Published online Apr 27, 2016. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i4.315
Peer-review started: October 22, 2015
First decision: December 11, 2015
Revised: December 15, 2015
Accepted: January 29, 2016
Article in press: January 31, 2016
Published online: April 27, 2016
Processing time: 182 Days and 9.8 Hours
AIM: To determine the outcome of the management of iatrogenic gastrointestinal tract perforations treated by over-the-scope clip (OTSC) placement.
METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 20 patients (13 female and 7 male; mean age: 70.6 ± 9.8 years) in eight high-volume tertiary referral centers with upper or lower iatrogenic gastrointestinal tract perforation treated by OTSC placement. Gastrointestinal tract perforation could be with oval-shape or with round-shape. Oval-shape perforations were closed by OTSC only by suction and the round-shape by the “twin-grasper” plus suction.
RESULTS: Main perforation diameter was 10.1 ± 4.3 mm (range 3-18 mm). The technical success rate was 100% (20/20 patients) and the clinical success rate was 90% (18/20 patients). Two patients (10%) who did not have complete sealing of the defect underwent surgery. Based upon our observations we propose two types of perforation: Round-shape “type-1 perforation” and oval-shape “type-2 perforation”. Eight (40%) out of the 20 patients had a type-1 perforation and 12 patients a type-2 (60%).
CONCLUSION: OTSC placement should be attempted after perforation occurring during diagnostic or therapeutic endoscopy. A failed closure attempt does not impair subsequent surgical treatment.
Core tip: The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of over-the-scope clip management of patients with iatrogenic gastrointestinal tract perforations in eight high-volume tertiary referral centers. Technical success was of 100% and clinical success of 90%. Moreover, after evaluating our results we did a classification of the iatrogenic perforation: We defined the perforation with round-shape “type-1 perforation” and the oval-shape one as “type-2 perforation”.