©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2026; 18(2): 115744
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.115744
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.115744
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients undergoing percutaneous cholecystostomy (n = 174)
| Variables of interest | n (%), mean (SD) or median (IQR) |
| Demographics | |
| Age, mean (SD), years | 71.7 (15.8) |
| Gender | |
| Female | 92 (53) |
| Male | 82 (47) |
| Race | |
| Hispanic | 50 (29) |
| White | 49 (28) |
| Asian | 49 (28) |
| Black | 17 (10) |
| Other | 9 (5) |
| Comorbidities | |
| Hypertension | 124 (71) |
| Diabetes | 85 (49) |
| Clinical status | |
| Median CCI (IQR) | 5 (4–7) |
| ICU admission | 50 (29) |
| Antibiotics | |
| Piperacillin/tazobactam | 83 (48) |
| Cefoxitin | 25 (14) |
| Ceftriaxone | 10 (6) |
| Cefepime | 7 (4) |
| Ampicillin/sulbactam | 4 (2) |
| Vancomycin | 39 (22) |
| Ciprofloxacin | 13 (7) |
| Metronidazole | 32 (18) |
| Ertapenem | 2 (1) |
| Meropenem | 11 (6) |
| Aztreonam | 13 (7) |
| Doxycycline | 7 (4) |
Table 2 Blood and bile culture data of patients undergoing percutaneous cholecystostomy (n = 174), n (%)
| Microorganism | Blood culture | Bile culture |
| Escherichia coli | 14 (8) | 36 (21) |
| Enterococcus species | 3 (2) | 18 (10) |
| Klebsiella pneumoniae | 6 (3) | 26 (15) |
| Enterobacter | 1 (1) | 9 (5) |
| Acinetobacter | 0 (0) | 3 (2) |
| Clostridium perfrigens | 2 (1) | 3 (2) |
| No growth | 125 (72) | 61 (35) |
Table 3 Covariate analysis conducted based on percutaneous cholecystostomy placement status (n = 174), n (%)
| Characteristic | Early (n = 125) | Late (n = 49) | SMD: Early vs late |
| Age | 75 (65, 85) | 74 (64, 81) | -0.13 (-0.47, 0.21) |
| CCI | 5.00 (3.00, 6.00) | 6.50 (4.00, 8.00) | -0.57 (-0.92, -0.23) |
| Cholecystitis type | 0.30 (-0.04, 0.64) | ||
| Acalculous | 14 (11) | 1 (2) | 0.30 (-0.04, 0.64) |
| Calculous | 111 (89) | 48 (98) | -0.30 (-0.64, 0.04) |
| ICU status | 0.08 (-0.26, 0.42) | ||
| ICU | 34 (27.0) | 16 (33) | -0.08 (-0.42, 0.26) |
| Non-ICU | 91 (73.0) | 33 (67) | 0.08 (-0.26, 0.42) |
| Bile culture | 0.60 (0.25, 0.95) | ||
| Negative | 35 (28) | 26 (53) | -0.60 (-0.95, -0.25) |
| Positive | 90 (72) | 23 (47) | 0.60 (0.25, 0.95) |
| Blood culture | 0.41 (0.05, 0.76) | ||
| Negative | 85 (68) | 40 (82) | -0.41 (-0.76, -0.05) |
| Positive | 40 (32) | 9 (18) | 0.41 (0.05, 0.76) |
Table 4 Outcomes by timing of percutaneous cholecystostomy (n = 174)
| Outcome | Early PCT (≤ 4 days) (n = 125) | Late PCT (> 4 days) (n = 49) |
| Catheter duration (days), median (IQR) | 40 (30-60) | 55 (45-80) |
| Overall mortality | 15% (19/125) | 35% (17/49) |
| Catheter removal | 14% (17/125) | 12% (6/49) |
| Interval LC performed | 38% (48/125) | 16% (8/49) |
Table 5 Outcomes by intensive care unit status (n = 174)
| Outcome | ICU patients (n = 50) | Non-ICU patients (n = 124) |
| Catheter duration (days), median (IQR) | 60 (40-85) | 42 (32-55) |
| Overall mortality | 22% (11/50) | 20% (25/124) |
| Catheter removal | 12% (6/50) | 14% (17/124) |
| Interval LC performed | 22% (11/50) | 36% (45/124) |
Table 6 Outcomes by type of cholecystitis (calculous vs acalculous)
| Outcome | Calculous (n = 159) | Acalculous (n = 15) |
| Catheter duration (days), median (IQR) | 49.5 (30-85) | 47 (9-94) |
| Overall mortality (%) | 22.6 (36/159) | 0 (0/15) |
| Catheter removal (%) | 13.2 (21/159) | 1.5 (2/15) |
| Interval LC performed (%) | 31 (49/159) | 47 (7/15) |
Table 7 Covariate analysis conducted based on follow-up status (n = 174), n (%)
| Characteristic | Censored (n = 138) | Expired (n = 36) | SMD: Early vs late |
| Age | 74 (61, 83) | 79 (72, 88) | -0.69 (-1.07, -0.32) |
| CCI | 5.00 (3.00, 6.00) | 6.50 (5.50, 7.00) | -0.81 (-1.19, -0.43) |
| Cholecystitis type | 0.45 (0.08, 0.82) | ||
| Acalculous | 15 (11) | 0 (0) | 0.45 (0.08, 0.82) |
| Calculous | 123 (89) | 36 (100) | -0.45 (-0.82, -0.08) |
| ICU | 0.06 (-0.31, 0.43) | ||
| ICU | 39 (28) | 11 (31) | -0.06 (-0.43, 0.31) |
| Non-ICU | 99 (72) | 25 (69) | 0.06 (-0.31, 0.43) |
| Bile culture | 0.18 (-0.19, 0.55) | ||
| Negative | 50 (36) | 11 (31) | 0.18 (-0.19, 0.55) |
| Positive | 88 (64) | 25 (69) | -0.18 (-0.55, 0.19) |
| Blood culture | 0.01 (-0.37, 0.38) | ||
| Negative | 97 (70) | 28 (78) | 0.01 (-0.37, 0.38) |
| Positive | 41 (30) | 8 (22) | -0.01 (-0.38, 0.37) |
Table 8 Adjusted Cox proportional hazards model examining the effect of percutaneous cholecystostomy placement time on mortality (n = 174)
| Characteristic | HR | 95%CI | P value |
| PCT placement interval | |||
| Early | |||
| Late | 2.58 | 1.25, 5.32 | 0.01 |
| Age | 1.05 | 1.01, 1.08 | 0.01 |
| Charlson Comorbidity Index | 1.14 | 0.98, 1.32 | 0.09 |
| ICU status | |||
| ICU | |||
| Non-ICU | 0.85 | 0.39, 1.82 | 0.7 |
| Blood culture | |||
| Negative | |||
| Positive | 0.67 | 0.28, 1.60 | 0.4 |
| Bile culture | |||
| Negative | |||
| Positive | 2.07 | 0.95, 4.49 | 0.07 |
Table 9 Adjusted Cox proportional hazards model examining the effect of percutaneous cholecystostomy placement time on mortality in the subset of patients with calculous cholecystitis (n = 159)
| Characteristic | HR | 95%CI | P value |
| PCT placement interval | |||
| Early | |||
| Late | 2.51 | 1.21-5.18 | 0.01 |
| Age | 1.05 | 1.01-1.09 | 0.01 |
| Charlson Comorbidity Index | 1.11 | 0.96-1.29 | 0.2 |
| ICU status | |||
| ICU | |||
| Non-ICU | 0.93 | 0.44-2.00 | 0.9 |
| Blood culture | |||
| Negative | |||
| Positive | 0.67 | 0.28-1.60 | 0.4 |
| Bile culture | |||
| Negative | |||
| Positive | 2.21 | 1.02-4.79 | 0.04 |
- Citation: Hassanesfahani M, Giannis D, Marfo N, Kaur M, Quang CMPT, Miele A, Louis MA, Mandava NR. Defining endpoints in percutaneous cholecystostomy: Catheter management, patient survival, and long-term outcomes from a twelve-year retrospective study. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(2): 115744
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i2/115744.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.115744
