Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2025; 17(10): 109700
Published online Oct 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i10.109700
Published online Oct 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i10.109700
Table 1 Comparison of baseline characteristics between pathological complete response and non-pathological complete response groups, n (%)
| Characteristics | pCR group (n = 41) | Non-pCR group (n = 174) | P value |
| Demographic characteristics | |||
| Age (years), median | 61.3 | 60.8 | 0.742 |
| Gender | 0.796 | ||
| Male | 26 (63.4) | 114 (65.5) | |
| Female | 15 (36.6) | 60 (34.5) | |
| BMI (kg/m2), mean | 22.4 | 22.1 | 0.631 |
| Tumor characteristics | |||
| Lauren classification | < 0.001 | ||
| Intestinal | 26 (63.4) | 55 (31.6) | |
| Diffuse | 10 (24.4) | 81 (46.6) | |
| Mixed | 5 (12.2) | 38 (21.8) | |
| Tumor location | 0.218 | ||
| Cardia | 10 (24.4) | 46 (26.4) | |
| Body | 12 (29.3) | 57 (32.8) | |
| Antrum | 18 (43.9) | 67 (38.5) | |
| Diffuse | 1 (2.4) | 4 (2.3) | |
| Clinical staging | |||
| Clinical T stage | 0.022 | ||
| cT3 | 22 (53.7) | 60 (34.5) | |
| cT4 | 19 (46.3) | 114 (65.5) | |
| Clinical N stage | 0.038 | ||
| cN1 | 20 (48.8) | 54 (31.0) | |
| cN2 | 14 (34.1) | 70 (40.2) | |
| cN3 | 7 (17.1) | 50 (28.8) | |
Table 2 Relationship between inflammatory indicators and pathological complete response in gastric cancer
| Group | NLR | PLR | pCR rate (%) | P value | Clinical significance |
| Individual NLR analysis | |||||
| Low NLR group | < 2.5 | - | 29.6 | 0.003 | Significantly higher pCR |
| High NLR group | ≥ 2.5 | - | 13.4 | - | Lower pCR rate |
| Individual PLR analysis | |||||
| Low PLR group | - | < 135 | 26.1 | 0.017 | Significantly higher pCR |
| High PLR group | - | ≥ 135 | 13.9 | - | Lower pCR rate |
| Combined analysis | |||||
| Optimal group | < 2.5 | < 135 | 33.8 | < 0.001 | Highest pCR rate |
| Single low NLR | < 2.5 | ≥ 135 | 22.4 | - | Intermediate pCR rate |
| Single low PLR | ≥ 2.5 | < 135 | 16.9 | - | Intermediate pCR rate |
| Poor prognosis group | ≥ 2.5 | ≥ 135 | 10.7 | - | Lowest pCR rate |
Table 3 Influence of chemotherapy regimens and cycles on pathological complete response rates
| Factor | Category | pCR rate (%) | P value |
| Chemotherapy regimen | Platinum compound type | ||
| Oxaliplatin-containing (FLOT, SOX, XELOX) | 22.3% | 0.034 | |
| Cisplatin-containing (DCF) | 12.7% | - | |
| Specific regimen | 0.023 | ||
| FLOT | 27.5% | ||
| SOX | 18.2% | ||
| XELOX | 15.4% | ||
| DCF | 11.8% | ||
| Chemotherapy cycles | General comparison | ||
| ≥ 4 cycles | 24.8% | 0.006 | |
| < 4 cycles | 11.2% | - | |
| Detailed cycle ranges | - | N/A | |
| 2-3 cycles | 11.2% | ||
| 4-5 cycles | 21.6% | ||
| 6 cycles | 28.3% | ||
| > 6 cycles | 27.9% | ||
- Citation: Bi B, Liu C, Chai J, Duan YM. Retrospective analysis of predictive factors for pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(10): 109700
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i10/109700.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i10.109700
