BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Prospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 27, 2026; 18(8): 121902
Published online Aug 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.121902
Non-surgical magnetic-electrical biofeedback improves anterior resection syndrome after sphincter-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer
Xia-Hui Weng, Yin Huang
Xia-Hui Weng, Yin Huang, Pelvic Floor Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Wuhan Eighth Hospital (Wuhan Colorectal Hospital), Wuhan 430012, Hubei Province, China
Author contributions: Weng XH Responsible for the entire research process, including the research design, data collection, statistical analysis, manuscript drafting, revision, and final approval; Huang Y Participated in the data organization, literature review, and manuscript proofreading. All the authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
AI contribution statement: The authors declare that no AI tools were used in the development or writing of this manuscript and take full responsibility for its integrity, accuracy, and originality.
Institutional review board statement: This study has been reviewed and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Wuhan Eighth Hospital (Wuhan Colorectal Hospital), Approval No. 0205.
Clinical trial registration statement: The study procedures consisted solely of routine clinical practice and standard treatment workflows without the introduction of experimental drugs, devices, or investigator-directed interventional modifications. The study protocol received approval from the institutional ethics committee, and all participants provided written informed consent before enrollment. Based on the understanding at the time of study initiation that the research did not involve additional interventional measures beyond usual clinical care, formal clinical trial registration was not pursued, and therefore no trial registration number is available.
Informed consent statement: All the individuals who participated in this study provided their written informed consent prior to study enrolment.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
CONSORT 2010 statement: The authors have read the CONSORT 2010 Statement, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the CONSORT 2010 Statement.
Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.
Corresponding author: Xia-Hui Weng, Associate Chief Nurse, Pelvic Floor Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Wuhan Eighth Hospital (Wuhan Colorectal Hospital), No. 1288 Jianshe Avenue, Jiang’an District, Wuhan 430012, Hubei Province, China. wxh1390001@163.com
Received: May 12, 2026
Revised: June 16, 2026
Accepted: July 14, 2026
Published online: August 27, 2026
Processing time: 96 Days and 17.1 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Sphincter-preserving surgery is a common procedure for rectal cancer, but anterior resection syndrome (ARS) remains a frequent complication.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of combined magnetic-electrical biofeedback therapy in patients with ARS after sphincter-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer.

METHODS

Sixty patients with ARS following sphincter-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer admitted to our hospital between August 2024 to March 2026, were selected. Based on the chronological order of surgery, the patients were divided into control group and (n = 30) receiving conventional intervention or a study group (n = 30) receiving magnetic-electrical biofeedback therapy. Bowel function indicators, Low ARS (LARS) scores and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Bowel Function Instrument (MSKCC-BFI) scores were assessed before, 1 month after, and 3 months after intervention. Anal pressure indicators, including anal resting pressure and maximum squeeze pressure, were evaluated before and after the intervention. Anorectal function indicators, including first rectal sensation volume, maximum tolerated volume, and rectal compliance, were compared before and after the intervention. The clinical efficacy rates were also calculated for both groups.

RESULTS

Baseline bowel function indicators, LARS scores, and MSKCC-BFI scores (P > 0.05) did not differ significantly between groups. After treatment, the study group showed fewer daily bowel movements, lower fecal incontinence frequency scores, lower LARS scores, and higher MSKCC-BFI scores than the control group (all P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in anal pressure or anorectal function indicators before the intervention (P > 0.05). Anal resting pressure, maximum squeeze pressure, as first rectal sensation volume, maximum tolerated volume, and rectal compliance were also significantly higher in the study group than the control group (P < 0.05). The total effective rate was 96.67% (29/30) significantly higher in the study group than 73.33% (22/30) in the control group [96.67% (29/30) vs 73.33% (22/30), P < 0.05].

CONCLUSION

Combined intervention using magnetic-electrical biofeedback demonstrated significant efficacy in patients with ARS after sphincter-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer. It facilitates the synergistic recovery of rectal and anal canal functions, plays a positive role in improving patients’ bowel movements and anorectal function, and promotes enhanced clinical outcomes.

Keywords: Magnetic-electrical biofeedback therapy; Low rectal cancer; Sphincter-preserving surgery; Anterior resection syndrome; Anorectal function

Core Tip: Anterior resection syndrome remains one of the most challenging functional complications after sphincter-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer, substantially affecting patients' quality of life. This study demonstrates that combined magnetic-electrical biofeedback therapy significantly improves bowel function, anal sphincter function, anorectal physiological parameters, and patient-reported bowel function compared with conventional rehabilitation alone. The combined intervention achieved a higher overall clinical response rate and promoted coordinated recovery of rectal and anal functions, suggesting that it is a safe, effective, and promising rehabilitation strategy for postoperative anterior resection syndrome management.

Write to the Help Desk