BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Apr 27, 2026; 18(4): 118003
Published online Apr 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i4.118003
Table 1 Characteristics of the patients and postoperative anastomotic leakage, n (%)
Parameters
Non-AL
AL
SD
P value
P value1
Number of patients570109---
Age (years), mean ± SD61.66 ± 7.6762.50 ± 6.550.12 (-0.09 to 0.32)0.2860.435
BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD22.63 ± 2.7922.37 ± 2.760.10 (-0.11 to 0.30)0.3650.369
Length of RGEA measured with CTA (cm), mean ± SD28.36 ± 3.6923.53 ± 2.461.54 (1.32, 1.76)< 0.001< 0.001
Sex (male/female)468/10282/220.06 (-0.15 to 0.26)0.571-
Smoking history0.14 (-0.07 to 0.34)0.396-
Never smoking332 (58.25)61 (55.96)-
Previously smoking120 (21.05)29 (26.61)-
Presently smoking118 (20.70)19 (17.43)-
Neoadjuvant therapy0.23 (0.04, 0.43)0.115-
No342 (61.62)75 (60.48)-
Chemotherapy141 (25.41)24 (19.35)-
Chemotherapy with immunotherapy49 (8.83)19 (15.32)-
Others23 (4.14)6 (4.84)-
Hypertension (yes/no)59/51115/940.10 (-0.10 to 0.31)0.295-
Diabetes mellitus (yes/no)19/55115/940.06 (-0.14 to 0.27)0.516-
Family history of cancer (yes/no)12/5583/1060.04 (-0.16 to 0.25)0.674-
Surgical method (MI/open)569/1108/10.10 (-0.10 to 0.31)0.1900.295
Table 2 Segmented regression analysis of the association between right gastroepiploic artery length and risk of anastomotic leakage
Outcome
Estimated (95%CI)
P value
Model I: Linear effect0.5 (0.4, 0.6)< 0.001
Model II: Threshold (K)27.80 cm-
Segmental effect 1 (< K)0.4 (0.3, 0.5)< 0.001
Segmental effect 2 (> K)0.9 (0.7, 1.2)0.638
Difference between 2 and 12.7 (1.7, 4.2)< 0.001
Predicted log relative risk at the cutoff point-4.0 (-4.7 to -3.2)-
Likelihood ratio test-< 0.001