Influence of different magnetic forces on the effect of colonic anastomosis in rats

doi:10.4240/wjgs.v16.i3.860

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 16, Issue 3

This Article

Peer-Review Report of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (5487)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-7) series, Tables (1-2) series.

Item

Count

PDF

212

HTML

1643

Figures (1-7)

439

Tables (1-2)

479

Sum=2773

Featured Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

404

Download

1049

Sum=1453

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

170

Download

889

Sum=1059

Mar 27, 2024 (publication date) through Feb 20, 2026

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (2)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

ISSN

1948-9366

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Basic Study

World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2024; 16(3): 860-870
Published online Mar 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i3.860

Influence of different magnetic forces on the effect of colonic anastomosis in rats

Bo-Yan Tian, Miao-Miao Zhang, Jia Ma, Yi Lyu, Xiao-Peng Yan

Bo-Yan Tian, Miao-Miao Zhang, Yi Lyu, Xiao-Peng Yan, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, Shaanxi Province, China

Miao-Miao Zhang, Yi Lyu, Xiao-Peng Yan, National Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Precision Surgery & Regenerative Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, Shaanxi Province, China

Jia Ma, Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an 710068, Shaanxi Province, China

Co-first authors: Bo-Yan Tian and Miao-Miao Zhang.

Co-corresponding authors: Xiao-Peng Yan and Yi Lyu.

Author contributions: Lyu Y and Yan XP designed and coordinated the study; Tian BY, Zhang MM, Ma J, Yan XP performed the research and acquired the data; Tian BY, Zhang MM, Ma J analyzed the data; Zhang MM tested and analyzed the magnetic test; Tian BY, Zhang MM and Yan XP wrote the manuscript; Yan XP and Lyu Y conceived of the study and contributed to the study design, the interpretation of the results, and the critical revision of the manuscript; Yan XP and Zhang MM proposed the “Yan-Zhang’s Magnetic Force Sea-Level Theory”; all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Supported by the Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi, No. 2022SF-036; the Institutional Foundation of The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, No. 2022MS-07; and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, No. xzy022023068.

Institutional review board statement: This study was reviewed and approved by the Xi’an Jiaotong University Institution Review Board, No. 2021-1534.

Institutional animal care and use committee statement: The study protocol and all experimental procedures were carried out strictly in accordance with the Guidelines for Care and Use of Experimental Animals issued by the Xi’an Jiaotong University Medical Center. This experimental study was approved by the Experimental Ethics Committee of Xi’an Jiaotong University, No. 2021-1534.

Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.

Data sharing statement: The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article or from the corresponding authors upon request.

ARRIVE guidelines statement: The authors have read the ARRIVE guidelines, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the ARRIVE guidelines.

Corresponding author: Xiao-Peng Yan, MD, PhD, Associate Research Scientist, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 277 West Yanta Road, Xi'an 710061, Shaanxi Province, China. yanxiaopeng9966@163.com

Received: October 16, 2023
Peer-review started: October 16, 2023
First decision: January 12, 2024
Revised: January 18, 2024
Accepted: February 6, 2024
Article in press: February 6, 2024
Published online: March 27, 2024
Processing time: 158 Days and 2.5 Hours

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

Research background

Magnetic compression anastomosis, as a new type of anastomosis, mainly includes esophageal anastomosis, gastrointestinal anastomosis and intestinal anastomosis in the study and clinical application of digestive tract. At present, there are more and more researches on magnetic compression anastomosis (MCA), but there is no relevant research report on magnetic force and anastomosis healing.

Research motivation

At present, there are few reports on the relationship between MCA and optimal magnetic force, and the evaluation criteria of optimal magnetic force are inconsistent. We think that such studies are not enough.

Research objectives

To investigate the influence of different magnetic magnets on the anastomosis formed by MCA of digestive tract.

Research methods

Colonic MCA was performed on two groups of rats using two sets of magnets of the same size but different magnetic forces. The anastomotic specimens were collected 4 wk after operation to evaluate the formation of the anastomosis in the two groups.

Research results

There was no significant difference in operation time, bursting pressure and anastomotic diameter between the two groups. The discharge time of the strong magnet group was slightly longer than that of the common magnet group, but the difference was not statistically significant. The anastomosis of the two groups of specimens healed well, the continuity of the mucosa was good, and there was no difference in healing.

Research conclusions

The results indicate that there is no significant difference in the formation of the anastomosis between the magnets with different magnetic forces used in this experiment.

Research perspectives

Although this study seems to have a negative result, it has important significance in the basic research of MCA.