BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Basic Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2026; 18(3): 116575
Published online Mar 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i3.116575
Sutured rectal lift for obstructed defecation: Mesh-free sphincter-preserving transanal technique for Oxford grade II-III prolapse
Claudio Eduardo Pagano, Sonia Sarnari, Umberto Favetta, Roberto Picheo, Fabrizio Gambarini, Angelo Guttadauro, Michele Schiano di Visconte
Claudio Eduardo Pagano, Umberto Favetta, Roberto Picheo, Fabrizio Gambarini, Proctological and Pelvic Floor Surgery Unit, Istituto di Cura Città di Pavia, Pavia 27100, Lombardy, Italy
Sonia Sarnari, Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases Center, Azienda ULSS 2 "Marca Trevigiana", Treviso 31100, Treviso, Italy
Angelo Guttadauro, Department of Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza 20900, Italy
Michele Schiano di Visconte, Department of General Surgery, Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases Center, Azienda ULSS 2 “Marca Trevigiana”, Treviso 31100, Veneto, Italy
Author contributions: Schiano di Visconte M designed the research study; Pagano CE, Sarnari S, Favetta U, Picheo R, Gambarini F, Guttadauro A and Schiano di Visconte M performed the technical development and bench simulations and contributed to data analysis and interpretation; Schiano di Visconte M and Pagano CE drafted the manuscript; all authors revised the manuscript for important intellectual content and approved the final version.
Institutional review board statement: This basic study did not involve human participants, identifiable personal data, or the use of animal models. Therefore, formal approval by an institutional review board or ethics committee was not required, in accordance with national and international regulations.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Data sharing statement: No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study; therefore, data sharing is not applicable.
Corresponding author: Michele Schiano di Visconte, MD, PhD, Chief, Department of General Surgery, Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases Center, Azienda ULSS 2 “Marca Trevigiana”, Via Sant'Ambrogio in Fiera, Treviso 31100, Veneto, Italy. mschianodivisconte@gmail.com
Received: November 14, 2025
Revised: December 13, 2025
Accepted: January 15, 2026
Published online: March 27, 2026
Processing time: 133 Days and 13.3 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) frequently results from an internal rectal prolapse, which disrupts the rectal axis and impairs evacuation. Resectional transanal operations can remove redundant tissue, but fail to restore structural support, whereas abdominal mesh rectopexy involves prosthetic materials and has a higher operative burden. The sutured rectal lift (SuReL) was developed as a reconstructive, non-resective, and mesh-free transanal technique to restore rectal suspension while preserving continence in patients with ODS secondary to internal prolapse.

AIM

To describe the rationale, indications, and step-by-step operative technique of SuReL for Oxford grade II-III internal rectal prolapse causing obstructed defecation.

METHODS

SuReL was performed using the Sylarum® transanal access device. The rectal wall was addressed sequentially in six circumferential sectors (11, 1, 9, 3, 7, and 5 o’clock). In each sector, a triphasic suture sequence with a barbed 0/0 monofilament (Filbloc®) was placed: (1) A mucosa-submucosa pass; (2) A deeper pass including the muscularis layer at the same level; and (3) A third pass 3 mm caudally, forming a semiloop for suspension. Cranial plications advanced distally to the upper limit of the prolapse. A deep circumferential reinforcement layer with a 2/0 Assuplus® monofilament consolidated the lift.

RESULTS

The procedure standardizes the reconstructive phase through sector-based rotation, allowing symmetric traction and full-thickness suspension without resection. Operative pearls consist of maintaining uniform exposure, ensuring precise semiloop depth for tension control, and verifying lumen patency with saline irrigation. Key technical advantages include the absence of stapling devices or prosthetic materials, minimal bleeding, a short operative time, and preservation of mucosal sensitivity. Postoperative recovery is typically rapid with early mobilization and minimal discomfort.

CONCLUSION

SuReL represents a technically reproducible and standardized approach for the treatment of internal rectal prolapse. This preclinical study demonstrated feasibility and mechanical consistency using anatomical simulators, while the clinical efficacy and physiological benefits remain to be validated in prospective trials.

Keywords: Obstructed defecation syndrome; Internal rectal prolapse; Transanal surgery; Sphincter preservation; Rectal suspension; Surgical standardization

Core Tip: Obstructed defecation syndrome due to internal rectal prolapse requires options beyond resection or mesh rectopexy. Sutured rectal lift is a physiological, mesh-free, sphincter-preserving transanal suspension. This basic study details the anatomic rationale, step-by-step standardization, and bench validation of suture-based lift to restore the rectal axis and compliance. By focusing on Oxford grade II–III prolapse and excluding multicompartmental descent, we provide reproducible technical guidance and implementation pearls that are distinct from the clinical outcomes reported elsewhere. The aim was to enable safe adoption, inform the study design, and avoid data overlap with prior clinical series.