Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 27, 2024; 16(11): 3413-3424
Published online Nov 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i11.3413
Published online Nov 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i11.3413
Table 1 Incidence of pancreatic fistula after gastric cancer surgery
| Ref. | Year | Incidence % | Patient total | Surgical approach | Study type |
| Hiki et al[3] | 2018 | 2.2 | 1067 | LDG for GC | Multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial |
| 1.0 | 1067 | ODG for GC | |||
| Inaki et al[30] | 2015 | 3.4 | 86 | LG for AGC | Multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial |
| Nakauchi et al[31] | 2016 | 13 | 92 | TLTG for AGC | Single-center retrospective study |
| Yu et al[32] | 2013 | 0.4 | 490 | LDG/LPG for GC | Single-center retrospective study |
| 1.7 | 236 | ODG/OPG for GC | |||
| 3.8 | 79 | LTG for GC | |||
| 22.2 | 86 | OTG for GC | |||
| Lee et al[33] | 2019 | 1.9 | 526 | LDG for AGC | Multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial |
| 0.6 | 524 | ODG for AGC | |||
| Hu et al[36] | 2016 | 0.4 | 519 | LDG + D2 for AGC | Multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial |
| 0.0 | 520 | ODG + D2 for AGC | |||
| Obama et al[38] | 2011 | 7.2 | 138 | LG for GC | Single-center retrospective study |
| 2.1 | 95 | OG for GC | |||
| Ojima et al[46] | 2019 | 4.7 | 639 | LG for GC | Single-center retrospective study |
| 0.0 | 20 | RG for GC | |||
| Ye et al[47] | 2020 | 2.8 | 285 | LDG for AGC | Single-center retrospective study |
| 0.4 | 285 | RDG for AGC |
Table 2 Key parameters for postoperative pancreatic fistula grading[2]
Table 3 Revised 2016 International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery classification and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: Checklist for clinical use[55]
| Event | BL | Grade B POPF1 | Grade C POPF1 |
| Increased amylase activity > 3 times upper limit institutional normal serum value | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Persisting peripancreatic drainage > 3 weeks | No | Yes | Yes |
| Clinically relevant change in management of POPF2 | No | Yes | Yes |
| POPF percutaneous or endoscopic specific interventions for collections | No | Yes | Yes |
| Angiographic procedures for POPF related bleeding | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reoperation for POPF | No | No | Yes |
| Signs of infection related to POPF | No | Yes, without organ failure | Yes, with organ failure |
| POPF related organ failure3 | No | No | Yes |
| POPF-related death | No | No | Yes |
Table 4 Clavien-Dindo classification[56]
| Grades | Definition |
| I | Any deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic, and radiological interventions. Allowed therapeutic regimens are: Drugs as antiemetics, antipyretics, analgesics, diuretics and electrolytes, and physiotherapy. This grade also includes wound infections opened at the bedside |
| II | Requiring pharmacological treatment with drugs other than such allowed for Grade I complications. Blood transfusions and total parenteral nutrition are also included |
| III | Requiring surgical, endoscopic, or radiological intervention |
| IIIa | Intervention not under general anesthesia |
| IIIb | Intervention under general anesthesia |
| IV | Life-threatening complication (including CNS complications: Brain hemorrhage, ischemic stroke, subarachnoid bleeding, but excluding transient ischemic attacks) requiring IC/ICU management |
| IVa | Single organ dysfunction (including dialysis) |
| IVb | Multi-organ dysfunction |
| V | Death of the patient |
| Suffix “d” | If the patient suffers from a complication at the time of discharge, the suffix ‘d’ (for ‘disability’) is added to the respective grade of complication. This label indicates the need for a follow-up to fully evaluate the complication |
- Citation: Liu SS, Xie HY, Chang HD, Wang L, Yan S. Risk factors and prevention of pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(11): 3413-3424
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v16/i11/3413.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i11.3413
