Ferroptosis is a form of necrotic cell death characterized by phospholipid oxidation. The cystine-glutamate antiporter (xCT), composed of solute carrier family 7 member 11 (SLC7A11) and SLC3A2, imports cystine for glutathione synthesis. Glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) requires glutathione to counteract lipid peroxidation and prevent ferroptosis. Erastin, an xCT inhibitor, and Ras-selective lethal small molecule 3 (RSL3), a GPX4 inhibitor, suppress GPX4 function and induce ferroptosis. Tumor protein p53 (TP53) has a paradoxical role in ferroptosis regulation. Mouse double minute 2 homolog (MDM2), a negative regulator of TP53, is a key oncogene in well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS). Therefore, the present study explored the role of ferroptosis in DDLPS treatment response and resistance. Publicly available expression profiles of WDLPS, DDLPS and adipose tissue were analyzed, and the differential expression of ferroptosis-related genes regulated by the MDM2-TP53 pathway was identified in WDLPS and DDLPS. In vitro experiments were performed to assess the effects of erastin and RSL3 on the viability, lipid peroxidation and apoptosis of DDLPS cell lines. The results revealed that erastin and RSL3 induced lipid peroxidation and apoptosis, thereby exerting cytotoxic effects. In addition, nutlin-3, an MDM2 inhibitor, was demonstrated to increase lipid peroxidation and cytotoxicity when applied prior to erastin treatment. Notably, nutlin-3 also upregulated SLC3A2 expression in DDLPS cell lines, thereby enhancing cystine uptake. This increase in cystine uptake was suppressed by erastin. In addition, nutlin-3-induced SLC3A2 upregulation was abolished by TP53 knockdown. Nutlin-3 combined with erastin or RSL3 reduced absolute p-4EBP-1 levels in NDDLS-1 cells and p-p70S6 levels in both cell lines, with no significant impact on the p-4EBP-1/4EBP-1 and p-p70S6/p70S6 ratios. These results indicate that ferroptosis is a therapeutic vulnerability in the response to MDM2 inhibition in DDLPS. Furthermore, combining MDM2 inhibitors with ferroptosis-inducing agents may provide a potential therapeutic strategy for DDLPS and the role of mTOR in the pro-apoptotic effect of these combinations deserve further investigation.

Retroperitoneal well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) are rare tumors presenting as bulky abdominal tumors requiring multidisciplinary management in high-volume centers. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment through complete en bloc resection with the goal of achieving macroscopically complete resection, with a single specimen encompassing the tumor and involved contiguous organs. Preoperative radiation therapy is not standard of care and the role of preoperative chemotherapy is under investigation. If the tumor is not resectable or metastatic, the preferred treatment is doxorubicin-based chemotherapy in the case of DDLPS, whereas WDLPS are generally thought of as chemo-resistant.

Objectives: To evaluate the clinical heterogeneity of sarcomas by examining associations between histological subtypes, metastatic patterns, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes. Methods: We analyzed data from 97,062 adult patients diagnosed with sarcoma between 2000 and 2020, using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Fourteen histological subtypes were included. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to adjust for baseline differences, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify prognostic variables. Results: The most prevalent subtypes were sarcoma not otherwise specified (31.9%), leiomyosarcoma (17.1%), and liposarcoma (13.9%). Metastatic patterns differed significantly by subtype; liver metastases were most common in sarcomas with small blue round cell (SBRC) features (8.9%) and stromal sarcoma (6.1%), while lung metastases were frequently observed in Ewing sarcoma (10.0%) and rhabdomyosarcoma (9.7%). Median overall survival (mOS) varied widely, ranging from 234 months in chondrosarcoma to 16-20 months in rhabdomyosarcoma and SBRC sarcoma. Overall, patients with primary sarcoma had significantly better survival than those with treatment-related disease (119.0 vs. 45.0 months, p < 0.0001), with this trend consistent across most subtypes. Treatment responses were subtype- and size-dependent. For instance, surgery plus radiotherapy improved outcomes in giant cell sarcoma regardless of tumor size, whereas chemotherapy provided benefit only in tumors larger than 5 cm. Combined surgery and radiotherapy offered additional survival benefit in select subtypes, including chordoma, leiomyosarcoma (>5 cm), and synovial sarcoma (<5 cm). Conclusions: Sarcomas exhibit substantial clinical and prognostic heterogeneity across histological subtypes. These findings underscore the importance of subtype-specific, individualized treatment strategies in optimizing patient outcomes.

The cancer/testis antigen New York esophageal squamous cell carcinoma 1 (NY-ESO-1) is a promising target in myxoid/round cell liposarcoma (MRCLS).

In this pilot study, we assessed the adoptive T-cell therapy NY-ESO-1c259T letetresgene autoleucel (lete-cel) in patients with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A*02:01-, HLA-A*02:05-, and/or HLA-A*02:06-positive advanced/metastatic NY-ESO-1-expressing MRCLS. Patients underwent a reduced-dose (cohort 1) or standard-dose (cohort 2) lymphodepletion regimen (LDR). The primary end point was investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR). Safety was assessed through adverse event (AE) reports. Correlative biomarker analyses were performed post hoc. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02992743).

Of 23 enrolled patients, 10 in cohort 1 and 10 in cohort 2 received lete-cel. Investigator-assessed ORR was 20% (95% CI, 2.5 to 55.6) and 40% (95% CI, 12.2 to 73.8), median duration of response was 5.3 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 8.7) and 7.5 months (95% CI, 6.0 to not estimable [NE]), and median progression-free survival was 5.4 months (95% CI, 2.0 to 11.5) and 8.7 months (95% CI, 0.9 to NE) in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. AEs included cytokine release syndrome and cytopenias, consistent with T-cell therapy/LDR. Post hoc correlative biomarkers showed T-cell expansion and persistence in both cohorts.

To our knowledge, this study is the first demonstrating the clinical promise of lete-cel in HLA-/NY-ESO-1-positive patients with advanced MRCLS.

Patients with hard-to-treat or rare cancers and those not responding to standard-of-care (SoC) treatment have unmet needs. Limited access to novel drugs is an increasing additional challenge. In 2003, the Danish government adopted a Health Act to ensure that treatment of patients with life-threatening disease could be reevaluated by independent experts. The Danish Health Authority (DHA) set up an Expert Advisory Panel to provide advice on possibilities for further treatment of patients, including treatment not approved nationally. A few years later, clinical units were established that could offer unestablished treatment to patients by referral from the Panel. The treatment was first reimbursed by the Government and later by regional authorities.

We present the structure, workflow, and impact of the Health Act for 21 years for patients with cancer. Annual reports from the DHA were the primary data source.

11 034 cases from 9603 cancer patients were evaluated by the Panel from 2003 to 2023, representing a median of 372 unique cases yearly. In 53%, the Panel advised on further treatment in Denmark, and of these, 56% were recommended nationally nonapproved treatment, 21% SoC treatment or workup, and 19% clinical trial participation. In 4.5% of cases, advice was given on treatment abroad. A significant decline in admissions to the Panel from a peak of 1167 patients in 2008 to 3-400 yearly from 2012 to 2017 followed the conversion of nonapproved treatments to SoC practice. A shift in drug reimbursement, independent of Panel advise, reduced the clinical impact and explained the further decline observed in admissions lately to only 51 patients in 2023.

This unique national scheme provided early access to treatment for patients with no further SoC options and facilitated the introduction of new cancer treatments, initiation of clinical trials, and establishment of trial units in the country. The scheme may be adapted to other countries with a public healthcare system. Results of the current report indicate that impact is dependent on delivering clinical units and reimbursement associated with the recommended treatment.

Dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) is one of the most common types of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) characterized by liposarcomatous differentiation and a predilection for the retroperitoneum. Despite the growing number of histology-specific immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) trials in STS, it is still difficult to identify the radiographic objective response rate (ORR) for DDLPS in the real world setting. This study aimed to evaluate the ORR and survival of patients with DDLPS treated with ICB at a single center.

We conducted a retrospective study of 31 patients with pathologically confirmed DDLPS treated with ICB at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2018 and 2023. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, treatment history, and response to ICB were analyzed. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on tumor samples to assess immune-related markers.

ORR by RECIST 1.1 was 3.2% (n=1/31). Among all patients (n=31), 6% achieved partial radiographic response, while 39% had stable disease, and 55% showed progressive disease. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.5 (95%CI:1.9, 4.7) months, and overall survival (OS) after ICB initiation was 19.7 (95%CI: 8.8, not reached) months. Patients without prior systemic therapy demonstrated better OS (p=0.004). Immunohistochemistry revealed no relationship between pre- or post-ICB expression of CD8, CD20, CD21 and PDL-1 and response.

While the response to ICB in DDLPS remains limited, specific immune markers may influence treatment outcomes. CD20/21 post-ICB appear more important for prognosis. Further research is warranted to identify predictive factors for ICB efficacy in DDLPS.

Mesenchymal tumors of the breast constitute a rare and heterogeneous group of neoplasms, representing only 0.5% to 1% of all breast tumors. Originating from mesenchymal tissues, these tumors include various histological subtypes. They are particularly aggressive, characterized by a high propensity for local recurrence and an overall poor prognosis. The rarity of these cases has impeded the development of comprehensive clinical studies, leading to a lack of standardized diagnostic protocols and treatment guidelines. This review provides a thorough synthesis of current knowledge on breast mesenchymal tumors with a specific focus on malignant variants such as phyllodes tumors and breast sarcomas. It also addresses the diagnostic challenges faced by clinicians, evaluates current therapeutic strategies, and emphasizes the crucial role of surgical treatment. Additionally, it examines the evolving roles of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in enhancing patient outcomes.

In recent decades, the potentiality of marine natural products (MNPs) in the medical field has been increasingly recognized. Natural compounds derived from marine microorganisms, algae, and invertebrates have shown significant promise for treating inflammation-related diseases. In this review, we cover the three primary sources of MNPs and their diverse and unique chemical structures and bioactivities. This review aims to summarize the progress of MNPs in combating inflammation-related diseases. Moreover, we cover the functions and mechanisms of MNPs in diseases, highlighting their functions in regulating inflammatory signaling pathways, cellular stress responses, and gut microbiota, among others. Meanwhile, we focus on key technologies and scientific methods to address the current limitations and challenges in MNPs.

Soft-tissue sarcomas are rare, diverse malignant tumors of mesenchymal origin, requiring diagnosis and treatment by a specialized multidisciplinary team. Initial assessment includes radiology and biopsy, followed by wide surgical resection with clear margins for localized cases. Radiotherapy is recommended for large, deep, high-grade tumors or after incomplete resection, while perioperative chemotherapy may be considered for high-risk cases. In oligometastatic disease, combining local and systemic therapies is an option. Anthracycline-based chemotherapy is the first-line treatment in advanced disease, though other drugs show efficacy in certain subtypes. Given the limited options, enrolling in clinical trials is advised for patients needing further treatment.

Dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) is a fairly common subtype of soft tissue sarcoma, but relatively little is known about the clinical course and prognostic factors of this mesenchymal malignancy.

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with DDLPS at the University Hospital Leuven, Belgium between 1991 and 2022 based on an established clinical database and patient records.

We identified 259 patients with DDLPS, with the retroperitoneum as most common location of the primary tumor (47.5%). 204/259 patients (78.8%) patients had primary surgery. Radiotherapy was administered in the pre- (46/259, 17.8%) or postoperative setting (51/259, 19.7%). At diagnosis 28/259 (10.8%) patients presented with locally inoperable disease and 26/259 (10.0%) with synchronous metastasis. In patients who had primary surgery, local relapses were seen in 114/259 (44.0%) patients and 80/259 (30.9%) patients developed metachronous metastasis. A total of 48/259 (18.5%) patients developed both local relapse and metastasis. Patients with inoperable or metastatic disease were often treated with systemic therapy. The most common first-line systemic therapies were doxorubicin (51/98, 52.0%), doxorubicin combined with ifosfamide (12/98, 12.2%) and different types of experimental treatments (18/98, 18.4%). The median overall survival from first diagnosis of DDLPS to death of all causes was 70.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 56.6-98.6) for all patients, 10.9 months (95% CI 3.6-29.2) in patients with inoperable disease, 28.4 months (95% CI 1.3-199.3) for patients with local relapse and only 9.4 months (95% CI 1.2-25.9) for patients with metastatic disease. We identified lower age, primary surgery, absence of synchronous metastasis, absence of local relapse and treatment with experimental therapy as statistically significant favorable prognostic factors.

DDLPS is a subtype of soft tissue sarcoma with an aggressive clinical course and very poor prognosis, especially in patients with inoperable or metastatic disease. The results with classic chemotherapy are poor, and experimental treatments may be a preferred choice for individual patients. Data from this retrospective series can inform the design of future prospective and ongoing trials in this setting.

Background: Liposarcoma (LPS) is one of the most frequent histotypes of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Eribulin is a cytotoxic agent that has improved overall survival in patients with advanced LPS. Additionally, preclinical and clinical evidence suggests its influence on vascularization and cellular differentiation. Based on these data, we developed this study to investigate non-mitotic effects of eribulin in patients with advanced LPS. Methods: In this prospective monocentric observational study, we included patients with advanced LPS eligible to receive eribulin. An assessment with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and a biopsy were planned before treatment and after four cycles of eribulin. DCE-MRI scans were elaborated to obtain perfusion and permeability maps. Results: From September 2019 to January 2024, 11 patients were enrolled. Among them, 8/11 (73%) had successful pre- and post-treatment assessment. At the time of the analysis, 8/11 (73%) patients had disease progression and 4 (36%) had died, median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 3.3 months, and median overall survival (mOS) was 8.7 months. Among the evaluable patients, DCE-MRI perfusion decreased after eribulin treatment in patients with disease control (partial response or stable disease), while perfusion values increased in patients with progressive disease (PD). No significant change in permeability was found. Post-treatment histological changes were seen nearly in all patients, with decreased cellularity the most common change (50%), followed by vascularization modifications (20%). Conclusions: Eribulin appears to exhibit non-mitotic activity involving both vascularization and cell differentiation in LPS patients. Further studies are needed to better define these effects.

Locally advanced and metastatic leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is an aggressive cancer with limited treatment options. This single-institution, retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced or metastatic LMS treated at Stanford Medical Center.

Seventy-four patients with unresectable or metastatic LMS were deemed eligible and treated with first-line chemotherapy regimens, including gemcitabine plus docetaxel, dacarbazine, doxorubicin combinations (with evofosfamide or ifosfamide), and doxorubicin monotherapy. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and disease control rate (DCR) were assessed using RECIST v1.1, with survival analyses performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods.

The cohort consisted of 56 females (75.7%) and 18 males (24.3%), with a median age of 55.5 years. The majority (93.2%) had metastatic disease. The median PFS for the entire cohort was 4.9 months (range: 0.6-28.1 mo), and the median OS was 27.3 months (range: 1.9-140.2 mo). The doxorubicin combination (DC) group had the highest median PFS of 7.9 months (range: 0.6-15.8 mo). Doxorubicin alone had the highest median OS of 33.8 months (4.2-100.2 mo). Doxorubicin combinations demonstrated superior PFS in both uterine and non-uterine LMS subgroups.

These findings reaffirm the efficacy of doxorubicin-based combination regimens as a first-line treatment for locally advanced and metastatic LMS, particularly in non-uterine LMS.

Selinexor is a new compound studied for the treatment of liposarcoma, particularly dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS), where treatment options remain limited. As a first-in-class oral exportin-1 (XPO1) inhibitor, selinexor has shown anti-tumour activity in preclinical models, particularly in MDM2- and CDK4-amplified DDLPS, where it induces apoptosis, inhibits tumour growth and promotes nuclear retention of p53. Preclinical studies have also suggested potential synergy with doxorubicin and eribulin, although these findings have yet to be validated in randomised clinical trials. The phase II/III SEAL trial (NCT02606461) evaluated selinexor versus placebo in patients with advanced, previously treated DDLPS. While the study demonstrated a statistically significant, albeit modest, improvement in median progression-free survival (PFS) from 2.1 to 2.8 months, no overall survival benefit was observed. In addition, selinexor was associated with significant toxicity, including fatigue, nausea and weight loss. Similarly, a phase Ib/II study (NCT03042819) evaluating selinexor in combination with doxorubicin reported a 21% response rate and a median PFS of 5.5 months, although this regimen was also associated with high rates of neutropenia and fatigue. Despite these results, selinexor is not currently approved for the treatment of liposarcoma and its clinical utility remains under investigation. Ongoing studies, such as the SeliSarc trial (NCT04595994) evaluating selinexor in combination with gemcitabine and the NRSTS2021 trial (NCT06239272) evaluating selinexor in paediatric soft tissue sarcoma, aim to further define its role. The results of these studies will be critical in determining whether selinexor can be incorporated into standard sarcoma treatment.

Soft tissue sarcomas [STSs] are rare tumors of mesodermal origin that arise in diverse tissues such as muscles, fat, and nerves. There are over 100 subtypes of STS, each with distinct clinical behaviors and responses to treatment. Recent advances in treatment have moved towards histology-specific approaches, emphasizing the integration of pathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular features to guide treatment. Localized STS is primarily treated with surgery, often supplemented by neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation and/or chemotherapy. However, about half of patients with localized disease will progress to an advanced stage, which is typically managed with systemic therapies including anthracycline-based chemotherapy such as doxorubicin or epirubicin. Despite these treatments, the survival rates for most subtypes of advanced metastatic STS remain relatively low. While anthracycline-based chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment, ongoing research into the biology of STSs is enhancing our understanding and approach to these complex tumors with an expansion beyond chemotherapy to include targeted therapy and immunotherapy to improve response rates and survival outcomes. This review focuses on STS other than gastrointestinal stromal tumors [GISTs], examines the current systemic treatment strategies, highlights recent advances, and explores future directions in the systemic therapy of sarcoma patients.

Uterine sarcomas are rare, aggressive tumors with limited chemotherapy responsiveness. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) have emerged as targeted therapies for patients with BRCA mutations across multiple cancer types, with anecdotal responses in uterine sarcoma. This retrospective, single-center study aims to describe relevant genomic and clinical features of patients with BRCA-altered uterine sarcoma and the efficacy of PARPis in this population.

Eligible patients included all histopathologically confirmed uterine sarcoma with pathogenic BRCA alterations identified through Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center-integrated mutation profiling of actionable cancer targets, excluding carcinosarcoma. Genomic, pathologic, and treatment information was extracted from the cBioPortal database and chart review.

Thirty-five patients were identified with uterine sarcoma harboring pathogenic BRCA alterations, including 33 BRCA2 alterations (70% homozygous deletions, 3% structural variants, 27% mutations) and two BRCA1 mutations. Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) was the most common histology (86%). Thirteen patients with uterine LMS were treated with PARPis in the recurrent/metastatic therapy setting (54% combination therapy regimens) with an overall response rate (ORR) of 46% (1 of 6 for PARPi monotherapy, 5 of 7 for PARPi combination regimens), a clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 62%, and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 13.2 months (range, 1.0-71.9). The median PFS ratio compared with previous systemic therapy was 1.9 (range, 0.4-53.9), and 58% had a PFS ratio of ≥1.3. The median time on PARPi was 14.5 months (range, 1.3-71.9). The ORR for patients with somatic BRCA2 deletions was 60% (n = 6 of 10), with a CBR of 80% (n = 8 of 10). One patient with metastatic disease and progression on previous hormonal and chemotherapy demonstrated a complete response to PARP/PD-L1 inhibitor combination therapy, ongoing for 70+ months.

PARPis demonstrate promising efficacy in patients with uterine LMS with somatic BRCA2 deletions.

Trabectedin extravasation can cause significant soft tissue disorders. Early surgical intervention has been recommended in the event of chemotherapeutic extravasation; however, treatment tends to remain conservative. Trabectedin is a vesicant drug that is associated with a risk of delayed tissue damage; therefore, leaks should be promptly stopped. Complications associated with central venous (CV) ports include infection, catheter damage and obstruction, which can lead to trabectedin extravasation. In the present case report, a 61-year-old woman who received trabectedin treatment for multiple liver and lung metastases is described. Extravasation developed from a CV port in the right chest during the third course of treatment and swelling was the only apparent symptom at that time. Trabectedin was immediately discontinued and she was administered steroids subcutaneously. Erythema, induration and tenderness appeared on day 1 after extravasation, but skin symptoms were not subsequently exacerbated. The central region of the erythema became crusted ~1 month after extravasation. When the skin condition had settled at 2 months post-extravasation, the patient underwent port removal, debridement and port reattachment.

Trabectedin is a chemotherapeutic agent that has shown activity in the treatment of patients with soft tissue sarcomas after failure of anthracycline-based therapy and the best results were recorded in the treatment of L-sarcomas. There is a need for prognostic and predictive factors that will help clinicians with therapy selection. In this study we aim to analyze treatment results, prognostic and predictive factors in patients treated with trabectedin in routine clinical practice. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients who started treatment with trabectedin between 04/2008 and 09/2021. Demographic and clinical data were extracted, and markers of systemic inflammation, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and systemic inflammation index (SII), were calculated. We identified 251 patients, including 174 with complete baseline laboratory data. Objective responses were noted in 10.8% of patients, and disease stabilization was noted in 49.0%. Median PFS and OS were 5.26 months and 17.98 months, respectively. In the overall population, liposarcoma and metastasis-free interval (MFI) > 10 months were predictive factors for PFS, while female sex and MFI > 10 prognostic factors for OS. Among patients with available laboratory data, the median NLR at baseline was 2.87, and SII was 1047.26. In multivariate analysis, SII ≤ 670 significantly correlated with longer PFS but not with OS. Long-term results of trabectedin treatment in Polish patients with L-sarcomas are comparable to the results of other real-world evidence studies. In conclusion, the systemic inflammation index correlates significantly with PFS, is a simple marker available for daily clinical practice to identify patients most likely to benefit from treatment.

Liposarcoma (LPS) is the most prevalent soft tissue sarcoma. The most common biological subtypes are well-differentiated (WDLPS), a low-grade disease that can evolve to high-grade dedifferentiated LPS (DDLPS), with increased rates of recurrence and metastasis and low response rates to chemotherapy and targeted therapies. Preclinical testing of immunotherapeutics for LPS has been held back by the lack of an immunocompetent mouse model. Here, we present a spontaneous immunocompetent LPS mouse model, ACPP, with targeted deletion of Trp53 and Pten in adipocytes to mimic signaling alterations observed in human LPS. Similar to human LPS, tumors arising in ACPP mice produce WDLPS and DDLPS, along with tumors that exhibit both WD and DD components. Murine and human DDLPS tumors possess transcriptional similarities, including increased expression of oncogenes Cdk4 and Hmga2 and reduced expression of the tumor suppressor Cebpa; further, both mouse and human DDLPS exhibit either high or low T cell infiltration. Syngeneic cell lines derived from spontaneous ACPP DDLPS reliably produce tumors following orthotopic injection, each with distinct growth patterns, aggressiveness and tumor infiltrating lymphocyte profiles. These models provide much needed tools to understand the complex immunobiology of LPS and greatly accelerate the pace of preclinical studies to uncover new therapies for patients with this aggressive malignancy.

A subgroup analysis of a randomized study demonstrated that patients with advanced or metastatic liposarcoma treated with eribulin had longer overall survival and progression-free survival compared to those treated with dacarbazine, suggesting eribulin as a therapeutic option for advanced liposarcoma. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of eribulin versus dacarbazine in the treatment of advanced liposarcoma. We established a 10-year Markov model to compare the cost-effectiveness of eribulin and dacarbazine regimens. Clinical data were sourced from a subgroup analysis of a multicenter, randomized, open-label phase 3 trials. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were computed. The total cost of the dacarbazine scheme was $10,895.558, with a QALY of 0.533. In contrast, the total cost of the eribulin scheme was $16,961.891, with a QALY of 0.698. The ICER between the eribulin and dacarbazine schemes was $36,736.467, which is below the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold in China ($37,877.469). From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, eribulin is cost-effective compared to dacarbazine at the WTP threshold.

The prognosis of patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) remains dismal. Trofosfamide (TRO) has been proposed as a well-tolerated oral maintenance therapy. This retrospective analysis aims to determine the value of this therapy.

Fifty-nine patients with advanced STS who received TRO maintenance therapy between 2016 and 2022 were reviewed and analysed regarding clinical parameters and outcomes.

The median age was 48 years; the most common histological subtype was synovial sarcoma (n = 22, 37%), and 71% of patients (n = 42) presented with metastatic disease. No radiological evidence of disease (NED) before the start of maintenance was reported in 36% of patients (n = 21). The median follow-up was 38.2 months with a median maintenance duration of 9.0 months. The median event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 9.5 and 33.2 months, respectively. In metastatic patients achieving NED before the initiation of TRO, the median EFS was 29.4 months, while the median OS was not reached. In metastatic patients with anthracycline + ifosfamide (AI) as first-line induction therapy without prior metastasis-directed local therapy, the median EFS and OS from the start of AI were 13.9 and 26.8 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis of the overall cohort demonstrated that NED before the start of maintenance was significantly associated with a prolonged EFS (p = 0.024, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.26), and G2 histology correlated with longer OS (p = 0.030, HR = 0.16, reference: G3).

Oral maintenance therapy with TRO appears to improve outcomes in patients with advanced STS. Metastatic patients who achieve NED through prior metastasectomy may particularly benefit from TRO maintenance.

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumours arising in mesenchymal tissues and can occur almost anywhere in the body. Their rarity, and the heterogeneity of subtype and location, means that developing evidence-based guidelines is complicated by the limitations of the data available. This makes it more important that STS are managed by expert multidisciplinary teams, to ensure consistent and optimal treatment, recruitment to clinical trials, and the ongoing accumulation of further data and knowledge. The development of appropriate guidance, by an experienced panel referring to the evidence available, is therefore a useful foundation on which to build progress in the field. These guidelines are an update of the previous versions published in 2010 and 2016 [1, 2]. The original guidelines were drawn up by a panel of UK sarcoma specialists convened under the auspices of the British Sarcoma Group (BSG) and were intended to provide a framework for the multidisciplinary care of patients with soft tissue sarcomas. This iteration of the guidance, as well as updating the general multidisciplinary management of soft tissue sarcoma, includes specific sections relating to the management of sarcomas at defined anatomical sites: gynaecological sarcomas, retroperitoneal sarcomas, breast sarcomas, and skin sarcomas. These are generally managed collaboratively by site specific multidisciplinary teams linked to the regional sarcoma specialist team, as stipulated in the recently published sarcoma service specification [3]. In the UK, any patient with a suspected soft tissue sarcoma should be referred to a specialist regional soft tissues sarcoma service, to be managed by a specialist sarcoma multidisciplinary team. Once the diagnosis has been confirmed using appropriate imaging and a tissue biopsy, the main modality of management is usually surgical excision performed by a specialist surgeon, combined with pre- or post-operative radiotherapy for tumours at higher risk for local recurrence. Systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) may be utilised in cases where the histological subtype is considered more sensitive to systemic treatment. Regular follow-up is recommended to assess local control, development of metastatic disease, and any late effects of treatment.

There has been noteworthy progress in molecular characterisation and therapeutics in soft tissue sarcomas. Novel agents have gained regulatory approval by the FDA. Examples are the tyrosine kinase inhibitors avapritinib and ripretinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST), the immune check point inhibitor atezolizumab in alveolar soft part tissue sarcoma, the γ-secretase inhibitor nirogacestat in desmoid tumours, the NTRK inhibitors larotrectinib and entrectinib in tumours with NTRK fusions, the mTOR inhibitor nab-sirolimus in PEComa, and the EZH-2 inhibitor tazemetostat in epithelioid sarcoma. The FDA has also recently granted accelerated approval for autologous T-cell therapy with afami-cel in patients with HLA-A*02 and MAGE-A4-expressing synovial sarcoma. There are other promising treatments that are still investigational, such as MDM2 and CDK4/6 inhibitors in well-/dedifferentiated liposarcoma, immune checkpoint inhibitors in the head and neck angiosarcoma and a subset of patients with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, and PARP inhibitors in leiomyosarcoma. The challenges in drug development in soft tissue sarcoma are due to the rarity and the molecular heterogeneity of the disease and the fact that many subtypes are associated with complex karyotypes or non-targetable molecular alterations. We believe that progress maybe possible with a better understanding of the complex biology, the development of novel compounds for difficult targets such as proteolysis targeting chimeras (Protacs), the utilisation of modern clinical trial designs, and enhanced collaboration of academia with industry to develop treatments with a strong biologic rationale.

Soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs) are rare and challenging to diagnose due to their heterogeneous presentation. In 2009, Denmark introduced the Cancer Patient Pathways for sarcomas (CPPs) to improve sarcoma treatment by streamlining diagnostic and therapeutic processes. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of the CPPs on the overall survival of patients with deep-seated, high-grade STSs, comparing outcomes from before and after CPP implementation.

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from 712 patients diagnosed with high-grade STSs in the extremities or trunk wall between 2000 and 2018. Patients were grouped into pre-CPP (2000-2008) and post-CPP (2010-2018) cohorts. Overall survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates.

The five-year overall survival improved from 43% in the pre-CPP cohort to 52% post-CPP (p = 0.05). Time-to-treatment was significantly reduced in the post-CPP cohort, with a median decrease of 3 days (18 vs. 15 days, p < 0.001). We found only a very weak tendency toward larger tumor sizes in the pre-CPP cohort and no difference regarding the percentage of patients that had distant metastases at diagnosis between cohorts. In the post-CPP cohort, the percentage of whoops operations decreased and the use of oncological services increased.

After the introduction of the CPPs for the sarcoma patients, overall survival improved and time to treatment was reduced. This study highlights the importance of efficient referral pathways in improving cancer outcomes but cannot exclude that other factors could also have contributed.

Liposarcomas are malignancies of adipocytic lineage and represent one of the most common types of soft tissue sarcomas. They encompass multiple histologies, each with unique molecular profiles. Treatment for localized disease includes resection, potentially with perioperative radiation or systemic therapy. Treatment for unresectable or metastatic disease revolves around palliative systemic therapy, for which improved therapies are urgently needed.

We reviewed the literature on novel therapies in clinical development for liposarcomas within the past 5 years and discuss their potential impact on future treatment strategies.

Understanding of the molecular characteristics of liposarcoma subtypes has led to testing of several targeted therapies, including inhibitors of amplified gene products (CDK4 and MDM2) and upregulated proteins (XPO1). Immuno-oncology has played an increasing role in the treatment of liposarcomas, with checkpoint inhibition showing promise in dedifferentiated liposarcomas, and immune therapies targeting cancer testis antigens NY-ESO-1 and MAGE family proteins poised to become an option for myxoid/round cell liposarcomas. The search for novel agents from existing classes (tyrosine kinase inhibitors) with efficacy in liposarcoma also continues. Combination therapies as well as biomarker identification for patient selection of therapies warrant ongoing exploration.

Background In 2024, reimbursement for gemcitabine-docetaxel therapy (GEM-DOC; gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and docetaxel 70 mg/m2 on day 8 every 21 days, GEM 900-DOC 70) to treat recurrent/metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) was made in Japan. Methods We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of advanced/metastatic STS patients who underwent off-label gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy at the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research between February 2007 and October 2019. Results Of 115 enrolled patients, 51 were treated with GEM-DOC (26 patients received the dose as previously stated) and the other 64 with gemcitabine monotherapy. Objective response rates (ORR; 9.8% versus 4.7%), progression-free survival (PFS; 3.8 months versus 2.1 months), and overall survival (OS; 21.5 months versus 11.8 months) tended to be superior in GEM-DOC; the difference of the rate of following salvage treatment (GEM-DOC, 82.4%; gemcitabine monotherapy, 48.4%) could affect the OS. As for safety, severe adverse events (grade 3 {G3} or more) were more frequent in patients with GEM-DOC (hematologic, 80.4% versus 40.6%; non-hematologic, 19.6% versus 15.6%), including those using the stated dose (hematologic, 96.1%; non-hematologic, 26.9%). Conclusion The stated dose of GEM-DOC could be effective for STS but shows more toxicity compared to other dose settings or gemcitabine monotherapy. An investigation of appropriate dose settings by prospective clinical trial may be needed.

The marine drug trabectedin has shown unusual effectiveness in the treatment of myxoid liposarcoma (MLPS), a liposarcoma characterized by the expression of the FUS-DDIT3 chimera. Trabectedin elicits a significant transcriptional response in MLPS resulting in cellular depletion and reactivation of adipogenesis. However, the role of the chimeric protein in the mechanism of action of the drug is not entirely understood.

FUS-DDIT3-specific binding sites were assessed through Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing (ChIP-Seq). Trabectedin-induced effects were studied on pre-established patient-derived xenograft models of MLPS, one sensitive to (ML017) and one resistant against (ML017ET) trabectedin at different time points (24 and 72 h, 15 days). Data were integrated with RNA-Seq from the same models.

Through ChIP-Seq, here we demonstrate that trabectedin inhibits the binding of FUS-DDIT3 to its target genes, restoring adipocyte differentiation in a patient-derived xenograft model of MLPS sensitive to trabectedin. In addition, complementary RNA-Seq data on the same model demonstrates a two-phase effect of trabectedin, characterized by an initial FUS-DDIT3-independent cytotoxicity, followed by a transcriptionally active pro-differentiation phase due to the long-lasting detachment of the chimera from the DNA. Interestingly, in a trabectedin-resistant MLPS model, the effect of trabectedin on FUS-DDIT3 rapidly decreased over time, and prolonged treatment was no longer able to induce any transcription or post-transcriptional modifications.

These findings explain the unusual mechanism underlying trabectedin's effectiveness against MLPS by pinpointing the chimera's role in inducing the differentiation block responsible for MLPS pathogenesis. Additionally, the findings hint at a potential mechanism of resistance acquired in vivo.

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that develop from bone and soft tissue. Approximately 80% of sarcomas affect soft tissue, with liposarcoma being one of the most common types, accounting for approximately 13-20% of all soft-tissue sarcomas. Per the World Health Organization, liposarcoma can be broadly classified into four different subtypes based on histologic examination: well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLS)/atypical lipomatous tumors (ALT), dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS), myxoid liposarcoma (MLS), and pleomorphic liposarcoma (PLS). WDLS/ALT is the most common liposarcoma subtype, accounting for approximately 31-33% of liposarcomas; DDLS accounts for 20%; MLS accounts for 19%; and PLS, the least common subtype, represents 7-8% of liposarcomas. Sarcoma diagnosis is challenging because of its rarity, intrinsic complexity, and diagnostic technological complexity. Sarcomas are misdiagnosed in approximately 30% of cases, leading to delays in diagnosis and access to appropriate therapy and clinical trials. Furthermore, treatment options are limited for those diagnosed with liposarcoma. This review discusses the epidemiology, pathology, and treatment options currently available for liposarcoma.

(1) Background: Metastatic L-type sarcomas (liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma) are rare and have a poor prognosis. Trabectedin is an effective agent that can be used after anthracyclines. This study was designed to evaluate the real-life effectiveness and safety of trabectedin. (2) Methods: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted on patients who were treated with trabectedin for metastatic L-type sarcomas at ten tertiary oncology centers between 2015 and 2023. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), time to treatment failure (TTF), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated in the cohort. Cox regression analysis was used to determine prognostic factors for survival. (3) Results: A total of 98 patients (52% liposarcoma and 48% leiomyosarcoma) were included in the study. The median treatment line was three (range: 1 to 6). Thirteen patients (13.3%) underwent local treatment due to oligoprogression, and dose reduction was required in seventeen patients (17.3%) due to toxicity. The ORR and DCR were 16% and 42%, respectively. The median TTF was 3 months, and the median OS was 10 months. In univariate analysis, a significantly longer median TTF was observed in patients who underwent local treatment (p = 0.008), obtained objective responses (p < 0.001), and underwent dose reduction (p = 0.002). No statistical differences were observed according to the histologic subtype and metastatic site. In the multivariate analysis for OS, it was found that obtaining an objective response was a good prognostic factor (p = 0.003), while the presence of liver metastases was associated with a poor prognosis (p = 0.016). (4) Conclusion: Trabectedin is a suitable option for L-type sarcoma after doxorubicin-based treatments. Survival was not worse in patients who underwent dose reduction. The use of local therapies simultaneously with trabectedin can be effective.

The Dutch Committee for the Evaluation of Oncological Drugs evaluates the effectiveness of new oncological treatments. The committee compares survival endpoints to the so-called PASKWIL-2023 criteria for palliative treatments, which define if treatment effects are considered clinically relevant. A positive recommendation depends on whether the median overall survival (OS) is below or above 12 months in the comparator arm. If the former applies, an OS benefit of at least 12 weeks, and a hazard ratio (HR) smaller than 0.7 are required. If the latter applies, an OS or progression free survival (PFS) benefit of at least 16 weeks, and an HR smaller than 0.7 are required. Nonetheless, the median survival time may not be reached and the proportional hazards (PH) assumption, quantified by the HR, is likely violated for immuno-oncology (IO) therapies, deeming these criteria inappropriate.

We conducted a systematic literature review to identify statistical methods used to represent the clinical effectiveness of IO therapies based on trial data. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to August 31, 2022, limited to English papers. Methodological studies, randomized controlled trials, and discussion papers recognising key issues of survival data analysis of IO therapies were eligible for inclusion.

A total of 1,035 unique references were identified. After full paper screening, 17 publications were included in the review. Additionally, 43 papers were identified through 'snowballing'. We conclude that the current PASKWIL-2023 criteria are methodologically incorrect under non-PH. In that case, single summary statistics fail to capture the treatment effect and any measure should be interpreted in combination with the Kaplan-Meier curves. We recommend 'parameter-free' measures, such as the difference in restricted mean survival time, avoiding assumptions on the underlying survival.

The HR is commonly used to assess treatment effectiveness, without investigating the validity of the PH assumption. This happens with the application of the PASKWIL-2023 criteria for palliative oncology treatments, which can only be valid under a PH setting. Under non-PH, alternative treatment effect measures are suggested. We propose a step-by-step approach supporting the choice of the most appropriate methods to quantify treatment effectiveness that can be used to redefine the PASKWIL-2023 criteria, or similar criteria in other clinical areas.

Myxoid liposarcoma (MLS) is a rare subtype of soft tissue sarcoma that distinguishes itself from conventional subtypes through its propensity for extrapulmonary metastasis. The distinctive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of MLS render it an invaluable tool for identifying primary and secondary lesions. Pathologically, MLS is characterized by the FUS-DDIT3 gene fusion. Accurate diagnosis, facilitated by MRI and pathological assessment, is critical for prognostication and the formulation of appropriate treatment strategies. Surgery remains the cornerstone of local management for MLS. The combination of surgery and radiotherapy can significantly reduce the local recurrence rate in MLS, as it is highly sensitive to both radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Additionally, for high-risk MLS cases with a large tumor diameter, chemotherapy has been shown to improve survival. The comprehensive treatment approach for MLS demonstrates superior local recurrence rates and survival rates compared to most soft tissue sarcomas. Current research focuses on developing effective therapies for unresectable or advanced disease based on genomic and phenotypic characteristics as well as the immune-tumor microenvironment.

The tumor microenvironment (TME) is a critical determinant in the initiation, progression, and treatment outcomes of various cancers. Comprising of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF), immune cells, blood vessels, and signaling molecules, the TME is often likened to the soil supporting the seed (tumor). Among its constituents, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) play a pivotal role, exhibiting a dual nature as both promoters and inhibitors of tumor growth. This review explores the intricate relationship between TAMs and the TME, emphasizing their diverse functions, from phagocytosis and tissue repair to modulating immune responses. The plasticity of TAMs is highlighted, showcasing their ability to adopt either protumorigenic or anti-tumorigenic phenotypes based on environmental cues. In the context of cancer, TAMs' pro-tumorigenic activities include promoting angiogenesis, inhibiting immune responses, and fostering metastasis. The manuscript delves into therapeutic strategies targeting TAMs, emphasizing the challenges faced in depleting or inhibiting TAMs due to their multifaceted roles. The focus shifts towards reprogramming TAMs to an anti-tumorigenic M1-like phenotype, exploring interventions such as interferons, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and small molecule modulators. Noteworthy advancements include the use of CSF1R inhibitors, CD40 agonists, and CD47 blockade, demonstrating promising results in preclinical and clinical settings. A significant section is dedicated to Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) technology in macrophages (CAR-M cells). While CAR-T cells have shown success in hematological malignancies, their efficacy in solid tumors has been limited. CAR-M cells, engineered to infiltrate solid tumors, are presented as a potential breakthrough, with a focus on their development, challenges, and promising outcomes. The manuscript concludes with the exploration of third-generation CAR-M technology, offering insight into in-vivo reprogramming and nonviral vector approaches. In conclusion, understanding the complex and dynamic role of TAMs in cancer is crucial for developing effective therapeutic strategies. While early-stage TAM-targeted therapies show promise, further extensive research and larger clinical trials are warranted to optimize their targeting and improve overall cancer treatment outcomes.

Background The current management of large, high-grade soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the trunk and extremities includes radiation and surgical resection. The initial use of chemotherapy and targeted therapy are controversial and although most patients present with localized disease, many eventually develop incurable metastases. The results and analysis of the safety and antitumor activity of combined checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy with neoadjuvant radiation for high-risk primary STS are presented here. Methods This was an integrated phase I/II prospective single-arm trial (Nutrition and Exercise in Critical Illness Trial (NEXIS) trial). Eligible patients were age ≥18 years with histologically confirmed intermediate or high-grade STS of the trunk or extremity ≥5 cm diameter and were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1. The treatment algorithm included neoadjuvant anti-PD-L1 (Durvalumab) and anti-CTLA-4 (Tremelimumab) for three cycles of four weeks/cycle along with external beam radiation for five weeks, followed by wide surgical resection, and adjuvant Durvalumab monotherapy for four cycles. High-grade toxicity was continually assessed for the first 12 patients in phase I and the primary endpoint for phase II was an excellent histological response (grade 0 or 1 score on a semi-quantitative assessment for tumor regression). This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03116529. Findings Between October 2017 and November 2021, 23 patients were enrolled. Five patients had progression of distant disease during neoadjuvant treatment and withdrew from the study before surgery. A total of 18 patients who completed at least the neoadjuvant immunotherapy, radiation and surgery were included for analysis. The most common tumor was undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (n=9, 50%). The occurrence of any adverse event (AE) was recorded in 16 (88.9%) patients, and 3 (16.7%) patients had a serious AE. Eight out of 18 patients (44.4%) had disease-free survival at a median of 39.7 months. Four out of 18 patients (22.2%) were alive-with-disease at a median of 37.1 months from diagnosis of distant metastasis, and six out of 18 (33.3%) died of disease at a median of 20.8 months from diagnosis of distant metastasis. Local recurrence occurred in two patients (11.1%) and was concomitant with distant disease in each case. Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1, a partial response was noted in five (27.8%) cases, stable disease in 10 (55.6%) cases, and progressive disease in three (16.7%) cases. Histological semiquantitative analysis revealed a "good" response in eight (44.4%) patients, a "moderate" response in four (22.2%) patients, and a "poor" response in six (33.3%) patients. The mean patient-reported outcome measures regarding fatigue, physical function, or physical interference demonstrated no significant differences between various timepoints before, during, or after treatment. Conclusion Neoadjuvant combined immunotherapy and radiation for high-risk STS was relatively well-tolerated. The histological, radiologic, and clinical outcome data in this novel trial were relatively similar to historical literature for non-immunotherapy treatment regimens.

Uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) represents a rare yet highly aggressive tumor, comprising approximately 1% of uterine malignancies. First-line regimens involving doxorubicin or gemcitabine and docetaxel demonstrate modest response rates. Notably, the combination of doxorubicin plus trabectedin has emerged as a preferred first-line option following the LMS-04 study, showing superior progression-free survival compared to doxorubicin alone. Second-line therapy for recurrent LMS poses greater challenges, with single-agent treatments exhibiting limited efficacy. Herein, we present a case of a 65-year-old woman with stage 1B uterine leiomyosarcoma, previously treated with surgical resection and adjuvant gemcitabine/docetaxel, due to surgical morcellation. Despite initially achieving disease-free status, she experienced a first recurrence 5 years later, treated with surgery and radiation, and a second recurrence 4 years after, necessitating second-line therapy with doxorubicin and trabectedin. The patient exhibited a remarkable response to this regimen, achieving partial response after 6 cycles of doxorubicin and trabectedin chemotherapy. She maintained stable disease over 13 cycles of maintenance trabectedin and 6 months off treatment, for a total of 16 months of progression-free survival. This case underscores the potential efficacy of combination chemotherapy with doxorubicin and trabectedin as a second-line treatment option for recurrent uterine leiomyosarcoma.

Sarcomas are a rare and highly diverse group of malignancies of mesenchymal origin. While sarcomas are generally considered resistant to immunotherapy, recent studies indicate subtype-specific differences in clinical response to checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) that are associated with distinct immune phenotypes present in sarcoma subtypes. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are designed to selectively infect and kill tumor cells and induce intratumoral immune infiltration, enhancing immunogenicity and thereby sensitizing tumors to immunotherapy. Herein we review the accumulated clinical data evaluating OVs in sarcoma. Small numbers of patients with sarcoma were enrolled in early-stage OV trials as part of larger solid tumor cohorts demonstrating safety but providing limited insight into the biological effects due to the low patient numbers and lack of histologic grouping. Several recent studies have investigated talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), an approved oncolytic herpes simplex virus (HSV-1), in combination therapy regimens in sarcoma patient cohorts. These studies have shown promising responses in heavily pre-treated and immunotherapy-resistant patients associated with increased intratumoral immune infiltration. As new and more potent OVs enter the clinical arena, prospective evaluation in subtype-specific cohorts with correlative studies to define biomarkers of response will be critical to advancing this promising approach for sarcoma therapy.

The addition of trabectedin to doxorubicin, followed by trabectedin maintenance, may have superior efficacy to doxorubicin alone as first-line treatment in patients with advanced leiomyosarcoma.

We conducted a phase 3 trial involving patients with metastatic or unresectable leiomyosarcoma who had not received chemotherapy previously. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either single-agent doxorubicin (six cycles) or doxorubicin plus trabectedin (six cycles), with continued trabectedin as maintenance therapy in patients in the doxorubicin-trabectedin group who did not have disease progression. Surgery to resect residual disease was allowed in each group after six cycles of therapy. Analyses of progression-free survival (primary end point) and overall survival (secondary end point) were adjusted for two stratification factors: tumor origin site (uterine vs. soft tissue) and disease stage (locally advanced vs. metastatic). The primary end-point results were reported previously.

A total of 150 patients underwent randomization. At a median follow-up of 55 months (interquartile range, 49 to 63), a total of 107 patients had died (47 in the doxorubicin-trabectedin group and 60 in the doxorubicin group). The median overall survival was longer in the doxorubicin-trabectedin group (33 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 26 to 48) than in the doxorubicin group (24 months; 95% CI, 19 to 31); the adjusted hazard ratio for death was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.44 to 0.95). In a finding consistent with earlier reports, progression-free survival was longer in the doxorubicin-trabectedin group (12 months; 95% CI, 10 to 16) than in the doxorubicin group (6 months; 95% CI, 4 to 7); the adjusted hazard ratio for progression or death was 0.37 (95% CI, 0.26 to 0.53). The incidence of adverse events and the percentage of patients with dose reductions were higher with doxorubicin plus trabectedin than with doxorubicin alone.

Combination therapy with doxorubicin and trabectedin induction, followed by trabectedin maintenance, was associated with improved overall survival and progression-free survival, as compared with doxorubicin alone, among patients with metastatic or surgically unresectable uterine or soft-tissue leiomyosarcoma. (Funded by PharmaMar and others; LMS04 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02997358.).