BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Dec 27, 2025; 17(12): 111481
Published online Dec 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.111481
Figure 1
Figure 1  Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram illustrating the study selection process for this scoping review.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Multimodal assessment of the ileo-colonic anastomosis in postoperative Crohn’s disease. A: Transabdominal ultrasound showing a thickened anastomotic site between the colon and ileum (marked with an asterisk) with gap in the submucosa; B: Measurement of bowel wall thickness (5.79 mm) proximal to the ileo-colonic anastomosis in neo-terminal ileum using high-frequency ultrasound; C: Ileocolonoscopic image showing ulcerated anastomotic site with suture material and few ulcers in neo-terminal ileum; D: Endoscopic view of the ulcerated anastomostic site with proximal ulcerations.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Suggested surveillance algorithm integrating intestinal ultrasound and fecal calprotectin for monitoring postoperative Crohn’s disease. BWT: Bowel wall thickness; FCP: Fecal calprotectin; NPV: Negative predictive value; IUS: Intestinal ultrasound; ICA: Ileocolonic anastomosis; CEUS: Contrast enhanced ultrasound; SICUS: Small intestine contrast ultrasound.