©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2026; 18(2): 115744
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.115744
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.115744
Figure 1 Restricted cubic splines model for optimal selection of early vs late percutaneous cholecystostomy placement cut-off.
PCT: Percutaneous cholecystostomy.
Figure 2
Patient flow diagram.
Figure 3
Overall survival curve.
Figure 4 Unadjusted and adjusted survival curve: Early vs late percutaneous cholecystostomy placement.
A: Unadjusted survival curve; B: Adjusted survival curve. PCT: Percutaneous cholecystostomy.
- Citation: Hassanesfahani M, Giannis D, Marfo N, Kaur M, Quang CMPT, Miele A, Louis MA, Mandava NR. Defining endpoints in percutaneous cholecystostomy: Catheter management, patient survival, and long-term outcomes from a twelve-year retrospective study. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(2): 115744
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i2/115744.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.115744
