©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2026; 18(2): 114378
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.114378
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.114378
Figure 1 The process of patient inclusion and exclusion.
HCC: Hepatocellular carcinoma; TACE: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization; MWA: Microwave ablation.
Figure 2 Comparative analysis of ablation related parameters between the two groups.
A: Quantity of ablation needles employed in the synchronous vs sequential groups; B: Ablation time in both cohorts; C: Power settings applied during ablation in both groups. aP < 0.05 vs sequential group.
Figure 3 Comparative analysis of tumor biomarkers.
A: Pre- and post-treatment alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in two groups; B: AFP-L3 prior to and following treatment in both cohorts. AFP: Alpha-fetoprotein. aP < 0.01 vs pre- treatment.
Figure 4 Comparative assessment of liver function indices.
A: Comparison of pre- and post-treatment total bilirubin; B: Pre- and post-treatment alanine aminotransferase variations across cohorts; C: Aspartate aminotransferase levels prior to and following therapy. TBIL: Total bilirubin; ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; AST: Aspartate aminotransferase. aP < 0.01 vs pre-treatment values.
- Citation: Yu Y, Yuan W, Lei J, Zhao CB, Tao CG, Liu SH, Wang BL. Synchronous vs sequential combination of transarterial chemoembolization and microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Efficacy and prognosis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(2): 114378
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i2/114378.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.114378
