Kumar P, Khan HM, Hasanrabba S. Treatment of perforated giant gastric ulcer in an emergency setting. World J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 6(1): 5-8 [PMID: 24627735 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v6.i1.5]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Dr. Pradeep Kumar, Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, ESI-PGIMSR and Medical College, Rajajinagar, Bangalore 560010, Karnataka, India. dr.pradeep_k20@yahoo.com
Research Domain of This Article
Surgery
Article-Type of This Article
Brief Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2014; 6(1): 5-8 Published online Jan 27, 2014. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v6.i1.5
Table 1 Patient demography
SerialNo.
Age, yr
Sex
Procedureundergone
Nature of gastric ulcer
Recovery
Discharge day post-operatively
1
47
Male
PC
BENIGN
U
6
2
54
Male
PC
BENIGN
U
6
3
52
Male
PC + DG + GJ
BENIGN
GF
17
4
77
Male
PC + SG + GJ + D2
MALIGNANT
GF + ARDS + MODS + M
-
5
63
Male
DG + GJ
MALIGNANT
U
6
6
74
Female
DG + GJ
BENIGN
U
6
7
79
Female
DG + GJ
BENIGN
U
6
8
57
Male
DG + GJ
BENIGN
U
6
9
53
Male
DG + GJ
MALIGNANT
U
8
10
46
Male
DG + GJ
BENIGN
U
11
72
Male
DG + GJ
MALIGNANT
U
8
12
49
Female
DG + GJ
BENIGN
U
6
13
67
Male
DG + GJ
BENIGN
U
6
14
56
Male
DG + GJ
BENIGN
U
7
15
68
Female
DG + GJ
MALIGNANT
U
8
16
63
Male
DG + GJ
BENIGN
U
9
17
61
Male
DG + GJ
MALIGNANT
U
7
18
56
Female
DG + GJ
BENIGN
U
9
19
49
Male
DG + GJ
BENIGN
U
7
20
66
Male
DG + GJ
BENIGN
U
6
Table 2 Distribution of patients according to age of the patients n (%)
Age group
Number of patients
41-50
4 (20)
Mean age = 63 yr
51-60
6 (30)
61-70
6 (30)
71-80
4 (20)
Total
20
Table 3 Distribution of patients according to the type of surgery n (%)
Type of surgery
Number of patients
PC
4 (18.2)
DG + GJ
17 (77.3)
SG + GJ + D2
1 (4.5)
Total
22
Table 4 Distribution of patients according to recovery n (%)
Type of patient compliance
Number of patients
Uneventful recovery
18 (85.72)
Complications
2 (9.52)
Mortality
1 (4.76)
Total
21
Citation: Kumar P, Khan HM, Hasanrabba S. Treatment of perforated giant gastric ulcer in an emergency setting. World J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 6(1): 5-8