Efficacy of sodium zirconium phosphate alginate dressings for peristomal dermatitis after gastrointestinal surgery: A retrospective study

Table 1 Results before propensity score matching, mean ± SD/n (%)

Group	Sex		Age (year)	BMI (kg/m2)	Onset of dermatitis (day)	Stoma type
	Male	Female				Ileostomy	Colostomy
Observation (n = 56)	38 (67.86)	18 (32.14)	64.35 ± 3.51	23.87 ± 1.35	6.75 ± 0.88	17 (30.36)	39 (69.64)
Control (n = 64)	32 (50.00)	32 (50.00)	60.22 ± 3.14	23.04 ± 1.25	7.20 ± 0.78	31 (48.44)	33 (51.56)
Statistical value	χ2 = 3.918		t = 6.803	t = 3.496	t = 2.970	χ2 = 4.068
P value	0.048		< 0.001	0.001	0.004	0.044

BMI: Body mass index.

Table 2 Results after propensity score matching, mean ± SD/n (%)

Group	Sex		Age (year)	BMI (kg/m2)	Onset of dermatitis (day)	Stoma type
	Male	Female				Ileostomy	Colostomy
Observation (n = 56)	28 (62.22)	17 (37.78)	63.04 ± 3.49	23.35 ± 1.48	6.88 ± 0.89	15 (33.33)	30 (66.67)
Control (n = 64)	26 (57.78)	19 (42.22)	62.80 ± 3.57	23.29 ± 1.50	7.02 ± 0.82	18 (40.00)	27 (60.00)
Statistical value	χ2 = 0.185		t = 0.323	t = 0.191	t = 0.776	χ2 = 0.431
P value	0.667		0.748	0.849	0.440	0.512

BMI: Body mass index.

Table 3 A comparison of clinical efficacy between two groups, n (%)

Group	Recovered	Markedly effective	Effective	Ineffective	Overall effective rate
Observation (n = 56)	28 (62.22)	14 (31.11)	3 (6.67)	0 (0.00)	42 (93.33)
Control (n = 64)	24 (53.33)	11 (24.44)	8 (17.78)	2 (4.44)	35 (77.78)
χ2 value					4.406
P value					0.036

Table 4 A comparison of discolouration, erosion, tissue overgrowth/assessment, intervention, monitoring scores between two groups (points), mean ± SD

Group	Pre-intervention	Post-3 days	Post-6 days	Post-9 days	Post-12 days
Observation (n = 56)	8.52 ± 1.03	7.48 ± 0.95	6.67 ± 0.88	4.20 ± 0.74	2.28 ± 0.54
Control (n = 64)	8.65 ± 0.97	7.64 ± 0.87	7.04 ± 0.91	5.71 ± 0.85	4.63 ± 0.71
t value	0.616	0.833	1.961	8.988	17.673
P value	0.539	0.407	0.053	< 0.001	< 0.001

Table 5 A comparison of complications between the two groups, n (%)

Group	Abnormal bowel	Stoma infection	Stoma stenosis	Overall incidence
Observation (n = 56)	2 (4.44)	0 (0.00)	0 (0.00)	2 (4.44)
Control (n = 64)	5 (11.11)	2 (4.44)	3 (6.67)	10 (22.22)
χ2 value				6.154
P value				0.013

Table 6 A comparison of satisfaction levels between the two intervention groups, n (%)

Group	Satisfied	Generally satisfied	Not satisfied	Overall satisfaction
Observation (n = 56)	27 (60.00)	16 (35.56)	2 (4.44)	43 (95.56)
Control (n = 64)	19 (42.22)	15 (33.33)	11 (24.44)	34 (75.56)
χ2 value				7.283
P value				0.007