BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026. No commercial re-use. See Permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2026; 18(2): 116235
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.116235
Managing reflux after tubular gastric esophageal substitution
Li-Juan Yan, Si-Wen Shen, Ting-Ting Fang
Li-Juan Yan, Si-Wen Shen, Ting-Ting Fang, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214000, Jiangsu Province, China
Author contributions: Yan LJ conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, data curation, writing-original draft; Shen SW validation, resources, software, visualization, writing-review and editing; Fang TT supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, writing-review and editing. All authors strictly follow academic norms to ensure that contributions are authentic, traceable, and have no statements of conflict of interest.
Supported by Nursing Research Seedling Action Plan of Jiangnan University Affiliated Hospital, No. TJXD-2025-206.
Institutional review board statement: The procedures for both assessment time points (baseline and post-intervention) adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and ethical principles for medical, psychological, and sociological research involving human participants, and the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University Research Ethics Committee approved the study protocol, No. LS2025478.
Informed consent statement: All patients signed informed consent forms before the study.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to declare the present study.
Data sharing statement: No other data provided.
Corresponding author: Ting-Ting Fang, Master degree, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, No. 1000 Hefeng Road, Binhu District, Wuxi 214000, Jiangsu Province, China. f981836931@163.com
Received: November 14, 2025
Revised: December 11, 2025
Accepted: January 7, 2026
Published online: February 27, 2026
Processing time: 103 Days and 23 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Tubular gastric substitution is a common procedure after esophagectomy, and postoperative reflux symptoms significantly impair the patients' quality of life and nutritional status. Effective long-term nursing strategies are crucial in managing this complication. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a comprehensive follow-up approach.

AIM

To investigate the follow-up nursing interventions and clinical outcomes of reflux following tubular gastric esophageal replacement surgery.

METHODS

A randomized prospective trial was conducted using clinical data from 100 patients with postoperative reflux following tubular gastric esophageal replacement surgery treated at our hospital's Department of Thoracic Surgery between July 2023 and July 2025. Patients were divided into control and study groups based on differing clinical nursing approaches; the control group received routine follow-up care, while the study group underwent comprehensive follow-up care for two months. Pre- and post-intervention comparisons assessed 24-hour reflux frequency, reflux episodes lasting over five minutes, reflux symptom scores, nutritional indicators, quality of life scores, complication rates, and nursing satisfaction.

RESULTS

Pre-intervention, no significant differences existed between groups in 24-hour reflux frequency (study: 9.25 ± 1.33 vs control: 9.30 ± 1.28, P = 0.848) or episodes lasting ≥ 5 minutes (study: 4.83 ± 1.16 vs control: 4.78 ± 1.09, P = 0.825). Post-intervention, both groups showed reductions, with the study group exhibiting significantly lower rates than the control group (24-hour frequency: 2.13 ± 0.35 vs 4.52 ± 1.06, P = 0.000; episodes ≥ 5 minutes: 0.88 ± 0.17 vs 2.03 ± 0.44, P = 0.000). The assessment revealed no significant pre-intervention differences in the scores for heartburn, acid regurgitation, upper abdominal distension, or upper abdominal pain. Post-intervention, all scores decreased, with the study group showing significantly lower scores than the control group (e.g., heartburn: 0.91 ± 0.12 vs 1.46 ± 0.26, P = 0.001). Pre-intervention hemoglobin (Hb), serum albumin, and prealbumin levels were not significantly different between the groups. Post-intervention, all parameters increased, with the study group significantly exceeding the control group (e.g., Hb: 76.05 ± 5.19 g/L vs 62.19 ± 5.07 g/L, P = 0.001). Pre-intervention World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief total scores were comparable between groups (study: 68.15 ± 4.16 vs control: 68.08 ± 4.29, P = 0.931). Post-intervention, both groups demonstrated increased scores, with the study group significantly exceeding the control group (study: 94.02 ± 4.39 vs control: 81.07 ± 5.23, P = 0.000). At the two-month follow-up post-intervention, the complication rate in the study group was 4.0% (2/50), which was significantly lower than the 18.0% (9/50) in the control group [18.0% (9/50); P = 0.001]. Questionnaire surveys revealed a nursing satisfaction rate of 94.0% (47/50) in the study group, which was significantly higher than 78.0% (39/50) in the control group (P = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

Implementing comprehensive follow-up nursing for patients with post-tubular gastric esophageal replacement surgery reflux effectively alleviates reflux symptoms, enhances nutritional status and quality of life, and reduces the incidence of complications, demonstrating significant clinical value.

Keywords: Tubular gastric esophageal replacement surgery; Reflux; Follow-up nursing; Nutritional indicators; Quality of life

Core Tip: Comprehensive follow-up nursing after tubular gastric esophageal replacement surgery can significantly alleviate reflux symptoms, reduce reflux episodes, and improve nutritional indicators and quality of life. Compared to routine care, it also lowers complication rates and increases patient satisfaction, highlighting its clinical value in long-term postoperative management.