Application of Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle based on software, hardware, environment, liveware model in preventing infection after endoscopic mucosal resection

Table 1 Incidence of postoperative incision infection in two groups of patients, n (%)

Groups	n	Incidence of infection
Observation group	70	4 (5.71)
Control group	70	13 (18.57)
χ2	-	5.423
P value	-	0.020

Table 2 Postoperative recovery outcomes in both groups, mean ± SD

Groups	n	Time to first flatus (hour)	Time to first defecation (hour)	Time to first bed movement (hour)	Length of stay (day)
Observation group	70	7.34 ± 1.37	12.59 ± 2.42	10.01 ± 1.27	7.10 ± 1.66
Control group	70	9.89 ± 1.37	17.21 ± 2.44	12.81 ± 1.51	12.98 ± 1.80
t	-	10.984	11.222	11.896	20.121
P value	-	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001

Table 3 Quality of care scores in the operating room in both groups, mean ± SD

Groups	n	Environmental management	Nursing training	Nursing safety	Sterilization and isolation
Observation group	70	93.66 ± 1.36	92.59 ± 1.10	94.26 ± 0.94	95.17 ± 1.23
Control group	70	87.71 ± 1.49	86.44 ± 1.24	86.84 ± 1.10	88.39 ± 0.89
t	-	24.680	31.038	42.844	37.455
P value	-	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001

Table 4 Comparison of patient care satisfaction between the two groups, n (%)

Groups	n	Very satisfied	Satisfied	Neutral	Dissatisfied	Total satisfaction
Observation group	70	38 (54.29)	21 (30.00)	7 (10.00)	4 (5.71)	59 (84.29)
Control group	70	28 (40.00)	18 (25.71)	14 (20.00)	10 (14.29)	46 (65.71)
χ2	-	-	-	-	-	6.438
P value	-	-	-	-	-	0.011