Laparoscopic colorectal surgery combined with Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) has improved patient outcomes by promoting faster recovery, reducing pain, and lowering the risk of complications. However, increasing demand on hospital capacity for clinical admissions and the shortage of healthcare professionals remains challenging. Home monitoring after surgical procedures and early discharge offers a potential solution. This study aims to assess the feasibility, safety and patient satisfaction with early discharge following elective colorectal surgery using continuous monitoring of vital signs and questionnaires.

A prospective, single-centre, interventional study. Patients who meet the discharge criteria could leave on day one or two after surgery, monitored at home with sensors for vital signs and health questionnaires.

Of 51 patients, 30 (58.8%) were discharged early. The results show successful early discharge in 80% (24 out of 30 patients) with a readmission rate of 20% of which 13.3% due to problems with the monitoring system. None of these readmissions were due to deviations in vital sign measurement at home. The patient satisfaction was high ranging between 6 and 7 (out of 7).

Early discharge with continue monitoring is feasible for a selected group of colorectal surgery patients. No patients were readmitted because of serious complications. Further research should focus on expending the sample size and investigating the impact of early discharge without continuous monitoring.

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a common and severe complication after colon cancer resection, but studies investigating various treatment strategies and factors influencing outcomes are scarce.

(1) To identify predictive factors associated with 90-day mortality and 90-day Clavien-Dindo grade 4-5 complications amongst patients who developed AL following colon cancer resection with subsequent development and validation of prediction models, and (2) to explore and compare the effectiveness of various treatment strategies for AL following colon cancer resection, adjusting for type of index surgery, different leak entities and patient factors.

The TENTACLE - Colon is an international multicentre retrospective cohort study. Consecutive patients with AL after colon cancer resection operated between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2022 from participating centres will be included. The planned sample size is 2000 patients. The primary outcome is 90-day mortality and the co-primary composite endpoint is Clavien-Dindo grade 4-5 complications. Secondary outcomes include: hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, number of radiological and surgical reinterventions within one year after resection, mortality (in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year), the comprehensive complication index, and 1-year stoma-free survival. For objective 1, regression models will be used to identify predictors associated with 90-day mortality and grade 4-5 complications. For objective 2, comparative analyses of various treatment strategies will be performed for the specified outcomes, adjusting for patient, tumour, resection and leakage characteristics.

This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06528054) since July 30th, 2024.

Purpose: Our aim was to examine the efficacy of concurrent exercise (i.e., aerobic and strength exercise) during prehabilitation programs on functional capacity in comparison with standard cancer care strategies in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients scheduled for surgery. Methods: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials was performed. A search of electronic databases [PubMed, Web of Science, and EBSCO Host] was conducted to identify all publications employing concurrent exercise in patients with CRC. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to calculate the standardized change in mean difference (SMD) and 95%CI between exercise intervention and control groups for the 6 min walking test (6MWT) distance covered before and after prehabilitation. Results: Six studies met the inclusion criteria (379 patients with CRC). Concurrent training during prehabilitation led to significant positive effects on the 6MWT (0.28 SMD [0.03-0.54], p = 0.037). Subgroup analyses showed a higher SMD (0.48 [0.00-0.98], p = 0.050) in younger (i.e., <70 years) CRC patients compared to their older counterparts (0.10 [0.08-0.11], p = 0.310). Meta-regression models between SMD of the 6MWT and body mass index, prehabilitation program duration, and baseline 6MWT distance covered did not show any significant relationship. Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates the superiority of concurrent exercise prehabilitation in improving functional capacity related to cardiometabolic changes and lowering postoperative risk in patients with CRC.

Supervised multimodal prehabilitation prior to colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery is associated with reduced complications and enhanced recovery. However, it is labor intensive and expensive. In an aging population with increasing demand and costs on healthcare and staff shortages, home-based prehabilitation (HBP) with an app could be of interest. This study assessed the effectiveness of a Fit4Surgery app in CRC surgery.

The app was effectuated in a prospective cohort study of 100 CRC patients ≥60 years from October 2021-December 2022. The primary outcome was preservation or improvement of the 6-minute walking test (6MWT) six weeks postoperative, compared to baseline. Secondary outcomes were 90-day complication and mortality rate, 90-day readmission, length of stay, 6MWT and Short Performance Physical Battery (SPPB) at different timepoints and total costs.

Three patients needed urgent surgery, remaining 97 patients (mean age 72) using the app for at least three weeks. The 6MWT was preserved in 74.7 % with a 12.1 m higher mean six weeks postoperative, compared to baseline (p = 0.194). A significant higher 6MWT was observed after prehabilitation and one year postoperative, compared to baseline (p=<0.001). The SPPB was significant higher at all timepoints. Overall 90-day complication rate was 25.8 %, readmission rate 6.3 % and mortality occurred in 2.1 %. Total costs were €518.50 per patient.

This is the first study of multimodal HBP by an app for CRC surgery patients with high compliance. Results show promising results regarding functional capacity and a low occurrence of complications, in line with multimodal supervised prehabilitation. This by reducing costs by half.

Background and Objectives: In contrast to the standardization of laparoscopic gastrectomy techniques, the complexity of intracorporeal anastomosis techniques in totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy, the lack of standardization, the positional challenges posed by working in a confined space, and varying complication rates have prevented a consensus on the optimal intracorporeal digestive tract reconstruction method. Selecting an appropriate reconstruction method for esophagojejunostomy is crucial for a successful surgical outcome. This study aims to define a modified anastomotic technique for TLTG and share our experience with this technique. Materials and Methods: A total of 21 patients who underwent TLTG with D2 LND between July 2024 and December 2024 using the sutureless L-shape esophagojejunostomy (SLEJ) technique at the Surgical Oncology Clinic of Gulhane Training and Research Hospital due to gastric cancer were included in the study. In our technique, gastrectomy, lymph node dissection, anastomosis preparation, esophagojejunostomy anastomosis, and enteroenterostomy anastomosis were all performed laparoscopically and intracorporeally. Results: The mean operative time was 180.48 min, with a mean EJ anastomosis duration of 40.24 min. In the standard technique, two Endo GIA™ staplers were used for pyloric and small bowel transection, two for EJ anastomosis, and one for intracorporeal jejunojejunostomy. In only one patient, three staplers were used for anastomosis. Therefore, the average number of staplers was 5.05, with a mean of 2.05 staplers used for anastomosis. The mean hospital stay was 8.19 days, and there were no mortalities. The number of patients with an anastomotic leakage was 1. Since the patient's general condition remained stable, percutaneous drainage or laparotomy was not planned. The patients' esophagojejunostomy anastomotic leak was classified as Class 1 and Grade 3a according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. The average size of our widest incision was 3.28 cm, and surgical site infections were developed in two patients. Conclusions: Sutureless L-Shape With Endoscopic Assistance (SLEJ) is an easily applicable, technically simpler, shorter-in-duration, easier-to-learn, and safer intracorporeal EJ anastomosis technique with a low rate of postoperative complications.

Appearance care enables cancer patients to maintain social connections during treatment, but it remains an unmet need in Japan. We surveyed healthcare professionals in Japan to collect information on their awareness of appearance care and their institutions' appearance care systems.

From November 1 to December 13, 2022, we performed an online survey of 16,838 members of the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.

We received responses from 807 members (671(83%) physicians; 65(8%) pharmacists; 45(6%) nurses; 22(3%) dentists; and 4(0.5%) others), 72% of whom were men and 28%, women. Among respondents, 93% (n = 749//807) had been asked by patients about appearance care, and 46% (n = 318/693) of the physicians and dentists had refused to perform treatment or changed it because of its effects on physical appearance. Only 59% (n = 410) of physicians and dentists were familiar with the term appearance care, but 100% (n = 45) of nurses and 97% (n = 63) of pharmacists were. Among all respondents, 26% reported that their institution had a specialized department and specific personnel for appearance care. In some cases, physicians and dentists had difficulty communicating correct information to patients, and other healthcare professionals compensated for this deficit.

The survey revealed that physicians have low awareness of appearance care. It was suggested that communication and a team approach between physicians and other healthcare professionals is recommended. Each medical facility may be encouraged to establish a sustainable system for providing information on appearance care in that patients or medical personnel themselves can easily consult. Activities are also needed to raise awareness about appearance care among physicians.

Surgical resection is the primary treatment modality for colorectal cancer. Prehabilitation is about enhancing the patient's physiological capacity preoperatively to reduce the risk of treatment-related complications. Clear definitions of the modality, content, and duration of prehabilitation, including its components such as nutrition, exercise, and psychological support, are lacking. Some review articles have proposed that a multimodal approach may yield the best overall outcomes, but the clinical efficacy of such an approach requires further exploration.

This study consisted of a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effectiveness of multimodal prehabilitation programs for patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library from inception to August 5, 2023, without language or publication period restrictions. The included studies were randomized controlled trials, prospective studies, or retrospective studies that examined the effectiveness of multimodal prehabilitation programs for patients undergoing colorectal surgery. A random-effects model was used for data analysis.

This study included 14 articles that analyzed data from 2314 patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery. In comparisons against a control group, multimodal prehabilitation significantly reduced the length of hospital stay ([mean difference; MD] = -2.47 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-3.56, -1.39]), postoperative complication rate (odds ratio; [OR] = 0.74, 95% CI [0.59, 0.94]), and time to the first passage of flatus (MD = -0.43 days, 95% CI [-0.66, -0.20]).

Multimodal prehabilitation interventions before colorectal cancer surgery reduce hospital stay lengths, lower complication rates, and promote bowel recovery, particularly in older populations.

An exploration of the influence of probiotics combined with immune checkpoint suppressors and chemotherapeutic agents on digestive system function, intestinal immunity and prognosis in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

This was a quasi-experimental study. During March 2019 to March 2020, 96 patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma were arbitrarily classified into control group (n = 48) and intervention group (n = 48). The control group received only immune checkpoint inhibitors or chemotherapy, while the intervention group received immune checkpoint inhibitors or chemotherapy, plus probiotic therapy. Survival and complication rates after 6 months, 12 months and 2 years of treatment were calculated. Intestinal barrier function, immune function and quality of life were analyzed before and after treatment.

Ninety-six patients were recorded at the follow-up demonstrating superior survival in the intervention group after 6 months, 12 months and 2 years of therapy. D-lactate and diamine oxidase (DAO) levels were elevated in the intervention group after treatment, with smaller elevations (P < 0.05). The levels of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus were remarkably higher in the intervention group after treatment compared to the control group prior to and following therapy (P < 0.05). The amount of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli in the intervention group after treatment was obviously lower compared to the pre-treatment and control groups (P < 0.05). CD3+, CD4+, and CD4+/CD8+ levels were found to be higher in the intervention group (P < 0.05), while CD8+ levels were reduced in the intervention group (P < 0.05). All dimensions of the QLQC-30 scale were higher in the intervention group (P < 0.05). The incidence of complications such as nausea and vomiting, loss of appetite, bloating and diarrhea was considerably reduced in the intervention group (P < 0.05).

Immune checkpoint suppressors combined with chemotherapeutic agents or probiotic regimens can obviously enhance the prognosis of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. This combination therapeutic strategy can balance the imbalanced intestinal flora, improve intestinal function, and lessen the incidence of adverse events, so it is worthy of clinical application and can lessen the incidence of adverse reactions.

To analyze the incidence and risk factors of postoperative fever (POF) in gastrointestinal cancer (GIC), discuss the influence of POF on short-term clinical outcomes, and predict anastomotic leakage (AL) based on POF characteristics.

Overall, 1362 patients that underwent radical resection for GIC were retrospectively analyzed. POF was defined as a postoperative temperature ≥38°C during hospitalization. Patients were divided according to whether they experienced POF. The influence of POF on short-term clinical outcomes was analyzed using propensity score matching. A subgroup analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between different POF characteristics and AL or infection-related complications.

POF occurred in 172 patients (12.6%). Overall, 115 patients (66.9%) had fever ≥38.6°C, while 105 (61.0%) had fever at postoperative day (POD) 2, and 73 (42.4%) had POF multiple times. Multivariate analysis showed that patients with a preoperative albumin level < 37 g/L (odds ratio [OR]=1.57, p=0.016), operative time >195min (OR=1.55, p=0.020), and radical gastrectomy (OR=1.84, p=0.009) were more likely to develop POF. Compared to patients without fever, drainage tube indwelling time, duration of antibiotic use, and hospital stay were prolonged, while AL and infection-related complications were more common in patients with POF. POF ≥38.6°C (OR=1.74, p=0.039) and PCT >0.7 ng/mL (OR=2.99, p=0.022) at POD 3 were early predictors of AL.

POF was closely related to preoperative albumin levels, operative time, and type of operation, and it delayed postoperative recovery in patients with GIC. And POF ≥38.6°C and PCT >0.7 ng/mL at POD 3 were independent predictors of AL.

To develop a patient decision aid facilitating shared decision making for patients with potential pancreatic cancer deciding about no treatment, surgical or medical treatment.

Based on a user-centred design by Wittemann et al., we developed a shared decision making intervention in three phases: 1) Understanding decision needs 2) Development of a patient decision aid (PtDA) based on a generic template 3) Assessment of the intervention from interviews with patients (n = 11), relatives (n = 11), nurses (n = 4) and surgeons (n = 2) analysed with thematic analysis, and measuring patients' perceptions of choice of options with the Decisional Conflict Scale.

Results showed varying experiences with the use of the PtDA, with surgeons not finding PtDA useful as it was impractical and constraining with patients' conversations. There was no difference in patients' perceptions in choosing options for those being presented vs those patients not being presented for the PtDA.

The format and structure of the PtDA was not feasible for the surgeons as fundamental users in the present clinic.

This study highlights the urgent need to consider clinical context before introducing a predefined tool and shows the importance of a multistakeholder approach. Research should focus on finding means to successful implement shared decision making.

Background: In the present study, we aimed to investigate the association between (EORTC) QLQ-C30 scores and both preoperative somatometric parameters and postoperative outcomes in elderly patients undergoing elective surgery for resectable colorectal cancer. Methods: The 118 elderly consecutive patients who underwent colorectal surgery for cancer in a single university's surgical department between 01/2018 and 12/2018 were prospectively enrolled in the present study. All patients with an age > 65 years, diagnosed with resectable colorectal cancer, without metastatic disease, that underwent elective surgery were included prospectively in the present study. Results: Regarding patients' characteristics, a negative correlation between preoperative QLQ (pQLQ) score and age (p = 0.001) and a positive correlation between body mass index (BMI) and pQLQ score (p = 0.048) were observed. Furthermore, there was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.004) in the mean pQLQ score between patients with rectal or colon cancer. Moreover, assessing pQLQ score was a useful tool in terms of postoperative recovery. Negative correlations between the pQLQ score and time (days) of beginning oral feeding (p < 0.001) and length of hospital stay (p = 0.004) were found. The pQLQ score was statistically significantly lower (p = 0.005) in patients who had any postoperative complication; however, there was no difference in patients with major complications. Conclusions: Advanced age, colon cancer and decreased BMI were negatively associated with preoperative QLQ. The assessment of pQLQ in elderly patients with colorectal cancer can be a useful predictive tool for postoperative complications, length of hospital stay and postoperative rehabilitation.

The preoperative period provides a window of opportunity to improve modifiable risk factors for treatment complications such as malnutrition, the so-called prehabilitation. Identifying factors related to adherence to nutritional interventions is essential for optimizing prehabilitation programs. The aim of this study is to evaluate a nutritional support module as part of a teleprehabilitation program in high-risk patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

A secondary analysis with a mixed method design of the nutritional support module of a pre-post teleprehabilitation pilot study was performed. Change in weight, complaints with intake, motivation, and subjective and objective adherence were evaluated.

Eleven patients were included. Subjectively, six patients (55%) were able to adhere to the nutritional advice. Despite that, nine of eleven (82%) patients experienced difficulties with the amount of food that was advised by the dietician. Six of eleven (55%) patients gained weight during the prehabilitation program. After prehabilitation, nine of eleven (82%) were able to reach 100% of their energy requirement and six of eleven (55%) were able to reach 100% of their protein requirement. Differences between patients in motivation and/or having complaints did not seem to be associated with protein and energy intake.

This secondary analysis of a pilot study provides insights into understanding patients' experiences with a nutritional support module as part of a teleprehabilitation program. With 82% of patients who were able to reach 100% of their energy requirement, teleprehabilitation seems to be feasible, while there is still room for improvement with respect to protein intake as only 55% of patients reached a sufficient intake.

This systematic review aimed to assess the effect of non-pharmacologic perioperative oral hygiene care on reduced incidence of postoperative pneumonia (PP), surgical site infection (SSI), and the length of hospital stay in patients with cancer, and to describe the details of oral hygiene care.

We searched seven databases. Eligibility criteria were based on perioperative oral hygiene care provided by healthcare professionals to patients aged ≥18 years who were surgically treated under general anesthesia and were evaluated for the incidence of PP and SSI. We reported risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes for PP and SSI using a fixed-effects model of meta-analysis.

The search resulted in 850 articles, among which two were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 21 were observational studies. Most studies indicated that dentists and medical care providers performed a combination of oral cleaning, and oral hygiene instructions. In RCTs, perioperative oral hygiene care significantly reduced the incidence of PP (RR, 0.86; p = .60), while in observational studies, perioperative oral hygiene care significantly reduced the incidence of PP (RR, 0.55; p < .001) and SSI (RR, 0.47; p < .001). The length of hospital stay was also significantly reduced (p < .05). However, the effectiveness of nursing intervention was not clear.

Perioperative oral hygiene care implemented by healthcare professionals prevented PP and SSI and reduced length of hospital stays for patients after cancer surgery. As daily perioperative oral hygiene care is performed by nurses, it is necessary to research the effects of oral hygiene by nurses in the future.

Intestinal flora disorder (IFD) poses a significant challenge after laparoscopic colonic surgery, and no standard criteria exists for its diagnosis and treatment.

To analyze the clinical features and risk factors of IFD.

Patients with colon cancer receiving laparoscopic surgery were included using propensity-score-matching (PSM) methods. Based on the occurrence of IFD, patients were categorized into IFD and non-IFD groups. The clinical characteristics and treatment approaches for patients with IFD were analyzed. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors of IFD.

The IFD incidence after laparoscopic surgery was 9.0% (97 of 1073 patients). After PSM, 97 and 194 patients were identified in the IFD and non-IFD groups, respectively. The most common symptoms of IFD were diarrhea and abdominal, typically occurring on post-operative days 3 and 4. All patients were managed conservatively, including modulation of the intestinal flora (90.7%), oral/intravenous application of vancomycin (74.2%), and insertion of a gastric/ileus tube for decompression (23.7%). Multivariate regression analysis identified that pre-operative intestinal obstruction [odds ratio (OR) = 2.79, 95%CI: 1.04-7.47, P = 0.041] and post-operative antibiotics (OR = 8.57, 95%CI: 3.31-23.49, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for IFD, whereas pre-operative parenteral nutrition (OR = 0.12, 95%CI: 0.06-0.26, P < 0.001) emerged as a protective factor.

A stepwise approach of probiotics, vancomycin, and decompression could be an alternative treatment for IFD. Special attention is warranted post-operatively for patients with pre-operative obstruction or early use of antibiotics.

Temporary ileostomy (TI) has proven effective in reducing the severity of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery; however, some ileostomies fail to reverse over time, leading to conversion into a permanent stoma (PS). In this study, we aimed to investigate the preoperative risk factors and cumulative incidence of TI non-closure after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer.

We conducted a meta-analysis after searching the Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and MEDLINE databases from their inception until November 2023. We collected all published studies on the risk factors related to TI non-closure after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer.

A total of 1610 studies were retrieved, and 13 studies were included for meta-analysis, comprising 3026 patients. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the identified risk factors included older age (p = 0.03), especially > 65 years of age (p = 0.03), male sex (p = 0.009), American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥ 3 (p = 0.004), comorbidity (p = 0.001), and distant metastasis (p < 0.001). Body mass index, preoperative hemoglobin, preoperative albumin, preoperative carcinoma embryonic antigen, tumor location, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, smoking, history of abdominal surgery, and open surgery did not significantly change the risk of TI non-closure.

We identified five preoperative risk factors for TI non-closure after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. This information enables surgeons to identify high-risk groups before surgery, inform patients about the possibility of PS in advance, and consider performing protective colostomy or Hartmann surgery.

The possible negative impact of radical surgery on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) plays an important role in preoperative counseling. Here, we analyzed the HRQoL of patients treated for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) in the context of a single-arm phase 2 multicenter study, in which the safety and efficacy of a single preoperative intravesical instillation with mitomycin C were investigated. Our objective was to investigate early changes in HRQoL in patients undergoing radical surgery for UTUC and identify factors associated with these outcomes.

Patients with pTanyN0-1M0 UTUC were prospectively included. HRQoL was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaire at baseline, and at 1 and 3 mo after surgery. A linear mixed model was used to evaluate the changes in HRQoL over time and identify the variables associated with these outcomes. The clinical effect size was used to assess the clinical impact and level of perceptibility of HRQoL changes for clinicians and/or patients based on given thresholds.

Between 2017 and 2020, 186 patients were included. At baseline, 1 mo after surgery, and 3 mo after surgery, response rates were 91%, 84%, and 78%, respectively. One month after surgery, a statistically significant and clinically relevant deterioration was observed in physical, role, and social functioning, and for the included symptom scales: constipation, fatigue, and pain. An improvement in emotional functioning was observed. At 3 mo, HRQoL returned to baseline levels, except emotional functioning, which improved at 1 mo and persisted to be better than that before surgery. Age >70 yr was associated with worse physical functioning, but better social and emotional functioning. Male patients reported better emotional functioning than females. Postoperative complications were negatively associated with social functioning.

UTUC patients treated with radical surgery experienced a significant, albeit temporary, decline in HRQoL. Three months following surgery, HRQoL outcomes returned to baseline levels. This information can be used to counsel UTUC patients before undergoing radical surgery and contextualize recovery after surgery.

We investigated the changes in quality of life as reported by patients who underwent surgery for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We found that patients experienced a decline in quality of life 1 mo after surgery, but this was temporary, with full recovery of quality of life 3 mo after surgery. These findings can help doctors and other medical staff in counseling UTUC patients before undergoing radical surgery.

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate the interrelationship between different baseline functional capacity items, and their relationship with postoperative course in colorectal cancer patients. [Participants and Methods] This was a three-institution cohort study that included 127 patients scheduled for elective colorectal cancer surgery. Baseline functional capacity was evaluated using skeletal muscle index (SMI), six-minute walk test (6MWT), serum-albumin (Alb), vitality, and mental health before surgery. Postoperative findings, including C-reactive protein (CRP) levels 3 days post-operation, frequency of postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay (LOS), were evaluated based on the medical records. [Results] CRP was positively related to SMI, but negatively related to Alb level. LOS was negatively related to vitality. The 6MWT results and mental health-related findings were not significantly related to the postoperative course, but were directly and indirectly related to vitality, respectively. Alb level was also indirectly related to vitality through the 6MWT and mental health-related findings. The final constructed model demonstrated an acceptable fit to the data (goodness-of-fit index=0.958, adjusted goodness-of-fit index=0.930, comparative fit index=1.000, root mean square error of approximation=0.000). [Conclusion] Nutrition status, as measured by Alb level before surgery, may positively affect both the postoperative course and other functional capacity parameters.

Introduction: Early mobilization after surgery is crucial for reducing postoperative complications and restoring patients' fitness and ability to care for themselves. Immersive, activity-promoting fitness games in virtual reality (VR) can be used as a low-cost motivational adjunct to standard physiotherapy to promote recovery after surgery. In addition, they have potentially positive effects on mood and well-being, which are often compromised after colorectal surgery. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility and clinical outcomes of a VR-based intervention that provides additional mobilization. Methods: Patients undergoing curative surgery for colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to an intervention group or a control group. Participants in the intervention group (VR group) received daily bedside fitness exercises using immersive, activity-promoting, virtual reality fitness games in addition to standard care during their postoperative hospital stay. Results: A total of 62 patients were randomized. The feasibility outcomes were in line with the predefined goals. In the VR group, an improvement in overall mood (+0.76 points; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39 to 1.12; P < 0.001) and a shift toward positive feelings were observed. The median length of hospital stay was 7.0 days in the VR group compared with 9.0 days in the control group, but the difference (2.0 days) did not reach statistical significance (95% CI -0.0001 to 3.00; P = 0.076). Surgical outcomes, health status, and measures of distress did not differ between groups. Conclusions: The study demonstrated the feasibility of a VR intervention that improved overall mood and showed a desirable effect on feelings and length of hospital stay after colorectal surgery. The results should stimulate further research investigating the potential of VR as an adjunct to physiotherapy to enhance mobilization after surgery.

Short-term exercise prehabilitation programmes have demonstrated promising results in improving aerobic capacity of unfit patients prior to major abdominal surgery. However, little is known about the cardiac and skeletal muscle adaptations explaining the improvement in aerobic capacity following short-term exercise prehabilitation.

In this single-centre study with a pretest-post-test design, 12 unfit patients with a preoperative oxygen uptake (VO2) at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold ≤13 mL/kg/min and/or VO2 at peak exercise ≤18 mL/kg/min, who are scheduled to undergo hepatopancreatobiliary surgery at the University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), the Netherlands, will be recruited. As part of standard care, unfit patients are advised to participate in a home-based exercise prehabilitation programme, comprising high-intensity interval training and functional exercises three times per week, combined with nutritional support, during a 4-week period. Pre-intervention and post-intervention, patients will complete a cardiopulmonary exercise test. Next to this, study participants will perform additional in-vivo exercise cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and phosphorus 31-MR spectroscopy of the quadriceps femoris muscle before and after the intervention to assess the effect on respectively cardiac and skeletal muscle function.

This study was approved in May 2023 by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the UMCG (registration number NL83611.042.23, March 2023) and is registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov register. Results of this study will be submitted for presentation at (inter)national congresses and publication in peer-reviewed journals.

NCT05772819.

Whilst there has been significant improvement in mortality outcomes after emergency laparotomy, there is little information on longer term outcomes in the year after discharge. The main aim of the study was to assess the impact that an emergency laparotomy has on patients' and employment and health status 1 year after surgery.

This study was a questionnaire study conducted in a single centre district general hospital of patients who had undergone an emergency laparotomy between October 2015 and December 2016. Patients were included according to the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit criteria. At screening, patients who were alive at 1 year and had the capacity to consent were approached between January and December 2017. Patients underwent a researcher-led telephone interview using a semi-structured questionnaire to assess the impact of emergency laparotomy on overall, general and physical health (Glasgow Benefit Inventory) as well as employment status. The symptoms that patients experienced and their impact were also recorded.

Forty-two patients responded to and completed the questionnaire. Just over one-third of patients experienced a deterioration in their general or physical health and 21% of patients experienced a change in employment. Factors which significantly impacted on health status were stoma issues, postoperative morbidity and a change in employment (p < 0.05). The main symptoms which patients identified as being troublesome were altered bowel habit and stoma issues with a resultant social and psychological impact.

One-third of patients experienced a deterioration in their psychosocial and physical health status as well as a change in employment during the first-year postsurgery. Larger research studies are required to define the impact of emergency laparotomy on patients in the longer term and more research is needed to improve perioperative rehabilitation in the postoperative period to ensure optimal functional gain after technically successful surgery.

To compare the effect of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery on the quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) in the growth period after the operation, and to provide a reference for surgical treatment decisions of patients with CRC.

PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched through May 7, 2022 for clinical studies comparing the postoperative quality of life in CRC patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery with those who underwent open surgery. Data were extracted from eligible studies following rigorous quality review. All studies included patient numbers, surgery type, follow-up length, and quality of life scores.

A total of 6 studies were included, resulting in significantly better physical functioning scores with laparoscopic versus open surgery. (Standardized mean difference = 0.45; 95% CI (0.15, 0.75), P = .003). However, in general health, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, quality of life index, Global Quality Scale, physical component summary and mental component summary, there was no telling difference between the 2 surgical therapies.

Compared with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery has weak advantages. There was no noteworthy difference in the long-term quality of life between the 2 surgical treatments for CRC patients. Whether laparoscopic surgery can bring more improvement to the quality of life of patients with CRC needs more high-quality clinical randomized studies to verify.

Colorectal cancer is diagnosed in approximately 500,000 patients each year in Europe, leading to a high number of patients having to cope with the consequences of resection for colorectal cancer. As treatment options tend to grow, more information on the effects of these treatments is needed to engage in shared decision-making. This study aims to explore the impact of resection for colorectal cancer on patients' daily life.

Patients (≥18 years of age) who underwent an oncological colorectal resection between 2018 and 2021 were selected. Purposeful sampling was used to include patients who differed in age, comorbidity conditions, types of (neo)adjuvant therapy, postoperative complications and the presence/absence of a stoma. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, guided by a topic guide. Interviews were fully transcribed and subsequently thematically analysed using the framework approach. Analyses were carried out using the following predefined themes: (1) daily life and activities; (2) psychological functioning; (3) social functioning; (4) sexual functioning; and (5) healthcare experiences.

Sixteen patients with a follow-up period of between 0.6 and 4.4 years after surgery were included in this study. Participants reported several challenges experienced because of poor bowel function, a stoma, chemotherapy-induced neuropathy, fear of recurrence and sexual dysfunction. However, they reported these as not interfering much with daily life.

Colorectal cancer treatment leads to several challenges and treatment-related health deficits. This is often not recognized by generic patient-reported outcome measures, but the findings on treatment-related health deficits presented in this study contain valuable insights which might contribute to improving colorectal cancer care, shared decision making and value-based health care.

Trends of surgical and non-surgical complications among the old, older and oldest patients after colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery could help to identify the best target outcome to further improve postoperative outcome.

All consecutive patients ≥70 years receiving curative elective CRC resection between 2011 and 2019 in The Netherlands were included. Baseline variables and postoperative complications were prospectively collected by the Dutch ColoRectal audit (DCRA). We assessed surgical and non-surgical complications over time and within age categories (70-74, 75-79 and ≥ 80 years) and determined the impact of age on the risk of both types of complications by using multivariate logistic regression analyses.

Overall, 38648 patients with a median age of 76 years were included. Between 2011 and 2019 the proportion of ASA score ≥3 and laparoscopic surgery increased. Non-surgical complications significantly improved between 2011 (21.8%) and 2019 (17.1%) and surgical complications remained constant (from 17.6% to 16.8%). Surgical complications were stable over time for each age group. Non-surgical complications improved in the oldest two age groups. Increasing age was only associated with non-surgical complications (75-79 years; OR 1.17 (95% CI 1.10-1.25), ≥80 years; OR 1.46 (95% CI 1.37-1.55) compared to 70-74 years), not with surgical complications.

The reduction of postoperative complications in the older CRC population was predominantly driven by a decrease in non-surgical complications. Moreover, increasing age was only associated with non-surgical complications and not with surgical complications. Future care developments should focus on non-surgical complications, especially in patients ≥75 years.

To review the efficacy of 2 score tools for identifying pulmonary complications after cardiac surgery.

A retrospective observational study.

At the West China Hospital of Sichuan University General Hospital.

Patients who underwent elective cardiac surgery (N = 508).

Not applicable.

A total of 508 patients who underwent elective cardiac surgery between March 2021 and December 2021 were included in this observational study. Three independent physiotherapists used 2 different sets of score tools, as described by Kroenke et al. (Kroenke Score) and Reeve et al. (Melbourne Group Scale), to evaluate clinically defined pulmonary complications according to the European Perioperative Clinical Outcome definitions (including atelectasis, pneumonia, and respiratory failure) daily after surgery at midday. The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) was 51.6% (262/508) with the Kroenke Score and 21.9% (111/508) with the Melbourne Group Scale. The clinically observed incidence of atelectasis was 51.4%, pneumonia was 20.9%, and respiratory failure at 6.5%. The receiver operator characteristics curve showed that the overall validity of the Kroenke Score was better than that of the Melbourne Group Scale in atelectasis (area under the curve [AUC], 91.5% v 71.3%). The Melbourne Group Scale performed better in pneumonia (AUC, 99.4% v 80.0%) and respiratory failure (AUC, 88.5% v 75.9%) than the Kroenke Score.

The incidence of PPCs after cardiac surgery was highly prevalent. Both the Kroenke Score and the Melbourne Group Scale are effective in identifying patients with PPCs. Kroenke Score can identify patients with mild pulmonary adverse events, whereas the Melbourne Group Scale is more dominant in identifying moderate-to-severe pulmonary complications.

Long-term survival after emergency colorectal cancer surgery is low, and its estimation is most frequently neglected, with priority given to the immediate prognosis. This study aimed to propose an effective nomogram to predict overall survival in these patients.

We retrospectively studied 437 patients who underwent emergency surgery for colorectal cancer between 2008 and 2019, in whom we analyzed the clinical, paraclinical, and surgical parameters.

Only 30 patients (6.86%) survived until the end of the study. We identified the risk factors through the univariate Cox regression analysis and a multivariate Cox regression model. The model included the following eight independent prognostic factors: age > 63 years, Charlson score > 4, revised cardiac risk index (RCRI), LMR (lymphocytes/neutrophils ratio), tumor site, macroscopic tumoral invasion, surgery type, and lymph node dissection (p < 0.05 for all), with an AUC (area under the curve) of 0.831, with an ideal agreement between the predicted and observed probabilities. On this basis, we constructed a nomogram for prediction of overall survival.

The nomogram created, on the basis of a multivariate logistic regression model, has a good individual prediction of overall survival for patients with emergency surgery for colon cancer and may support clinicians when informing patients about prognosis.

Surgery is the most common treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) and can cause relative long average length of stay (LOS) and high risks of unplanned readmissions and complications. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways can reduce the LOS and postsurgical complications. Digital health interventions provide a flexible and low-cost way of supporting patients to achieve this. This protocol describes a trial aiming to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the RecoverEsupport digital health intervention in decreasing the hospital LOS in patients undergoing CRC surgery.

The two-arm randomised controlled trial will assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the RecoverEsupport digital health intervention compared with usual care (control) in patients with CRC. The intervention consists of a website and a series of automatic prompts and alerts to support patients to adhere to the patient-led ERAS recommendations. The primary trial outcome is the length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes include days alive and out of hospital; emergency department presentations; quality of life; patient knowledge and behaviours related to the ERAS recommendations; health service utilisation; and intervention acceptability and use.

The trial has been approved by the Hunter New England Research Ethics Committee (2019/ETH00869) and the University of Newcastle Ethics Committee (H-2015-0364). Trial findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. If the intervention is effective, the research team will facilitate its adoption within the Local Health District for widespread adaptation and implementation.

ACTRN12621001533886.

Quality of life (QoL) is essential for maintaining a healthy, balanced lifestyle, especially among individuals with chronic diseases. Saudi Arabia (SA) launched a health sector transformation program as part of the nationwide Vision 2030 initiative to ensure the sustainable development of efficient healthcare services, aiming to improve health by increasing well-being and QoL. More investigation into the current status of health rehabilitation services provided to individuals with chronic diseases and future needs to optimize services and improve QoL is needed. This was narratively discussed by experts from different health rehabilitation services in SA. Comprehensive health rehabilitation services including orthopedic, occupational, cardiac, pulmonary, critical care, perioperative, hearing and speech, substance use disorders, and vocational rehabilitation services were addressed. Health rehabilitation services in SA, as in other countries, are suboptimal for individuals in health rehabilitation programs. To optimize the QoL of individuals with chronic diseases, health rehabilitation services should be tailored based on the unique requirements of each service and its serving patients. The shared need to improve health rehabilitation services includes the adoption of home-based and telehealth services, the integration of multi-governmental sectors, the empowerment and allocation of health rehabilitation specialists, public awareness campaigns, policy legislation and guideline development, and the implementation of a long-term follow-up system. This review is one of the first to address the intersection of health rehabilitation services and QoL in SA; urgent and holistic actions are paramount to address the pressing need to optimize SA's health rehabilitation services. The experts' recommendations in this study may be applicable to other countries' health systems, as health rehabilitation services are not well optimized globally.

The effect of postoperative complications on long-term quality of life (QoL) is controversial in abdominal surgery. This study aimed to investigate the impact of 30-day postoperative complications on long-term QoL after gastrectomy.

This is a longitudinal cohort study that enrolled 908 patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer between 2016 and 2017. QoL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) generic cancer (QLQ C-30) and gastric module (STO-22) preoperatively and at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Patients were divided into the morbidity (30-day postoperative complications) and no-morbidity groups, and the postoperative QoL change was compared using a linear mixed model.

The mean age was 62.5 ± 12.0 years. Subtotal and total gastrectomy was performed in 763 (84.0%) and 145 (16.0%) patients, respectively. There were 189 (20.8%) patients developing postoperative complications. The morbidity group showed worse scores in several functions and symptoms of QoL at the baseline. However, the two groups showed no significant difference in postoperative changes in most functions and symptoms of the QLQ C-30 and STO-22 (P_{group × time} > 0.05). The recovery of global health (P_{group × time} < 0.001) and anxiety (P_{group × time} = 0.008) was slightly better in the morbidity group. The subgroup analysis of patients developing major abdominal complications showed similar results.

The morbidity group showed worse QoL in several functions and symptoms at the baseline. However, postoperative complications had little influence on QoL change following gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Postoperative complications and readmissions to hospital are factors known to negatively influence the short- and long-term quality of life of patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Active family involvement in activities, such as fundamental care activities, has the potential to improve the quality of health care. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the relationship between active family involvement and outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal cancer after surgery.

This protocol aims to evaluate the effect of a family involvement program (FIP) on unplanned readmissions of adult patients undergoing surgery for malignant gastrointestinal tumors. Furthermore, the study aims to evaluate the effect of the FIP on family caregiver (FC) burden and their well-being and the fidelity of the FIP.

This cohort study will be conducted in 2 academic hospitals in the Netherlands. The FIP will be offered to adult patients and their FCs. Patients are scheduled for oncological gastrointestinal surgery and have an expected hospital stay of at least 5 days after surgery. FCs must be willing to participate in fundamental care activities during hospitalization and after discharge. Consenting patients and their families will choose to either participate in the FIP or be included in the usual care group. According to the power calculation, we will recruit 150 patients and families in the FIP group and 150 in the usual care group. The intervention group will receive the FIP that consists of information, shared goal setting, task-oriented training, participation in fundamental care, presence of FCs during ward rounds, and rooming-in for at least 8 hours a day. Patients in the comparison group will receive usual postoperative care. The primary outcome measure is the number of unplanned readmissions up to 30 days after surgery. Several secondary outcomes will be collected, that is, total number of complications (sensitive to fundamental care activities) at 30 and 90 days after surgery, emergency department visits, intensive care unit admissions up to 30 and 90 days after surgery, hospital length of stay, patients' quality of life, and the amount of home care needed after discharge. FC outcomes are caregiver burden and well-being up to 90 days after participating in the FIP. To evaluate fidelity, we will check whether the FIP is executed as intended. Univariable regression and multivariable regression analyses will be conducted.

The first participant was enrolled in April 2019. The follow-up period of the last participant ended in May 2022. The study was funded by an unrestricted grant of the University hospital in 2018. We aim to publish the results in 2023.

This study will provide evidence on outcomes from a FIP and will provide health care professionals practical tools for family involvement in the oncological surgical care setting.

DERR1-10.2196/38028.

To investigate the impact of family visit restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic on deliriums, falls, pneumonia, pressure ulcers and readmissions among surgical inpatients with gastrointestinal (oncologic) diseases.

Cohort study.

This study was conducted among adult inpatients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery in two academic hospitals. During the COVID-19 outbreak in 2020, over a 10-week period, one cohort was subjected to family visit restrictions. Per patient, one person per day was allowed to visit for a maximum of 30 min. This cohort was compared with another cohort in which patients were not subjected to such restrictions during a 10-week period in 2019. Logistic regression analyses were used to investigate the impact of the restrictions on deliriums, falls, pneumonia, pressure ulcers and readmissions.

In total, 287 patients were included in the 2020 cohort and 243 in the 2019 cohort. No differences were observed in the cohorts with respect to baseline characteristics. Logistic regression analyses showed no significant differences in deliriums, falls, pneumonia, pressure ulcers and readmissions between the cohorts.

We cautiously conclude that the family visit restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic did not contribute to deliriums, falls, pneumonia, pressure ulcers or readmissions in surgical patients with gastrointestinal (oncologic) diseases.

COVID-19 influenced family-centred care due to family visit restrictions. Nurses need to continue monitoring outcomes known to be sensitive to family-centred care to gain insight into the effects of visit restrictions and share the results in order to include nurses' perspectives in COVID-19-decision-making. Re-implementing of family visit restrictions should be carefully considered in policy-making.

Quality of life is a topic increasingly being addressed by researchers. Due to the increasing incidence of colorectal cancer, this issue is particularly relevant. Despite the increasing number of publications on this topic each year, it still requires further research. The aim of this study was to analyze the available literature from the past 10 years, addressing the topic of QoL in patients with colorectal cancer which has been treated surgically.

This review is based on 93 articles published between 2012 and 2022. It analyzes the impact of socioeconomic factors, the location and stage of the tumor, stoma and the method of surgical treatment on patients' QoL and sexual functioning.

CRC has a negative impact on patients' financial status, social functioning, pain and physical functioning. Patients with stage II or III cancer have an overall lower QoL than patients with stage I. The more proximally the lesion is located to the sphincters, the greater the negative impact on the QoL. There was a significant difference in favor of laparoscopic surgery compared with open surgery. In patients with a stoma, the QoL is lower compared with patients with preserved gastrointestinal tract continuity. The more time has passed since surgery, the more the presence of a stoma has a negative impact on QoL. Surgery for CRC negatively affects patients' sex lives, especially in younger people and among men.

This study may contribute to the identification of the factors that affect the QoL of patients with surgically treated colorectal cancer. This will allow even more effective and complete treatment, facilitating patients' return to normal physical, mental and social functioning.

This European multicenter study aims to compare the results of laparoscopic versus laparotomy approach for the resection of splenic flexure colon carcinoma (SFC).

Patients with SFC who required curative resection by laparoscopy (LAP) or laparotomy (OPEN) between 2000 and 2018 were included. Three types of interventions were considered: extended right hemi-colectomy, left hemi-colectomy and splenic flexure resection. The LAP and OPEN groups were matched according to propensity score and compared with Chi-square, Mann-Whitney tests, and multivariate regression models. Overall survival and recurrence-free survival were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

The study population consisted of 399 patients, including 297 operated by LAP and 102 by OPEN. Extended right hemi-colectomy was performed in 35.8% of cases, left hemi-colectomy in 32.8% and splenic flexure resection in 31.4%. After propensity score matching, the LAP (n=64) and OPEN (n=64) groups were comparable for all pre-operative variables and tumor characteristics. The LAP group showed less blood loss and a shorter interval to return of transit and feeding compared to the OPEN group, regardless of the resection technique. There were no differences between the groups in terms of overall survival and 5-year recurrence-free survival.

These results support the application of laparoscopy for the resection of SFC.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequent malignancy and the second cause of cancer death worldwide. Several factors have been postulated to be involved in CRC pathophysiology, including physical inactivity, unhealthy dietary habits, obesity, and the gut microbiota. Emerging data suggest that the microbiome may play a key role in CRC prognosis and derived complications in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. On the other hand, dietary intervention has been demonstrated to be able to induce significant changes in the gut microbiota and related metabolites in different conditions; therefore, the manipulation of gut microbiota through dietary intervention may constitute a useful approach to improve perioperative dysbiosis and post-surgical outcomes in patients with CRC. In this article, we review the role of the gut microbiota in CRC surgery complications and the potential therapeutic modulation of gut microbiome through nutritional intervention in patients with CRC undergoing surgery.

Quality of life (QOL) of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients has been little studied in Tunisia. The aim of this work was to evaluate the QOL of CRC patients and to identify factors that may influence it.

A cross-sectional, study spread was made over a period of 6 months on patients with CRC treated in the department of Medical Oncology of Farhat Hached University Hospital of Sousse. The EORTC questionnaires translated and validated in Arabic (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29) were used.

142 patients diagnosed with colon or rectal cancer were enrolled. The overall QOL score was 58.5 ± 29.1. The emotional and sexual functional dimensions were the most affected, especially in women and patients under 50 years of age. QOL scores were higher in patients who were in complete remission (71.4 ± 24.7) and in good general condition (63.7 ± 26.6) physical activity may have a significant influence on all functional dimensions of QOL (p < 0.001). Fatigue was significantly (p < 0.001) more present when there was a sedentary lifestyleradiotherapy, palliative chemotherapy (1st and 2nd line) and targeted therapy.

Evaluating quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer in Tunisia is necessary especially those under 50 years old and in women. Laparoscopic surgery with restoration of intestinal continuity, less toxic palliative chemotherapy protocols, more accessibility to new radiotherapy technics will improve QOL of CRC patients. Physical activity and nutrition support are also essential in promoting QOL of these patients.

Several recent studies have shown that the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol reduces morbidity and mortality and shortens the length of stay compared to conventional recovery strategy (pre-ERAS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the implementation of this protocol on 3-year overall survival and postoperative outcome in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer.

This was a retrospective, single-center, comparative, and non-randomized study. Between January, 2005, and December, 2017, 1001 patients were included (ERAS, n = 497; pre-ERAS, n = 504).

The 3-year overall survival rate was significantly better for ERAS than for pre-ERAS patients (76.1 vs 69.2%; p = 0.017). The length of hospital stay (median 10 days vs 15; p =  ≤ 0.001) and the 90-day readmission rate (15 vs 20%; p = 0.037) were significantly lower in the ERAS group. Three-year recurrence-free survival (p = 0.398) and 90-day complications (p = 0.560) were similar in the two groups. Analysis of 3-year survival by a multivariate Cox model identified ERAS as a protective factor with a 30% reduction in the risk of death: (HR = 0.70 [0.55-0.90]).

The implementation of the ERAS protocol was associated with an improvement in 3-year survival, a reduction of the length of hospital stay and the rate of readmission. ERAS is associated with better 3-year survival, independent of other commonly considered parameters. An ASA score > 2, smoking, a history of cancer, and atrial fibrillation are deleterious risk factors linked to earlier mortality.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neoCRT) followed by surgery is the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), but the emergence of different drug regimens may result in different response rates. Good clinical response translates into greater sphincter preservation, but quality of life (QOL) may be impaired after treatment due to chemoradiotherapy and surgical side effects.

To prospectively evaluate the impact of clinical response and surgical resection on QOL in a randomized trial comparing two different neoCRT regimens.

Stage II and III rectal cancer patients were randomized to receive neoCRT with either capecitabine (group 1) or 5-Fu and leucovorin (group 2) concomitant to long-course radiotherapy. Clinical downstaging was accessed using MRI 6-8 weeks after treatment. EORTCs QLQ-C30 and CR38 were applied before treatment (T0), after neoCRT (T1), after rectal resection (T2), early after adjuvant chemotherapy (T3), and 1 year after the end of treatment or stoma closure (T4). The Wexner scale was used for fecal incontinence evaluation at T4. A C30SummaryScore (Geisinger and cols.) was calculated to compare QOL results.

Thirty-two patients were assigned to group 1 and 31 to group 2. Clinical downstaging occurred in 70.0% of group 1 and 53.3% of group 2 (p = 0.288), and sphincter preservation was 83.3% in group 1 and 80.0% in group 2 (p = 0.111). No significant difference in QOL was detected when comparing the two treatment groups after neoCRT using QLQ-C30. However, the CR38 module detected differences in micturition problems (15.3 points), gastrointestinal problems (15.3 points), defecation problems (11.8 points), and sexual satisfaction (13.3 points) favoring the capecitabine group. C30SummaryScore detected significant improvement comparing T0 to T1 and deterioration comparing T1 to T2 (p = 0.025). The mean Wexner scale score was 9.2, and a high score correlated with symptoms of diarrhea and defecation problems at T4.

QOL was equivalent between groups after neoCRT except for micturition problems, gastrointestinal problems, defecation problems, and sexual satisfaction favoring the capecitabine arm after. The overall QOL using the C30SummaryScore was improved after neoCRT, but decreased following rectal resection, returning to basal levels at late evaluation. Fecal incontinence was high after sphincter preservation.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03428529.

Postoperative ileus (POI) is an inevitable complication of almost all abdominal surgeries, which results in prolonged hospitalisation and increased healthcare costs. Various treatment strategies have been developed for POI but with limited success. Electroacupuncture (EA) might be a potential therapy for POI. However, evidence from rigorous trials that evaluated the effectiveness of EA for POI is limited. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine whether EA can safely reduce the time to the first defecation after laparoscopic surgery in patients with POI.

This multicentre randomised sham-controlled trial will be conducted in four hospitals in China. A total of 248 eligible participants with colorectal cancer who will undergo laparoscopic surgery will be randomly allocated to an EA group and a sham EA group in a 1:1 ratio. Treatment will be performed starting on postoperative day 1 and continued for four consecutive days, once per day. If the participant is discharged within 4 days after surgery, the treatment will cease on the day of discharge. The primary outcome will be the time to first defecation. The secondary outcome measures will include time to first flatus, tolerability of semiliquid and solid food, length of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative nausea and vomiting, abdominal distension, postoperative pain, postoperative analgesic, time to first ambulation, blinding assessment, credibility and expectancy and readmission rate.

Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (number 2020BZHYLL0116) and the institutional review board of each hospital. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications. This study protocol (V.3.0, 6 March 2020) involves human participants and was approved by the ethics committees of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (number 2020BZHYLL0116), Beijing Friendship Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University (number 2020-P2-069-01), Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University (number 2020-3-11-2), National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (number 20/163-2359), and the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University (number QYFYKYLL711311920). The participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.

ChiCTR2000038444.