Clinical effect and prognosis of laparoscopic surgery on colon cancer complicated with intestinal obstruction patients

Table 1 General data of patients in both groups, mean ± SD

Indicators		Control group (n = 50)	Observation group (n = 50)	P value
Gender (male/female)		30/20	29/21	> 0.05
Average age (year)		52.93 ± 8.35	53.06 ± 8.47	> 0.05
TNM stage	Stage I	20	21	> 0.05
	Stage II	25	24
	Stage III	5	5

Table 2 Clinical effect in both groups, n (%)

Groups	n	Cure	Improvement	Ineffective	Total effective rate
Control group	50	20	22	8	42 (84.00)
Observation group	50	26	23	1	49 (98.00)
χ2					5.983
P value					< 0.05

Table 3 Occurrence of complications in both groups, n (%)

Groups	n	Pulmonary infection	Incision infection	Intra-abdominal hemorrhage	Anastomotic fistula	Total incidence rate
Observation group	50	1	0	1	1	3 (6.00)
Control group	50	3	2	3	3	11 (22.00)
χ2						5.316
P value						< 0.05

Table 4 Postoperative drainage volume, mean ± SD

	Control group	Observation group	t value	P value
3-day drainage tube drainage volume (mL)	671.03 ± 228.52	670.21 ± 219.15	0.35	0.52
7-day drainage tube drainage volume (mL)	1220.95 ± 506.43	1224.85 ± 503.05	0.63	0.31
Total drainage tube drainage volume(mL)	1652.63 ± 520.15	1662.15± 521.83	0.54	0.37

Table 5 Occurrence of complications in both groups, n (%)

Groups	n	1-year tumor recurrence rate	1-year tumor metastasis rate	1-year survival rate	3-year survival rate
Observation group	50	17 (14)	3 (6)	46 (92)	35 (70)
Control group	50	10 (20)	5 (10)	45 (90)	32 (64)
χ2		0.638	0.543	0.122	0.407
P value		0.424	0.461	0.727	0.523