Effect of stratified management and stepwise training on pulmonary rehabilitation in older patients with liver cancer

Table 1 Clinical patient stratification by evidence

Grade	Postoperative complication risk	Frailty index	Liver function grade	Cough score	Activity level	Surgical method
I	High risk	> 2	Grade A	0-2 points	Bedridden	Open surgery
II	Medium risk	1-2	Grade B	3-4 points	Lying/standing	Laparoscopic surgery
III	Low risk	0	Grade C	4-5 points	Walking	Laparoscopic surgery

Table 2 Comparison of intergroup surgical conditions, mean ± SD

Group	Cases	Time to first postoperative mobilization (hours)	Postoperative hospital stays (days)	Average hospitalization cost (10000 yuan)
Study group	60	23.19 ± 2.44	11.23 ± 1.09	3.71 ± 0.44
Control group	60	26.23 ± 2.18	13.31 ± 1.24	4.10 ± 0.58
t		7.197	19.062	7.857
P value		0.000	0.001	0.000

Table 3 Comparison of SPO₂ levels at different nodes between groups after surgery, mean ± SD

Group	Cases	Postoperative day 1	Postoperative day 3	t	P value
Study group	60	90.45 ± 2.20	96.34 ± 2.15	55.211	0.001
Control group	60	90.80 ± 2.30	91.41 ± 2.72	41.476	0.000
t		0.665	9.987
P value		0.507	0.001

Table 4 Comparison of 6-minute walk distance levels at different nodes after surgery, mean ± SD

Group	Cases	Postoperative day 3	Postoperative day 7	t	P value
Study group	60	198.32 ± 23.17	476.71 ± 34.18	52.221	0.001
Control group	60	201.08 ± 22.25	412.45 ± 36.27	38.478	0.000
t		0.665	9.987
P value		0.507	0.001

Table 5 Comparison of different node Borg scores after operation, mean ± SD

Group	Cases	Postoperative day 3	Postoperative day 7	t	P value
Study group	60	5.32 ± 1.14	3.24 ± 1.05	10.395	0.000
Control group	60	5.28 ± 1.21	4.17 ± 1.31	4.821	0.000
t		0.186	4.291
P value		0.853	0.001

Table 6 Comparison of postoperative complication incidence between groups, n (%)

Group	Number of cases	Atelectasis	Pleural effusion	Abdominal infection	Total occurrences
Study group	60	0 (0)	2 (3.33)	0 (0)	2 (3.33)
Control group	60	4 (6.67)	3 (5.0)	1 (1.67)	8 (13.33)
t					3.927
χ2					0.04