Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jun 27, 2026; 18(6): 119524
Published online Jun 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.119524
Published online Jun 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.119524
Table 1 Preoperative risk factors for difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy
| n | Factor |
| 1 | Obesity |
| 2 | Cirrhosis |
| 3 | Fatty liver infiltration |
| 4 | Elevated American Society of Anesthesiologists score |
| 5 | Diabetes mellitus |
| 6 | Previous upper abdominal surgery |
| 7 | In acute cholecystitis, diabetes mellitus, positive Murphy’s sign |
| 8 | Previous acute cholecystitis or percutaneous gallbladder drainage |
| 9 | Concomitant common bile duct stones |
| 10 | Thickened gallbladder wall in imaging |
| 11 | Pericholecystic fluid collection in imaging |
| 12 | Impacted gallstone in gallbladder neck in imaging |
| 13 | Previous episode of acute biliary pancreatitis |
| 14 | C- reactive protein levels > 11 mg/dL in elective procedures |
Table 2 Conditions that required conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy
| n | Condition |
| 1 | Severe fibrosis |
| 2 | Hard scar |
| 3 | Uncontrolled hemorrhage |
| 4 | Cholecystoenteric fistula |
| 5 | Mirizzi syndrome |
| 6 | Surgeon’s expertise |
| 7 | Suspected malignancy |
Table 3 Randhawa and Pujahari[96] difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
| Factors | Score1 |
| Age > 50 years | 1 |
| Male gender | 1 |
| History of acute cholecystitis | 4 |
| BMI > 27.5 | 1 |
| Abdominal scar | 1 |
| Palpable gallbladder | 1 |
| GB wall thickness > 4 mm | 2 |
| Pericholecystic collection | 1 |
| Impacted stone | 1 |
Table 4 Sugrue et al[97] difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
| Factors | Score1 |
| Adhesions covering gallbladder | 1-3 |
| Distended or contracted gallbladder | 1 |
| Unable to grasp gallbladder | 1 |
| Stone ≥ 1 cm impacted in Hartmann’s pouch | 1 |
| BMI > 30 | 1 |
| Time to identify cystic artery/duct > 90 minutes | 1 |
| Severe inflammation, necrosis, perforation | 1 |
Table 5 Nassar et al[98] difficulty grading system for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
| Grade | Factors |
| I | Floppy GB, clear anatomy |
| II | Mild adhesions |
| III | Dense adhesions, difficult dissection |
| IV | Severe inflammation, empyema, contracted gallbladder |
| V | Mirizzi syndrome, cholecystoenteric fistula |
Table 6 Simplified management algorithm for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
| Order | Steps |
| 1 | Preoperative clinical, biochemical and imaging assessment |
| 2 | Initiation of laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
| 3 | Intraoperative imaging utilization if needed |
| 4 | Achieving CVS can lead to completion of uneventful procedure |
| 5 | Impossible CVS necessitates bailout policy (subtotal laparoscopic cholecystectomy as first choice) |
| 6 | Unclear anatomy, persistent bleeding, potential CBD injury at any stage, or suspected malignancy necessitate immediate conversion to open cholecystectomy |
- Citation: Pavlidis ET, Mouratidou C, Marneri AG, Kofinas A, Stavrati KE, Pavlidis TE. Essential strategies for the management of challenging laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(6): 119524
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i6/119524.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.119524