BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Observational Study
©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2026; 18(2): 114378
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.114378
Table 1 Comparison of the baseline demographics for the study cohorts
Data
Synchronous group (n = 56)
Sequential group (n = 50)
χ2/t
P value
Sex (male/female)32/2428/220.0140.906
Age (years)60.12 ± 5.9459.82 ± 6.940.2400.811
Child-Pugh classification (A/B)30/2630/200.4440.505
Tumor diameter (cm)4.48 ± 0.804.40 ± 0.910.4820.631
Clinical staging (II/III/IV)18/26/1213/27/100.6700.716
Number of lesions (single/multiple)19/3720/300.4190.518
Table 2 Comparative therapeutic outcomes, n (%)
Response
Synchronous group (n = 56)
Sequential group (n = 50)
χ2
P value
CR23 (41.07)17 (34.00)
PR21 (37.50)19 (38.00)
SD6 (10.71)8 (16.00)
PD6 (10.71)6 (12.00)
ORR44 (78.57)36 (72.00)0.6160.433
DCR50 (89.29)44 (88.00)0.0430.835
Table 3 Prognostic comparison between groups, n (%)
Prognosis
Synchronous group (n = 56)
Sequential group (n = 50)
χ2/t
P value
PFS (months)7.09 ± 2.607.58 ± 2.271.0280.306
OS
    3 months after treatment56 (100.00)49 (98.00)1.1310.288
    6 months after treatment56 (100.00)48 (96.00)2.2830.131
    12 months after treatment51 (91.07)45 (90.00)0.0350.851
Table 4 Comparative analysis of complications, n (%)
Complications
Synchronous group (n = 56)
Sequential group (n = 50)
χ2
P value
Pyrexia2 (3.57)3 (6.00)
Abdominal pain3 (5.36)2 (4.00)
Gastrointestinal responses3 (5.36)4 (8.00)
Total8 (14.29)9 (18.00)0.2710.603