BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Randomized Controlled Trial
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2026; 18(3): 116214
Published online Mar 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i3.116214
Table 1 Comparison of first urinary symptom score and wound healing time between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Groups
Patients
First urinary symptom score
Wound healing time (days)
Lower abdominal symptoms
Waiting time for urination
Incomplete urination
Urinary difficulty
Observation group503.90 ± 1.393.66 ± 1.263.54 ± 1.163.48 ± 1.1116.70 ± 3.05
Control group505.94 ± 0.965.28 ± 1.295.40 ± 1.215.34 ± 1.2621.26 ± 3.37
T value8.5556.3537.8257.8467.088
P value< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001
Table 2 Comparison of anal pain levels between the two groups (mean ± SD)
GroupsPatientsVisual analog scale score
Preoperative
Postoperative day 3
Postoperative day 7
Postoperative day 14
Observation group505.98 ± 1.224.30 ± 0.46a3.42 ± 0.50a,b2.26 ± 0.44a,b,c
Control group505.92 ± 1.264.90 ± 0.42a3.92 ± 0.27a,b2.78 ± 0.42a,b,c
T value 0.2426.8136.2146.033
P value0.809< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001
Table 3 Comparison of sleep conditions between the two groups (mean ± SD)
GroupsPatientsPSQI score
Preoperative
Postoperative day 3
Postoperative day 7
Postoperative day 14
Observation group5015.18 ± 3.4310.86 ± 2.04a8.92 ± 1.21a,b6.26 ± 1.03a,b,c
Control group5015.26 ± 3.2712.46 ± 2.12a10.36 ± 1.38a,b8.02 ± 1.24a,b,c
T value 0.1193.8445.5457.742
P value0.905< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001
Table 4 Comparison of complications between the two groups, n (100%)
Groups
Patients
Wound infection
Anal incontinence
Uroschesis
Total
Observation group500 (0.00)1 (2.00)1 (2.00)2 (4.00)
Control group501 (2.00)3 (6.00)4 (8.00)8 (16.00)
χ2 value4.000
P value0.046