained from current randomized clinical data. Everolimus plus ET may be considered as a valid control arm in novel clinical trial designs.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly heterogeneous tumor lacking estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression. It has higher aggressiveness and metastasis than other subtypes, with limited effective therapeutic strategies, leading to a poor prognosis. The phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway is prevalently over-activated in human cancers and contributes to breast cancer (BC) growth, survival, proliferation, and angiogenesis, which could be an interesting therapeutic target. This review summarizes the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway activation mechanism in TNBC and discusses the relationship between its activation and various TNBC subtypes. We also report the latest clinical studies on kinase inhibitors related to this pathway for treating TNBC. Our review discusses the issues that need to be addressed in the clinical application of these inhibitors.

The global BOLERO-2 trial established the efficacy and safety of combination everolimus (EVE) and exemestane (EXE) in the treatment of estrogen receptor positive (ER +), HER2-, advanced breast cancer (ABC). BOLERO-5 investigated this combination in a Chinese population (NCT03312738).

BOLERO-5 is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo controlled, phase II trial comparing EVE (10 mg/day) or placebo (PBO) in combination with EXE (25 mg/day). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) per investigator assessment. Secondary endpoints included PFS per blinded independent review committee (BIRC), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), pharmacokinetics, and safety.

A total of 159 patients were randomized to EVE + EXE (n = 80) or PBO + EXE (n = 79). By investigator assessment, treatment with EVE + EXE prolonged median PFS by 5.4 months (HR 0.52; 90% CI 0.38, 0.71), from 2.0 months (PBO + EXE; 90% CI 1.9, 3.6) to 7.4 months (EVE + EXE; 90% CI 5.5, 9.0). Similar results were observed following assessment by BIRC, with median PFS prolonged by 4.3 months. Treatment with EVE + EXE was also associated with improvements in ORR and CBR. No new safety signals were identified in BOLERO-5, with the incidence of adverse events in Chinese patients consistent with the safety profile of both drugs.

The efficacy and safety results of BOLERO-5 validate the findings from BOLERO-2, and further support the use of EVE + EXE in Chinese post-menopausal women with ER + , HER2- ABC. NCT03312738, registered 18 October 2017.

Breast cancer is a significant public health issue, exhibiting the most pronounced occurrence and fatality rates among malignant neoplasms globally. Targeted therapy is a medical intervention that focuses on specific molecular markers. This study aims to investigate and evaluate the current research trends and directions in the field of targeted therapy for breast cancer using bibliometric analysis.

The Web of Science database was utilized to retrieve relevant articles published between 2003 and 2022. The VOSviewer software and Bibliometrix package in the R language were employed to conduct co-occurrence and clustering analyses of authors, countries, institutions, journals, references, and the CiteSpace tool was utilized for keyword burst detection.

A total of 2,258 articles were included and the annual number of publications increased rapidly. The most prolific country on this topic was the USA (n=898, 39.77%) and the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center published most papers (n=93). Dennis J. Slamon and Gabriel N. Hortobagyi stood out in the field, with Dennis J. Slamon leading in terms of co-citations(n=653) and Gabriel N. Hortobagyi topping the list in terms of published articles(n=18). The most productive journal was Breast Cancer Research and Treatment and the most cited journal was Journal of Clinical Oncology. The clustering of keywords indicated that the primary focus of researches in the past two decades was on the development and clinical evaluation of tumor-targeted drugs associated with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family signaling pathway, and explored mechanisms related to biological behavior of breast cancer. Keywords co-occurrence and burst analysis identified current research hotspots and potential research trends.

This study employed bibliometric analysis to examine research on targeted therapy for breast cancer over a span of 20 years, and identified development trends of research and elucidated potential research trajectories in the domain of this topic. This study helps in the identification of prospective collaborators and partner institutions for researchers.

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a pivotal regulator, integrating diverse environmental signals to control fundamental cellular functions, such as protein synthesis, cell growth, survival, and apoptosis. Embedded in a complex network of signaling pathways, mTOR dysregulation is implicated in the onset and progression of a range of human diseases, including metabolic disorders such as diabetes and cardiovascular diseases, as well as various cancers. mTOR also has a notable role in aging. Given its extensive biological impact, mTOR signaling is a prime therapeutic target for addressing these complex conditions. The development of mTOR inhibitors has proven advantageous in numerous research domains. This review delves into the significance of mTOR signaling, highlighting the critical components of this intricate network that contribute to disease. Additionally, it addresses the latest findings on mTOR inhibitors and their clinical implications. The review also emphasizes the importance of developing more effective next-generation mTOR inhibitors with dual functions to efficiently target the mTOR pathways. A comprehensive understanding of mTOR signaling will enable the development of effective therapeutic strategies for managing diseases associated with mTOR dysregulation.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide. It has been estimated that about 416 000 new cases and over 117 000 deaths of breast cancer occurred in China in 2020. Among the new cases of breast cancer diagnosed each year, 3-10% have distant metastasis at the time of initial diagnosis. In addition, approximately 30% of patients with early-stage breast cancer may eventually experience recurrence or metastases. The 5-year survival rate of patients with advanced breast cancer is only 20% with a median overall survival of 2-3 years. Although advanced breast cancer remains incurable at present, new therapeutic options and multidisciplinary treatment could be utilized to alleviate symptoms, improve quality of life, and prolong patients' survival. The choice of treatment regimens for patients with advanced breast cancer is very important, and the optimal treatment strategy beyond the first- and second-line therapy is often lacking. Herein, the China Advanced Breast Cancer Guideline Panel discussed and summarized recent clinical evidence, updated the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of advanced breast cancer based on the 2020 edition, and formulated the "Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of advanced breast cancer in China (2022 edition)" for clinicians' reference.

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy and benefits from endocrine agents such as tamoxifen. However, the development of drug resistance in cancerous cells often leads to recurrence, thus limiting the therapeutic benefit. Identification of potential biomarkers that can predict response to tamoxifen and recognize patients who will clinically benefit from this therapy is urgently needed. In this study, we report that high collagen type XI alpha 1 (COL11A1) expression was associated with poor therapeutic response and prognosis in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen. To confirm the role of COL11A1 in the development of tamoxifen resistance, we established MCF-7/COL11A1 and T47D/COL11A1 cell lines, which stably expressed COL11A1. Compared with parental MCF-7 and T47D, MCF-7/COL11A1 and T47D/COL11A1 cells were more resistant to 4-OHT-induced growth inhibition. Moreover, the level of COL11A1 expression was upregulated in tamoxifen-resistant MCF-7/TamR and T47D/TamR cell lines, and depletion of COL11A1 markedly sensitized the cells to 4-OHT in vitro and in vivo. Interestingly, the level of estrogen receptor α (ERα) expression was elevated, probably due to the increased COL11A1 in TamR cells. In addition, knockdown of COL11A1 decreased the expression of ERα and its downstream target genes. Overall, our findings suggest that overexpressed COL11A1 contributes to tamoxifen resistance, and targeting COL11A1 holds great promise for reversing endocrine resistance.

The growing availability of targeted therapies for patients with advanced oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer has improved survival, but there remains much to learn about the optimal management of these patients. The PI3K-AKT and mTOR pathways are among the most commonly activated pathways in breast cancer, whose crucial role in the pathogenesis of this tumour type has spurred major efforts to target this pathway at specific kinase hubs. Approvals for oestrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer include the PI3K inhibitor alpelisib for PIK3CA-mutated tumours, the AKT inhibitor capivasertib for tumours with alterations in PIK3CA, AKT1, or PTEN, and the mTOR inhibitor everolimus, which is used irrespective of mutation status. The availability of different inhibitors leaves physicians with a potentially challenging decision over which of these therapies should be used for individual patients and when. In this Review, we present a comprehensive summary of our current understanding of the pathways and the three inhibitors and discuss strategies for the optimal sequencing of therapies in the clinic, particularly after progression on a CDK4/6 inhibitor.

To identify patients most likely to respond to everolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, a prospective biomarker study was conducted in hormone receptor-positive endocrine-resistant metastatic breast cancer patients treated with exemestane-everolimus therapy.

Metastatic tumor biopsies were processed for immunohistochemical staining (p4EBP1, PTEN, pAKT, LKB1, and pS6K). ESR1, PIK3CA and AKT1 gene mutations were detected by NGS. The primary endpoint was the association between the p4EBP1 expression and clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 6 months of everolimus plus exemestane treatment.

Of 150 patients included, 107 were evaluable for the primary endpoint. p4EBP1 staining above the median (Allred score ≥6) was associated with a higher CBR at 6 months (62% versus 40% in high-p4EBP1 versus low-p4EBP1, χ2 test, p = 0.026) and a longer progression-free survival (PFS) (median PFS of 9.2 versus 5.8 months in high-p4EBP1 versus low-p4EBP1; p = 0.02). When tested with other biomarkers, only p4EBP1 remained a significant predictive marker of PFS in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 0.591; p = 0.01).

This study identified a subset of patients with hormone receptor-positive endocrine-resistant metastatic breast cancer and poor outcome who would derive less benefit from everolimus and exemestane. p4EBP1 may be a useful predictive biomarker in routine clinical practice.

NCT02444390.

We investigated key signalling pathways' activity and mutational status of early-stage breast carcinomas with low and intermediate 21-gene recurrence score (RS) to identify molecular features that may predict recurrence.

This is a retrospective case-control study of 18 patients with recurrent breast carcinoma with low and intermediate 21-gene RS (<25) and control group of 15 non-recurrent breast cancer patients. DNA and mRNA were extracted from tumour tissue. mRNA expression of genes involved in oestrogen receptor (ER), androgen receptor (AR), PI3K and MAPK signalling pathways was measured by real-time quantitative reverse transcription-qPCR (OncoSIGNal G4 test, InnoSIGN). Tumour mutational landscape was assessed by targeted DNA sequencing (Oncomine Precision Assay).

There were no statistical differences between the groups' demographic and clinicopathological characteristics. PI3K pathway showed significantly higher activity in cases compared with controls (p=0.0014). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.79 for PI3K pathway activity in the prediction of recurrent disease in low and intermediate 21-gene RS breast cancer. There was no difference in ER, AR and MAPK pathway activity. PIK3CA alterations were the most common driver mutations, but no difference was found between the groups (p=0.46) and no association with PI3K pathway activity (p=0.86). Higher Ki67 gene expression was associated with recurrences (p=0.042) CONCLUSION: Increased PI3K pathway activity, independent of PIK3CA mutations, may play a role in the recurrence of early-stage breast cancer with low and intermediate 21-gene RS. Pathway analysis can help to identify high-risk patients in this setting.

In the past decade, significant progress was made in treating hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC), but many clinical questions remain. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors are now widely used in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) as standard of care, having demonstrated significant progression-free survival versus ET, and also significant overall survival benefits in the metastatic setting. Inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR intracellular signaling pathway coupled with ET typically follows first-line therapies. Novel endocrine options including oral selective estrogen receptor down-regulators (SERDs) are in late phases of development, with elacestrant being the first oral SERD to be approved for ESR1-mutant mBC. However, endocrine-refractory disease is inevitable in most patients and represents an area of unmet need, with current recommended options offering poor efficacy, undesirable toxicity, and reduced quality of life. Breakthrough advances in the metastatic setting came via the development of antibody-drug conjugates, which have the advantage of delivering cytotoxic payloads to tumor cells with higher tumor selectivity. Trastuzumab deruxtecan offers a novel therapeutic option for patients with HR+/HER2-low mBC and sacituzumab govitecan is a novel therapeutic option for patients with HR+/HER2- mBC, including those with unmet treatment need in the later-line endocrine-refractory setting. Data gaps still exist regarding optimal sequencing of these novel agents; additional studies into mechanisms of resistance in the metastatic setting would provide further insights. Herein, we describe the current treatment options for HR+/HER2- mBC, including the latest practice-impacting data, and provide commentary on future directions.

Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequent cancer in women. In female dogs, canine mammary gland tumor (CMT) is also the leading neoplasm. Comparative oncology indicates similar tumor behaviors between human BCs (HBCs) and CMTs. Therefore, this review summarizes the current research in hormone and targeted therapies and describes the future prospects for HBCs and CMTs. For hormone receptor-expressing BCs, the first medical intervention is hormone therapy. Monoclonal antibodies against Her2 are proposed for the treatment of Her2+ BCs. However, the major obstacle in hormone therapy or monoclonal antibodies is drug resistance. Therefore, increasing alternatives have been developed to overcome these difficulties. We systemically reviewed publications that reported inhibitors targeting certain molecules in BC cells. The various treatment choices for humans decrease mortality in females with BC. However, the development of hormone or targeted therapies in veterinary medicine is still limited. Even though some clinical trials have been proposed, severe side effects and insufficient case numbers might restrict further explorations. This difficulty highlights the urgent need to develop updated hormone/targeted therapy or novel immunotherapies. Therefore, exploring new therapies to provide more precise use in dogs with CMTs will be the focus of future research. Furthermore, due to the similarities shared by humans and dogs, well-planned prospective clinical trials on the use of combinational or novel immunotherapies in dogs with CMTs to obtain solid results for both humans and dogs can be reasonably anticipated in the future.

Neoplastic meningitis (NM), also known as leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, is characterized by the infiltration of tumor cells into the meninges, and poses a significant therapeutic challenge owing to its aggressive nature and limited treatment options. Breast cancer is a common cause of NM among solid tumors, further highlighting the urgent need to explore effective therapeutic strategies. This review aims to provide insights into the evolving landscape of NM therapy in breast cancer by collating existing research, evaluating current treatments, and identifying potential emerging therapeutic options.

This review explores the clinical features, therapeutic strategies, recent advances, and challenges of managing NM in patients with breast cancer. Its management includes multimodal strategies, including systemic and intrathecal chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and supportive care. This review also emphasizes targeted drug options and optimal drug concentrations, and discusses emerging therapies. Additionally, it highlights the variability in treatment outcomes and the potential of combination regimens to effectively manage NM in breast cancer.

Challenges in treating NM include debates over clinical trial end points and the management of adverse effects. Drug resistance and low response rates are significant hurdles, particularly inHER2-negative breast cancer. The development of more precise and cost-effective medications with improved selectivity is crucial. Additionally, global efforts are needed for infrastructure development and cancer control considering the diverse nature of the disease.

mTOR is a serine/threonine kinase that plays various roles in cell growth, proliferation, and metabolism. mTOR signaling in cancer becomes irregular. Therefore, drugs targeting mTOR have been developed. Although mTOR inhibitors rapamycin and rapamycin rapalogs (everolimus, rapamycin, temsirolimus, deforolimus, etc.) and new generation mTOR inhibitors (Rapalink, Dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitors, etc.) are used in cancer treatments, mTOR resistance mechanisms may inhibit the efficacy of these drugs. Therefore, new inhibition approaches are developed. Although these new inhibition approaches have not been widely investigated in cancer treatment, the use of nanoparticles has been evaluated as a new treatment option in a few types of cancer. This review outlines the functions of mTOR in the cancer process, its resistance mechanisms, and the efficiency of mTOR inhibitors in cancer treatment. Furthermore, it discusses the next-generation mTOR inhibitors and inhibition strategies created using nanoparticles. Since mTOR resistance mechanisms prevent the effects of mTOR inhibitors used in cancer treatments, new inhibition strategies should be developed. Inhibition approaches are created using nanoparticles, and one of them offers a promising treatment option with evidence supporting its effectiveness.

In estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/HER2- breast cancer, multiple measures of intratumor heterogeneity are associated with a worse response to endocrine therapy. We sought to develop a novel experimental model to measure heterogeneity in response to tamoxifen treatment in primary breast tumors.

To investigate heterogeneity in response to treatment, we developed an operating room-to-laboratory pipeline for the collection of live normal breast specimens and human tumors immediately after surgical resection for processing into single-cell workflows for experimentation and genomic analyses. Live primary cell suspensions were treated ex vivo with tamoxifen (10 μmol/L) or control media for 12 hours, and single-cell RNA libraries were generated using the 10X Genomics droplet-based kit.

In total, we obtained and processed normal breast tissue from two women undergoing reduction mammoplasty and tumor tissue from 10 women with ER+/HER2- invasive breast carcinoma. We demonstrate differences in tamoxifen response by cell type and identify distinctly responsive and resistant subpopulations within the malignant cell compartment of human tumors. Tamoxifen resistance signatures from resistant subpopulations predict poor outcomes in two large cohorts of ER+ breast cancer patients and are enriched in endocrine therapy-resistant tumors.

This novel ex vivo model system now provides the foundation to define responsive and resistant subpopulations within heterogeneous human tumors, which can be used to develop precise single cell-based predictors of response to therapy and to identify genes and pathways driving therapeutic resistance.

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is a group of endometrial epithelial malignancies, most of which are adenocarcinomas and occur in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. It is one of the most common carcinomas of the female reproductive system. It has been shown that the occurrence and development of EC is closely associated with the interaction between estrogen (estradiol, E2) and estrogen receptors (ERs), particularly ERα. As a key nuclear transcription factor, ERα is a carcinogenic factor in EC. Its interactions with upstream and downstream effectors and co-regulators have important implications for the proliferation, metastasis, invasion and inhibition of apoptosis of EC. In the present review, the structure of ERα and the regulation of ERα in multiple dimensions are described. In addition, the classical E2/ERα signaling pathway and the crosstalk between ERα and other EC regulators are elucidated, as well as the therapeutic targeting of ERα, which may provide a new direction for clinical applications of ERα in the future.

Breast cancer in men is rare, but a relevant public health issue, yielding a 25% higher risk of mortality comparing to female counterparts. The representation of males in clinical trials has been scarce and treatment decisions are based mainly on extrapolations from data in females. In the setting of estrogen-dependent metastatic disease, the use of everolimus has been seldom reported, although the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway seems to be a critical oncogenic driver. This paper dissects hallmark biological features of ER+/HER2-advanced male breast cancer, setting a comprehensive basis to promote personalized care, focusing on the potential of targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.

The second most common breast carcinoma, invasive lobular carcinoma, accounts for approximately 15% of tumors of breast origin. Its incidence has increased in recent times due in part to hormone replacement therapy and improvement in diagnostic modalities. Although believed to arise from the same cell type as their ductal counterpart, invasive lobular carcinomas (ILCs) are a distinct entity with different regulating genetic pathways, characteristic histologies, and different biology. The features most unique to lobular carcinomas include loss of E-Cadherin leading to discohesion and formation of a characteristic single file pattern on histology. Because most of these tumors exhibit estrogen receptor positivity and Her2 neu negativity, endocrine therapy has predominated to treat these tumors. However novel treatments like CDK4/6 inhibitors have shown importance and antibody drug conjugates may be instrumental considering newer categories of Her 2 Low breast tumors. In this narrative review, we explore multiple pathological aspects and translational features of this unique entity. In addition, due to advancement in technologies like spatial transcriptomics and other hi-plex technologies, we have tried to enlist upon the characteristics of the tumor microenvironment and the latest associated findings to better understand the new prospective therapeutic options in the current era of personalized treatment.

Hormone receptor (HR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer is defined by the presence of the estrogen receptor and/or the progesterone receptor and the absence of HER2 gene amplification. HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer accounts for 65%-70% of all breast cancers, and incidence increases with increasing age. Treatment varies by stage, and endocrine therapy is the mainstay of treatment in both early stage and late-stage disease. Combinations with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors have reduced distant recurrence in the early stage setting and improved overall survival in the metastatic setting. Chemotherapy is used based on stage and tumor biology in the early stage setting and after endocrine resistance for advanced disease. New therapies, including novel endocrine agents and antibody-drug conjugates, are now changing the treatment landscape. With the availability of new treatment options, it is important to define the optimal sequence of treatment to maximize clinical benefit while minimizing toxicity. In this review, the authors first discuss the pathologic and molecular features of HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer and mechanisms of endocrine resistance. Then, they discuss current and emerging therapies for both early stage and metastatic HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer, including treatment algorithms based on current data.

Over the past decade, thousands of articles have been published on the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) and its role in breast cancer. However, the variability and heterogeneity of academic data may impact the acquisition of published research information. Due to the large number, heterogeneity, and varying quality of publications related to mTOR and breast cancer, sorting out the present state of the research in this area is critical for both researchers and clinicians. Therefore, scientometric techniques and visualization tools were employed to analyze the large number of bibliographic metadata related to the research area of mTOR and breast cancer. The features of relevant publications were searched from 2012 to 2022 to evaluate the present status of research and the evolution of research hotspots in this particular field. Web of Science was utilized to extract all relevant publications from 2012 to 2022. Subsequently, Biblioshiny and VOSviewer were utilized to obtain data on the most productive countries, authors, and institutions, annual publications and citations, the most influential journals and articles, and the most frequently occurring keywords. In total, 1,471 publications were retrieved, comprising 1,167 original articles and 304 reviews. There was a significant rise in publications between 2015 and 2018, followed by a sharp decline in 2019 and a rebound since then. The publication with the highest number of citations was a 2012 review authored by Baselga et al. The United States had the highest number of publications, citations and connections among all countries. Oncotarget had the highest number of published articles among all the journals, and José Baselga had the strongest links with other authors. Excluding the search topics, the most frequently used words were "expression" (n = 297), "growth" (n = 228), "activation" (n = 223), "pathway" (n = 205), and "apoptosis" (n = 195). mTOR is crucially involved in breast cancer pathogenesis, but its exact mechanism of action remains controversial and warrants further investigation. The scientometric analysis provides a distinct overview of the existing state of research and highlights the topical issues that deserve further exploration.

The increase in use of targeted systemic therapies in cancer treatments has catalyzed the importance of identifying patient- and tumor-specific somatic mutations, especially regarding metastatic disease. Mutations found to be most prevalent in patients with metastatic breast cancer include TP53, PI3K, and CDH1.

To determine the incidence of somatic mutations in patients with metastatic breast cancer to the spine (MBCS). To determine if a difference exists in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, and progression of motor symptoms between patients who do or do not undergo targeted systemic therapy after treatment for MBCS.

This is a retrospective study of patients with MBCS. Review of gene sequencing reports was conducted to calculate the prevalence of various somatic gene mutations within this population. Those patients who then underwent treatment (surgery/radiation) for their diagnosis of MBCS between 2010 and 2020 were subcategorized. The use of targeted systemic therapy in the post-treatment period was identified, and post-treatment OS, progression-free survival, and progression of motor deficits were calculated for this subpopulation.

A total of 131 patients were included in the final analysis with 56% of patients found to have a PI3K mutation. Patients who received targeted systemic therapies were found to have a significantly longer OS compared with those who did not receive targeted systemic therapies.

The results of this study demonstrate that there is an increased prevalence of PI3K mutations in patients with MBCS and there are a significant survival benefit and delay in progression of motor symptoms associated with using targeted systemic therapies for adjuvant treatment.

Everolimus is an oral drug that inhibits mTOR with immunosuppressive and antiproliferative characteristics. It is commonly used in association with exemestane in hormone receptor (HR)-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC).

The current review summarizes the publications relating to everolimus from clinical research in breast cancer. Everolimus showed treatment efficacy and an acceptable safety tolerance with prevention of side effects in Phase II/III studies. BOLERO-2 study showed a progression-free survival improvement in patients with HR-positive ABC previously treated with aromatase inhibitors (AI) and leading to its acceptance in this indication. The absence of a post CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i.) study and the arrival of new drugs may raise questions about its current place in the therapeutic strategy.

Everolimus is relevant in the management of HR-positive ABC. Because of its efficacy, acceptable tolerability and the absence of drugs that have shown a greater benefit, it remains a second-line treatment option in HR-positive, HER2 negative (score 0) patients without BRCA mutation or visceral crisis and can be discuss with fulvestrant in second line after CDK4-6i. It is likely that within 5 years this treatment will be replaced in second line HR-positive breast cancer by new emerging treatments: drug-conjugated antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors or immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy.