Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. May 27, 2025; 17(5): 103141
Published online May 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.103141
Published online May 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.103141
Table 1 Comparison of general characteristics between the two patient groups
Characteristic | Intervention group (n = 39) | Control group (n = 39) | χ2/t | P value |
Gender | 0.710 | 0.354 | ||
Male | 18 (46.15) | 20 (51.28) | ||
Female | 21 (53.85) | 19 (48.72) | ||
Age | 8.38 ± 1.46 | 8.56 ± 1.54 | -0.529 | 0.599 |
Height | 135.41 ± 10.11 | 137.56 ± 11.25 | -0.888 | 0.378 |
Weight | 30.10 ± 4.72 | 29.65 ± 5.36 | 0.385 | 0.701 |
Body temperature | 37.25 ± 0.85 | 37.05 ± 0.85 | 1.013 | 0.314 |
SBP | 112.50 ± 12.10 | 115.70 ± 11.20 | -1.214 | 0.229 |
DBP | 66.85 ± 8.15 | 67.25 ± 9.35 | -0.201 | 0.841 |
Course of disease | 13.54 ± 3.51 | 14.13 ± 4.53 | -0.643 | 0.522 |
Table 2 Comparison of length of hospital stay and visual analog scale scores between the two patient groups
Intervention group (n = 39) | Control group (n = 39) | t | P value | |
Hospital stay after surgery (hour) | 107.03 ± 31.44 | 155.33 ± 34.52 | -6.461 | < 0.001 |
VAS scores | ||||
6 h after surgery | 4.33 ± 0.66 | 4.79 ± 0.73 | -2.920 | 0.005 |
12 h after surgery | 3.46 ± 0.60 | 4.38 ± 0.75 | -6.013 | < 0.001 |
24 h after surgery | 2.79 ± 0.41 | 3.64 ± 0.67 | -6.743 | < 0.001 |
48 h after surgery | 2.23 ± 0.63 | 3.10 ± 0.55 | -6.518 | < 0.001 |
72 h after surgery | 1.72 ± 0.72 | 2.62 ± 0.54 | -6.192 | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of postoperative infection and complication rates between the two patient groups
Intervention group (n = 39) | Control group (n = 39) | χ2 | P value | |
Nausea and vomiting | 4 (10.26) | 8 (20.51) | ||
Incision infection | 0 | 3 (7.69) | ||
Intra-abdominal residual infection | 2 (5.13) | 6 (15.38) | ||
Ileus | 0 | 1 (2.56) | ||
Postoperative infection rate | 2 (5.13) | 9 (23.08) | 5.186 | < 0.001 |
Complication rate | 6 (15.38) | 18 (46.15) | 8.667 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of parent satisfaction between the two patient groups
Group | Unsatisfied | Basically satisfied | Satisfied | Satisfaction |
Intervention group (n = 39) | 3 (7.69) | 15 (38.46) | 21 (53.85) | 36 (92.31) |
Control group (n = 39) | 8 (20.51) | 20 (51.28) | 11 (28.21) | 28 (79.49) |
χ2 | 5.571 | |||
P value | < 0.05 |
Table 5 Univariate analysis of relevant clinical indexes of postoperative infections and complications
Non-complication group (n = 54) | Complication group (n = 24) | t/χ2 | P value | |
Age (year) | 8.28 ± 2.45 | 7.83 ± 2.16 | 0.765 | 0.447 |
BMI > 24 | 4 (7.41) | 8 (33.33) | 6.703 | < 0.001 |
Body temperature ≥ 37.3 °C | 6 (11.11) | 11 (45.83) | 11.753 | < 0.001 |
Received anticipatory nursing | 33 (61.11) | 6 (25.00) | 8.667 | < 0.001 |
CRP level (mg/L) | 38.35 ± 17.45 | 103.65 ± 42.35 | -7.284 | < 0.001 |
NLR | 2.27 ± 0.54 | 3.00 ± 0.78 | -4.145 | < 0.001 |
PLR | 151.55 ± 11.45 | 165.85 ± 13.07 | -4.872 | < 0.001 |
WBC (× 109/L) | 13.55 ± 4.85 | 18.25 ± 5.36 | -3.827 | < 0.001 |
Table 6 Results of multivariate logistic regression analysis
Variables | OR | 95%CI | P value |
BMI > 24 | 0.771 | 0.004-150.425 | 0.923 |
Body temperature ≥ 37.3 °C | 1.997 | 0.141-28.289 | 0.609 |
Received anticipatory care | 0.865 | 0.785-1.028 | 0.025 |
CRP level (mg/L) | 1.081 | 1.016-1.150 | 0.013 |
NLR | 2.305 | 0.292-18.180 | 0.428 |
PLR | 1.113 | 0.973-1.273 | 0.119 |
WBC (× 109/L) | 1.191 | 0.950-1.494 | 0.130 |
- Citation: Xue NN, Li XJ, Liu ZM, Tian F, Wang LB, Wang JH. Application effect of anticipatory care in postoperative infection and complication management in children with acute appendicitis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(5): 103141
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i5/103141.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.103141