BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2026; 18(10): 120648
Published online Oct 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.120648
Figure 1
Figure 1 Perioperative indicators. A: Effects of the two management models on intraoperative bleeding volume; B: Effects of the two management models on operation time; C: Effects of the two management models on hospitalization time. aP < 0.05.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and Self-Rating Depression Scale scores. A: Effects of the two management models on Self-Rating Anxiety Scale scores; B: Effects of the two management models on Self-Rating Depression Scale scores. aP < 0.05 vs before nursing, cP < 0.05 vs the regular group. SAS: Self-Rating Anxiety Scale; SDS: Self-Rating Depression Scale.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Numeric Rating Scale and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores. A: Effects of the two management models on Numeric Rating Scale scores; B: Effects of the two management models on Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores. aP < 0.05, bP < 0.05 vs 6 hours post-operation, and cP < 0.05 vs the regular group.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Short-Form 36 Item Health Survey scores. A: Effects of the two management models on vitality; B: Effects of the two management models on social functioning; C: Effects of the two management models on role emotional; D: Effects of the two management models on mental health; E: Effects of the two management models on physical functioning; F: Effects of the two management models on role physical; G: Effects of the two management models on bodily pain; H: Effects of the two management models on general health. aP < 0.05. VT: Vitality; SF: Social functioning; RE: Role emotional; MH: Mental health; PF: Physical functioning; RP: Role physical; BP: Bodily pain; GH: General health.


Write to the Help Desk