Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2025; 17(3): 100143
Published online Mar 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.100143
Published online Mar 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.100143
Table 1 Comparison of surgical-related indicators among three groups of patients, mean ± SD
Groups | Cases | Intraoperative blood loss (mL) | Surgery duration (minute) | Postoperative time to first flatus (day) | Time to ambulation (day) | Postoperative hospital stay (day) |
Control | 40 | 398.14 ± 74.21 | 301.25 ± 45.15 | 5.25 ± 1.31 | 3.94 ± 1.21 | 16.91 ± 4.23 |
Open surgery | 25 | 205.13 ± 69.32 | 265.13 ± 37.43 | 4.13 ± 1.15 | 3.06 ± 0.80 | 15.15 ± 3.71 |
Laparoscopic surgery | 45 | 177.31 ± 55.15 | 231.25 ± 27.77 | 3.43 ± 1.02 | 2.87 ± 0.74 | 13.15 ± 3.15 |
F value | 131.998 | 37.756 | 26.156 | 14.486 | 10.973 | |
P value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Table 2 Comparison of trauma stress response indicators among three groups of patients, mean ± SD
Groups | Cases (n) | ET (ng/L) | NO (μmol/L) | CRP (mg/L) | |||
Before | After 12 hours | Before | After 12 hours | Before | After 12 hours | ||
Control | 40 | 1.05 ± 0.32 | 1.80 ± 0.58 | 10.08 ± 3.17 | 20.13 ± 3.40 | 21.15 ± 1.21 | 63.12 ± 12.58 |
Open surgery | 25 | 1.04 ± 0.39 | 1.65 ± 0.53 | 10.11 ± 3.15 | 18.05 ± 2.45 | 21.30 ± 1.25 | 59.12 ± 11.37 |
Laparoscopic surgery | 45 | 1.01 ± 0.35 | 1.39 ± 0.51 | 10.03 ± 3.11 | 16.13 ± 2.11 | 21.34 ± 1.18 | 50.10 ± 10.33 |
F value | 0.149 | 6.232 | 0.006 | 22.925 | 0.279 | 14.367 | |
P value | 0.862 | 0.002 | 0.994 | < 0.001 | 0.757 | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of complication incidence rates among three groups of patients, n (%)
Groups | Cases | Anastomotic fistula | Incision infection | Pulmonary infection | Dumping syndrome | Abdominal infection | Total incidence |
Control | 40 | 2 (5.00) | 3 (7.50) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.50) | 2 (5.00) | 8 (20.00) |
Open surgery | 25 | 3 (12.00) | 4 (16.00) | 1 (4.00) | 2 (8.00) | 4 (16.00) | 14 (56.00) |
Laparoscopic surgery | 45 | 7 (15.56) | 1 (2.22) | 0 (0) | 5 (11.11) | 5 (11.11) | 18 (40.00) |
Control and laparoscopic group χ2/P value | 8.904/0.002 | ||||||
Control and laparoscopic group χ2/P value | 3.989/0.045 | ||||||
Control and laparoscopic χ2/P value | 1.657/0.197 |
Table 4 Comparison of long-term prognosis follow-up survey among three groups of patients, n (%)
Group | Cases (n) | 6 months post-discharge | 1 year after discharge | 2 years after discharge |
Control | 40 | 36 (90.00) | 28 (70.00) | 22 (55.00) |
Open surgery | 25 | 24 (96.00) | 23 (92.00) | 20 (80.00) |
Laparoscopic surgery | 45 | 44 (97.78) | 41 (91.11) | 34 (75.56) |
Control and open χ2/P value | 0.780/0.377 | 4.406/0.035 | 4.205/0.040 | |
Control and laparoscopic χ2/P value | 2.313/0.128 | 6.176/0.012 | 3.980/0.046 | |
Open and laparoscopic χ2/P value | 0.183/0.668 | 0.016/0.898 | 0.180/0.671 |
- Citation: Zhu LL, Shen RZ. Follow-up of elderly gastric cancer post-radical surgery: Trauma, complications, and prognosis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(3): 100143
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i3/100143.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.100143