©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2026; 18(2): 113525
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.113525
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.113525
Figure 1 Comparison of postoperative analgesia scores (points) between two groups.
aP < 0.05; bP < 0.01. Error bars represent standard deviation. CA: Conventional anesthesia; DEX: Dexmedetomidine; PA: Preconditioning anesthesia.
Figure 2 Comparison of adverse reaction incidence rate between two groups.
A: Intraoperative adverse reaction incidence rate; B: Postoperative adverse reaction incidence rate. aP < 0.05. CA: Conventional anesthesia; DEX: Dexmedetomidine; NS: Not significant; PA: Preconditioning anesthesia.
- Citation: Chen M, Chen FC, Pan Q, Liu ZH. Impact of dexmedetomidine preconditioning on analgesic and postoperative recovery in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(2): 113525
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i2/113525.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.113525
