Published online Jul 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106311
Revised: April 28, 2025
Accepted: May 21, 2025
Published online: July 27, 2025
Processing time: 113 Days and 2.6 Hours
The clinical application of autostereoscopic (glass-free) 3D laparoscopic systems in the radical resection of gastrointestinal malignancies remains to be fully evaluated.
To compare the surgical outcomes and short-term postoperative complications between autostereoscopic (glass-free) 3D and glasses-based 3D laparoscopic systems in patients undergoing radical resection for gastric and colorectal malignancies.
This retrospective study involved 165 patients (99 males, 66 females; median age: 63 years; range: 28-86 years) who underwent laparoscopic radical resection for gastrointestinal malignancies between October 2022 and May 2023. Patients were divided into naked-eye 3D groups (gastric cancer: n = 16; colorectal cancer: n = 19) and glasses-based 3D groups (gastric cancer: n = 52; colorectal cancer: n = 78). Surgical outcomes and 30-day postoperative complications were compared between the groups.
For gastric cancer patients, no significant differences in operation time [195 (169, 214) minutes vs 196 (173, 222) minutes], blood loss [20 (10, 90) mL vs 40 (20, 100) mL], or complication rates (12.5% vs 17.3%) were detected between the naked-eye 3D (n = 16) and glasses-based (n = 52) groups. Similarly, in colorectal cancer patients, comparable outcomes were achieved between groups, with postope
Preliminary evidence suggests that the autostereoscopic 3D laparoscopic system achieves comparable surgical outcomes to those of conventional glasses-based systems in the radical resection of gastrointestinal malignancies. Further large-scale studies are needed to validate these findings.
Core Tip: This study explores the clinical application of autostereoscopic 3D laparoscopic systems in radical gastrointestinal cancer surgery. Key findings indicate that these systems demonstrate safety and efficacy comparable to traditional glasses-based 3D systems, with no significant differences in operative time, blood loss, complication rates, or lymph node harvest quality. However, certain challenges remain, including limited advantages for the entire surgical team and technical constraints such as restricted resolution and viewing angles. By identifying these limitations, this study provides valuable insights for improving the design and application of naked-eye 3D technology in minimally invasive gastrointestinal cancer procedures, paving the way for future advancements in surgical practice.