Pavlidis ET, Mouratidou C, Marneri AG, Kofinas A, Stavrati KE, Pavlidis TE. Essential strategies for the management of challenging laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(6): 119524 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.119524]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Theodoros E Pavlidis, MD, PhD, Professor Emeritus, The Second Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Hippokration General Hospital, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Konstantinoupoleos 49, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece. pavlidth@auth.gr
Research Domain of This Article
Surgery
Article-Type of This Article
review-article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jun 27, 2026; 18(6): 119524 Published online Jun 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.119524
Essential strategies for the management of challenging laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures
Efstathios T Pavlidis, Christina Mouratidou, Alexandra G Marneri, Athanasios Kofinas, Kalliopi E Stavrati, Theodoros E Pavlidis
Efstathios T Pavlidis, Theodoros E Pavlidis, The Second Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Hippokration General Hospital, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece
Christina Mouratidou, Alexandra G Marneri, Department of Intensive Care Unit, Hippokration General Hospital, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece
Athanasios Kofinas, Department of Transplantation Surgery, Center for Research and Innovation in Solid Organ Transplantation, Hippokration General Hospital, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece
Kalliopi E Stavrati, Department of Surgical, Eugenideio Hospital, Athens 11528, Greece
Author contributions: Pavlidis ET and Mouratidou C conceived the study design and carried out data analysis; Marneri AG and Stavrati KE developed analytical tools, assessed the data, and contributed to manuscript revision; Kofinas A assisted with data collection and interpretation; Pavlidis TE supervised data analysis and reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
AI contribution statement: No AI tools were used.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Corresponding author: Theodoros E Pavlidis, MD, PhD, Professor Emeritus, The Second Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Hippokration General Hospital, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Konstantinoupoleos 49, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece. pavlidth@auth.gr
Received: January 30, 2026 Revised: March 3, 2026 Accepted: March 31, 2026 Published online: June 27, 2026 Processing time: 141 Days and 12.5 Hours
Abstract
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) represents the most frequently conducted surgical intervention for managing symptomatic cholelithiasis. However, in the contemporary context of laparoscopic and robotic cholecystectomy procedures, open cholecystectomy remains a relevant surgical approach that minimizes the risk of severe complications. LC is considered to be a straightforward procedure in approximately 60% of cases and presents no significant challenges for most surgeons. However, in 20%-30% of cases, the procedure involves a moderate level of difficulty, and in 10%-15% of cases, the complexity is substantial, thus potentially requiring conversion to an open cholecystectomy approach and the involvement of a highly experienced surgeon who is proficient in both laparoscopic and open techniques. Existing scoring systems have the potential to predict procedural difficulty. Obesity, cirrhosis, elevated American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, prior abdominal surgeries, and the presence of acute cholecystitis or common bile duct stones have been identified as factors contributing to the complexity of cholecystectomy procedures. Radiological findings such as gallbladder wall thickening, pericholecystic fluid accumulation, and impacted gallstones are also correlated with increased surgical difficulty. Elevated body mass index and increased C-reactive protein levels were identified as significant independent predictors of surgical difficulty during LC in patients with acute cholecystitis. For cases in which the operation is anticipated to be challenging, the utilization of intraoperative imaging techniques (including intraoperative cholangiography, intraoperative ultrasound, and near-infrared cholangiography) is advised. When the safe attainment of the critical view of the hepatocystic triangle is not feasible, alternative surgical strategies [such as subtotal cholecystectomy (STC) or an anterograde approach] should be considered. Conversion to open surgery is recommended in instances of significant hemorrhage, cholecystoenteric fistula, Mirizzi syndrome, or suspected malignancy. Furthermore, consultation with or assistance from an additional surgeon is advised under complex operative conditions. The body-first approach and STC represent significant surgical approaches in cases of severe inflammation and fibrosis (including cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis, and biliary pancreatitis) and anatomical variations. Laparoscopic STC encompasses both fenestrating and reconstituting techniques. Moreover, robotic subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy is the prevailing technique due to the three-dimensional view. Thus, failure to appropriately manage challenging cases may result in severe complications, given the demanding nature of biliary surgery.
Core Tip: Patient safety requires increased caution and precision in decision-making when challenges are experienced during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. It is essential to incorporate valuable available diagnostic tools and alternative bailout operative interventions into the management plan for complex cases, along with recognizing when to stop or convert the approach to open cholecystectomy. Failure to accomplish this task may result in catastrophic complications during the procedure. Training and expertise are necessary preconditions for favorable outcomes.