BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2026; 18(10): 121006
Published online Oct 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.121006
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after radical colorectal cancer surgery and its impact on prognosis: Clinical education research
Yu Wang, Tao Wang, Zhi-Duan Xu, Su-Hang Wang, Fang-Fang Chen
Yu Wang, Tao Wang, Zhi-Duan Xu, Su-Hang Wang, Fang-Fang Chen, The Four Branches of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu 233000, Anhui Province, China
Author contributions: Wang Y drafted the manuscript; Wang Y, Wang T, and Xu ZD collected and analyzed the data; Wang Y and Chen FF conceived and designed the study; Wang SH performed the statistical analysis; Chen FF revised it critically for important intellectual content; all authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
AI contribution statement: Portions of this manuscript were edited using AI tools solely for language refinement. The authors carefully reviewed and verified all AI-assisted edits and assume full responsibility and accountability for the integrity, accuracy, originality, and scientific validity of the manuscript and all submitted materials.
Supported by Teaching Research Project of Bengbu Medical University, Anhui Province (Key Project), No. 2025fyjyxm10; and Scientific Research Project of Anhui Higher Education Institutions, No. 2024AH051186.
Institutional review board statement: This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University (approval No. CB20260200021).
Informed consent statement: This study was a retrospective cohort analysis based on existing anonymized clinical records. The requirement for written informed consent was waived by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University (approval No. CB20260200021), as no identifiable patient information was involved.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors declare no conflict of interest in publishing the manuscript.
STROBE statement: The authors have read the STROBE Statement – checklist of items, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE Statement – checklist of items.
Data sharing statement: The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. No additional data are available.
Corresponding author: Yu Wang, Chief Physician, The Four Branches of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, No. 287 Changhuai Road, Bengbu 233000, Anhui Province, China. house2737@163.com
Received: April 28, 2026
Revised: June 8, 2026
Accepted: September 4, 2026
Published online: October 27, 2026
Processing time: 173 Days and 7.8 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the severe complications developed after radical colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery that has an incidence between 3% and 19%, and might also severely deteriorate long-term oncological outcomes. The perioperative management of high-risk patients requires that they be identified pre-operatively. We sought to determine independent risk factors for AL and assess the prognostic effect of AL in patients who underwent surgery with curative intent for CRC.

AIM

To investigate the incidence, independent risk factors, and impact on short-term and long-term prognosis of AL following radical CRC surgery, and to provide clinical evidence for perioperative risk stratification and management.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted, collecting data from 200 patients who underwent elective radical resection for CRC at the Department of General Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, from January 2019 to December 2024. Patients were divided into an AL group (n = 22) and a non-AL group (n = 178) based on whether AL occurred within 30 days postoperatively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent risk factors. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression model were used to evaluate the impact of AL on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Action-Process-Object-Schema theory combined with principles of critical thinking ability assessment was used as a supplementary framework to organize perioperative risk evaluation and clinical interpretation.

RESULTS

AL occurred in 22 of 200 patients (11.0%). Multivariate logistic regression identified body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m² [odds ratio (OR) = 2.354, 95%CI: 1.196-4.632, P = 0.013], diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.660, 95%CI: 1.258-5.624, P = 0.010), rectal tumor location (OR = 2.440, 95%CI: 1.198-4.970, P = 0.014), neoadjuvant therapy (OR = 2.186, 95%CI: 1.042-4.584, P = 0.039), preoperative albumin < 35 g/L (OR = 2.680, 95%CI: 1.278-5.620, P = 0.009), operation time ≥ 180 minutes (OR = 2.334, 95%CI: 1.142-4.770, P = 0.020), and intraoperative blood loss ≥ 200 mL (OR = 2.142, 95%CI: 1.024-4.482, P = 0.043) as independent risk factors; protective stoma (OR = 0.403, 95%CI: 0.174-0.932, P = 0.034) was a protective factor. The AL group had significantly longer hospital stay, higher overall complication rate, higher reoperation rate, higher permanent stoma rate, and higher rate of adjuvant chemotherapy delay (all P < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the 5-year overall survival rate was 63.6% vs 82.6% (Log-rank P = 0.003), and DFS rate was 54.5% vs 77.5% (Log-rank P = 0.001) in the AL vs non-AL groups, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression confirmed AL as an independent adverse prognostic factor for DFS (hazard ratio = 2.048, 95%CI: 1.312-3.198, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

AL following radical CRC surgery is associated with multiple perioperative risk factors and significantly impairs both short-term and long-term prognosis. Preoperative nutritional and glycemic optimization, judicious use of protective stoma in high-risk patients, and reduction of intraoperative stress are key strategies to reduce AL incidence and improve patient outcomes. The Action-Process-Object-Schema-informed critical thinking framework may further enhance the clinical interpretation and application of perioperative risk assessment.

Keywords: Colorectal cancer; Radical surgery; Anastomotic leakage; Risk factors; Prognosis; Retrospective cohort study; Action-Process-Object-Schema theory; Critical thinking

Core Tip: This retrospective cohort study evaluated the incidence, risk factors, and prognostic impact of anastomotic leakage (AL) after radical colorectal cancer surgery. Among 200 patients, AL occurred in 11.0% and was independently associated with body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m², diabetes mellitus, rectal tumor location, neoadjuvant therapy, hypoalbuminemia, prolonged operation time, and increased intraoperative blood loss, while protective stoma was a significant protective factor. Patients with AL had significantly worse short-term outcomes, including higher complication and reoperation rates, prolonged hospitalization, and delayed adjuvant chemotherapy. Importantly, AL was also associated with inferior long-term survival and was identified as an independent predictor of poorer disease-free survival.

Write to the Help Desk