Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jun 27, 2024; 16(6): 1670-1680
Published online Jun 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1670
Published online Jun 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1670
Table 1 Baseline data between liver metastasis group and non-liver metastasis group (n = 195)
Index | Liver metastases group (n = 70) | Non-liver metastases group (n = 125) | P value |
Age (mean ± SD, yr) | 58.3 ± 12.5 | 61.7 ± 12.0 | 0.067 |
Gender, n (%) | 0.865 | ||
Man | 40 (57.1) | 73 (58.4) | |
Female | 30 (42.9) | 52 (41.6) | |
Primary tumor location, n (%) | 0.042 | ||
Colon | 38 (54.3) | 49 (39.2) | |
Rectum | 32 (45.7) | 76 (60.8) | |
BMI, M (P25, P75), kg/m2 | 22.5 (21.4, 24.7) | 22.1 (20.2, 25.0) | 0.28 |
TBIL, M (P25, P75), μmol/L | 14.9 (11.6, 24.7) | 12.8 (9.4, 16.9) | 0.001 |
DBIL, M (P25, P75), μmol/L | 7.2 (4.3, 10.6) | 3.3 (2.3, 5.4) | < 0.001 |
IBIL, M (P25, P75), μmol/L | 9.3 (5.2, 14.3) | 8.8 (6.0, 12.1) | 0.642 |
ALT, M (P25, P75), U/L | 31.5 (16.0, 54.8) | 17.0 (10.0, 25.0) | < 0.001 |
AST, M (P25, P75), U/L | 40.0 (27.8, 87.3) | 20.0 (16.0, 25.5) | < 0.001 |
AST/ALT, M (P25, P75) | 1.6 (1.1, 2.2) | 1.4 (0.9, 1.7) | 0.005 |
TP, M (P25, P75), g/L | 65.1 (58.9, 70.6) | 69.4 (64.3, 73.4) | 0.001 |
ALB, M (P25, P75), g/L | 36.3 (29.5, 40.2) | 41.4 (38.3, 44.1) | < 0.001 |
GLO, M (P25, P75), g/L | 29.3 (24.7, 33.5) | 28.3 (24.0, 31.0) | 0.124 |
A/G (mean ± SD) | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 1.5 ± 0.3 | < 0.001 |
GGT, M (P25, P75), U/L | 59.0 (25.8, 148.0) | 18.0 (13.0, 25.5) | < 0.001 |
ALP, M (P25, P75), U/L | 122.5 (77.5, 211.0) | 76.0 (63.0, 90.5) | < 0.001 |
AFP, M (P25, P75), μg/L | 2.6 (1.6, 3.4) | 2.5 (1.8, 3.2) | 0.845 |
CEA, M (P25, P75), μg/L | 79.5 (12.5, 476.0) | 2.9 (1.8, 5.9) | < 0.001 |
CA125, M (P25, P75), U/mL | 21.3 (11.0, 54.7) | 11.1 (7.9, 16.7) | < 0.001 |
CA19-9, M (P25, P75), U/mL | 85.5 (17.3, 801.7) | 10.9 (7.5, 17.0) | < 0.001 |
ALBI score, M (P25, P75) | -2.3 (-2.7, -1.6) | -2.8 (-3.0, -2.6) | < 0.001 |
Table 2 Baseline data between modeling group and validation group (n = 195)
Index | Modeling group (n = 130) | Validation group (n = 65) | P value |
Age (mean ± SD, yr) | 60.3 ± 11.8 | 60.8 ± 31.2 | 0.772 |
Gender, n (%) | 0.473 | ||
Man | 73 (56.2) | 40 (61.5) | |
Female | 57 (43.8) | 25 (38.5) | |
Primary tumor location, n (%) | 0.222 | ||
Colon | 62 (47.7) | 25 (38.5) | |
Rectum | 68 (52.3) | 40 (61.5) | |
BMI, M (P25, P75), kg/m2 | 22.3 (20.3, 24.9) | 22.0 (20.6, 25.0) | 0.992 |
TBIL, M (P25, P75), μmol/L | 13.3 (10.2, 18.0) | 14.0 (9.6, 18.7) | 0.825 |
DBIL, M (P25, P75), μmol/L | 4.7 (2.8, 7.3) | 3.9 (2.7, 7.1) | 0.462 |
IBIL, M (P25, P75), μmol/L | 8.7 (5.5, 11.9) | 9.6 (5.6, 13.0) | 0.412 |
ALT, M (P25, P75), U/L | 17.5 (11.0, 31.0) | 20.0 (11.0, 33.0) | 0.518 |
AST, M (P25, P75), U/L | 24.5 (17.0, 36.0) | 24.0 (17.5, 38.0) | 0.846 |
AST/ALT, M (P25, P75) | 1.4 (0.9, 1.8) | 1.4 (0.9, 1.9) | 0.715 |
TP, M (P25, P75), g/L | 68.3 (63.8, 72.9) | 67.1 (61.8, 73.0) | 0.348 |
ALB, M (P25, P75), g/L | 40.1 (35.8, 43.5) | 39.1 (36.8, 42.7) | 0.666 |
GLO, M (P25, P75), g/L | 28.7 (24.4, 32.4) | 28.4 (24.0, 31.4) | 0.556 |
A/G (mean ± SD) | 1.4 ± 0.4 | 1.4 ± 0.3 | 0.991 |
GGT, M (P25, P75), U/L | 22.5 (14.0, 52.3) | 22.0 (14.5, 40.5) | 0.828 |
ALP, M (P25, P75), U/L | 80.0 (63.8, 111.0) | 86.0 (67.0, 110.0) | 0.606 |
AFP, M (P25, P75), μg/L | 2.5 (1.7, 3.3) | 2.7 (1.6,3.2) | 0.607 |
CEA, M (P25, P75), μg/L | 4.7 (2.0, 33.3) | 5.3 (2.5, 35.3) | 0.514 |
CA125, M (P25, P75), U/mL | 12.6 (8.6, 23.2) | 31.2 (9.1, 22.7) | 0.792 |
CA19-9, M (P25, P75), U/mL | 13.9 (8.1, 52.6) | 15.2 (8.2, 52.4) | 0.697 |
ALBI score, M (P25, P75) | -2.7 (-2.9, -2.3) | -2.7 (-2.9, -2.4) | 0.522 |
Table 3 Multivariate Logistic regression analysis of factors influence liver metastasis of colorectal cancer
Variable | β | Error | Wald | Freedom | P value | OR | 95%CI | |
Lower limit | Upper limit | |||||||
ALT (U/L) | 0.036 | 0.017 | 4.734 | 1 | 0.030 | 1.037 | 1.004 | 1.071 |
CEA (μg/L) | 0.025 | 0.009 | 8.017 | 1 | 0.005 | 1.025 | 1.008 | 1.043 |
ALBI score | 2.087 | 0.588 | 12.588 | 1 | 0.000 | 8.062 | 2.545 | 25.540 |
Constant term | 3.047 | 1.555 | 3.839 | 1 | 0.050 | 21.058 | - |
Table 4 Diagnostic efficacy between individual and combined detection of alanine aminotransferase, carcinoembryonic antigen, and albumin bilirubin score in modeling group
Testing index | AUC | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | P value |
ALT | 0.704 | 58.0 | 85.0 | < 0.001 |
CEA | 0.897 | 84.0 | 87.5 | < 0.00 |
ALBI score | 0.825 | 84.0 | 72.5 | < 0.001 |
ALT combined with CEA | 0.896 | 80.0 | 912 | < 0.00 |
ALT combined with ALBI score | 0.858 | 80.0 | 78.7 | < 0.001 |
CEA combined with ALBI score | 0. 91 | 82.0 | 86.3 | < 0.001 |
Combination of the three | 0.921 | 78.0 | 95.0 | < 0.001 |
Table 5 Diagnostic efficacy between individual and combined detection of alanine aminotransferase, carcinoembryonic antigen, and albumin bilirubin score in verification group
Testing index | AUC | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | P value |
ALT | 0.774 | 75.0 | 73.3 | < 0.001 |
CEA | 0.864 | 75.0 | 88.9 | < 0.001 |
ALBI score | 0.659 | 45.0 | 97.8 | 0.042 |
ALT combined with CEA | 0.916 | 85.0 | 95.6 | < 0.001 |
ALT combined with ALBI score | 0.784 | 60.0 | 91.1 | < 0.001 |
CEA combined with ALBI score | 0.834 | 70.0 | 100.0 | < 0.001 |
Combination of the three | 0.918 | 85.0 | 95.6 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Wang ZM, Pan SP, Zhang JJ, Zhou J. Prediction and analysis of albumin-bilirubin score combined with liver function index and carcinoembryonic antigen on liver metastasis of colorectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(6): 1670-1680
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v16/i6/1670.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1670