Fast-track rehabilitation plus humanized nursing improves gastrointestinal function and quality of life in post-surgical gastric cancer patients

Table 1 Comparative analysis of patients’ general data, n (%)

Factors	n	Research group (n = 52)	Control group (n = 50)	χ2/t	P value
Age (years old), mean ± SD	102	53.90 ± 7.15	53.24 ± 7.59	0.452	0.652
Sex				0.394	0.530
Male	58	28 (53.85)	30 (60.00)
Female	44	24 (46.15)	20 (40.00)
Pathological stage				0.146	0.703
I-II	55	29 (55.77)	26 (52.00)
III	47	23 (44.23)	24 (48.00)
Tumor site				0.197	0.906
Gastric antrum	51	26 (50.00)	25 (50.00)
Gastric body	29	14 (26.92)	15 (30.00)
Stomach fundus	22	12 (23.08)	10 (20.00)
Surgical methods				3.000	0.223
Total gastrectomy	16	5 (9.62)	11 (22.00)
Proximal gastrectomy	23	13 (25.00)	10 (20.00)
Distal gastrectomy	63	34 (65.38)	29 (58.00)
Educational background				0.594	0.441
Below high school	43	20 (38.46)	23 (46.00)
High school and above	59	32 (61.54)	27 (54.00)
Family history of gastric cancer				0.118	0.732
Without	77	40 (76.92)	37 (74.00)
With	25	12 (23.08)	13 (26.00)

Table 2 Comparative analysis of postoperative complications, n (%)

Categories	Research group (n = 52)	Control group (n = 50)	χ2 value	P value
Abdominal distension	2 (3.85)	3 (6.00)
Infection	1 (1.92)	3 (6.00)
Gastrointestinal bleeding	1 (1.92)	3 (6.00)
Anastomotic leakage	0 (0.00)	2 (4.00)
Deep vein thrombosis	0 (0.00)	1 (2.00)
Total incidence	4 (7.69)	12 (24.00)	5.126	0.024

Table 3 Comparative analysis of nursing satisfaction, n (%)

Categories	Research group (n = 52)	Control group (n = 50)	χ2 value	P value
Very satisfied	28 (53.85)	21 (42.00)
Satisfied	18 (34.62)	15 (30.00)
Dissatisfied	6 (11.54)	14 (28.00)
Nursing satisfaction	46 (88.46)	36 (72.00)	4.382	0.036