Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Dec 27, 2025; 17(12): 111704
Published online Dec 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.111704
Published online Dec 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.111704
Table 1 Baseline data of participants, n (%)
| Indicators | Observation group (n = 65) | Control group (n = 50) | t/χ2 | P value |
| Age (years) (mean ± SD) | 56.06 ± 11.26 | 59.92 ± 10.79 | 1.856 | 0.066 |
| Sex | 0.070 | 0.791 | ||
| Male | 38 (58.46) | 28 (56.00) | ||
| Female | 27 (41.54) | 22 (44.00) | ||
| Tumor classification | 0.606 | 0.895 | ||
| Gastric cancer | 18 (27.69) | 15 (30.00) | ||
| Rectal cancer | 16 (24.62) | 13 (26.00) | ||
| Colon cancer | 14 (21.54) | 12 (24.00) | ||
| Pancreatic cancer | 17 (26.15) | 10 (20.00) | ||
| Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (points) (mean ± SD) | 27.18 ± 6.34 | 28.18 ± 6.46 | 0.832 | 0.407 |
| Karnofsky Performance Status functional status score (points) (mean ± SD) | 39.58 ± 11.32 | 40.40 ± 14.04 | 0.347 | 0.729 |
| Previous chemotherapy treatments | 0.645 | 0.422 | ||
| No | 20 (30.77) | 12 (24.00) | ||
| Yes | 45 (69.23) | 38 (76.00) |
Table 2 Quality of life of patients in two groups, mean ± SD
| Indicators | Observation group (n = 65) | Control group (n = 50) | t value | P value |
| Physical function | ||||
| Before nursing | 36.11 ± 10.14 | 38.52 ± 12.01 | 1.166 | 0.246 |
| After nursing | 56.89 ± 14.80b | 46.26 ± 14.13a | 3.894 | < 0.001 |
| Symptom scores | ||||
| Pain | ||||
| Before nursing | 61.31 ± 15.98 | 65.40 ± 13.71 | 1.446 | 0.151 |
| After nursing | 37.48 ± 11.42b | 48.68 ± 16.97a | 4.223 | < 0.001 |
| Fatigue | ||||
| Before nursing | 66.43 ± 15.17 | 66.80 ± 14.45 | 0.132 | 0.895 |
| After nursing | 51.45 ± 13.12b | 59.26 ± 12.92a | 3.186 | 0.002 |
| Nausea/vomiting | ||||
| Before nursing | 51.29 ± 14.21 | 49.18 ± 16.75 | 0.730 | 0.467 |
| After nursing | 18.82 ± 9.28b | 37.78 ± 14.64a | 8.467 | < 0.001 |
| Overall quality of life | ||||
| Before nursing | 33.65 ± 11.41 | 34.68 ± 10.74 | 0.492 | 0.624 |
| After nursing | 54.49 ± 13.63b | 40.62 ± 11.42a | 5.797 | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Quality of death comparison, mean ± SD
| Score (points) | Observation group (n = 65) | Control group (n = 50) | t value | P value |
| Personal autonomy | 7.45 ± 1.71 | 5.86 ± 1.75 | 4.893 | < 0.001 |
| Treatment preferences | 7.48 ± 1.82 | 5.84 ± 2.20 | 4.373 | < 0.001 |
| Social connections | 6.89 ± 1.73 | 6.18 ± 1.79 | 2.149 | 0.034 |
| Perceptions of death and dignity | 7.72 ± 1.71 | 6.76 ± 1.81 | 2.910 | 0.004 |
| Spiritual needs | 6.88 ± 1.75 | 5.96 ± 2.17 | 2.517 | 0.013 |
| Use of life-prolonging interventions | 7.08 ± 1.80 | 4.74 ± 1.58 | 7.283 | < 0.001 |
| Overall dying quality | 7.65 ± 1.65 | 6.30 ± 1.71 | 4.281 | < 0.001 |
| Quality of care provided by healthcare professionals | 8.09 ± 1.45 | 7.16 ± 1.83 | 3.041 | 0.003 |
| Support from involved caregivers | 7.82 ± 1.50 | 6.54 ± 1.66 | 4.330 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Nursing satisfaction comparison, n (%)
| Indicators | Observation group (n = 65) | Control group (n = 50) | χ2 | P value |
| Very satisfied | 42 (64.62) | 20 (40.00) | ||
| Satisfied | 18 (27.69) | 12 (24.00) | ||
| Fair | 5 (7.69) | 10 (20.00) | ||
| Dissatisfied | 0 (0.00) | 6 (12.00) | ||
| Very dissatisfied | 0 (0.00) | 2 (4.00) | ||
| Overall satisfaction | 60 (92.31) | 32 (64.00) | 14.154 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Zhao P, Miao L, Fu GJ, Feng JY, Deng W, Li HY. Developing Kano’s model of customer satisfaction-driven intensive care unit end-of-life care strategies for gastrointestinal cancer patients. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(12): 111704
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i12/111704.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.111704
