Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2026; 18(3): 115349
Published online Mar 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i3.115349
Published online Mar 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i3.115349
Table 1 Level 1 and level 2 indicators and weights of the safety handover management system
| Primary indicator and weight | Secondary indicator and weight | Composite weight |
| A1: Pre-handover preparation (0.3512) | B1: Completeness of patient information preparation (0.4015) | 0.1411 |
| B2: Preparation of drugs/supplies/equipment (0.3287) | 0.1155 | |
| B3: Environment and personnel readiness (0.2698) | 0.0948 | |
| A2: Handover process execution (0.4635) | B4: Accurate patient identification (0.2150) | 0.0997 |
| B5: Completeness of intra-operative status transfer (0.1832) | 0.0849 | |
| B6: Handover of vital signs and level of consciousness (0.1714) | 0.0794 | |
| B7: Tubing check and secure fixation (0.1555) | 0.0721 | |
| B8: Fluid balance and medication summary (0.1349) | 0.0625 | |
| B9: Skin integrity and belongings transfer (0.0751) | 0.0348 | |
| B10: Special issues and key medical orders (0.0649) | 0.0301 | |
| A3: Post-handover verification (0.1853) | B11: Information recheck and clarification of doubts (0.6328) | 0.1172 |
| B12: Mutual signature and documentation (0.3672) | 0.0681 |
Table 2 Importance scores and weights for selected level 3 indicators
| Level 2 indicator | Level 3 indicator | Importance score (mean ± SD) | Weight |
| B4: Accurate patient identification | Use at least two methods to verify identity (name, hospital ID) | 4.95 ± 0.22 | 0.402 |
| Check wristband information | 4.85 ± 0.37 | 0.318 | |
| Verify operative site and procedure | 4.75 ± 0.44 | 0.280 | |
| B7: Tubing check and secure fixation | Name, insertion depth, and fixation of each tube (drains, NG, CVC, etc.) | 4.90 ± 0.31 | 0.256 |
| Confirm drain patency and characteristics/volume of drainage | 4.95 ± 0.22 | 0.294 | |
| IV access patent; insertion site without leakage or swelling | 4.80 ± 0.41 | 0.235 | |
| Oxygen catheter/mask patent and properly secured | 4.60 ± 0.50 | 0.215 | |
| B11: Information recheck and clarification of doubts | Receiving nurse repeats key data (blood loss, special drugs, allergies) | 4.75 ± 0.44 | 0.421 |
| Handover staff confirm or correct the repeated information | 4.70 ± 0.47 | 0.342 | |
| Both parties immediately clarify any discrepancies and reach agreement | 4.85 ± 0.37 | 0.237 |
Table 3 Baseline data comparison between the two patient groups, n (%)
| Group | n | Sex | Age (years) | Surgery time (minutes) | ASA | Types of surgery | ||||
| Male | Female | II | Ⅲ | IV | Open-abdominal surgery | Laparoscopic | ||||
| Experimental | 250 | 142 (56.80) | 108 (43.20) | 58.76 ± 8.23 | 182.54 ± 35.63 | 48 (19.20) | 152 (60.80) | 50 (20.00) | 95 (38.00) | 155 (62.00) |
| Control | 250 | 139 (55.60) | 111 (44.40) | 57.95 ± 9.14 | 178.96 ± 35.26 | 52 (20.80) | 146 (58.40) | 52 (20.80) | 88 (35.20) | (64.80) |
| χ2/t | - | 0.073 | 1.091 | 1.239 | 0.218 | 0.456 | ||||
| P value | - | 0.787 | 0.276 | 0.216 | 0.897 | 0.500 | ||||
Table 4 Expert consultation results
| Round | Questionnaires distributed | Valid responses | Valid response rate | Expert authority coefficient | Kendall’s W | χ2 value | P value |
| 1 | 20 | 20 | 100 | 0.87 | 0.216 | 135.24 | < 0.001 |
| 2 | 20 | 20 | 100 | 0.89 | 0.331 | 207.51 | < 0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of handover quality indicators between the two patient groups
| Group | n | Handover time (minutes) | Information omission rate (%) |
| Experimental | 250 | 9.86 ± 1.83 | 3.28 ± 1.57 |
| Control | 250 | 8.52 ± 2.15 | 15.86 ± 4.34 |
| t-value | - | 8.624 | 45.217 |
| P value | - | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Table 6 Comparison of complication and adverse event incidence during the anesthesia recovery period, n (%)
| Group | n | Hypothermia | Agitation | Nausea/vomiting | Respiratory depression | Unplanned extubation | Infusion failure | Pressure ulcer |
| Experimental | 250 | 35 (14.00) | 28 (11.20) | 33 (13.20) | 5 (2.00) | 0 (0.00) | 4 (1.60) | 1 (0.40) |
| Control | 250 | 68 (27.20) | 55 (22.00) | 42 (16.80) | 8 (3.20) | 2 (0.80) | 15 (6.00) | 3 (1.20) |
| χ2 value | - | 15.789 | 11.429 | 1.563 | 0.714 | 2.008 | 7.143 | 1.026 |
| P value | - | < 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.211 | 0.398 | 0.156 | 0.008 | 0.311 |
Table 7 Comparison of handover satisfaction among medical staff in the two groups
| Group | n | Process clarity | Information completeness | Work efficiency | Overall security | Total score |
| Experimental | 30 | 90.22 ± 5.35 | 93.66 ± 4.14 | 85.45 ± 6.83 | 92.51 ± 5.02 | 90.43 ± 4.56 |
| Control | 30 | 76.43 ± 8.26 | 72.81 ± 9.58 | 70.69 ± 10.14 | 75.27 ± 8.75 | 73.88 ± 7.64 |
| t-value | - | 7.892 | 11.234 | 6.543 | 9.876 | 10.123 |
| P value | - | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Hu J, Yang WW, Qin W, Ren TT, Zhang MX, Zhu Q. Developing a standardized safety handover system for post-anesthesia patients in gastrointestinal surgery: Construction and validation. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(3): 115349
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i3/115349.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i3.115349
