|
1
|
Athanasiadis DI, Makhecha K, Blundell N, Mizota T, Anderson-Montoya B, Fanelli RD, Scholz S, Vazquez R, Gill S, Stefanidis D. How Accurate Are Surgeons at Assessing the Quality of Their Critical View of Safety During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy? J Surg Res 2025; 305:36-40. [PMID: 39642744 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.10.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Revised: 10/11/2024] [Accepted: 10/26/2024] [Indexed: 12/09/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Obtaining the critical view of safety (CVS) is considered an important step to reduce bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). However, existing literature suggests that few surgeons obtain adequate CVS when LC videos are directly evaluated by experts. This discrepancy calls for effective, standardized CVS teaching methods. While self-assessment (SA) remains the principal tool utilized by practicing surgeons for performance improvement, its effectiveness is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare surgeon SAs of repeated LC performance and attainment of the CVS with that of expert raters. METHODS Multi-institutional study of surgeon members from the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons who volunteered to participate. All surgeons were asked to submit an LC video and complete a SA of the CVS quality using the Strasberg scale (0-6 score with ≥5 score indicating appropriate CVS). The same videos were reviewed by two blinded expert raters, members of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons safe cholecystectomy task force, who had received prior rater training. Surgeon self-ratings and expert ratings were compared with a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS Twenty-five surgeon-participants were recruited, 13 of whom submitted an LC video. Surgeons did not achieve adequate CVS in their first submitted video based on expert ratings. Surgeons in the SA group overestimated their performance across all four scales: Operative Performance Rating System (z = -0.36, P = 0.715), Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (z = -0.37, P = 0.712), Strasberg (z = -1.84, P = 0.066), and Competency Assessment Tool (z = -0.73, P = 0.465). Surgeons in the coaching group overestimated their performance on each scale as well: Operative Performance Rating System (z = -0.67, P = 0.500), Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (z = -1.48, P = 0.138), Strasberg (z = -1.07, P = 0.285), and Competency Assessment Tool (z = -1.21, P = 0.225). CONCLUSIONS Our study confirms that an adequate CVS is infrequently obtained during LC in a small but national sample of general surgeons. It further adds to the existing body of literature that suggests that SA alone may be inadequate for performance improvement. Effective teaching methods such as expert or artificial intelligence coaching are needed to improve the use of appropriate CVS by surgeons that may help decrease bile duct injury risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Keith Makhecha
- Indiana University Medical School, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | | - Tomoko Mizota
- Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Hakodate Hospital, Hakodate, Japan
| | | | - Robert D Fanelli
- Minimally Invasive Surgery and Surgical Endoscopy, The Guthrie Clinic, Sayre, Pennsylvania
| | - Stefan Scholz
- Department of Pediatric General and Thoracic Surgery, UPMC Children's Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Richard Vazquez
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sujata Gill
- Department of Surgery, Northeast Georgia Physicians Group, Gainesville, Georgia
| | - Dimitrios Stefanidis
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Borie F, Sabbagh C, Fabre JM, Fuchshuber P, Gravié JF, Gugenheim J, Asbun H. SAGES SAFE CHOLE program changes surgeons practice in France-results of the FCVD implementation of SAFE CHOLE in France. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:6483-6490. [PMID: 37253869 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10128-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the Society of Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons supervision, the Safe Cholecystectomy Task Force (SAFE CHOLE) was translated into French by the the Federation of Visceral and Digestive Surgery (FCVD) and adopted to run on its national e-learning platform for surgical continuing medical education (CME). The objective of this study was to assess the impact of the SAFE CHOLE (SF) program on the knowledge and practice of French surgeons performing cholecystectomy and participating in the FCVD lead CME activity. METHODS To obtain CME certification, each participant must fill out three FCVD validated questionnaires regarding (1) the participants' routine practice for cholecystectomy, (2) the participants' knowledge and practice after successful completion of the program, and (3) the educational value of the SC program. RESULTS From 2021 to 2022, 481 surgeons completed the program. The overall satisfaction rate for the program was 81%, and 53% of the surgeons were practicing routine cholangiography before the SC program. Eighty percent declared having acquired new knowledge. Fifty-six percent reported a change in their practice of cholecystectomy. Of those, 46% started routinely using the critical view of safety, 12% used a time-out prior transection of vital structures, and 11% adopted routine intraoperative cholangiography. Sixty-seven percent reported performing a sub-total cholecystectomy in case the CVS was unobtainable. If faced with BDI, 45% would transfer to a higher level of care, 33% would seek help from a colleague, and 10% would proceed with a repair. Ninety percent recommended adoption of SC by all general surgeons and 98% reported improvement of patient safety. CONCLUSIONS Large-scale implementation of the SC program in France is feasible within a broad group of diverse specialty surgeons and appears to have a significant impact on their practice. These data should encourage other surgeons and health systems to engage in this program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederic Borie
- Federation of Visceral and Digestive Surgery (FCVD), 12 rue Bayard, 31000, Toulouse, France.
- Research Unit INSERM University of Montpellier, IDESP Institute Desbrest of Epidemiology and Public Health, Montpellier, France.
| | - Charles Sabbagh
- Federation of Visceral and Digestive Surgery (FCVD), 12 rue Bayard, 31000, Toulouse, France
| | - Jean-Michel Fabre
- Federation of Visceral and Digestive Surgery (FCVD), 12 rue Bayard, 31000, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Jean-François Gravié
- Federation of Visceral and Digestive Surgery (FCVD), 12 rue Bayard, 31000, Toulouse, France
| | - Jean Gugenheim
- Federation of Visceral and Digestive Surgery (FCVD), 12 rue Bayard, 31000, Toulouse, France
| | - Horacio Asbun
- Baptist Health Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Strasberg SM, Brunt LM, Fields RC, Alseidi A, Hawkins WG. Comments on "Challenging Orthodoxy: Beyond the Critical View of Safety". J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:1292-1293. [PMID: 37095333 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05685-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Steven M Strasberg
- Department of Surgery, Washington University in Saint Louis, Box 8109, 1 Barnes Jewish Hospital Plaza, MO, 63110, St Louis, USA.
| | - L Michael Brunt
- Department of Surgery, Washington University in Saint Louis, Box 8109, 1 Barnes Jewish Hospital Plaza, MO, 63110, St Louis, USA
| | - Ryan C Fields
- Department of Surgery, Washington University in Saint Louis, Box 8109, 1 Barnes Jewish Hospital Plaza, MO, 63110, St Louis, USA
| | - Adnan Alseidi
- Department of Surgery, Washington University in Saint Louis, Box 8109, 1 Barnes Jewish Hospital Plaza, MO, 63110, St Louis, USA
| | - William G Hawkins
- Department of Surgery, Washington University in Saint Louis, Box 8109, 1 Barnes Jewish Hospital Plaza, MO, 63110, St Louis, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Wu S, Chen Z, Liu R, Li A, Cao Y, Wei A, Liu Q, Liu J, Wang Y, Jiang J, Ying Z, An J, Peng B, Wang X. SurgSmart: an artificial intelligent system for quality control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an observational study. Int J Surg 2023; 109:1105-1114. [PMID: 37039533 PMCID: PMC10389595 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rate of bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) continues to be high due to low critical view of safety (CVS) achievement and the absence of an effective quality control system. The development of an intelligent system enables the automatic quality control of LC surgery and, eventually, the mitigation of bile duct injury. This study aims to develop an intelligent surgical quality control system for LC and using the system to evaluate LC videos and investigate factors associated with CVS achievement. MATERIALS AND METHODS SurgSmart, an intelligent system capable of recognizing surgical phases, disease severity, critical division action, and CVS automatically, was developed using training datasets. SurgSmart was also applied in another multicenter dataset to validate its application and investigate factors associated with CVS achievement. RESULTS SurgSmart performed well in all models, with the critical division action model achieving the highest overall accuracy (98.49%), followed by the disease severity model (95.45%) and surgical phases model (88.61%). CVSI, CVSII, and CVSIII had an accuracy of 80.64, 97.62, and 78.87%, respectively. CVS was achieved in 4.33% in the system application dataset. In addition, the analysis indicated that surgeons at a higher hospital level had a higher CVS achievement rate. However, there was still considerable variation in CVS achievement among surgeons in the same hospital. CONCLUSIONS SurgSmart, the surgical quality control system, performed admirably in our study. In addition, the system's initial application demonstrated its broad potential for use in surgical quality control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shangdi Wu
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery
- West China School of Medicine
| | - Zixin Chen
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery
- West China School of Medicine
| | - Runwen Liu
- ChengDu Withai Innovations Technology Company
| | - Ang Li
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery
- Guang’an People’s Hospital, Guang’an, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yu Cao
- Operating Room
- West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University
| | - Ailin Wei
- Guang’an People’s Hospital, Guang’an, Sichuan Province, China
| | | | - Jie Liu
- ChengDu Withai Innovations Technology Company
| | - Yuxian Wang
- ChengDu Withai Innovations Technology Company
| | - Jingwen Jiang
- West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University
- Med-X Center for Informatics, Sichuan University, Chengdu
| | - Zhiye Ying
- West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University
- Med-X Center for Informatics, Sichuan University, Chengdu
| | - Jingjing An
- Operating Room
- West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University
| | - Bing Peng
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery
- West China School of Medicine
| | - Xin Wang
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery
- West China School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Manatakis DK, Antonopoulou MI, Tasis N, Agalianos C, Tsouknidas I, Korkolis DP, Dervenis C. Critical View of Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence and Future Perspectives. World J Surg 2023; 47:640-648. [PMID: 36474120 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06842-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Critical View of Safety (CVS) has been increasingly recognised as the standard method for identification of the cystic structures, to prevent vasculobiliary injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, however, its adoption has been anything but universal. A significant proportion of surgeons has a poor understanding of the three requirements. To bridge this gap between theory and practice, we aimed to summarise the available evidence on CVS, emphasising on current debates and future perspectives. METHOD We systematically reviewed the literature (1995-2021), to identify studies reporting on the CVS. Eligible articles were classified according to methodology and key idea. A quantitative analysis was performed to evaluate effectiveness of the CVS in preventing bile duct injury (BDI). RESULTS 150 relevant articles were identified, focusing on six main points, (1) safety and effectiveness, (2) intraoperative documentation, (3) complementary imaging techniques, (4) bail-out alternatives, (5) adoption among surgeons, and (6) education and training. The quantitative analysis included 11 studies, with 10,938 cases. Overall, the CVS was achieved in 92.5%. Conversion rate was 4.8%. CVS-related BDI was 0.09% (0.05% technical errors and 0.04% misidentification errors). CONCLUSION Routine application of the CVS reduces BDI, but does not eliminate them altogether. Besides operative notes, the CVS should be documented by an imaging modality of sufficient quality. When the CVS cannot be safely established, the threshold for bail-out alternatives or complementary imaging should be low. Adoption by the surgical community worldwide shows great variability and focus should be placed on training through structured educational modules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios K Manatakis
- Department of Surgery, Athens Naval and Veterans Hospital, Deinokratous 70, 11521, Athens, Greece. .,Department of Surgical Oncology, St Savvas Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece.
| | | | - Nikolaos Tasis
- Department of Surgery, Athens Naval and Veterans Hospital, Deinokratous 70, 11521, Athens, Greece
| | - Christos Agalianos
- Department of Surgery, Athens Naval and Veterans Hospital, Deinokratous 70, 11521, Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Tsouknidas
- Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, USA
| | | | - Christos Dervenis
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Metropolitan Hospital, Piraeus, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Use of Critical View of Safety and Proctored Preceptorship in Preventing Bile Duct Injury During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy-Experience of 3726 Cases From a Tertiary Care Teaching Institute. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY, ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES 2023; 33:12-17. [PMID: 36730233 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000001127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Bile duct injury (BDI) continues to occur despite technological advances and improvements in surgical training over the past 2 decades. This study was conducted to audit our data on laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed over the past 2 decades to determine the role of Critical View of Safety (CVS) and proctored preceptorship in preventing BDI and postoperative complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were analyzed retrospectively. The data were obtained from a prospectively maintained database from January 2004 to December 2019. Proctored preceptorship was used in all cases. Intraoperative details included the number of patients where CVS was defined, number of BDI and conversions. Postoperative outcomes, including hospital stay, morbidity, and bile duct stricture, were noted. RESULTS Three thousand seven hundred twenty-six patients were included in the final analysis. Trainee surgeons performed 31.6% of surgeries and 9.5% of these surgeries were taken over by the senior surgeon. A CVS could be delineated in 96.6% of patients. The major BDI rate was only 0.05%. CONCLUSION This study reiterates the fact that following the basic tenets of safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy, defining and confirming CVS, and following proctored preceptorship are critical in preventing major BDI.
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Real-time fluorescent cholangiography with indocyanine green in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial to establish the optimal indocyanine green dose within 30 min preoperatively. Surg Today 2023; 53:223-231. [PMID: 35920936 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-022-02563-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To establish the optimal dose of indocyanine green (ICG) to administer intravenously 30 min before laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). METHODS In this randomized controlled trial (RCT), patients undergoing LC for cholecystitis, cholelithiasis, and/or cholecystic polyps were randomized into four groups given four different ICG doses (0.025, 0.1, 0.25, 2.5 mg). Using OptoMedic endoscopy combined with a near-infrared fluorescent imaging system, we evaluated the fluorescence intensity (FI) of the common bile duct and liver at three timepoints: before surgical dissection of the cystohepatic triangle, before clipping of the cystic duct, and before closure. The bile duct-to-liver ratio (BLR) of the FI was analyzed to assess the cholangiography effect. RESULTS Sixty-four patients were allocated to one of four groups, with 40 patients included in the final analysis. Generally, with increasing ICG doses, the levels of FI in the bile duct and liver increased gradually at each of the three timepoints. Before surgical dissection of the cystohepatic triangle, 0.1-mg ICG showed the highest BLR (F = 3.47, p = 0.0259). Before clipping the cystic duct and before closure, the 0.025- and 0.1-mg groups showed a higher BLR than the 0.25- and 2.5-mg groups (p < 0.05). When setting the ideal cholangiography at a BLR ≥ 1, ≥ 3, or ≥ 5, the 0.1-mg group showed the highest qualified case number at the three timepoints. CONCLUSIONS The intravenous administration of 0.1-mg ICG, 30 min before LC, is significantly better for fluorescent cholangiography of the extrahepatic biliary structures before dissection and clipping of the cystohepatic triangle. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) (ChiCTR2200057933).
Collapse
|
|
8
|
Jin Y, Liu R, Chen Y, Liu J, Zhao Y, Wei A, Li Y, Li H, Xu J, Wang X, Li A. Critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective investigation from both cognitive and executive aspects. Front Surg 2022; 9:946917. [PMID: 35978606 PMCID: PMC9377448 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.946917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundThe achievement rate of the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is much lower than expected. This original study aims to investigate and analyze factors associated with a low critical view of safety achievement.Materials and MethodsWe prospectively collected laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos performed from September 2, 2021, to September 19, 2021, in Sichuan Province, China. The artificial intelligence system, SurgSmart, analyzed videos under the necessary corrections undergone by expert surgeons. Also, we distributed questionnaires to surgeons and analyzed them along with surgical videos simultaneously.ResultsWe collected 169 laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgical videos undergone by 124 surgeons, among which 105 participants gave valid answers to the questionnaire. Excluding those who conducted the bail-out process directly, the overall critical view of safety achievement rates for non-inflammatory and inflammatory groups were 18.18% (18/99) and 9.84% (6/61), respectively. Although 80.95% (85/105) of the surgeons understood the basic concept of the critical view of safety, only 4.76% (5/105) of the respondents commanded all three criteria in an error-free way. Multivariate logistic regression results showed that an unconventional surgical workflow (OR:12.372, P < 0.001), a misunderstanding of the 2nd (OR: 8.917, P < 0.05) and 3rd (OR:8.206, P < 0.05) criterion of the critical view of safety, and the don't mistake “fundus-first technique” as one criterion of the critical view of safety (OR:0.123, P < 0.01) were associated with lower and higher achievements of the critical view of safety, respectively.ConclusionsThe execution and cognition of the critical view of safety are deficient, especially the latter one. Thus, increasing the critical view of safety surgical awareness may effectively improve its achievement rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Jin
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Runwen Liu
- Department of Algorithm, ChengduWithai Innovations Technology Company, Chengdu, China
| | - Yonghua Chen
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jie Liu
- Department of Algorithm, ChengduWithai Innovations Technology Company, Chengdu, China
| | - Ying Zhao
- National Chengdu Center for Safety Evaluation of Drugs, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ailin Wei
- Department of Science and Technology, Guang'an People's Hospital, Guang'an, China
| | - Yichuan Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Guang'an People's Hospital, Guang'an, China
| | - Hai Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Chongzhou People's Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Jun Xu
- Department of Minimal Invasive Surgery, Shangjin Nanfu Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Correspondence: Ang Li Xin Wang
| | - Ang Li
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Correspondence: Ang Li Xin Wang
| |
Collapse
|
|
9
|
Cirocchi R, Panata L, Griffiths EA, Tebala GD, Lancia M, Fedeli P, Lauro A, Anania G, Avenia S, Di Saverio S, Burini G, De Sol A, Verdelli AM. Injuries during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Scoping Review of the Claims and Civil Action Judgements. J Clin Med 2021; 10:5238. [PMID: 34830520 PMCID: PMC8622805 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10225238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To define what type of injuries are more frequently related to medicolegal claims and civil action judgments. METHODS We performed a scoping review on 14 studies and 2406 patients, analyzing medicolegal claims related to laparoscopic cholecystectomy injuries. We have focalized on three phases associated with claims: phase of care, location of injuries, type of injuries. RESULTS The most common phase of care associated with litigation was the improper intraoperative surgical performance (47.6% ± 28.3%), related to a "poor" visualization, and the improper post-operative management (29.3% ± 31.6%). The highest rate of defense verdicts was reported for the improper post-operative management of the injury (69.3% ± 23%). A lower rate was reported in the incorrect presurgical assessment (39.7% ± 24.4%) and in the improper intraoperative surgical performance (21.39% ± 21.09%). A defense verdict was more common in cystic duct injuries (100%), lower in hepatic bile duct (42.9%) and common bile duct (10%) injuries. CONCLUSIONS During laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the most common cause of claims, associated with lower rate of defense verdict, was the improper intraoperative surgical performance. The decision to take legal action was determined often for poor communication after the original incident.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Cirocchi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, 06132 Perugia, Italy; (R.C.); (M.L.); (S.A.)
| | - Laura Panata
- Legal Medicine and Insurance Office, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, 06129 Perugia, Italy; (L.P.); (A.M.V.)
| | - Ewen A. Griffiths
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK;
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Giovanni D. Tebala
- Surgical Emergency Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK;
| | - Massimo Lancia
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, 06132 Perugia, Italy; (R.C.); (M.L.); (S.A.)
| | - Piergiorgio Fedeli
- School of Law, Legal Medicine, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy;
| | - Augusto Lauro
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Hospital “Policlinico Umberto I”, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy;
| | - Gabriele Anania
- Department of Medical Science, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy;
| | - Stefano Avenia
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, 06132 Perugia, Italy; (R.C.); (M.L.); (S.A.)
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- Department of General Surgery, ASUR Marche, AV5, Hospital of San Benedetto del Tronto, 63074 San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy;
| | - Gloria Burini
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Hospital “Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona”, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Angelo De Sol
- Department of General Surgery, St. Maria Hospital, 05100 Terni, Italy;
| | - Anna Maria Verdelli
- Legal Medicine and Insurance Office, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, 06129 Perugia, Italy; (L.P.); (A.M.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
10
|
Chavira AM, Rivas JF, Molina APRF, de la Cruz SA, Zárate AC, Musa AB, Osorio VJC. The educational quality of the critical view of safety in videos on youtube® versus specialized platforms: which is better? Critical view of safety in virtual resources. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:337-345. [PMID: 33527206 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08286-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The surgical education has evolved by adopting the visual platforms as a resource of searching. The videos complement the visual learning of surgical techniques of trainees, residents, and surgeons. YouTube® is the most frequently consulted platform in the surgical field. WebSurg® and GIBLIB® are two recognized medical platforms. The Critical View of Safety (CVS) is the most important and effective method to reduce the risk of bile duct injury (BDI) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Reaching a satisfactory CVS is a crucial point. We evaluated the CVS of videos on WebSurg® and GIBLIB®, comparing the results with those of the worldwide most popular video platform. METHODS We performed a search under the term "Laparoscopic cholecystectomy" on the virtual platforms YouTube®, GIBLIB®, and WebSurg®. Three evaluators reviewed the 77 selected videos using the "Sanford-Strasberg' CVS score." The inferential analysis was performed between two groups: YouTube® and Non-YouTube (GIBLIB® and WebSurg®). The characteristics of each video were analyzed including country of origin, type of profile, number of views, and number of Likes. RESULTS Satisfactory CVS obtained from each of the platforms was GIBLIB® 40%; WebSurg® 44.4%; YouTube® 27.7%. The comparative analysis of CVS quality and CVS score for the Non-YouTube and YouTube® groups did not show a significant difference (p = 0.142, p = 0.377, respectively). CONCLUSION The videos on GIBLIB® and WebSurg® offer a higher probability of satisfactory CVS compared to YouTube®. Nevertheless, there is no significant superiority of GIBLIB® and WebSurg® over YouTube®.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Marmolejo Chavira
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Central Sur de Alta Especialidad, PEMEX, 7th Floor, Periférico Sur 4091 Fuentes del Pedregal, Tlalpan, 14140, Mexico City, Mexico.
| | - Jorge Farell Rivas
- Department of Surgery, Director of Surgical Residency Program, Hospital Central Sur de Alta Especialidad, PEMEX, 7th Floor, Periférico Sur 4091 Fuentes del Pedregal, Tlalpan, 14140, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Ana Paula Ruiz Funes Molina
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Central Sur de Alta Especialidad, PEMEX, 7th Floor, Periférico Sur 4091 Fuentes del Pedregal, Tlalpan, 14140, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Sergio Ayala de la Cruz
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Hospital Universitario "Dr. José E. González", Av. Francisco I. Madero Pte. Mitras Centro, 1st Floor, 64460, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
| | - Alejandro Cruz Zárate
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Central Sur de Alta Especialidad, PEMEX, 7th Floor, Periférico Sur 4091 Fuentes del Pedregal, Tlalpan, 14140, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Alfonso Bandin Musa
- Department of Transplants, Hospital Central Sur de Alta Especialidad, PEMEX, 10th Floor, Periférico Sur 4091 Fuentes del Pedregal, Tlalpan, 14140, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Víctor José Cuevas Osorio
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Central Sur de Alta Especialidad, PEMEX, 7th Floor, Periférico Sur 4091 Fuentes del Pedregal, Tlalpan, 14140, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
|
11
|
Safe Cholecystectomy Multi-society Practice Guideline and State of the Art Consensus Conference on Prevention of Bile Duct Injury During Cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 2020; 272:3-23. [PMID: 32404658 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND BDI is the most common serious complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. To address this problem, a multi-society consensus conference was held to develop evidenced-based recommendations for safe cholecystectomy and prevention of BDI. METHODS Literature reviews were conducted for 18 key questions across 6 broad topics around cholecystectomy directed by a steering group and subject experts from 5 surgical societies (Society of Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons, Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, and European Association for Endoscopic Surgery). Evidence-based recommendations were formulated using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation methodology. When evidence-based recommendations could not be made, expert opinion was documented. A number of recommendations for future research were also documented. Recommendations were presented at a consensus meeting in October 2018 and were voted on by an international panel of 25 experts with greater than 80% agreement considered consensus. RESULTS Consensus was reached on 17 of 18 questions by the guideline development group and expert panel with high concordance from audience participation. Most recommendations were conditional due to low certainty of evidence. Strong recommendations were made for (1) use of intraoperative biliary imaging for uncertainty of anatomy or suspicion of biliary injury; and (2) referral of patients with confirmed or suspected BDI to an experienced surgeon/multispecialty hepatobiliary team. CONCLUSIONS These consensus recommendations should provide guidance to surgeons, training programs, hospitals, and professional societies for strategies that have the potential to reduce BDIs and positively impact patient outcomes. Development of clinical and educational research initiatives based on these recommendations may drive further improvement in the quality of surgical care for patients undergoing cholecystectomy.
Collapse
|
|
12
|
Safe cholecystectomy multi-society practice guideline and state-of-the-art consensus conference on prevention of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2020; 34:2827-2855. [PMID: 32399938 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07568-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 04/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bile duct injury (BDI) is the most common serious complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. To address this problem, a multi-society consensus conference was held to develop evidenced-based recommendations for safe cholecystectomy and prevention of BDI. METHODS Literature reviews were conducted for 18 key questions across six broad topics around cholecystectomy directed by a steering group and subject experts from five surgical societies (SAGES, AHPBA IHPBA, SSAT, and EAES). Evidence-based recommendations were formulated using the GRADE methodology. When evidence-based recommendations could not be made, expert opinion was documented. A number of recommendations for future research were also documented. Recommendations were presented at a consensus meeting in October 2018 and were voted on by an international panel of 25 experts with greater than 80% agreement considered consensus. RESULTS Consensus was reached on 17 of 18 questions by the Guideline Development Group (GDG) and expert panel with high concordance from audience participation. Most recommendations were conditional due to low certainty of evidence. Strong recommendations were made for (1) use of intraoperative biliary imaging for uncertainty of anatomy or suspicion of biliary injury; and (2) referral of patients with confirmed or suspected BDI to an experienced surgeon/multispecialty hepatobiliary team. CONCLUSION These consensus recommendations should provide guidance to surgeons, training programs, hospitals, and professional societies for strategies that have the potential to reduce BDIs and positively impact patient outcomes. Development of clinical and educational research initiatives based on these recommendations may drive further improvement in the quality of surgical care for patients undergoing cholecystectomy.
Collapse
|
|
13
|
Abstract
The incidence of biliary injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has shown a declining trend though it may still be twice that as with open cholecystectomy. Major biliary or vasculobiliary injury is associated with significant morbidity. As prevention is the best strategy, the concept of a culture of safe cholecystectomy has been recently introduced to educate surgeons and apprise them of basic tenets of safe performance of LC. Various aspects of safe cholecystectomy include: (1) thorough knowledge of relevant anatomy, various anatomical landmarks, and anatomical variations; (2) an understanding of the mechanisms involved in biliary/vascular injury, the most important being the misidentification injury; (3) identification of various preoperative and intraoperative predictors of difficult cholecystectomy; (4) proper gallbladder retraction; (5) safe use of various energy devices; (6) understanding the critical view of safety, including its doublet view and documentation; (7) awareness of various error traps (e.g., fundus first technique); (8) use of various bailout strategies (e.g., subtotal cholecystectomy) in difficult gallbladder cases; (9) use of intraoperative imaging techniques (e.g., intraoperative cholangiogram) to ascertain correct anatomy; and (10) understanding the concept of time-out. Surgeons should be facile with these aspects of this culture of safety in cholecystectomy in an attempt to reduce the incidence of biliary/vascular injury during LC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vishal Gupta
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Shatabdi Hospital Phase 1, King George's Medical University, Lucknow 226003, Uttar Pradesh, India.
| | - Gaurav Jain
- Transplant and HPB Surgery, the Iowa Clinic-Iowa Methodist Hospital, Des Moines, IA 50309, United States
| |
Collapse
|
|
14
|
Gupta V, Jain G. Safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Adoption of universal culture of safety in cholecystectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2019; 11:62-84. [PMID: 30842813 PMCID: PMC6397793 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v11.i2.62] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2018] [Revised: 01/06/2019] [Accepted: 01/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The incidence of biliary injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has shown a declining trend though it may still be twice that as with open cholecystectomy. Major biliary or vasculobiliary injury is associated with significant morbidity. As prevention is the best strategy, the concept of a culture of safe cholecystectomy has been recently introduced to educate surgeons and apprise them of basic tenets of safe performance of LC. Various aspects of safe cholecystectomy include: (1) thorough knowledge of relevant anatomy, various anatomical landmarks, and anatomical variations; (2) an understanding of the mechanisms involved in biliary/vascular injury, the most important being the misidentification injury; (3) identification of various preoperative and intraoperative predictors of difficult cholecystectomy; (4) proper gallbladder retraction; (5) safe use of various energy devices; (6) understanding the critical view of safety, including its doublet view and documentation; (7) awareness of various error traps (e.g., fundus first technique); (8) use of various bailout strategies (e.g., subtotal cholecystectomy) in difficult gallbladder cases; (9) use of intraoperative imaging techniques (e.g., intraoperative cholangiogram) to ascertain correct anatomy; and (10) understanding the concept of time-out. Surgeons should be facile with these aspects of this culture of safety in cholecystectomy in an attempt to reduce the incidence of biliary/vascular injury during LC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vishal Gupta
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Shatabdi Hospital Phase 1, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow 226003, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Gaurav Jain
- Transplant and HPB Surgery, the Iowa Clinic-Iowa Methodist Hospital, Des Moines, IA 50309, United States
| |
Collapse
|
|
15
|
Effects of Different Levels of Intra-Abdominal Pressure on the Postoperative Hepatic Function of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2019; 28:275-281. [PMID: 29672346 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the differences in postoperative markers of the hepatic function under different intra-abdominal pressures in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). METHODS Several databases were searched for control studies, and then the weighted data were pooled with random-effect models. RESULTS A total of 11 studies involving 865 patients were included. The meta-analysis reveals that the level of the aspartate aminotransferase and alanine transaminase of the low-pressure group has a lower postoperative increase than the moderate-pressure group (P<0.001). The level of the aspartate aminotransferase and alanine transaminase of the moderate-pressure group has a lower postoperative increase than the high-pressure group (P<0.001). Totally, the effect of lower pressure LC on postoperative hepatic functions is less significant than that of the higher one. Potential subgroup analysis does not modify these results. CONCLUSIONS The recommended pressure in LC is suggested to be lower so as to result in a better surgical safety, especially for special populations.
Collapse
|
|
16
|
Safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review of bile duct injury prevention. Int J Surg 2018; 60:164-172. [PMID: 30439536 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2018] [Revised: 10/14/2018] [Accepted: 11/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), a substantial increase in bile duct injury (BDI) incidence was noted. Multiple methods to prevent this complication have been developed and investigated. The most suitable method however is subject to debate. In this systematic review, the different modalities to aid in the safe performance of LC and prevent BDI are delineated. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic search for articles describing methods for the prevention of BDI in LC was conducted using EMBASE, Medline, Web of science, Cochrane CENTRAL and Google scholar databases from inception to 11 June 2018. RESULTS 90 studies were included in this systematic review. Overall, BDI preventive techniques can be categorized as dedicated surgical approaches (Critical View of Safety (CVS), fundus first, partial laparoscopic cholecystectomy), supporting imaging techniques (intraoperative radiologic cholangiography, intraoperative ultrasonography, fluorescence imaging) and others. Dedicated surgical approaches demonstrate promising results, yet limited research is provided. Intraoperative radiologic cholangiography and ultrasonography demonstrate beneficial effects in BDI prevention, however the available evidence is low. Fluorescence imaging is in its infancy, yet this technique is demonstrated to be feasible and larger trials are in preparation. CONCLUSION Given the low sample sizes and suboptimal study designs of the studies available, it is not possible to recommend a preferred method to prevent BDI. Surgeons should primarily focus on proper dissection techniques, of which CVS is most suitable. Additionally, recognition of hazardous circumstances and knowledge of alternative techniques is critical to complete surgery with minimal risk of injury to the patient.
Collapse
|
|
17
|
Population-Based Studies Should not be Used to Justify a Policy of Routine Cholangiography to Prevent Major Bile Duct Injury During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. World J Surg 2017; 41:82-89. [PMID: 27468742 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3665-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Iatrogenic bile duct injury at time of cholecystectomy is a rare but devastating event. A twofold higher frequency of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy without cholangiography is reported in population-based studies. Some interpret this as a cause-and-effect relationship and thus mandate routine cholangiography. A critical appraisal of population studies is required to determine whether these studies are suitable in determining the role of routine cholangiography. The literature search was performed using combinations of the forced search terms "duct injury", "population" and "cholangiography" to identify population-based studies assessing the relationship between cholangiography and iatrogenic bile duct injury. All seven population-based studies reported a numerically higher rate of bile duct injury when an intraoperative cholangiogram was not obtained during cholecystectomy. Five predate the critical view technique. Only one was limited to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. All studies identified cholangiography as a likely marker for disease severity or surgical technique. Six studies did not demonstrate a cause-and-effect relationship by not including effect modifiers. The only study to address confounders reported the same rate of injury irrespective of the use of cholangiography. Critical appraisal of population-based studies does not support their use in justifying a policy of routine cholangiography to prevent major bile duct injury.
Collapse
|