BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2025; 17(9): 108621
Published online Sep 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.108621
Efficacy of single-lumen and double-lumen peripherally inserted central catheters in patients undergoing digestive surgery within bundled care contexts
Xiao-Hui Ye, Rong-Hong Cui, Lei Xu, Mei-Jun Wang, Ling-Rong Ye, Ming Jiang
Xiao-Hui Ye, Rong-Hong Cui, Lei Xu, Mei-Jun Wang, Ling-Rong Ye, Venous Nursing Specialist Clinic, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People’s Hospital, Quzhou 324000, Zhejiang Province, China
Ming Jiang, Department of Pancreatology, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou 324000, Zhejiang Province, China
Author contributions: Ye XH designed the experiments and conducted clinical data collection; Cui RH, Xu L, Wang MJ and Ye LR performed postoperative follow-up and recorded the data, conducted the collation and statistical analysis; Ye XH and Jiang M wrote the original manuscript and revised the paper; All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People’s Hospital.
Informed consent statement: The Ethics Committee agreed to waive informed consent.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Data sharing statement: All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Ming Jiang, Associate Chief Physician, Department of Pancreatology, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, No. 100 Minjiang Avenue, Kecheng District, Quzhou 324000, Zhejiang Province, China. qzrmyygdywk@163.com
Received: April 22, 2025
Revised: May 20, 2025
Accepted: July 11, 2025
Published online: September 27, 2025
Processing time: 155 Days and 0.4 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are crucial for patients requiring long-term intravenous therapy, especially within digestive surgery under bundled care protocols.

AIM

To evaluate and compare the efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of single-lumen vs double-lumen PICCs among patients undergoing digestive surgery within a structured bundled care framework.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 249 patients who underwent digestive surgery and utilized either single-lumen (n = 117) or double-lumen (n = 132) PICCs between January 2021 and June 2024. Clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, catheterization duration, and complication rates were compared using statistical analysis via SPSS (version 29.0). The bundled care protocol was consistently applied, focusing on standardized procedures, staff training, and patient support.

RESULTS

Single-lumen PICCs were associated with a significantly lower thrombosis rate (0.85%) than double-lumen PICCs (6.82%, P = 0.039). The single-lumen group experienced shorter catheterization durations (12.5 ± 3.14 days vs 13.6 ± 4.50 days, P = 0.025) and higher successful infusion rates (92.7% ± 5.32% vs 90.4% ± 6.60%, P = 0.003). This group also reported higher comfort scores (8.40 ± 1.20 vs 7.90 ± 1.50, P = 0.004) and lower pain levels (2.90 ± 0.70 vs 3.20 ± 0.80, P = 0.002). Aside from thrombosis, complication rates showed no significant difference between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Within bundled care context, single-lumen PICCs demonstrated advantages in reducing thrombosis risk, procedural efficiency, patient comfort, and satisfaction compared with double-lumen PICCs. The findings underscore the importance of considering patient-specific needs and clinical scenarios in catheter choice.

Keywords: Single-lumen peripherally inserted central catheter; Double-lumen peripherally inserted central catheter; Digestive surgery; Bundled care; Patient satisfaction; Thrombosis

Core Tip: This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of single-lumen vs double-lumen peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in digestive surgery patients under bundled care protocols. Key findings indicate that single-lumen PICCs significantly reduce thrombosis rates, shorten catheterization durations, and improve patient comfort and satisfaction compared to double-lumen PICCs. These results highlight the importance of selecting appropriate catheter types based on patient-specific needs and clinical scenarios, optimizing both procedural efficiency and patient outcomes within a structured bundled care framework.