While severe postoperative complications (SPCs) impact cancer prognosis, their effect on locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients with varying immunonutritional statuses after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is unclear.

This retrospective study analyzed 442 patients with locally advanced ESCC who underwent MIE, investigating the relationship between SPCs and survival based on preoperative immunonutritional status, determined by the prognostic nutritional index (PNI). Nomograms were developed for patients with preserved immunonutritional status using Cox regression, and their performance was assessed.

Of the patients, 102 (23.1%) experienced SPCs after MIE. Five-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were significantly different between SPCs and non-SPCs groups (p < 0.001). In the preserved immunonutritional group, SPCs significantly reduced 5-year OS (p = 0.008) and DFS (p = 0.011), but not in the poor immunonutritional group (OS p = 0.152, DFS p = 0.098). Multivariate Cox regression identified SPCs as an independent risk factor for OS (HR = 1.653, p = 0.013) and DFS (HR = 1.476, p = 0.039). A nomogram for predicting OS and DFS in preserved immunonutritional patients demonstrated excellent performance.

SPCs significantly affect prognosis in ESCC patients with preserved immunonutritional status after MIE. Nomograms based on SPCs can predict OS and DFS in these patients.

Anastomotic leak (AL) is a serious complication following esophagectomy and is often linked to poor perfusion of the gastric conduit (GC) and esophageal stump (EC). The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of intraoperative Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) versus visual assessment VA) to assess perfusion status and its impact on the rate of AL.

Fifty-eight esophageal or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma patients were randomized to ICG-FA (28) and VA (30) groups. Perfusion status was assessed with VA alone in the VA group and with VA followed by ICG-FA in the ICG-FA group.

The ICG-FA group had a lower leak rate of 4% when compared to 27% in the VA group (p = 0.03). ICG-FA identified nine cases where VA misjudged the GC tip vascularity, thereby avoiding unnecessary resections. ICG-FA necessitated revision of the GC tip in one case missed by VA and also identified poor perfusion of ES tip in three cases mandating revision which were deemed well-perfused by VA.

ICG-FA demonstrated superiority over VA in assessing perfusion adequacy of the GC and ES, which resulted in a statistically significant decrease in the rate of anastomotic leaks.

The construction of a gastric-tube-substitute esophagus is a common method for digestive tract reconstruction after esophagectomy. However, the incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage remains high. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of 2 gastric tube fabrication methods-cis-cutting and retro-cutting-in reducing postoperative anastomotic leakage.

We retrospectively analyzed 253 patients who underwent McKeown radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University from February 2021 to February 2024. Patients were divided into cis-cut (n = 126) and retro-cut (n = 127) groups on the basis of the surgical technique used. The incidence of anastomotic leakage was compared, and logistic regression was used to identify risk factors.

Anastomotic leakage (16.7%, 21/126 vs 3.9%, 5/127; P < .001) and stricture (28.6%, 36/126 vs 15%, 19/127; P = .009) rates were lower in the retro-cut group than the cis-cut group. Multivariable analysis identified the gastric tube fabrication method in the cis-cut group as an independent risk factor (odds ratio, 3.390; 95% confidence interval, 1.147-10.018; P = .027) for postoperative anastomotic leakage.

Retro-cut gastric tube fabrication significantly reduces the incidence of anastomotic leakage and anastomotic stricture, suggesting its suitability as a standard technique for esophageal reconstruction.

The impact of anastomotic leak (AL) on the long-term survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear. This study investigated whether AL influences the long-term survival of patients with ESCC following McKeown esophagectomy.

An original database was queried to identify patients with ESCC who underwent McKeown esophagectomy between 2012 and 2020 at a high-volume cancer center. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared using Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves. Cox regression analysis was used for multivariate analysis. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for the confounding factors.

A total of 1614 patients were included, of whom 16.9% developed AL. In patients without neoadjuvant therapy, for patients with and without AL, the 5-year OS was 55.8% and 62.0%, and the 5-year DFS was 48.7% and 59.1%, respectively (OS: p = 0.37, DFS: p = 0.046). In the neoadjuvant cohort, for patients with and without AL, the 5-year OS was 57.9% and 63.2%, and the 5-year DFS was 55.4% and 58.8%, respectively (OS: p = 0.48, DFS: p = 0.78). Moreover, AL significantly increased the risk of distant recurrence in patients without neoadjuvant therapy (p = 0.023).

These findings suggest that AL negatively influences DFS in patients without neoadjuvant therapy, but does not significantly affect long-term survival in patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment. Intensive treatment and follow-up plan should be considered when patients without neoadjuvant therapy.

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a major concern following esophagectomy due to the associated morbidity and mortality. The impact of hospital volume on postoperative outcomes after esophagectomy has previously been reported. The aim of this study was to analyze the current trends in postoperative anastomotic leakage and associated failure-to-rescue after esophagectomy in relation to hospital volume in German acute care hospitals using real-world data from the German Diagnosis-Related Groups (G-DRG) database.

A retrospective secondary data analysis of the G-DRG database was performed for all in-hospital cases of patients undergoing esophagectomy from 2013 to 2021. AL and in-house mortality rates were assessed in relation to hospital case volume and endoscopic treatment modalities.

The study included 32 335 cases. The mean reported AL rate was 17.1% with a mean failure-to-rescue rate of 18.9%. AL rates did not differ between hospitals with an annual case-volume ≤ 25 procedures/year vs. >25 procedures/year (16.8% vs. 17.6%, OR 1.06, P = 0.07). However, in high-volume centers (> 25 procedures/year), in-hospital mortality for cases with AL (failure-to-rescue) was lower compared to medium-volume (10-25 cases/year) and low-volume (1-9 cases/year) centers (14.2% vs. 21.5% vs. 25.1%). The use of endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) increased over time, reaching 58.1% of AL cases in 2021 compared to 14.2% in 2013, while the use of self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) decreased from 37.0% in 2013 to 9.3% in 2021.

AL rates after esophagectomy remain high. In-house mortality is significantly lower in high-volume hospitals highlighting the importance to consider improvements in centralization of procedures. Further efforts are needed to reduce AL rates and improve outcomes after esophagectomy.

Anastomotic leak after esophagectomy is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. We sought to identify the prevalence of anastomotic leak, stratified by operative approach and disease etiology, as well as risk factors for leak.

A retrospective cohort analysis using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database was conducted on patients who underwent esophagectomy with gastric reconstruction between 2009 and 2021. Baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared between patients who did and did not develop an anastomotic leak. Multivariable mixed effects logistic regression models identified risk factors for leak.

Of 18,419 patients, 3416 (19%) developed an anastomotic leak. Patients who leaked had more comorbidities, including obesity and diabetes. There was no difference in leak based on disease etiology (P = .435.) Patients with anastomotic leak had increased 30-day mortality (7% vs 4%, P < .001), reoperation (58% vs 10%, P < .001), and longer lengths of stay (18 vs 10 days, P < .001). On multivariable analysis, obesity (odds ratio [OR], 1.27; 95% CI, 1.16-1.38; P < .001), diabetes (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04-1.25; P = .006), and smoking (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.15-1.37; P < .001) were independently predictive of anastomotic leak. Compared with an open 2-field, a transhiatal (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.17-1.55; P < .001) or 3-field esophagectomy (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.25-1.70; P < .001) was more likely to leak. A robotic approach was associated with an increased risk of leak (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.03-1.08; P < .001), however lost significance in a modern subgroup from 2018-2021.

Obesity, diabetes, smoking, pulmonary hypertension, and a cervical anastomosis are risk factors for anastomotic leak regardless of disease etiology. These important clinical risk factors identify an opportunity for modifiable risk reduction with aggressive medical optimization perioperatively.

There are two types of methods of creating a gastric conduit after esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer: narrow gastric tube reconstruction or whole stomach reconstruction. Whole stomach reconstruction with good blood perfusion was reported in a prospective cohort study to be safe and that it has the possibility to prevent anastomotic leakage (AL). We therefore planned a randomized controlled phase III study to investigate the superiority of whole stomach reconstruction over narrow gastric tube reconstruction after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

This is a single center, two-arm, open-label, randomized phase III trial. We calculated that 65 patients in each arm of this study and total study population of 130 patients are required according to our historical data on narrow gastric tube reconstruction and prospective data on whole stomach reconstruction. In the narrow gastric tube group, a 3.5-cm-wide gastric tube is made along the greater curvature of the stomach using linear staplers. Otherwise, in the whole stomach group, after the lymphadenectomy of the lesser curvature and No.2, the stomach is cut just below the esophagogastric junction using a linear stapler. The primary endpoint of this study is the incidence of AL. Secondary endpoints are the occurrence rate of anastomotic stenosis, the occurrence rate of pneumonia, the occurrence rate of all postoperative complications, the occurrence rate of reflux esophagitis, quality of life evaluation by EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC OES-18, nutritional evaluation, the amount of blood loss, postoperative hospital stays, and blood flow evaluation. Complications are evaluated using the Clavien-Dindo classification (version 2.0), and those of grade II or higher are considered to be postoperative complications.

If the optimal method for creating a gastric conduit after esophagectomy is clarified, it may be possible to contribute to improving short-term and long-term surgical outcomes for patients undergoing surgery for esophageal cancer.

The protocol of ATHLETE trial was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000050677 ( http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm ). Date of registration: March 26, 2023. Date of first participant enrollment: March 27, 2023.

The purpose was to explore the independent risk factors for esophagogastric anastomotic leakage (EGAL) and establish a nomogram.

Patients who underwent esophagectomy were enrolled and randomly divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort at a ratio of 7:3. The differences between the two groups of factors were analyzed by difference analysis, and multivariate regression analysis was subsequently performed. A nomogram was established, and the feasibility of the nomogram was verified by analyzing the discrimination, calibration, and decision curves.

A total of 775 patients were enrolled, including 532 in the training cohort and 223 in the validation cohort. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that age, smoking history, drinking history, nutritional indicators, and anastomotic location were independent risk factors. In terms of discrimination, in the training group, the area under the curve was 0.757 (P = 0.025). In the calibration curve, the curves and fitting lines before and after correction in the training group and the validation group were basically the same. The results of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed that the chi-square value of the training cohort was 5.48 (P = 0.791). In the decision curve analysis of the training set, when the threshold probability was in the range of 5-63%, the net benefit of patients was greater than that of the two extreme curves.

Preoperative malnutrition is an independent risk factor for EGAL. A diagnostic model, developed on age, anastomotic location, smoking status, and drinking history, was a reliable noninvasive tool to timely predict the occurrence of AL.

This study aims to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis of the effects of postoperative complications (PCs) on survival following esophagectomy using the restricted mean survival time (RMST) analysis.

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Medline, including articles published up to July 2024. Data were reconstructed from Kaplan-Meier curves, and the difference in RMST (RMSTD) and the RMST/restricted mean time loss (RMTL) ratios were calculated to examine the effects of PCs on overall survival.

A total of 12 articles, including 7925 patients, met the inclusion criteria. RMSTD estimates indicate that patients with overall PCs survived an average of 0.04 years shorter (RMSTD = -0.04, 95% CI: -0.06, -0.03) than those without PCs at the 1-year follow-up and 0.39 years shorter (RMSTD = -0.39, 95% CI: -0.55, -0.22) at the 5-year follow-up. Patients with anastomotic leaks survived an average of 0.34 years shorter (RMSTD = -0.34, 95% CI: -0.49, -0.19), and patients with pulmonary complications survived an average of 0.63 years shorter (RMSTD = -0.63, 95% CI: -0.81, -0.45) at the 5-year follow-up. Additionally, RMTL ratios were estimated to be 1.21 (95% CI: 1.12, 1.31) for overall PCs, 1.19 (95% CI: 1.11, 1.28) for anastomotic leaks, and 1.53 (95% CI: 1.36, 1.73) for pulmonary complications at the 5-year follow-up, respectively.

Our findings quantified the annual negative impact of PCs of esophageal cancer on overall patient survival following esophagectomy. Increased efforts are needed to enhance prevention, early screening, and timely treatment for complications, particularly for patients with pulmonary complications.

One risk factor for anastomotic leakage (AL) after esophagectomy with retrosternal gastric reconstruction is excessive compression of the gastric tube at the thoracic inlet. In this study, we evaluated the effect of our modified procedure to reduce AL by placing the esophagogastric anastomosis below the thoracic inlet. Between January 2008 and December 2022, 174 consecutive patients underwent subtotal esophagectomy with retrosternal gastric pull up, followed by circular stapler anastomosis in our hospitals. After January 2016, the gastric tube was pulled down to place the anastomosis below the suprasternal notch. Postoperative CT then measured the level of esophagogastric anastomosis (LEA). Comparing cases before and after revision (conventional group, n = 65 vs. test group, n = 109), AL was significantly reduced from 11 (16.9%) to 3 (2.8%) cases (P = 0.002). After propensity score matching, AL was observed in 14% (8/57) and 0% (0/57) cases in the conventional and test groups, respectively (P = 0.006). Smaller circular stapler size (P < 0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.001), and lower LEA (P < 0.001) were observed in the test group than in the conventional group. Multivariate analysis revealed that anastomotic procedure (OR [95%CI], 0.01[0.00-0.46], P = 0.008), and body mass index (OR [95%CI], 6.92[1.10-135.01], P = 0.038) were the independent risk factors for the development of AL. Our modified procedure to avoid compression of the gastric tube at the thoracic inlet is suggested to noninvasively reduce the risk of AL in the subtotal esophagectomy with retrosternal reconstruction.

Malnutrition is common with esophagogastric cancers and is associated with negative outcomes. We aimed to evaluate if immunonutrition during neoadjuvant treatment improves patient's health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and reduces postoperative morbidity and toxicities during neoadjuvant treatment.

A multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) was undertaken. Included patients had untreated nonmetastatic esophagogastric tumor, aged 18 ≥ years with a life expectancy of >3 months. The study was powered for 80% power to detect a clinically relevant difference in EORTC-QLQC30 with standard deviation of 15 between groups. Primary end point was the quality of life as measured by the global health status at 30 days after surgery. An intention-to-treat analysis was employed.

The study was terminated at the interim analysis stage. About 300 patients were randomized: 149 to the IMPACT group and 151 to the control-formula group. Patient groups were well-balanced in terms of age, sex, body mass index, WHO performance status, and clinical tumor stage. Analysis of the primary end point for the study of global health status at 30-day postoperatively failed to show any significant differences between the groups (55.4 ± 18.6 [IMPACT] vs. 55.9 ± 19.8 [control]; P = 0.345). No significant differences between the groups were detected in the majority of domains from EORTC QLQC30 and OG25 tools after neoadjuvant therapy and 30 days postoperatively. Finally, no significant differences were seen between groups in neoadjuvant therapy or postoperative complications, or tumor response.

The results of this multicenter double-blind RCT fail to demonstrate any HRQOL benefits to the utilization of immunonutrition during neoadjuvant therapy in patients with esophagogastric cancer.

Early postoperative reflux (PR) can compromise anastomotic healing after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (ILE) and poses a risk for aspiration. Anastomotic insufficiency is the most threatening surgical complication. We present the protective method of pre-emptive active reflux drainage (PARD) with simultaneous enteral feeding. We report our experience with this new safety concept in esophageal surgery in a cohort of 43 patients.

For PARD we use a double lumen open porous film drainage (dOFD). To create the dOFD, the gastric tube of a Trelumina probe (Freka®Trelumina, Fresenius) is coated with a double-layered open-pore drainage film (Suprasorb®CNP drainage film, Lohmann & Rauscher) over a length of 25 cm. The dOFD is endoscopically inserted into the tubular stomach intraoperatively after completion of the anastomosis. Continuous negative pressure is applied with an electronic pump (-125 mm Hg). The PR is continuously aspirated completely and the stomach and anastomotic region are decompressed. At the same time, nutrition is delivered via an integrated intestinal tube. Depending on the results of the endoscopic control after 5 days, PARD is either continued or terminated.

During the observation period (2017-2023), PARD was used in all patients (n = 43) with ILE. The healing rate under PARD was 100% and healing was observed in all anastomoses. No additional endoscopic procedures or surgical revisions of the anastomoses were required. The median duration of PARD was 8 days (range 4-21). We observed problems in the healing of the anastomosis in 20 of 43 patients (47%) for whom we defined endoscopic criteria for at-risk anastomosis.

Our results suggest that PARD has a strong protective effect on anastomotic healing and may reduce the risk of anastomotic insufficiency. The integrated feeding tube of the dOFD allows early postoperative enteral feeding while simultaneously applying negative pressure. PARD appears to prevent the negative consequences of impaired anastomotic healing.

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the configuration of anastomotic doughnuts from upper gastrointestinal surgeries was associated with anastomotic leakage (AL).

AL is a severe postoperative complication after upper gastrointestinal cancer surgeries. AL is associated with an increase in overall and cancer-related morbidity and mortality in patients with esophageal and gastric cancer. New intraoperative biomarkers are needed to predict the risk of AL to implement early preventive measures.

Anastomotic doughnuts from 102 patients undergoing surgery for esophageal or gastric cancer using circular staplers were examined. The minimal and maximal height and width of the anastomotic doughnuts were measured and correlated with the postoperative AL rate.

The AL rate in our study collective was 15,7 %. The minimal width (Wmin) of the oral and aboral anastomotic doughnuts was significantly lower in patients with AL compared to patients without AL (p = 0.002 and p = 0.041 respectively). The Wmin of the esophageal anastomotic doughnut was an independent risk factor for AL in the multivariable analysis (p = 0.034). Negative predictive values for the measurements of anastomotic doughnuts (Wmin) with regard to the risk of AL were higher than for the commonly used postoperative biomarker C-reactive protein.

Minimal anastomotic doughnut width was statistically significantly associated with AL. Thus, not only the evaluation of the completeness of the anastomotic doughnuts but also intraoperative measurements could be used to predict the risk of AL to initiate early preventive measures to prevent the development of AL and/or reduce AL-associated morbidity.

Surgery for esophageal cancer has an associated high rate of postoperative complications such as anastomotic leakage (AL) and fistulas. Pre-operative sarcopenia as a loss of skeletal muscle mass and function is identified as a potential prognostic factor in determining the outcomes of oncological surgical resections for esophageal cancers. In this study, we evaluated the impact of body composition on postoperative complications in esophageal cancer surgery.

In this cohort study, we analyzed patients' body composition at the level of the third lumbar vertebra on CT scans before Ivor Lewis resections for esophageal cancers between January 2015 and December 2022. Patients with a skeletal muscle index (SMI) ≤ 38.5 cm2/m2 in women and ≤52.4 cm2/m2 in men were classified as sarcopenic. Postoperative complications were categorized following the Dindo-Clavien classification and included AL, postoperative pneumonia, length of hospital stay, and failure-to-rescue which were compared between the sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients.

From a group of 111 patients with Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, 70 patients (63.1%) were classified as sarcopenic based on the SMI and the previously published gender-specific cut-off values. AL occurred at 12.6% (5.6% in adenocarcinoma). Within the whole cohort, patients with AL had a significantly low SMI of 43.487 ± 8.088 vs. 48.668 ± 7.514; p = 0.012. Additionally, the SMI showed a negative correlation to the length of postoperative hospital stay (r = -0.204; p = 0.032; N = 111). The failure-to-rescue rate was higher in the group of sarcopenic patients (12.8% vs. 8%).

Our data showed a correlation between SMI and AL. This effect could not be seen in gender-specific SMI. This study showed a lower failure-to-rescue rate in non-sarcopenic patients after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. These findings underscore the crucial role of determining the preoperative nutritional and body composition status as measured by the preoperative CT scans.

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a major complication after esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction. This retrospective study aims to reveal the factors in prevention of AL and in reduction of its severity.

Enrolled in this study were the 183 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy followed by narrow gastric tube reconstruction at Wakayama Medical University Hospital between January 2018 and March 2023. Evaluation of blood perfusion using indocyanine green began in September 2020.

AL occurred in 42 patients (22%) and did not occur in 141 patients (78%). Patient characteristics were not significantly different between patients with and without AL. Evaluation of blood perfusion of the gastric tube was performed in 69 of the 183 patients (37.7%), and after its introduction the rates of AL decreased from 28.0% to 14.4%. Blood perfusion was less evaluated in the AL group than in the non-AL group (23.8% vs. 41.8%, P=0.034). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that non-evaluation of blood perfusion using indocyanine green (odds=3.115) was an independent risk factor for AL. For the patients with AL, active interventions (eg, tube insertion into the gastric tube through the nose or fistula, embolization of cyanoacrylate) were performed significantly more often in the group without evaluation of blood perfusion than in the group with evaluation. Without evaluation of blood perfusion, there was significantly longer time from onset to resumption of diet and significantly longer postoperative hospital stays.

Evaluation of qualitative blood perfusion can lead to both risk reduction and prevention of severe AL after narrow gastric tube reconstruction for esophageal cancer.

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a major complication after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, and the significance of elevated postoperative lactate levels in the occurrence of AL is unclear.

We evaluated 583 patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Serum lactate levels were measured immediately after esophagectomy and in the morning on postoperative days (POD) 1, 2, 3, and 4. We also evaluated the factors associated with AL using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

AL occurred in 8.9% (n = 52) of patients, and the median onset of AL was POD10 (interquartile range: 7-13). The lactate levels immediately after esophagectomy through POD3 were significantly higher in patients with AL than in those without AL. A further multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that elevated lactate level on POD2 was an independent predictor of the occurrence of AL (odds ratio 11.9; 95% confidence interval: 4.04-17.3; P < 0.001). Severe AL was significantly more frequent in the higher lactate patients (P < 0.001). Furthermore, in patients with AL with higher lactate, the onset tended to be earlier (P = 0.054), and the treatment duration of AL was significantly longer compared with those with lower lactate (P = 0.037).

AL was significantly associated with elevated postoperative lactate levels. Elevated lactate levels on POD2 could be significant predictor of AL development after esophagectomy.

To evaluate prognostic differences between minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and open esophagectomy (OE) in patients with surgery after a prolonged interval (>12 wk) following chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

Previously, we established that a prolonged interval after CRT before esophagectomy was associated with poorer long-term survival.

This was an international multicenter cohort study involving 17 tertiary centers, including patients who received CRT followed by surgery between 2010 and 2020. Patients undergoing MIE were defined as thoracoscopic and laparoscopic approaches.

A total of 428 patients (145 MIE and 283 OE) had surgery between 12 weeks and 2 years after CRT. Significant differences were observed in American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, radiation dose, clinical T stage, and histologic subtype. There were no significant differences between the groups in age, sex, body mass index, pathologic T or N stage, resection margin status, tumor location, surgical technique, or 90-day mortality. Survival analysis showed MIE was associated with improved survival in univariate ( P =0.014), multivariate analysis after adjustment for smoking, T and N stage, and histology (HR=1.69; 95% CI: 1.14-2.5) and propensity-matched analysis ( P =0.02). Further subgroup analyses by radiation dose and interval after CRT showed survival advantage for MIE in 40 to 50 Gy dose groups (HR=1.9; 95% CI: 1.2-3.0) and in patients having surgery within 6 months of CRT (HR=1.6; 95% CI: 1.1-2.2).

MIE was associated with improved overall survival compared with OE in patients with a prolonged interval from CRT to surgery. The mechanism for this observed improvement in survival remains unknown, with potential hypotheses including a reduction in complications and improved functional recovery after MIE.

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a dreaded complication following esophageal resection. No clear consensus exist for the optimal handling of this severe complication. The aim of this study was to describe the treatment outcome following AL. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study including all patients with AL operated with Ivor Lewis esophagectomy from 2010 to 2021 at Oslo University Hospital, Norway. 74/526 (14%) patients had AL. Patient outcomes were analyzed and categorized according to main AL treatment strategy; stent (54%), endoscopic vacuum therapy and stent (EVT + stent) (19%), nasogastric tube and antibiotics (conservative) (16%), EVT (8%) and by other endoscopic means (other) (3%). One patient had surgical debridement of the chest cavity. In 66 patients (89%), the perforation healed after median 27 (range: 4-174) days. Airway fistulation was observed in 11 patients (15%). Leak severity (ECCG) was associated with development of airway fistula (P = 0.03). The median hospital and intensive care unit stays were 30 (range: 12-285) and 9 (range: 0-60) days. The 90-days mortality among patients with AL was 5% and at follow up, 13% of all deaths were related to AL. AL closure rates were comparable across the groups, but longer in the EVT + stent group (55 days vs. 29.5 days, P = 0.04). Thirty-two percent developed a symptomatic anastomotic stricture within 12 months. Conclusion: The majority of AL can be treated endoscopically with preservation of the conduit and the anastomosis. We observed a high number of AL-associated airway fistulas.

Background: Indocyanine Green (ICG) is a promising technique for the assessment of gastric conduit and anastomosis perfusion during esophagectomy. ICG integration may be helpful in minimizing the risk of anastomotic leak (AL). Literature evidence is sparse, while the real effect of ICG assessment on AL minimization remains unsolved. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare short-term outcomes between ICG-guided and non-ICG-guided (nICG) esophagogastric anastomosis during esophagectomy for cancer. Materials and Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were queried up to 25 April 2024. Studies that reported short-term outcomes for ICG versus non-ICG-guided (nICG) anastomosis in patients undergoing esophagectomy were considered. Primary outcome was AL. Risk ratio (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) were utilized as effect size measures, whereas to assess relative inference we used 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results: Overall, 1399 patients (11 observational studies) were included. Overall, 576 (41.2%) underwent ICG gastric conduit assessment. The patients' ages ranged from 22 to 91 years, with 73% being male. The cumulative incidence of AL was 10.4% for ICG and 15.4% for nICG. Compared to nICG, ICG utilization was related to a reduced risk for postoperative AL (RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.23-0.99; p = 0.05). No differences were found in terms of pulmonary complications (RR 0.83), operative time (SMD -0.47), hospital length of stay (SMD -0.16), or 90-day mortality (RR 1.70). Conclusions: Our study seems to indicate a potential impact of ICG in reducing post-esophagectomy AL. However, because of limitations in the design of the included studies, allocation/reporting bias, variable definitions of AL, and heterogeneity in ICG use, caution is required to avoid potential overestimation of the ICG effect.

The optimal management of patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma is unclear. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy (trimodality therapy) is supported as a standard of care, but definitive chemoradiotherapy is frequently given in practice to patients who may have been surgical candidates. This multi-institutional retrospective cohort study compared the outcomes of consecutive patients diagnosed with stage II to IVA esophageal adenocarcinoma between 2004 and 2018 who planned to undergo trimodality therapy or definitive chemoradiotherapy. A total of 493 patients were included, of whom 435 intended to undergo trimodality therapy and 56 intended to undergo definitive chemoradiotherapy. After a median follow-up of 7.3 years, trimodality therapy was associated with a lower risk of locoregional failure (5-year risk, 30.5% vs. 61.3%; HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.24-0.62; p<0.001) but not distant metastases (5-year risk, 58.2% vs. 53.9%; HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.77-1.91; p=0.40). There were no differences in overall survival (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.56-1.09; p=0.14) or cancer-specific survival (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.57-1.21; p=0.33). Findings were consistent on propensity score-matched sensitivity analyses. In conclusion, trimodality therapy was associated with a lower risk of locoregional failure, but this did not translate into a significantly lower risk of distant failure or improved survival. Further studies are required to accurately estimate the trade-offs between the two treatment strategies.

Management of mediastinal anastomotic leaks (MALs) after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy includes conservative, endoscopic, or surgical management. Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVAC) is becoming a routine approach for MALs, although the outcomes have not been defined. This study aimed to describe the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of MALs in patients who underwent esophagectomy in 3 Italian high-volume centers that routinely use EVAC for MAL.

Patients who underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy between September 2018 and March 2023 were included.

A total of 681 patients underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, of whom 88 had MAL. The MAL rates for open, minimally invasive, and robotic esophagectomies were 11.5%, 13.4%, and 14.8%, respectively. Global and specific 30- and 90-day mortality rates for MAL were 0.9% and 2.1% and 6.8% and 15.9%, respectively. Nonoperative management (NOM) as the primary treatment was chosen for 62 patients. EVAC was the most common NOM (62.9%), and the most common operative management (OM) was anastomotic redo (53.8%). Diversion was the OM for 7 patients, of whom 3 patients died. Primary treatment proved successful in 40 patients. Among them, EVAC alone was successful in 35.9% of patients. Globally, endoscopic treatment, including EVAC, was successful in 79.0% of NOM and 55.7% of MALs. NOM and OM were chosen as secondary treatments for 27 and 10 patients, respectively. Secondary treatment proved successful in 21 patients.

The incidence of MALs after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy is approximately 13%. Endoscopic techniques have a success rate of almost 80%, with EVAC representing a significant part of this treatment process.

Anastomotic leak is a serious complication after esophagectomy that has been associated with worse outcomes. However, identifying patients at increased risk for anastomotic leak remains challenging.

Patients were included from the 2016 to 2021 National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database who underwent elective esophagectomy with gastric reconstruction for cancer. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify risk factors associated with anastomotic leak.

A total of 4,331 patients were included in the study, of whom 647 patients experienced anastomotic leak (14.9%). Multivariable logistic regression revealed higher odds of anastomotic leak with smoking (adjusted odds ratio 1.24, confidence interval 1.02-1.51, P = .031), modified frailty index-5 score of 1 (adjusted odds ratio 1.44, confidence interval 1.19-1.75, P = .002) or 2 (adjusted odds ratio 1.52, confidence interval 1.19-1.94, P = .000), and a McKeown esophagectomy (adjusted odds ratio 1.44, confidence interval 1.16-1.80, P = .001). Each 1,000/μL increase in white blood cell count was associated with a 7% increase in odds of anastomotic leak (adjusted odds ratio 1.07, confidence interval 1.03-1.10, P = .0005). Higher platelet counts were slightly protective, and each 10,000/ μL increase in platelet count was associated with 2% reduced odds of anastomotic leak (adjusted odds ratio 0.98, confidence interval 0.97-0.99, P = .001).

In this study, smoking status, frailty index, white blood cell count, McKeown esophagectomy, and platelet counts were all associated with the occurrence of anastomotic leak. These results can help to inform surgeons and patients of the true risk of developing anastomotic leak and potentially improve outcomes by providing evidence to improve preoperative characteristics, such as frailty.

Esophagectomy is a complex and complication laden procedure. Despite centralization, variations in perioparative strategies reflect a paucity of evidence regarding optimal routines. The use of nasogastric (NG) tubes post esophagectomy is typically associated with significant discomfort for the patients. We hypothesize that immediate postoperative removal of the NG tube is non-inferior to current routines. All Nordic Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer centers were invited to participate in this open-label pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT). Inclusion criteria include resection for locally advanced esophageal cancer with gastric tube reconstruction. A pretrial survey was undertaken and was the foundation for a consensus process resulting in the Kinetic trial, an RCT allocating patients to either no use of a NG tube (intervention) or 5 days of postoperative NG tube use (control) with anastomotic leakage as primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include pulmonary complications, overall complications, length of stay, health related quality of life. A sample size of 450 patients is planned (Kinetic trial: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN39935085). Thirteen Nordic centers with a combined catchment area of 17 million inhabitants have entered the trial and ethical approval was granted in Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Denmark. All centers routinely use NG tube and all but one center use total or hybrid minimally invasive-surgical approach. Inclusion began in January 2022 and the first annual safety board assessment has deemed the trial safe and recommended continuation. We have launched the first adequately powered multi-center pragmatic controlled randomized clinical trial regarding NG tube use after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction.

It was typically necessary to place a closed thoracic drainage tube for drainage following esophageal cancer surgery. Recently, the extra use of thoracic mediastinal drainage after esophageal cancer surgery had also become more common. However, it had not yet been determined whether mediastinal drains could be used alone following esophageal cancer surgery.

A total of 134 patients who underwent esophageal cancer surgery in our department between June 2020 and June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 34 patients received closed thoracic drainage (CTD), 58 patients received closed thoracic drainage combined with mediastinal drainage (CTD-MD), while 42 patients received postoperative mediastinal drainage (MD). The general condition, incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications, postoperative NRS score, and postoperative anastomotic leakage were compared. The Mann-Whitney U tests, Welch's t tests, one-way ANOVA, chi-square tests and Fisher's exact tests were applied.

There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative hyperthermia, peak leukocytes, total drainage, hospitalization days and postoperative pulmonary complications between MD group and the other two groups. Interestingly, patients in the MD group experienced significantly lower postoperative pain compared to the other two groups. Additionally, abnormal postoperative drainage fluid could be detected early in this group. Furthermore, there was no significant change in the incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage and the mortality rate of patients after the occurrence of anastomotic leakage in the MD group compared with the other two groups.

Using mediastinal drain alone following esophageal cancer surgery was equally safe. Furthermore, it could substantially decrease postoperative pain, potentially replacing the closed thoracic drain in clinical practice.

The incidence of anastomotic leakage (AL) following esophagectomy is regarded as a noteworthy complication. There is a need for biomarkers to facilitate early diagnosis of AL in high-risk esophageal cancer (EC) patients, thereby minimizing its morbidity and mortality. We assessed the predictive abilities of inflammatory biomarkers for AL in patients after esophagectomy.

In order to ascertain the predictive efficacy of biomarkers for AL, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were generated. Furthermore, univariate, LASSO, and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to discern the risk factors associated with AL. Based on these identified risk factors, a diagnostic nomogram model was formulated and subsequently assessed for its predictive performance.

Among the 438 patients diagnosed with EC, a total of 25 patients encountered AL. Notably, elevated levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-10, C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT) were observed in the AL group as compared to the non-AL group, demonstrating statistical significance. Particularly, IL-6 exhibited the highest predictive capacity for early postoperative AL, exhibiting a sensitivity of 92.00% and specificity of 61.02% at a cut-off value of 132.13 pg/ml. Univariate, LASSO, and multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that fasting blood glucose ≥7.0mmol/L and heightened levels of IL-10, IL-6, CRP, and PCT were associated with an augmented risk of AL. Consequently, a nomogram model was formulated based on the results of multivariate logistic analyses. The diagnostic nomogram model displayed a robust discriminatory ability in predicting AL, as indicated by a C-Index value of 0.940. Moreover, the decision curve analysis provided further evidence supporting the clinical utility of this diagnostic nomogram model.

This predictive instrument can serve as a valuable resource for clinicians, empowering them to make informed clinical judgments aimed at averting the onset of AL.

Postesophagectomy anastomotic leakage occurs in up to 16% of patients and is the main cause of morbidity and mortality. The leak severity is determined by the extent of contamination and the degree of sepsis, both of which are related to the time from onset to treatment. Early prediction based on inflammatory biomarkers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, white blood cell counts, albumin levels, and combined Noble-Underwood (NUn) scores can guide early management. This review aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of these biomarkers.

This study was designed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered in the PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) database. Two reviewers independently conducted searches across PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Embase. Sources of bias were assessed, and a meta-analysis was performed.

Data from 5348 patients were analyzed, and 13% experienced leakage. The diagnostic accuracy of the serum biomarkers was analyzed, and pooled cutoff values were identified. CRP levels were found to have good diagnostic accuracy on days 2 to 5. The best discrimination was identified on day 2 for a cutoff value < 222 mg/L (area under the curve = 0.824, sensitivity = 81%, specificity = 88%, positive predictive value = 38.6%, and negative predictive value = 98%). A NUn score of >10 on day 4 correlated with poor diagnostic accuracy.

The NUn score failed to achieve adequate accuracy. CRP seems to be the only valuable biomarker and is a negative predictor of postesophagectomy leakage. Patients with a CRP concentration of <222 mg/L on day 2 are unlikely to develop a leak, and patients can safely proceed through their enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. Patients with a CRP concentration of <127 mg/L on day 5 can be safely discharged when clinically possible.

Anastomotic leakage post-esophagectomy remains a significant challenge. Despite the use of both mechanical and manual anastomosis, leakage rates remain high. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the manual layered insertion anastomosis technique in addressing this issue.

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent this technique from September 2020 to December 2021. The process involved thoracoscopic release of the esophagus, mediastinal lymph node dissection, laparoscopic stomach release, and its transformation into a tube. The latter was then guided to the neck for anastomosis. The posterior anastomotic wall was reshaped in the neck first for optimal insertion, followed by layered suturing with the gastric conduit. The anterior wall was subsequently sutured and repositioned into the chest.

The study included 56 patients (51 men, five women, mean age 65.4 y), with nine having undergone neoadjuvant therapy. All received minimally invasive esophagectomy. Average intraoperative blood loss was 79.8 mL, operation time averaged 331 min, and feeding resumed after an average of 6.3 d. No anastomotic leakages were reported, with reduced incidences of anastomotic stenosis and gastric acid reflux compared to previous studies.

The manual layered insertion anastomosis technique may reduce anastomotic leakage and associated complications, improving the efficacy of esophagectomy, which may improve postoperative results and patient quality of life, suggesting the method's potential suitability for wider clinical application.

Outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer have continued to improve over the last 30 years. Post-operative complications impact upon peri-operative and short-term survival but the effect on long-term survival remains debated. This study aims to investigate the effect of post-operative complications on long-term survival following esophagectomy.

All patients who underwent an esophagectomy between January 2010 and January 2019 were included from a single high-volume center. Data was collected contemporaneously. Patients were separated into three groups; those who experienced no, or very minor complications (Clavien-Dindo 0 or 1), minor complications (Clavien-Dindo 2), and major complications (Clavien-Dindo 3-4), at 30 days. To correct for short-term mortality effects, those who died during the index hospital admission were excluded. Overall survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and log rank testing.

The study cohort comprised 721 patients. There were 42.4% (306/721), 29.5% (213/721) and 25.7% (185/721) in the Clavien-Dindo 0-1, Clavien-Dindo 2, and Clavien-Dindo 3-4 group respectively. Seventeen patients (2.4%) died during their index hospital admission and were therefore excluded. There was no significant difference between median survival across the 3 groups (50, 57 and 52 months). Across all 3 groups, overall long-term survival rates were equivalent at 1 (87.5%, 84.9%, 83.2%), 3 (59.7%, 59.6%, 54.2%), and 5 years (43.9%, 48.9%, 45.7%) (p = 0.806). The only factors independently associated with survival in this cohort, were male gender, Charlson comorbidity index, and overall pathological stage of disease.

Long-term survival is not affected by peri-operative complications, irrespective of severity, following esophagectomy. Further study into the long-term quality of life is required.

This prospective study was conducted to determine postesophagectomy symptom severity of esophageal cancer survivors with use of the Upper Digestive Disease (UDD) questionnaire.

A prospective trial included adult esophagectomy patients diagnosed with primary esophageal carcinoma at a single institution from 2000 to 2011. Those who remained alive in 2015 to 2021 were enrolled. Comparison was made between sequential questionnaires.

From a prospective registry of 895 patients with esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, 297 (33%) long-term survivors were identified. Of those, 93 (31%) had recent contact data and 66 (71%) consented and completed the UDD questionnaire. Most participants, 77% (51), were men with a mean age of 57 (±7) years. The mean time from esophagectomy was 12 (8-20) years. The 66 enrolled patients completed 127 UDD questionnaires. A total of 27 (41%) completed at least 2 questionnaires. Poor performance was recorded in the 5 domains as follows: reflux, 19 patients (29%); pain, 3 patients (5%); dysphagia, 0 patients; gastrointestinal dumping, 31 patients (47%); and generalized dumping, 17 patients (26%). Between the first and second questionnaires, dysphagia had the most noticeable improvement in domain score (23/27 [85%]), and reflux had the most regression in domain score (7/27 [26%]).

Patient-reported outcome data are an integral part of esophageal cancer survivorship care. Having a standardized tool that would enhance research and standardize care pathway symptom management is needed.

Ischemia at the anastomotic site plays a critical role determinant in the development of anastomosis-related complications after esophagectomy. Gastric ischemic conditioning (GIC) before esophagectomy has been described to improve the vascular perfusion at the tip of the gastric conduit with a potential effect on anastomotic leak (AL) and stenosis (AS) risk minimization. Laparoscopic (LapGIC) and angioembolization (AngioGIC) techniques have been reported.

Compare short-term outcomes among different GIC techniques.

Systematic review and network meta-analysis. One-step esophagectomy (noGIC), LapGIC, and AngioGIC were compared. Primary outcomes were AL, AS, and gastric conduit necrosis (GCN). Risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) were used as pooled effect size measures, whereas 95% credible intervals (CrIs) were used to assess relative inference.

Overall, 1760 patients (14 studies) were included. Of those, 1028 patients (58.4%) underwent noGIC, 593 (33.6%) LapGIC, and 139 (8%) AngioGIC. AL was reduced for LapGIC versus noGIC (RR=0.68; 95% CrI 0.47-0.98) and AngioGIC versus noGIC (RR=0.52; 95% CrI 0.31-0.93). Similarly, AS was reduced for LapGIC versus noGIC (RR=0.32; 95% CrI 0.12-0.68) and AngioGIC versus noGIC (RR=1.30; 95% CrI 0.65-2.46). The indirect comparison, assessed with the network methodology, did not show any differences for LapGIC versus AngioGIC in terms of postoperative AL and AS risk. No differences were found for GCN, pulmonary complications, overall complications, hospital length of stay, and 30-day mortality among different treatments.

Compared to noGIC, both LapGIC and AngioGIC before esophagectomy seem equivalent and associated with a reduced risk for postoperative AL and AS.

Reports on combined resection for synchronous lung lesions and esophageal cancer (CRLE) cases are rare and mostly individual cases. Furthermore, the feasibility of CRLE has always been a controversial topic. In the current study, the authors retrospectively analyzed the feasibility of CRLE and established an individualized prediction model for esophageal anastomotic leaks after CRLE by performing a multicenter retrospective study.

Patients who underwent esophagectomy between January 2009 and June 2021 were extracted from a four-center prospectively maintained database, and those with CRLE at the same setting were matched in a 1:2 propensity score-matched (PSM) ratio to esophagectomy alone (EA) patients. A nomogram was then established based on the variables involved in multivariate logistic regression analysis. Internal validation of the nomogram was conducted utilizing Bootstrap resampling. Decision and clinical impact curve analysis were computed to assess the practical clinical utility of the nomogram. A prognosis analysis for CRLE and EA patients by Kaplan-Meier curves was conducted.

Of the 7152 esophagectomies, 216 cases of CRLE were eligible, and 1:2 ratio propensity score-matched EA patients were matched. The incidence of anastomotic leaks following CRLE increased significantly ( P =0.035). The results of the multivariate analysis indicated the leaks varied according to the type of lung resection (anatomic>wedge resection, P =0.016) and site of resected lobe (upper>middle/low lobe; P =0.027), and a nomogram was established to predict the occurrence of leaks accurately (area under the curve=0.786). Although no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) was observed in the CRLE group ( P =0.070), a trend toward lower survival rates was noted. Further analysis revealed that combined upper lobe anatomic resection was significantly associated with reduced OS ( P =0.027).

Our study confirms that CRLE is feasible but comes with a significantly increased risk of anastomotic leaks and a concerning trend of reduced survival, particularly when upper lobe anatomic resections are performed. These findings highlight the need for careful patient selection and surgical planning when considering CRLE.

Anastomotic leak (AL) is one of the most serious complications after oesophageal cancer surgery. A high cervical anastomosis using a narrow gastric tube based on optimized procedures has the potential to reduce the AL after a McKeown oesophagectomy.

A narrow gastric tube was defined as 2-2.5 cm in diameter. Meanwhile, we defined a high anastomosis (HA) and a normal anastomosis (NA) based on the position of the intraoperative cervical anastomosis above or below the level of the inferior thyroid artery, respectively. A total of 533 patients who had a McKeown oesophagectomy from March 2018 to March 2023 were included in this study, including 281 patients in the NA group and 252 patients in the HA group. Potential confounding factors in baseline characteristics were balanced by propensity score matching.

After matching, 190 patients remained in both groups. When comparing the pathological and surgical results, we found that more lymph nodes, both in total number (21.1 ± 10.0 vs 15.8 ± 7.7, P = 0.001) and thoracic part (13.5 ± 7.8 vs10.8 ± 6.1, P = 0.005), were harvested from the HA group . The pathological T and TNM stages of patients in the HA group were earlier than those in the NA group (P = 0.001). Overall postoperative complications (P = 0.001), including pulmonary infection (P = 0.001), AL (P < 0.001), leakage-related pyothorax (P < 0.001), recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (P = 0.031) and pleural effusion (P < 0.001), were all significantly lower in the HA group. Finally, multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that HA was an independent protective factor for AL (odds ratio = 0.331, 95% confidence interval: 0.166-0.658; P = 0.002).

For patients undergoing a McKeown oesophagectomy, a high cervical anastomosis using a narrow gastric tube can effectively reduce leakage-related complications.

Esophageal resection for the treatment of esophageal cancer generally entails high rates of morbidity and mortality. Patients with a smoking history have increased post-operative complications following esophagectomy. This study was undertaken to determine how smoking or a history of smoking can affect perioperative outcomes and morbidity following robotic transhiatal esophagectomy. 75 patients were prospectively followed and divided; 44 patients actively smoking or with a history of significant smoking were classified as 'smokers', while the other 31 patients were classified as 'non-smokers'. Significance was determined at a p-value of ≤ 0.05 and data are presented as median (mean ± SD). 'Smokers' averaged 70(70 ± 7.8) years, 89% male, with 82% undergoing neoadjuvant therapy. 'Nonsmokers' averaged 68(69 ± 7.8) years, 74% male, and 74% receiving neoadjuvant therapy. BMI and ASA class showed no significant difference between the cohorts. 'Smokers' had an operative time of 341(343 ± 91.0) minutes and a blood loss of 150(191 ± 140.0) mL; 'nonsmokers' had 291(298 ± 65.9) minutes and 100(140 ± 120.9) mL, respectively (p = 0.02 for operative time). Tumor size and AJCC staging were similar for both cohorts. No significant differences were noted in postoperative complications, Clavien-Dindo score ≥ III, in-hospital mortality, length of stay, or 30-day readmissions. Survival rates were comparable. Hospital costs for 'smokers' were $33,131(41,091 ± 23,465.17) and $34,896 (62,154 ± 65,839.53) for 'nonsmokers' (p = 0.05). Profit/loss was $-23,155 (- 15,137 ± 35,819.29) for smokers and $-23,720 (- 16,716 ± 50,864.64) for nonsmokers. Current or past 'smokers' had longer operative times and lower costs following robotic transhiatal esophagectomy, with no significant difference in postoperative complications or survival compared to 'non-smokers'.

Anastomotic leakage in esophagectomy is a serious complication, and assessing blood perfusion in the conduit can help minimize this risk. Indocyanine green is the most widely used method to assess tissue blood flow; however, this technique has disadvantages. Evaluating tissue oxygen saturation in the gastric conduit during thoracic esophagectomy compared with indocyanine green blood perfusion assessment addresses these disadvantages and can be performed easily and repeatedly.

This was a prospective study of patients with esophageal cancer who underwent thoracic esophagectomy. Intraoperative tissue oxygen saturation and indocyanine green measurements were obtained to determine the anastomotic site and to compare the correlation between the 2 methods. Tissue oxygen saturation and indocyanine green values were obtained at the tip of the gastric conduit, the demarcation line indicating visible perfusion, and the end of the right gastroepiploic artery.

Fifty-seven patients were enrolled in this study; 3 developed anastomotic leakage, and all 3 underwent robotic thoracic surgery. The tissue oxygen saturation value decreased gradually toward the tip of the conduit, as did congestion, and was significantly decreased at the tip compared with the value at the demarcation line (P = .001). Mean tissue oxygen saturation differed significantly between the leakage and no-leakage groups at the anastomosis site (P = .04). We found a negative correlation between tissue oxygen saturation and indocyanine green values at the end of the right gastroepiploic artery (r = -0.361; P = .03).

Tissue oxygen saturation imaging was useful in determining the anastomotic site and addressed the disadvantages associated with indocyanine green.

Intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy is a technically demanding surgical technique that can result in serious intrathoracic infections when anastomotic leakage occurs. Herein, we report a novel side-overlap esophagogastric anastomosis with pleural closure for esophagogastric junction cancer.

The 3 key points of our novel technique were the following: (1) overlap esophagogastric anastomosis and closure of the entry hole were all performed using a linear stapler; (2) the pleura was closed to separate the anastomotic site from the thoracic cavity; and (3) the mediastinal drain was inserted transhiatally from the abdominal cavity.

This modified anastomosis procedure was performed on 8 consecutive patients at our institution. The median overall/thoracoscopic operating time and estimated blood loss were 652.5/241.5 min and 89 mL, respectively. No mortality or serious postoperative complications occurred, and the median postoperative hospital stay was 22 days (range, 17 to 37 d).

This novel thoracoscopic overlap esophagogastric reconstruction procedure with pleural closure is safe and feasible.