Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2025; 17(9): 106514
Published online Sep 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.106514
Published online Sep 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.106514
Table 1 Comparison of general data between the two groups, mean ± SD/n (%)
Characteristic | Narrative nursing group (n = 59) | Routine nursing group (n = 49) | P value |
Gender (cases) | 0.080 | ||
Male | 52 (88.13) | 36 (73.46) | |
Female | 7 (11.87) | 13 (26.54) | |
Age (years) | 59.74 ± 8.46 | 61.53 ± 7.73 | 0.259 |
Degree of education | 0.387 | ||
Illiterate | 9 (15.25) | 13 (26.53) | |
Primary school | 26 (44.06) | 19 (38.77) | |
Junior/senior high school | 20 (33.89) | 12 (24.48) | |
College and above | 4 (6.80) | 5 (10.22) | |
History of previous surgery | 0.086 | ||
Yes | 16 (27.11) | 21 (42.85) | |
No | 43 (72.89) | 28 (57.20) | |
Underlying diseases | 0.566 | ||
No | 42 (71.18) | 32 (65.30) | |
Hypertension | 3 (5.08) | 7 (14.28) | |
Diabetes | 5 (8.62) | 3 (6.12) | |
Chronic bronchitis | 6 (10.16) | 4 (8.16) | |
Heart disease | 3 (4.96) | 3 (6.12) | |
Family history | 0.080 | ||
Yes | 2 (3.39) | 6 (12.25) | |
No | 57 (96.61) | 43 (87.75) | |
Surgical method | 0.667 | ||
Laparoscopic-assisted | 15 (25.43) | 15 (30.62) | |
Full endoscopy | 44 (74.57) | 34 (69.38) |
Table 2 Comparison of postoperative recovery between the two groups
Characteristic | Narrative nursing group (n = 59) | Routine nursing group (n = 49) | P value |
VAS (hour), median (QL-QU) | |||
12 | 3 (3-4) | 4 (3-5) | 0.001 |
24 | 3 (3-4) | 4 (3-5) | 0.003 |
48 | 3 (2-3) | 3 (3-4) | 0.033 |
72 | 3 (2-3) | 3 (2-4) | 0.028 |
96 | 2 (2-2) | 2 (2-3) | 0.004 |
120 | 2 (1-2) | 2 (1-2) | 0.243 |
Time to postoperative flatus (days), median (QL-QU) | 3 (2-3) | 3 (2-3) | 0.720 |
Time to postoperative defecation (days), median (QL-QU) | 3 (3-3) | 3 (3-3) | 0.208 |
Time to first postoperative ambulation (days), median (QL-QU) | 1 (1-2) | 1.6 (1-2) | 0.047 |
Postoperative hospital stay (days), median (QL-QU) | 10 (9-11) | 11 (10-12) | 0.003 |
Table 3 Comparison of postoperative psychological status, satisfaction, and postoperative nausea and vomiting between the two groups, mean ± SD
Characteristic | Narrative nursing group (n = 59) | Routine nursing group (n = 49) | P value |
Satisfaction score, median (QL-QU) | 100 (100-100) | 100 (93.5-100) | 0.001 |
PONV score, median (QL-QU) | 2 (1-2) | 1 (2-3) | 0.863 |
SAS score, median (QL-QU) | 46 (40-50) | 50 (47.5-60) | 0.001 |
SDS score | 46.96 ± 7.92 | 53.10 ± 9.43 | 0.001 |
Table 4 Univariate analysis of factors affecting postoperative satisfaction, n (%)
Characteristic | Satisfied (n = 100) | Dissatisfied (n = 8) | P value |
Interventions | 0.022 | ||
Narrative nursing | 58 (58.00) | 1 (12.50) | |
Routine nursing | 42 (42.00) | 7 (87.50) | |
Surgical method | 0.068 | ||
Laparoscopic-assisted | 30 (30.00) | 0 (0.00) | |
Totally endoscopic | 70 (70.00) | 8 (100.00) | |
Degree of education | 0.883 | ||
Illiterate | 21 (21.00) | 1 (12.50) | |
Primary school | 42 (42.00) | 3 (37.50) | |
Junior/senior high school | 29 (29.00) | 3 (37.50) | |
College and above | 8 (8.00) | 1 (12.50) | |
History of previous surgery | 0.259 | ||
Yes | 36 (36.00) | 1 (12.50) | |
No | 64 (64.00) | 7 (87.50) | |
Underlying diseases | 0.466 | ||
No | 69 (69.00) | 5 (62.50) | |
Hypertension | 8 (8.00) | 2 (25.00) | |
Diabetes | 8 (8.00) | 0 (0.00) | |
Chronic bronchitis | 9 (9.00) | 1 (12.50) | |
Heart disease | 6 (6.00) | 0 (0.00) |
Table 5 Univariate analysis of factors affecting postoperative satisfaction, n (%)
Characteristic | Satisfied (n = 100) | Dissatisfied (n = 8) | P value |
Family history | 0.080 | ||
Yes | 7 (7.00) | 1 (12.50) | |
No | 93 (93.00) | 7 (87.50) | |
Age (years) | 0.713 | ||
≥ 60 | 60 (60.00) | 4 (50.00) | |
< 60 | 40 (40.00) | 4 (50.00) | |
Postoperative hospital stay (days) | 0.259 | ||
≥ 10 | 64 (64.00) | 7 (87.50) | |
< 10 | 36 (36.00) | 1 (12.50) | |
SAS | 0.275 | ||
Normal | 65 (65.00) | 3 (37.50) | |
Mild | 30 (30.00) | 4 (50.00) | |
Moderate | 5 (5.00) | 1 (12.50) | |
SDS | 0.499 | ||
Normal | 53 (53.00) | 3 (37.50) | |
Mild | 36 (36.00) | 3 (37.50) | |
Moderate | 9 (9.00) | 2 (25.00) | |
Severe | 2 (2.00) | 0 (0.00) | |
Gender | 0.639 | ||
Male | 82 (82.00) | 6 (75.00) | |
Female | 18 (18.00) | 2 (25.00) |
Table 6 Binary logistic regression of the impact of interventions on postoperative satisfaction
Variable | β | SE | Wald | P value | OR | 95%CI |
Routine nursing | 2.269 | 1.088 | 4.347 | 0.037 | 9.667 | 1.146-81.555 |
- Citation: Shi LN, Wang L, Gao YB, Ma DH, Mao YL, Wang YQ, Wang Y, Guo QX, He RM, Chen JM. Clinical application value of narrative nursing model in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(9): 106514
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i9/106514.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.106514