|
1
|
Troisi RI, Rompianesi G, D'Hondt M, Vanlander A, Bertrand C, Hubert C, Detry O, Van den Bossche B, Malvaux P, Weerts J, Sablon T, Vermeiren K, Biglari M, Gryspeerdt F, De Meyere C, Dili A, Boterbergh K, Lucidi V. Multicenter Belgian prospective registry on minimally invasive and open liver surgery (BReLLS): experience from 1342 consecutive cases. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2025; 410:86. [PMID: 40029488 PMCID: PMC11876285 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-025-03661-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2025] [Indexed: 03/05/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE Minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) still appears to be adopted with significant variability. We aimed to investigate the diffusion, indications, and short-term outcomes of MILS compared to the open approach. METHODS A prospective registry of all liver resections performed for any indication and using any technique between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019, was established (BReLLS) and analyzed. RESULTS A total of 1342 consecutive liver resections were included, 684 (51%) MILS and 658 (49%) open procedures. MILS was not attempted due to technical complexity in the 46.2% of cases, followed by previous abdominal surgery (22.5%). Patients undergoing MILS had a higher proportion of benign indications and of hepatocellular carcinomas, patients affected by liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension and a lower proportion of major hepatectomies (all p < 0.001). After propensity-score matching, MILS showed better results in terms of surgery duration (p < 0.001), blood loss (p = 0.015), complication rate (p < 0.001), rate of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3 complications (p = 0.012), comprehensive complication index (p < 0.001), length of stay (p < 0.001), readmissions (p = 0.016). Centers performing over 50 liver resections per year had a higher proportion of overall MILS cases (p < 0.001), a similar proportion of major resections (p = 0.362), but a higher prevalence of MILS major resections (p = 0.004), lower 90-day mortality rates (p < 0.001), lower overall complication rates (p < 0.001), and shorter hospital length of stay (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION MILS was the preferred technique in half of the cases, particularly in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, and benign lesions. It provided superior short-term outcomes compared to the open approach for both minor and major liver resections in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Ivan Troisi
- Faculty of Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
- Federico II University Hospital, via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Olivier Detry
- Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation - CHU Liege, University of Liege, Liège, Belgium
| | | | - Philippe Malvaux
- Centre Hospitalier de Wallonie Picard site Notre-Dame, Tournai, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Valerio Lucidi
- Universite Libre de Bruxelles- Erasme Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Ghamarnejad O, Sahan LA, Kardassis D, Widyaningsih R, Edwin B, Stavrou GA. Technical aspects and learning curve of complex laparoscopic hepatectomy: how we do it. Surg Endosc 2024:10.1007/s00464-024-11002-7. [PMID: 38951242 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11002-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 06/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/03/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Laparoscopic liver surgery has advanced significantly, offering benefits, such as reduced intraoperative complications and quicker recovery. However, complex laparoscopic hepatectomy (CLH) is technically demanding, requiring skilled surgeons. This study aims to share technical aspects, insightful tips, and outcomes of CLH at our center, focusing on the safety and learning curve. METHODS We reviewed all patients undergoing liver resection at our center from July 2017 to December 2023, focusing on those who underwent CLH. Of 135 laparoscopic liver resections, 63 (46.7%) were CLH. The learning curve of CLH was also assessed through linear and piecewise regression analyses considering the operation time and intraoperative blood loss. RESULTS Postoperative complications occurred only in 4.8% of patients, with a 90-day mortality rate of 3.2%. The mean operation time and blood loss significantly decreased after the first 20 operations, marking the learning curve's optimal cut-off. Significant improvements in R0 resection (p = 0.024) and 90-day mortality (p = 0.035) were noted beyond the learning curve threshold. CONCLUSION CLH is a safe and effective approach, with a relatively short learning curve of 20 operations. Future large-scale studies should further investigate the impact of surgical experience on CLH outcomes to establish guidelines for training programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omid Ghamarnejad
- Department of General, Visceral, and Oncological Surgery, Klinikum Saarbrücken, Winterberg 1, 66119, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - Laura-Ann Sahan
- Department of General, Visceral, and Oncological Surgery, Klinikum Saarbrücken, Winterberg 1, 66119, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - Dimitrios Kardassis
- Department of General, Visceral, and Oncological Surgery, Klinikum Saarbrücken, Winterberg 1, 66119, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - Rizky Widyaningsih
- Department of General, Visceral, and Oncological Surgery, Klinikum Saarbrücken, Winterberg 1, 66119, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- The Intervention Centre, Department of HBP Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gregor Alexander Stavrou
- Department of General, Visceral, and Oncological Surgery, Klinikum Saarbrücken, Winterberg 1, 66119, Saarbrücken, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Kuemmerli C, Toti JM, Haak F, Billeter AT, Nickel F, Guidetti C, Santibanes M, Vigano L, Lavanchy JL, Kollmar O, Seehofer D, Abu Hilal M, Di Benedetto F, Clavien PA, Dutkowski P, Müller BP, Müller PC. Towards a Standardization of Learning Curve Assessment in Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery. Ann Surg 2024; 281:00000658-990000000-00954. [PMID: 38920042 PMCID: PMC11723502 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/27/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim was to analyze the learning curves of minimal invasive liver surgery(MILS) and propose a standardized reporting. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA MILS offers benefits compared to open resections. For a safe introduction along the learning curve, formal training is recommended. However, definitions of learning curves and methods to assess it lack standardization. METHODS A systematic review of PubMed, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases identified studies on learning curves in MILS. The primary outcome was the number needed to overcome the learning curve. Secondary outcomes included endpoints defining learning curves, and characterization of different learning phases(competency, proficiency and mastery). RESULTS 60 articles with 12'241 patients and 102 learning curve analyses were included. The laparoscopic and robotic approach was evaluated in 71 and 18 analyses and both approaches combined in 13 analyses. Sixty-one analyses (60%) based the learning curve on statistical calculations. The most often used parameters to define learning curves were operative time (n=64), blood loss (n=54), conversion (n=42) and postoperative complications (n=38). Overall competency, proficiency and mastery were reached after 34 (IQR 19-56), 50 (IQR 24-74), 58 (IQR 24-100) procedures respectively. Intraoperative parameters improved earlier (operative time: competency to proficiency to mastery: -13%, 2%; blood loss: competency to proficiency to mastery: -33%, 0%; conversion rate (competency to proficiency to mastery; -21%, -29%), whereas postoperative complications improved later (competency to proficiency to mastery: -25%, -41%). CONCLUSIONS This review summarizes the highest evidence on learning curves in MILS taking into account different definitions and confounding factors. A standardized three-phase reporting of learning phases (competency, proficiency, mastery) is proposed and should be followed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Kuemmerli
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis—University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
| | - Johannes M.A. Toti
- Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital of Bellinzona e Valli, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Fabian Haak
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis—University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Adrian T. Billeter
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis—University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
| | - Felix Nickel
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Cristiano Guidetti
- Hepato-pancreato-biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Martin Santibanes
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Liver and Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Luca Vigano
- Department of Surgery,Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Joël L. Lavanchy
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis—University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
| | - Otto Kollmar
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis—University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Seehofer
- Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-pancreato-biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Pierre-Alain Clavien
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Transplantation, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Philipp Dutkowski
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis—University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
| | - Beat P. Müller
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis—University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
| | - Philip C. Müller
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis—University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Federico VP, Nie JW, Hartman TJ, Oyetayo OO, Zheng E, MacGregor KR, Massel DH, Sayari AJ, Singh K. The Surgical Learning Curve for Cervical Disk Replacement. Clin Spine Surg 2024; 37:E82-E88. [PMID: 37684720 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE To characterize an experienced single surgeon learning curve for cervical disk replacement (CDR). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA A single surgeon learning curve has not been established for CDR. METHODS Patients undergoing CDR were included. The cumulative sum of operative time was utilized to separate cases into 3 phases: learning, practicing, and mastery. Demographics, perioperative characteristics, complications, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and radiographic outcomes were collected preoperatively and up to 1 year postoperatively. PROs included Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function, 12-item Short Form-12 Physical Component Score, 12-item Short Form-12 Mental Component Score, visual analog scale (VAS) arm, VAS neck, Neck Disability Index. Radiographic outcomes included segmental angle/segmental range of motion/C2-C7 range of motion. Minimum clinically important difference achievement was determined through a comparison of previously established values. RESULTS A total of 173 patients were identified, with 14 patients in the learning phase, 42 patients in the practicing phase, and 117 patients in the mastery phase. Mean operative time and mean postoperative day 0 narcotic consumption were significantly higher in the learning phase. The preoperative segmental angle was significantly lower for the learning phase, though these differences were eliminated at the final postoperative time point. Patients in the learning phase reported worse improvement to 6-week postoperative, final postoperative, and worse overall final postoperative VAS Arm scores compared with practicing and mastery phases. CONCLUSIONS For an experienced spine surgeon, the learning phase for CDR was estimated to span 14 patients. During this phase, patients demonstrated longer operative times, higher postoperative narcotic consumption, and worse postoperative VAS Arm scores. Radiographically, no postoperative differences were noted between different phases of mastery. This single surgeon learning curve demonstrates that CDR may be performed safely and with comparable outcomes by experienced spine surgeons despite decreased operative efficiency in the learning phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent P Federico
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Krenzien F, Schmelzle M, Pratschke J, Syn NL, Sucandy I, Chiow AKH, Marino MV, Gastaca M, Wang X, Lee JH, Chong CC, Fuks D, Choi GH, Efanov M, Kingham TP, D'Hondt M, Troisi RI, Choi SH, Sutcliffe RP, Liu R, Cheung TT, Tang CN, Han HS, Goh BKP. Propensity score-matched analysis of laparoscopic-assisted and hand-assisted laparoscopic liver resection versus pure laparoscopic liver resection: an international multicenter study. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:5482-5493. [PMID: 37043008 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10028-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic-assisted (LALR) and hand-assisted (HALR) liver resections have been utilized during the early adoption phase by surgeons when transitioning from open surgery to pure LLR. To date, there are limited data reporting on the outcomes of LALR or HALR compared to LLR. The objective was to compare the perioperative outcomes after LALR and HALR versus pure LLR. METHODS This is an international multicentric analysis of 6609 patients undergoing minimal-invasive liver resection at 21 centers between 2004 and 2019. Perioperative outcomes were analyzed after propensity score matching (PSM) comparison between LALR and HALR versus LLR. RESULTS 5279 cases met study criteria of whom 5033 underwent LLR (95.3%), 146 underwent LALR (2.8%) and 100 underwent HALR (1.9%). After 1:4 PSM, LALR was associated with inferior outcomes as evidenced by the longer postoperative stay, higher readmission rate, higher major morbidity rate and higher in-hospital mortality rate. Similarly, 1:6 PSM comparison between HALR and LLR also demonstrated poorer outcomes associated with HALR as demonstrated by the higher open conversion rate and higher blood transfusion rate. All 3 approaches technical variants demonstrated the same oncological radicality (R1 rate). CONCLUSION LALR and HALR performed during the learning curve was associated with inferior perioperative outcomes compared to pure LLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Krenzien
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Moritz Schmelzle
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nicholas L Syn
- Ministry of Health Holdings and Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Iswanto Sucandy
- AdventHealth Tampa, Digestive Health Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Adrian K H Chiow
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Marco V Marino
- General Surgery Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy
- Oncologic Surgery Department, P. Giaccone University Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Mikel Gastaca
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Xiaoying Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Charing C Chong
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Gi Hong Choi
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - T Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Sung Hoon Choi
- Department of General Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Rong Liu
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tan-To Cheung
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Chung Ngai Tang
- Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital Bundang, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
- Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Lan X, Zhang HL, Zhang H, Peng YF, Liu F, Li B, Wei YG. Four-year experience with more than 1000 cases of total laparoscopic liver resection in a single center. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28:2968-2980. [PMID: 35978880 PMCID: PMC9280729 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i25.2968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has become a safe surgical procedure that needs additional summarization.
AIM To review 4 years of total LLR surgeries, exceeding 1000 cases, which were performed at a single center.
METHODS Patients who underwent LLR at West China Hospital of Sichuan University between January 2015 and December 2018 were identified. Surgical details, including the interventional year, category of liver disease, and malignant liver tumors prognosis, were evaluated. The learning curve for LLR was evaluated using the cumulative sum method. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to perform survival analysis.
RESULTS Ultimately, 1098 patients were identified. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was the most common disease that led to the need for LLR at the center (n = 462, 42.08%). The average operation time was 216.94 ± 98.51 min. The conversion rate was 1.82% (20/1098). The complication rate was 9.20% (from grade II to V). The 1-year and 3-year overall survival rates of HCC patients were 89.7% and 81.9%, respectively. The learning curve was grouped into two phases for local resection (cases 1-106 and 107-373), three phases for anatomical segmentectomy (cases 1-44, 45-74 and 75-120), and three phases for hemihepatectomy (cases 1-17, 18-48 and 49-88).
CONCLUSION LLR may be considered a first-line surgical intervention for liver resection that can be performed safely for a variety of primary, secondary, and recurrent liver tumors and for benign diseases once technical competence is proficiently attained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiang Lan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
| | - Hai-Li Zhang
- Department of Liver Surgery & Liver Transplantation Center, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Hua Zhang
- Department of Liver Surgery & Liver Transplantation Center, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yu-Fu Peng
- Department of Liver Surgery & Liver Transplantation Center, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Fei Liu
- Department of Liver Surgery & Liver Transplantation Center, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Bo Li
- Department of Liver Surgery & Liver Transplantation Center, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yong-Gang Wei
- Department of Liver Surgery & Liver Transplantation Center, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Chong CC, Fuks D, Lee KF, Zhao JJ, Choi GH, Sucandy I, Chiow AKH, Marino MV, Gastaca M, Wang X, Lee JH, Efanov M, Kingham TP, D’Hondt M, Troisi RI, Choi SH, Sutcliffe RP, Chan CY, Lai ECH, Park JO, Di Benedetto F, Rotellar F, Sugioka A, Coelho FF, Ferrero A, Long TCD, Lim C, Scatton O, Liu Q, Schmelzle M, Pratschke J, Cheung TT, Liu R, Han HS, Tang CN, Goh BKP. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Robotic and Laparoscopic Right and Extended Right Hepatectomy. JAMA Surg 2022; 157:436-444. [PMID: 35262660 PMCID: PMC8908223 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.0161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Laparoscopic and robotic techniques have both been well adopted as safe options in selected patients undergoing hepatectomy. However, it is unknown whether either approach is superior, especially for major hepatectomy such as right hepatectomy or extended right hepatectomy (RH/ERH). OBJECTIVE To compare the outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic RH/ERH. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this case-control study, propensity score matching analysis was performed to minimize selection bias. Patients undergoing robotic or laparoscopic RH/EHR at 29 international centers from 2008 to 2020 were included. INTERVENTIONS Robotic vs laparoscopic RH/ERH. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Data on patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and short-term perioperative outcomes were collected and analyzed. RESULTS Of 989 individuals who met study criteria, 220 underwent robotic and 769 underwent laparoscopic surgery. The median (IQR) age in the robotic RH/ERH group was 61.00 (51.86-69.00) years and in the laparoscopic RH/ERH group was 62.00 (52.03-70.00) years. Propensity score matching resulted in 220 matched pairs for further analysis. Patients' demographics and tumor characteristics were comparable in the matched cohorts. Robotic RH/ERH was associated with a lower open conversion rate (19 of 220 [8.6%] vs 39 of 220 [17.1%]; P = .01) and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (median [IQR], 7.0 [5.0-10.0] days; mean [SD], 9.11 [7.52] days vs median [IQR], 7.0 [5.75-10.0] days; mean [SD], 9.94 [8.99] days; P = .048). On subset analysis of cases performed between 2015 and 2020 after a center's learning curve (50 cases), robotic RH/ERH was associated with a shorter postoperative hospital stay (median [IQR], 6.0 [5.0-9.0] days vs 7.0 [6.0-9.75] days; P = .04) with a similar conversion rate (12 of 220 [7.6%] vs 17 of 220 [10.8%]; P = .46). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE Robotic RH/ERH was associated with a lower open conversion rate and shorter postoperative hospital stay compared with laparoscopic RH/ERH. The difference in open conversion rate was associated with a significant decrease for laparoscopic but not robotic RH/ERH after a center had mounted the learning curve. Use of robotic platform may help to overcome the initial challenges of minimally invasive RH/ERH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charing C. Chong
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Kit-Fai Lee
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Joseph J. Zhao
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Gi Hong Choi
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Iswanto Sucandy
- AdventHealth Tampa, Digestive Health Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Adrian K. H. Chiow
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Marco V. Marino
- General Surgery Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy and Oncologic Surgery Department, P. Giaccone University Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Mikel Gastaca
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Xiaoying Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - T. Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Mathieu D’Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Roberto I. Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Sung-Hoon Choi
- Department of General Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Robert P. Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Chung-Yip Chan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and Duke-National University Singapore Medical School, Singapore
| | - Eric C. H. Lai
- Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - James O. Park
- Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- HPB and Liver Transplant, Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Atsushi Sugioka
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan
| | - Fabricio Ferreira Coelho
- Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of HPB and Digestive Surgery, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I, Turin, Italy
| | - Tran Cong Duy Long
- HPB Surgery Department, University Medical Center, HCMC, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Chetana Lim
- Department of Digestive, HBP and Liver Transplantation, Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere, APHP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Scatton
- Department of Digestive, HBP and Liver Transplantation, Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere, APHP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Qu Liu
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Moritz Schmelzle
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tan-To Cheung
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Rong Liu
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chung Ngai Tang
- Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Brian K. P. Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and Duke-National University Singapore Medical School, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
|
8
|
Kuemmerli C, Fichtinger RS, Moekotte A, Aldrighetti LA, Aroori S, Besselink MGH, D’Hondt M, Díaz-Nieto R, Edwin B, Efanov M, Ettorre GM, Menon KV, Sheen AJ, Soonawalla Z, Sutcliffe R, Troisi RI, White SA, Brandts L, van Breukelen GJP, Sijberden J, Pugh SA, Eminton Z, Primrose JN, van Dam R, Hilal MA, on behalf of the ORANGE trials collaborative. Laparoscopic versus open resections in the posterosuperior liver segments within an enhanced recovery programme (ORANGE Segments): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Trials 2022; 23:206. [PMID: 35264216 PMCID: PMC8908665 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06112-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A shift towards parenchymal-sparing liver resections in open and laparoscopic surgery emerged in the last few years. Laparoscopic liver resection is technically feasible and safe, and consensus guidelines acknowledge the laparoscopic approach in the posterosuperior segments. Lesions situated in these segments are considered the most challenging for the laparoscopic approach. The aim of this trial is to compare the postoperative time to functional recovery, complications, oncological safety, quality of life, survival and costs after laparoscopic versus open parenchymal-sparing liver resections in the posterosuperior liver segments within an enhanced recovery setting. METHODS The ORANGE Segments trial is an international multicentre randomised controlled superiority trial conducted in centres experienced in laparoscopic liver resection. Eligible patients for minor resections in the posterosuperior segments will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to undergo laparoscopic or open resections in an enhanced recovery setting. Patients and ward personnel are blinded to the treatment allocation until postoperative day 4 using a large abdominal dressing. The primary endpoint is time to functional recovery. Secondary endpoints include intraoperative outcomes, length of stay, resection margin, postoperative complications, 90-day mortality, time to adjuvant chemotherapy initiation, quality of life and overall survival. Laparoscopic liver surgery of the posterosuperior segments is hypothesised to reduce time to functional recovery by 2 days in comparison with open surgery. With a power of 80% and alpha of 0.04 to adjust for interim analysis halfway the trial, a total of 250 patients are required to be randomised. DISCUSSION The ORANGE Segments trial is the first multicentre international randomised controlled study to compare short- and long-term surgical and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic and open resections in the posterosuperior segments within an enhanced recovery programme. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03270917 . Registered on September 1, 2017. Before start of inclusion. PROTOCOL VERSION version 12, May 9, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Kuemmerli
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD UK
- Department of Surgery, Foundation Poliambulanza, Via Bissolati, Brescia, Italy
| | - Robert S. Fichtinger
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Alma Moekotte
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD UK
| | | | - Somaiah Aroori
- Peninsula HPB Unit, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Marc G. H. Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mathieu D’Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Rafael Díaz-Nieto
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Research Centre, Moscow, Russia
| | - Giuseppe M. Ettorre
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, San Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Aali J. Sheen
- Department of Surgery, Manchester University Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Zahir Soonawalla
- Department of Surgery, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Robert Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Roberto I. Troisi
- Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Steven A. White
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Lloyd Brandts
- Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Gerard J. P. van Breukelen
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jasper Sijberden
- Department of Surgery, Foundation Poliambulanza, Via Bissolati, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Siân A. Pugh
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Zina Eminton
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - John N. Primrose
- Department of Surgery, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Ronald van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD UK
- Department of Surgery, Foundation Poliambulanza, Via Bissolati, Brescia, Italy
| | - on behalf of the ORANGE trials collaborative
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD UK
- Department of Surgery, Foundation Poliambulanza, Via Bissolati, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Peninsula HPB Unit, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Research Centre, Moscow, Russia
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, San Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Institute of Liver Studies, Kings College Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Surgery, Manchester University Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Department of Surgery, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Department of Surgery, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
|
9
|
Shapera E, Sucandy I, Syblis C, Crespo K, Ja'Karri T, Ross S, Rosemurgy A. Cost analysis of robotic versus open hepatectomy: Is the robotic platform more expensive? J Robot Surg 2022; 16:1409-1417. [PMID: 35152343 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01375-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The robotic platform is perceived to be more expensive when compared to laparoscopic and open operations. We aimed to compare the perioperative costs of robotic vs. open hepatectomy for the treatment of liver tumors at our facility. We followed 370 patients undergoing robotic and open hepatectomy for benign and malignant liver tumors. Demographic, perioperative, cost and payment data were collected and analyzed. For illustrative purposes, the data were presented as median (mean ± SD). Two hundred sixty-seven robotic and 104 open hepatectomies were analyzed. There were no significant differences in perioperative variables between the two cohorts. The robotic group had a significantly lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (135 [208 ± 244.8] vs 300 [427 ± 502.5] ml, p < 0.0001), smaller lesion size (4 [5 ± 3.6] vs 5[6 ± 4.9] cm, p = 0.0052), shorter length of stay (LOS) (4 [4 ± 3.4] vs 6[8 ± 5.7] days, p < 0.0001) and decreased 90-day mortality (3 vs 7 p = 0.0028). There were no significant differences between the two groups any cost variable. The open group received significantly higher reimbursement ($29,297 [62,962 ± 75,377.96] vs $19,102 [38,975 ± 39,362.11], p < 0.001) and profit ($5005 [30,981 ± 79,541.09] vs $- 6682 [6146 ± 40,949.65], p < 0.001). Robotic hepatectomy is associated with lower EBL, shorter LOS and less mortality. There was no greater cost associated with the robotic platform despite a reduced reimbursement and profit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuel Shapera
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite 500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA
| | - Iswanto Sucandy
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite 500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA.
| | - Cameron Syblis
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite 500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Crespo
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite 500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA
| | - Thomas Ja'Karri
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite 500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA
| | - Sharona Ross
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite 500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA
| | - Alexander Rosemurgy
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite 500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
10
|
Shanti H, Raman R, Chakravartty S, Belgaumkar AP, Patel AG. OUP accepted manuscript. BJS Open 2022; 6:6563502. [PMID: 35380619 PMCID: PMC8982202 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Revised: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is a highly demanding procedure with great variability. Previously published randomized trials have proven oncological safety of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) as compared to open surgery. However, these were started after the learning curve (LC) was established. This leaves the question of whether the LC of LLR in the early laparoscopic era has affected the survival of patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). Methods All consecutive LLRs performed by a single surgeon between 2000 and 2019 were retrospectively analysed. A risk-adjusted cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) chart for conversion rate and the log regression analysis of the blood loss identified two phases in the LC. This was then applied to patients with CRLM, and the two subgroups were compared for recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The analysis was repeated with propensity score-matched (PSM) groups Results A total of 286 patients were included in the LC analysis, which identified two distinct phases, the early (EP; 68 patients) and the late (LP; 218 patients) phases. The LC was applied to 192 patients with colorectal liver metastasis (EPc, 45 patients; LPc, 147 patients). For patients with CRLM, R0 resection was achieved in 93 per cent: 100 per cent in the EPc group and 90 per cent in the LPc group (P = 0.026). Median OS and RFS were 60 and 16 months, respectively. The 5-year OS and RFS were 51 per cent and 32.7 per cent, respectively. OS (hazard ratio (h.r.) 0.78, 95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 0.51 to 1.2; P = 0.286) and RFS (h.r. 0.94, 95 per cent c.i. 0.64 to 1.37; P = 0.760) were not compromised by the learning curve. The results were replicated after PSM. Conclusion In our experience, the development of a laparoscopic liver resection programme can be achieved without adverse effects on the long-term survival of patients with CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiba Shanti
- Institute of Liver Studies, King’s College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Rakesh Raman
- Kent Oncology Centre, Kent and Canterbury Hospital, Canterbury, UK
| | | | - Ajay P. Belgaumkar
- Department of Surgery, Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Redhill, UK
| | - Ameet G. Patel
- Correspondence to: Ameet G. Patel, Institute of Liver Studies, King’s College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
|
11
|
Goh BK, Wang Z, Koh YX, Lim KI. Evolution and trends in the adoption of laparoscopic liver resection
in Singapore: Analysis of 300 cases. ANNALS OF THE ACADEMY OF MEDICINE, SINGAPORE 2021. [DOI: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2021213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The introduction of laparoscopic surgery has changed abdominal surgery. We evaluated
the evolution and changing trends associated with adoption of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and
the experience of a surgeon without prior LLR experience.
Methods: A retrospective review of 310 patients who underwent LLR performed by a single surgeon
from 2011 to 2020 was conducted. Exclusion criteria were patients who underwent laparoscopic liver
surgeries such as excision biopsy, local ablation, drainage of abscesses and deroofing of liver cysts.
There were 300 cases and the cohort was divided into 5 groups of 60 patients.
Results: There were 288 patients who underwent a totally minimally invasive approach, including
28 robotic-assisted procedures. Open conversion occurred for 13 (4.3%) patients; the conversion rate
decreased significantly from 10% in the initial period to 3.3% subsequently. There were 83 (27.7%)
major resections and 131 (43.7%) resections were performed for tumours in the difficult
posterosuperior location. There were 152 (50.7%) patients with previous abdominal surgery, including
52 (17.3%) repeat liver resections for recurrent tumours, and 60 patients had other concomitant
operations. According to the Iwate criteria, 135 (44.7%) were graded as high/expert difficulty. Major
morbidity (>grade 3a) occurred in 12 (4.0%) patients and there was no 30-day mortality. Comparison
across the 5 patient groups demonstrated a significant trend towards older patients, higher American
Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, increasing frequency of LLR with previous abdominal
surgery, increasing frequency of portal hypertension and huge tumours, decreasing blood loss and
decreasing transfusion rate across the study period. Surgeon experience (≤60 cases) and Institut
Mutualiste Montsouris (IMM) high grade resections were independent predictors of open conversion.
Open conversion was associated with worse perioperative outcomes such as increased blood loss,
transfusion rate, morbidity and length of stay.
Conclusion: LLR can be safely adopted for resections of all difficulty grades, including major resections
and for tumours located in the difficult posterosuperior segments, with a low open conversion rate.
Keywords: Laparoscopic hepatectomy, laparoscopic liver resection, robotic hepatectomy, robotic liver
resection, Singapore
Collapse
|
|
12
|
Chua D, Syn N, Koh YX, Goh BKP. Learning curves in minimally invasive hepatectomy: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Br J Surg 2021; 108:351-358. [PMID: 33779690 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaa118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2020] [Revised: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive hepatectomy (MIH) has become an important option for the treatment of various liver tumours. A major concern is the learning curve required. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and summarize current literature analysing the learning curve for MIH. METHODS A systematic review of the literature pertaining to learning curves in MIH to July 2019 was performed using PubMed and Scopus databases. All original full-text articles published in English relating to learning curves for both laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), robotic liver resection (RLR), or a combination of these, were included. To explore quantitatively the learning curve for MIH, a meta-regression analysis was performed. RESULTS Forty studies relating to learning curves in MIH were included. The median overall number of procedures required in studies utilizing cumulative summative (CUSUM) methodology for LLR was 50 (range 25-58) and for RLR was 25 (16-50). After adjustment for year of adoption of MIH, the CUSUM-derived caseload to surmount the learning curve for RLR was 47.1 (95 per cent c.i. 1.2 to 71.6) per cent; P = 0.046) less than that required for LLR. A year-on-year reduction in the number of procedures needed for MIH was observed, commencing at 48.3 cases in 1995 and decreasing to 23.8 cases in 2015. CONCLUSION The overall learning curve for MIH decreased steadily over time, and appeared less steep for RLR compared with LLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren Chua
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Nicholas Syn
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ye-Xin Koh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
- Duke-National University of Singapore (NUS) Medical School, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
|
13
|
Abstract
Previously, isolated caudate lobectomy was rarely performed and the caudate lobe was usually resected along with other segments. Isolated caudate lobe resection is a challenging procedure even for an experienced surgeon. Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility, safety and outcomes of laparoscopic isolated caudate lobectomy and to compare these with the open technique. We retrospectively analyzed 21 patients who underwent isolated caudate lobectomy between January 2005 and December 2018 at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. Patients who underwent either anatomical or non-anatomical resection of the caudate lobe were included. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they underwent laparoscopic or open surgery. Intra-operative and postoperative outcomes were compared with a median follow-up of 43 months (4–149). A total of 21 patients were included in the study. Of these, 12 (57.14%) underwent laparoscopic and nine (42.85%) underwent open caudate lobectomy. Median operation time (204.5 vs. 200 minutes, p = 0.397), estimated blood loss (250 vs. 400 ml, p = 0.214) and hospital stay (4 vs. 7 days, p = 0.298) were comparable between laparoscopy and open group. The overall post operative complication rate was similar in both groups (p = 0.375). The 5-year disease free survival rate (42.9% vs 60.0%, p = 0.700) and the 5-year overall survival rate (76.2% vs 64.8%, p = 0.145) was similar between laparoscopy and open group. Our findings demonstrate that with increasing surgical expertise and technological advances, laparoscopic isolated caudate lobectomy can become a feasible and safe in selected patients.
Collapse
|
|
14
|
Goh BK, Low TY, Koh YX, Lee SY, Teo JY, Kam JH, Jeyaraj PR, Cheow PC, Chow PK, Ooi LL, Chung AY, Chan CY. Changing trends and outcomes associated with the adoption of minimally invasive pancreatic surgeries: A single institution experience with 150 consecutive procedures in Southeast Asia. J Minim Access Surg 2020; 16:404-410. [PMID: 31571669 PMCID: PMC7597893 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_127_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2019] [Accepted: 06/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive pancreatic surgeries (MIPS) are increasingly adopted worldwide. However, it remains uncertain if these reported experiences are reproducible throughout the world today. This study examines the safety and evolution of MIPS at a single institution in Southeast Asia. METHODS This is a retrospective review of 150 consecutive patients who underwent MIPS between 2006 and 2018 of which 135 cases (90%) were performed since 2012. To determine the evolution of MIPS, the study population was stratified into 3 equal groups of 50 patients. Comparison was also made between pancreatoduodenectomies (PD), distal pancreatectomies (DP) and other pancreatic surgeries. RESULTS One hundred and fifty patients underwent MIPS (103 laparoscopic, 45 robotic and 2 hand-assisted). Forty-three patients underwent PD, 93 DP and 14 other MIPS. There were 21 (14.0%) open conversions. There was an exponential increase in caseload over the study period. Comparison across the 3 time periods demonstrated that patients were significantly more likely to have a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score, older, undergo PD and a longer operation time. The conversion rate decreased from 28% to 0% and increased again to 14% across the 3 time periods. Comparison between the various types of MIPS demonstrated that patients who underwent PD were significantly older, more likely to have symptomatic tumours, had longer surgery time, increased blood loss, increased frequency of extended pancreatectomies, increased frequency of hybrid procedures, longer post-operative stay, increased post-operative morbidity rate and increased post-operative major morbidity rate. CONCLUSION The case volume of MIPS increased rapidly at our institution over the study period. Furthermore, although the indications for MIPS expanded to include more complex procedures in higher risk patients, there was no change in key perioperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian K. Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, Singapore
| | - Tze Yi Low
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, Singapore
| | - Ye Xin Koh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, Singapore
| | - Ser Yee Lee
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, Singapore
| | - Jin-Yao Teo
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, Singapore
| | - Juinn Huar Kam
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, Singapore
| | - Prema Raj Jeyaraj
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, Singapore
| | - Peng-Chung Cheow
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, Singapore
| | - Pierce K. Chow
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, Singapore
| | - London L. Ooi
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, Singapore
| | - Alexander Y. Chung
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, Singapore
| | - Chung Yip Chan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
|
15
|
Clark J, Mavroeidis VK, Lemmon B, Briggs C, Bowles MJ, Stell DA, Aroori S. Intention to Treat Laparoscopic Versus Open Hemi-Hepatectomy: A Paired Case-Matched Comparison Study. Scand J Surg 2020; 109:211-218. [PMID: 31131722 DOI: 10.1177/1457496919851610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefits of laparoscopic hemi-hepatectomy compared to open hemi-hepatectomy are not clear. OBJECTIVE This study aims to share our experience with the laparoscopic hemi-hepatectomy compared to an open approach. METHODS A total of 40 consecutive laparoscopically started hemi-hepatectomy (intention-to-treat analysis) cases between August 2012 and October 2015 were matched against open cases using the following criteria: laterality of surgery and pathology (essential criteria); American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, pre-operative bilirubin, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, additional procedures, portal vein embolization, and presence of cirrhosis/fibrosis on histology (secondary criteria); age and gender (tertiary criteria). Hand-assisted and extended hemi-hepatectomy cases were excluded from the study. The two groups were compared for blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, morbidity, mortality, and oncological outcomes. All complications were quantified using the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS Two groups were well matched (p = 1.00). In the two groups, 10 patients had left and 30 had right hemi-hepatectomy. Overall conversion rate was 15%. Median length of hospital and high dependency unit stay was less in the intention to treat laparoscopic hemi-hepatectomy group: 6 versus 8 days, p = 0.025 and 1 versus 2 days, p = 0.07. Median operative time was longer in the intention to treat laparoscopic hemi-hepatectomy group: 420 min (range: 389.5-480) versus 305 min (range: 238.8-348.8; p = 0.001). Intra-operative blood loss was equivalent, but the overall blood transfusions were higher in the intention to treat laparoscopic hemi-hepatectomy (50 vs 29 units, p = 0.36). The overall morbidity (18 vs 20 patients, p = 0.65), mortality (2.5%), and the positive resection margin status were similar (18% vs 21%, p = 0.76). The 1- (87.5% vs 92.5%, p = 0.71) and 3-year survival (70% vs 72.5%, p = 1.00) was also similar. CONCLUSIONS We observed lower hospital and high dependency unit stay in the laparoscopic group. However, the laparoscopic approach was associated with longer operating time and a non-significant increase in blood transfusion requirements. There was no difference in morbidity, mortality, re-admission rate, and oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Clark
- Peninsula Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - V K Mavroeidis
- Peninsula Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - B Lemmon
- Peninsula Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - C Briggs
- Peninsula Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - M J Bowles
- Peninsula Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - D A Stell
- Peninsula Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - S Aroori
- Peninsula Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
|
16
|
Learning Curve in Laparoscopic Liver Resection, Educational Value of Simulation and Training Programmes: A Systematic Review. World J Surg 2020; 43:2710-2719. [PMID: 31384997 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-019-05111-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The laparoscopic approach is widely accepted as the procedure of choice for abdominal surgery. However, laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has advanced slowly due to the significant learning curve (LC), and only few publications have dealt with advanced training in LLR. METHODS Two reviewers conducted systematic research through MEDLINE and EMBASE with combinations of the following keywords: (learning curve OR teaching OR training OR simulation OR education) AND (liver OR hepatic) AND (laparoscopic OR laparoscopy). Robotic-assisted, hand-assisted and hybrid LLRs were excluded. RESULTS Nineteen studies were retrieved. Overall, the level of evidence was low. Thirteen articles assessed the LC during real-life LLR, and six articles focussed on simulation and training programmes in LLR. The LC in minor LLR comprised 60 cases overall, and 15 cases for standardised left lateral sectionectomy. For major LLR (MLLR), the LC was 50 cases for most studies, but was reported to be 15-20 cases in more recent studies, provided MLLR is performed progressively in selected patients. However, there was heterogeneity in the literature regarding the number of minor LLRs required before MLLR, with 60 minor LLRs reported as the minimum. Six studies showed a potential benefit of simulation and training programmes in this field. The gradual implementation of LLR combined with simulation-based training programmes could reduce the clinical impact of LC. CONCLUSIONS The LC in LLR is a long process, and MLLR should be gradually implemented under the supervision of experienced surgeons. Training outside the operating room may reduce the LC in real-life situations.
Collapse
|
|
17
|
Schmelzle M, Krenzien F, Schöning W, Pratschke J. Laparoscopic liver resection: indications, limitations, and economic aspects. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020; 405:725-735. [PMID: 32607841 PMCID: PMC7471173 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01918-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Minimally invasive techniques have increasingly found their way into liver surgery in recent years. A multitude of mostly retrospective analyses suggests several advantages of laparoscopic over open liver surgery. Due to the speed and variety of simultaneous technical and strategic developments, it is difficult to maintain an overview of the current status and perspectives in laparoscopic liver surgery. Purpose This review highlights up-to-date aspects in laparoscopic liver surgery. We discuss established indications with regard to their development over time as well as continuing limitations of applied techniques. We give an assessment based on the current literature and according to our own center experiences, not least with regard to a highly topical cost discussion. Conclusions While in the beginning mainly benign tumors were laparoscopically operated on, liver metastasis and hepatocellular carcinoma are now among the most frequent indications. Technical limitations remain and should be evaluated with the overall aim not to endanger quality standards in open surgery. Financial aspects cannot be neglected with the necessity of cost-covering reimbursement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moritz Schmelzle
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Felix Krenzien
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wenzel Schöning
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
|
18
|
Song KB, Kim SC, Lee W, Hwang DW, Lee JH, Kwon J, Park Y, Lee SJ, Park G. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary tumors: lessons learned from 500 consecutive patients in a single center. Surg Endosc 2020; 34:1343-1352. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06913-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2018] [Accepted: 06/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
|
19
|
Broering DC, Berardi G, El Sheikh Y, Spagnoli A, Troisi RI. Learning Curve Under Proctorship of Pure Laparoscopic Living Donor Left Lateral Sectionectomy for Pediatric Transplantation. Ann Surg 2020; 271:542-548. [PMID: 29995683 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the learning curve of an expert liver transplantation surgeon approaching fully laparoscopic living donor left lateral sectionectomy (L-LLS) under proctorship. BACKGROUND Laparoscopic liver resections necessitate a long learning curve trough a stepwise fulfillment of difficulties. L-LLS requires expertise in both living donor liver transplantation and advanced laparoscopic liver surgery. There is currently no data about the learning curve of L-LLS. METHODS A total of 72 pure L-LLS were included in this study. A Broken line model was used to identify the periods of the learning curve. A CUSUM analysis of the operative time was performed to evaluate improvements of outcomes with time. To evaluate the relationship between operative time and progressive number of procedures, a linear regression model was applied. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was carried out to identify the cutoff for completion of the learning curve. RESULTS Operative time decreased with the progressive increase of procedures. Two cutoffs and 3 different periods were identified: cases 1 to 22, cases 23 to 55, and cases 56 to 72. A significant decrease in blood loss and operative time was noted. The CUSUM analysis showed an increase in operative time in the first period, a stable duration in the second period, and a decrease in the last. Blood loss was significantly associated with an increase in operative time (P = 0.003). According to the ROC curve, the learning curve was completed after 25 procedures. CONCLUSIONS L-LLS is a safe procedure that can be standardized and successfully taught to surgeons with large experience in donor hepatectomy through a proctored learning curve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dieter C Broering
- Organ Transplant Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- Al Faisal University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Giammauro Berardi
- Department of Structure and Recovery of Man, Ghent University Faculty of Medicine, Ghent-Belgium
| | - Yasser El Sheikh
- Organ Transplant Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Alessandra Spagnoli
- Department of Statistical Sciences, Public Health and Infectious Diseases, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Organ Transplant Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- Department of Structure and Recovery of Man, Ghent University Faculty of Medicine, Ghent-Belgium
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
20
|
Sultana A, Nightingale P, Marudanayagam R, Sutcliffe RP. Evaluating the learning curve for laparoscopic liver resection: a comparative study between standard and learning curve CUSUM. HPB (Oxford) 2019; 21:1505-1512. [PMID: 30992198 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.03.362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2018] [Revised: 12/19/2018] [Accepted: 03/13/2019] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) requires training in both hepatobiliary surgery and advanced laparoscopy. Available data on LLR learning curves are derived from pioneer surgeons. The aims of this study were to evaluate the LLR learning curve for second generation surgeons, and to compare different CUSUM methodology with and without risk adjustment. METHODS Retrospective analysis of a prospective database of 111 consecutive patients who underwent LLR by two surgeons at a single centre between 2011 and 2016. The LLR learning curve for minor hepatectomy (MH) was evaluated for each surgeon using standard CUSUM before and after risk-adjusting for operative difficulty using the Iwate index, and compared with Learning Curve (LC) CUSUM. The end points were operative time and conversion rate. RESULTS Standard CUSUM analysis identified a learning curve of 50-60 MH procedures. The corresponding learning curve reduced to 25-30 after risk-adjusting for operative difficulty, whilst LC-CUSUM identified a learning curve of 17-25 procedures. CONCLUSIONS The learning curve for laparoscopic minor liver resection by second generation surgeons is shorter than that for pioneer surgeons. Laparoscopic HPB fellowship programmes may further shorten the learning curve, facilitating safe expansion of LLR. The LC-CUSUM method is an alternative technique that warrants further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asma Sultana
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Peter Nightingale
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ravi Marudanayagam
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
|
21
|
Berardi G, Aghayan D, Fretland ÅA, Elberm H, Cipriani F, Spagnoli A, Montalti R, Ceelen WP, Aldrighetti L, Abu Hilal M, Edwin B, Troisi RI. Multicentre analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic liver resection of the posterosuperior segments. Br J Surg 2019; 106:1512-1522. [PMID: 31441944 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2019] [Revised: 04/12/2019] [Accepted: 05/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic liver resection demands expertise and a long learning curve. Resection of the posterosuperior segments is challenging, and there are no data on the learning curve. The aim of this study was to evaluate the learning curve for laparoscopic resection of the posterosuperior segments. METHODS A cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis of the difficulty score for resection was undertaken using patient data from four specialized centres. Risk-adjusted CUSUM analysis of duration of operation, blood loss and conversions was performed, adjusting for the difficulty score of the procedures. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to identify the completion of the learning curve. RESULTS According to the CUSUM analysis of 464 patients, the learning curve showed an initial decrease in the difficulty score followed by an increase and, finally, stabilization. More patients with cirrhosis or previous surgery were operated in the latest phase of the learning curve. A smaller number of wedge resections and a larger number of anatomical resections were performed progressively. Dissection using a Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator and the Pringle manoeuvre were used more frequently with time. Risk-adjusted CUSUM analysis showed a progressive decrease in operating time. Blood loss initially increased slightly, then stabilized and finally decreased over time. A similar trend was found for conversions. The learning curve was estimated to be 40 procedures for wedge and 65 for anatomical resections. CONCLUSION The learning curve for laparoscopic liver resection of the posterosuperior segments consists of a stepwise process, during which accurate patient selection is key.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Berardi
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - D Aghayan
- Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Å A Fretland
- Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - H Elberm
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - F Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - A Spagnoli
- Department of Statistical Sciences, Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - R Montalti
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - W P Ceelen
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - L Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - M Abu Hilal
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - B Edwin
- Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - R I Troisi
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine, Ghent University, Belgium
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
22
|
Ferrero A, Lo Tesoriere R, Russolillo N. Ultrasound Liver Map Technique for Laparoscopic Liver Resections. World J Surg 2019; 43:2607-2611. [PMID: 31161357 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-019-05046-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is reported as a safe procedure with potential advantages over open surgery albeit with inherent limitations, such as loss of haptic perception and spatial orientation. Ultrasound is considered the best tool to identify anatomic landmarks and the transection plane during liver surgery. The aim of this study was to analyse the outcomes of LLR performed with a standardized US guidance technique. METHODS We have standardized a 4-step technique for ultrasound-guided LLR: (1) compose a 3-D mind map by studying relationships among lesions and surrounding anatomic structures, (2) sketch the map on the liver surface, (3) check, and (4) correct the transection plane in real time. RESULTS Between 01/2006 and 12/2016, 190 consecutive patients treated with US-guided LLR were analysed. The indications for LLR included malignant tumours in 148 patients (81.8%). The procedures were classified according to a difficulty scale. There were 18 major hepatectomies (9.9%), 80 anatomic bi- and monosegmentectomies (44.2%), and 101 non-anatomic resections (55.8%). Redo resection was performed in 17 patients (9.4%), and multiple liver resections were performed in 25 patients (24.7%). Median intraoperative blood loss was 100 ± 154 mL. Overall and major morbidity rates were 14.9% and 1.6%, respectively. Mortality was nil. CONCLUSIONS Ultrasound liver map technique enables planning and real-time guidance during laparoscopic liver resections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital "Umberto I", Largo Turati, 62, 10128, Turin, Italy.
| | - Roberto Lo Tesoriere
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital "Umberto I", Largo Turati, 62, 10128, Turin, Italy
| | - Nadia Russolillo
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital "Umberto I", Largo Turati, 62, 10128, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
23
|
Rashidian N, Willaert W, Giglio MC, Scuderi V, Tozzi F, Vanlander A, D’Herde K, Alseidi A, Troisi RI. Laparoscopic Liver Surgery Training Course on Thiel-Embalmed Human Cadavers: Program Evaluation, Trainer’s Long-Term Feedback and Steps Forward. World J Surg 2019; 43:2902-2908. [DOI: 10.1007/s00268-019-05103-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
|
|
24
|
Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Pure Laparoscopic Versus Hand-Assisted/Hybrid Major Hepatectomy at Two Western Centers. World J Surg 2019; 43:2025-2037. [PMID: 30953196 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-019-04998-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic major hepatectomy is expanding, but little data exist comparing surgical approaches. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that pure laparoscopic liver resection (PLAP) has advantages over hand-assisted (HALS) or hybrid (HYB) resection for major hemi-hepatectomy at two western centers. METHODS Using propensity score matching, 65 cases of HALS + HYB (18 hand-assisted and 47 hybrid) were matched to 65 cases of PLAP. Baseline characteristics were well matched for gender, age, ASA score, Childs A cirrhosis, right/left hepatectomy, malignancy, tumor size, and type between the groups. RESULTS The HALS + HYB group had 27 right and 38 left major hepatectomies (n = 65) versus 29 right and 36 left (n = 65) in the PLAP group (p = NS). The median number of lesions resected was 1 in each group, with median size 5.6 cm (HALS + HYB) versus 6.0 cm (PLAP), (p = NS). The HALS + HYB group had shorter OR time (240 versus 330 min, p < 0.01), and less blood loss (EBL 150 ml vs. 300 ml, p < 0.01) versus the PLAP group, respectively. Median length of stay (LOS) was 4 days with HALS + HYB versus 5 days in the PLAP group (p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in use of the Pringle maneuver, transfusion rate, ICU stay, post-op morbidity, liver-specific complications, or R0 resection. Pain regimen/usage in each group is provided. There were no 30/90-day deaths in either group. CONCLUSION This is the first reported series of propensity score matching of HALS + HYB versus PLAP for major hepatectomy. The HALS + HYB group had non-inferior OR time, blood loss, and LOS versus the PLAP group, while the other perioperative parameters were comparable. We conclude that minimally invasive liver resection with either PLAP or HALS + HYB technique yields excellent results.
Collapse
|
|
25
|
Yin X, Luo D, Huang Y, Huang M. Advantages of laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e15929. [PMID: 31169712 PMCID: PMC6571277 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000015929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2018] [Revised: 05/04/2019] [Accepted: 05/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy (LLH) has been widely accepted as a minimally invasive alternative to open liver surgery. We assessed the benefits and drawbacks of LLH compared with open left hemihepatectomy (OLH) using meta-analysis. METHODS Relevant literature was retrieved using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Ovid Medline databases. Multiple parameters of efficacy and safety were compared between the treatment groups. Results are expressed as odds ratio (OD) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for fixed- and random-effects models. RESULTS The meta-analysis included 13 trials involving 1163 patients. Compared with OLH, LLH significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss (MD, -91.01; 95% CI, -139.12 to -42.89; P = .0002), transfusion requirement (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.11-0.54; P = .0004), time to oral intake (MD, -0.80; 95% CI, -1.27 to -0.33; P = .0008), and hospital stay (MD, -3.94; 95% CI, -4.85 to -3.03; P < .0001). However, operative time; complications rate; and postoperative alanine transferase, albumin, and total bilirubin levels did not differ significantly between the 2 surgical groups (P > .05). For hepatolithiasis treatment, there were no significant differences in operative time, residual stones, stone recurrence, and complications rate between the groups (P > .05), but LLH resulted in lower incisional infection rate (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22-0.89; P = .02) than OLH. The LLH group demonstrated higher bile leakage rate (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.14-2.81; P = .01) and incurred greater hospital costs (MD, 618.56; 95% CI, 154.47-1082.64; P = .009). CONCLUSIONS LLH has multiple advantages over OLH and should thus be considered as the first choice for left hemihepatectomy.
Collapse
|
|
26
|
Aldrighetti L, Cipriani F, Fiorentini G, Catena M, Paganelli M, Ratti F. A stepwise learning curve to define the standard for technical improvement in laparoscopic liver resections: complexity-based analysis in 1032 procedures. Updates Surg 2019; 71:273-283. [PMID: 31119579 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-019-00658-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2019] [Accepted: 04/29/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The objective of this study is to define the learning curve in a series of procedures grouped according to their complexity calculated by difficulty index to define a standard for technical improvement. 1032 laparoscopic liver resections performed in a single tertiary referral center were stratified by difficulty scores: low difficulty (LD, n = 362); intermediate difficulty (ID, n = 332), and high difficulty (HD, n = 338). The learning curve effect was analyzed using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method taking into consideration the expected risk of conversion. The ratio of laparoscopic/total liver resections increased from 5.8% (2005) to 71.1% (2018). The CUSUM analysis per group showed that the average value of the conversion rate was reached at the 60th case in the LD Group and at the 15th in the ID and HD groups. The evolution from LD to ID and HD procedures occurred only when learning curve in LD resections was concluded. Reflecting different degree of complexity, procedures showed significantly different blood loss, morbidity, and conversions among groups. A standard educational model-stepwise and progressive-is mandatory to allow surgeons to define the technical and technological backgrounds to deal with a specific degree of difficulty, providing a help in the definition of indications to laparoscopic approach in each phase of training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Guido Fiorentini
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Catena
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Paganelli
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
27
|
Ferrero A, Russolillo N, Langella S, Forchino F, Stasi M, Fazio F, Lo Tesoriere R. Ultrasound liver map technique for laparoscopic liver resections: perioperative outcomes are not impaired by technical complexity. Updates Surg 2019; 71:49-56. [PMID: 30919242 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-019-00646-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2019] [Accepted: 03/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Intraoperative liver ultrasound has a crucial role to guide open liver surgery. A 4-step ultrasound liver map technique for laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been standardized in our center. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of our technique according to the hepatectomy technical complexity. A difficulty scale (DS) ranging from 1 to 10 was applied to each LLR. A cumulative sum control-chart analysis identified 3 periods of gradually increasing DS. Perioperative outcomes of the 3 periods were compared. 300 LLRs performed between 2006 and 2018 were analyzed. Median DS was 3 for first 100 cases (P1), 5 for cases 101-200 (P2) and 6 for cases 201-300 (P3). A significantly greater percentage of postero-superior segments resections (P1 11%, P2 36%, P3 46%, p < 0.001) were performed in P3. P3 LLRs had a significantly longer transection time (p < 0.001) and wider cut surface area (p < 0.001), but median blood losses were similar among the 3 periods (P1 100 cc, P2 100 cc, P3 140 cc). There were no differences among periods in overall morbidity (P1 12%, P2 17%, P3 17%), major morbidity (P1 1%, P2 2%, P3 3%) and length of hospital stay (5 days in all the three groups). Despite the increasing surgical complexity of LLR, ultrasound liver map technique allows good perioperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, "Umberto I" Largo Turati, 62, 10128, Turin, Italy.
| | - Nadia Russolillo
- Department of General and Oncological surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, "Umberto I" Largo Turati, 62, 10128, Turin, Italy
| | - Serena Langella
- Department of General and Oncological surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, "Umberto I" Largo Turati, 62, 10128, Turin, Italy
| | - Fabio Forchino
- Department of General and Oncological surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, "Umberto I" Largo Turati, 62, 10128, Turin, Italy
| | - Matteo Stasi
- Department of General and Oncological surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, "Umberto I" Largo Turati, 62, 10128, Turin, Italy
| | - Federico Fazio
- Department of General and Oncological surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, "Umberto I" Largo Turati, 62, 10128, Turin, Italy
| | - Roberto Lo Tesoriere
- Department of General and Oncological surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, "Umberto I" Largo Turati, 62, 10128, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
28
|
Berardi G, Igarashi K, Wakabayashi G. Laparoscopic liver resection-education and training. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 4:11. [PMID: 30976714 PMCID: PMC6414331 DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2019.01.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Accepted: 01/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Giammauro Berardi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of HBP Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Structure and Recovery of Man, Gent University Hospital, Belgium
| | - Kazuharu Igarashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of HBP Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of HBP Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
29
|
Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Lesions Located on Posterosuperior Segments: A Meta-Analysis of Short-term Outcomes. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2018; 28:203-208. [PMID: 30074976 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) are currently acknowledged as safe and efficient procedures. LLR in posterosuperior (PS) segments are considered highly challenging procedures. The aim of our meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of LLR versus open liver resection on short-term outcomes for PS segment lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic search of Medline, Scopus, Google Scholar, Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials and Clinicaltrials.gov databases for articles was performed. RESULTS Five studies involving 531 patients who underwent resection for PS liver segments lesions were included. LLR were associated with reduced blood loss and overall complications. Operative time, blood transfusion, R0 resection, resection margin, hospital stay, and mortality were not found different among the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS Notwithstanding their highly demanding nature, LLR in PS segments are safe and efficient procedures in the hands of experienced surgeons. Further studies are mandatory to evaluate their effect in these challenging liver resections.
Collapse
|
|
30
|
Response: The OSLO-COMET Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastases. Ann Surg 2018; 268:e69-e70. [DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
|
31
|
Goh BKP, Lee SY, Teo JY, Kam JH, Jeyaraj PR, Cheow PC, Chow PKH, Ooi LLPJ, Chung AYF, Chan CY. Changing trends and outcomes associated with the adoption of minimally invasive hepatectomy: a contemporary single-institution experience with 400 consecutive resections. Surg Endosc 2018; 32:4658-4665. [PMID: 29967997 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6310-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2018] [Accepted: 06/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several studies published mainly from pioneers and early adopters have documented the evolution of minimally invasive hepatectomy (MIH). However, questions remain if these reported experiences are applicable and reproducible today. This study examines the changing trends, safety, and outcomes associated with the adoption of MIH based on a contemporary single-institution experience. METHODS This is a retrospective review of 400 consecutive patients who underwent MIH between 2006 and 2017 of which 360 cases (90%) were performed since 2012. To determine the evolution of MIH, the study population was stratified into four equal groups of 100 patients. Analyses were also performed of predictive factors and outcomes of open conversion. RESULTS Four hundred patients underwent MIH of which 379 (94.8%) were totally laparoscopic/robotic. Eighty-eight (22.0%) patients underwent major hepatectomy and 160 (40.0%) had resection of tumors located in the posterosuperior segments. There were 38 (9.5%) open conversions. Comparison across the four groups demonstrated that patients were older, had higher ASA score, and had increased frequency of previous abdominal surgery and repeat liver resections. There was also an increase in the proportion of patients who underwent totally laparoscopic/robotic surgery, major liver resection, resection of ≥ 3 segments, and multiple resections. Comparison of outcomes demonstrated that there was a significant decrease in open conversion rate, longer operation time, and increased use of Pringles maneuver. The presence of cirrhosis and institution experience (1st 100 cases) were independent predictors of open conversion. Patients who required open conversion had significantly increased operation time, blood loss, blood transfusion rate, morbidity, and mortality. CONCLUSION The case volume of MIH performed increased rapidly at our institution over time. Although the indications of MIH expanded to include higher risk patients and more complex hepatectomies, there was a decrease in open conversion rate and no change in other perioperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Ser-Yee Lee
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jin-Yao Teo
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Juinn-Huar Kam
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Prema-Raj Jeyaraj
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Peng-Chung Cheow
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Pierce K H Chow
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - London L P J Ooi
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Alexander Y F Chung
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chung-Yip Chan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
|
32
|
Tozzi F, Berardi G, Vierstraete M, Kasai M, de Carvalho LA, Vivarelli M, Montalti R, Troisi RI. Laparoscopic Versus Open Approach for Formal Right and Left Hepatectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis. World J Surg 2018; 42:2627-2634. [PMID: 29417245 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-018-4524-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic liver surgery is expanding worldwide, but further evidence is needed to assess safety and efficacy of laparoscopic major hepatectomy. The study analyzes perioperative outcomes of pure laparoscopic versus open major hepatectomies matched by the propensity score method. METHODS From 2005 to 2017, 268 major hepatectomies were performed of which 73 were laparoscopic. After a 1:1 propensity score matching, 59 laparoscopic right and left hepatectomies were compared to 59 open. The matching was based on age, gender, year of procedure, BMI, ASA score, underlying liver disease, previous abdominal surgery, type of hepatectomy, preoperative chemotherapy, number, dimension and nature of lesions. An intention-to-treat analysis and a per-protocol analysis were carried out. RESULTS Mean surgical time was 315 min in the laparoscopic group and 292.5 min in the open group (p = 0.039); conversion rate in laparoscopy was 20.3%; blood loss was 480 ml (50-3000) versus 550 ml (50-2600), respectively, for laparoscopic and open (p = 0.577). Lengths of postoperative analgesia and hospital stay were shorter in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.0001 and 0.024, respectively). Postoperative complications occurred in 11.9% of laparoscopic cases and in 25.4% of open cases (p = 0.098). Median Comprehensive Complication Index was 26.2 (8.7-54.2) in the open group versus 20.9 (8.7-66.2) in open (p = 0.368). Per-protocol analysis showed a better trend in favor of laparoscopy concerning surgical time. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic major hepatectomies are safe and feasible procedures allowing a similar complication rate with a shorter hospital stay and diminished postoperative pain with respect to the standard approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Tozzi
- Department of General, Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, De Pintelaan 185, 2K12 IC, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Giammauro Berardi
- Department of General, Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, De Pintelaan 185, 2K12 IC, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Maaike Vierstraete
- Department of General, Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, De Pintelaan 185, 2K12 IC, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Meidai Kasai
- Department of General, Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, De Pintelaan 185, 2K12 IC, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
- Abdominal Surgery Aso Iizuka Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Luis Abreu de Carvalho
- Department of General, Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, De Pintelaan 185, 2K12 IC, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Roberto Montalti
- Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Roberto Ivan Troisi
- Department of General, Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, De Pintelaan 185, 2K12 IC, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
|
33
|
Jia C, Li H, Wen N, Chen J, Wei Y, Li B. Laparoscopic liver resection: a review of current indications and surgical techniques. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2018; 7:277-288. [PMID: 30221155 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2018.03.01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been the most impressive development in the field of liver surgery in recent two decades. Technical innovations and experience accumulation have made LLR a safe and effective procedure with faster postoperative recovery. Despite the fast spreading of the procedure, details regarding the indications, oncological outcomes and technical essentials were still disputable. To address these issues, two international consensus conferences were hold to update the knowledge in this field. The statements of the both conferences were not conclusive and more high-quality researches are required. In this article, we reviewed the development and the current state of LLR. Indications, outcomes, surgical techniques and devices used in LLR were also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenyang Jia
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Hongyu Li
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Ningyuan Wen
- College of Clinical Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
| | - Junhua Chen
- Department of General surgery, Chengdu First People's Hospital, Chengdu 610200, China
| | - Yonggang Wei
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Bo Li
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| |
Collapse
|
|
34
|
Saito Y, Yamada S, Imura S, Morine Y, Ikemoto T, Iwahashi S, Shimada M. A learning curve for laparoscopic liver resection: an effective training system and standardization of technique. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 3:45. [PMID: 30148230 DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2018.07.03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2018] [Accepted: 07/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence of laparoscopic liver resection (LHx) has been increased in the past decade. There have been some reports about some advantages of LHx, in both short and long-term outcomes after operation. The use of a minor LHx was regarded as a standard surgical practice, and some peri-operative complications hindered worldwide increase of LHx in the Second International Consensus Conference on LHx at Morioka. However, no suggestions were described in terms with how to provide the best teaching and training necessary to shorten the learning curve for inexperienced surgeons using a new surgical technique while continuing to maintain a low rate of morbidity from the very beginning. This study includes a literature review of published research which looked at a learning curve for LHx. As well, it proposes a new step-wise training method for inexperienced surgeons and standardization of a technique for LHx focusing especially on laparoscopic left hepatectomy (LLHx).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Saito
- Department of Surgery, Tokushima University, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Yamada
- Department of Surgery, Tokushima University, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Satoru Imura
- Department of Surgery, Tokushima University, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Yuji Morine
- Department of Surgery, Tokushima University, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Ikemoto
- Department of Surgery, Tokushima University, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Shuichi Iwahashi
- Department of Surgery, Tokushima University, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Mitsuo Shimada
- Department of Surgery, Tokushima University, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
35
|
[Technical aspects of laparoscopic liver surgery : Transfer from open to laparoscopic liver surgery]. Chirurg 2018; 89:984-992. [PMID: 29971460 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-018-0684-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic surgery has become the standard for most visceral surgery procedures in many hospitals. Now, liver resections are also being increasingly carried out laparoscopically. The advantages of the laparoscopic technique have been demonstrated in numerous case series and in a recent randomized controlled trial. AIMS The aim of this review article is to present the available techniques for laparoscopic liver surgery (LLS). METHODS The technical variations reported in the literature as well as the own experience with LLS are reported. RESULTS Optimal patient and trocar positions are crucial for successful LLS and they are chosen according to the planned type of liver surgery: the literature offers several options in particular for surgery of the cranial and dorsal liver segments. As for open liver surgery, a restrictive volume management and the application of the Pringle maneuver are helpful to reduce intraoperative blood loss in LLS. In addition, several dissection techniques have been adopted from open liver surgery. The Cavitron Ultrasound Surgical Aspirator (CUSA™) is particularly suitable for parenchymal dissection close to major vascular structures, since it guarantees a meticulous parenchymal dissection with minimal vascular injuries. CONCLUSION The developments of minimally invasive surgery nowadays allow complex liver resections, which can mostly be performed comparable to open liver surgery. Hopefully, minimally invasive liver surgery will further develop in Germany in the near future, since it offers several advantages over open liver surgery.
Collapse
|
|
36
|
Goh BKP, Teo JY, Lee SY, Kam JH, Cheow PC, Jeyaraj P, Chow PKH, Ooi LLPJ, Chung AYF, Chan CY. Critical appraisal of the impact of individual surgeon experience on the outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection in the modern era: collective experience of multiple surgeons at a single institution with 324 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 2018; 32:1802-1811. [PMID: 28916894 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5864-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2017] [Accepted: 08/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most studies analyzing the learning experience of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) focused on the experience of one or two expert pioneering surgeons. This study aims to critically analyze the impact of individual surgeon experience on the outcomes of LLR based on the contemporary collective experiences of multiple surgeons at single institution. METHODS Retrospective review of 324 consecutive LLR from 2006 to 2016. The cases were performed by 10 surgeons over various time periods. Four surgeons had individual experience with <20 cases, four surgeons with 20-30 cases, and two surgeons with >90 cases. The cohort was divided into two groups: comparing a surgeon's experience between the first 20, 30, 40, and 50 cases with patients treated thereafter. Similarly, we performed subset analyses for anterolateral lesions, posterosuperior lesions, and major hepatectomies. RESULTS As individual surgeons gained increasing experience, this was significantly associated with older patients being operated, decreased hand-assistance, larger tumor size, increased liver resections, increased major resections, and increased resections of tumors located at the posterosuperior segments. This resulted in significantly longer operation time and increased use of Pringle maneuver but no difference in other outcomes. Analysis of LLR for tumors in the posterosuperior segments demonstrated that there was a significant decrease in conversion rates after a surgeon had experience with 20 LLR. For major hepatectomies, there was a significant decrease in morbidity, mortality, and length of stay after acquiring experience with 20 LLR. CONCLUSION LLR can be safely adopted today especially for lesions in the anterolateral segments. LLR for lesions in the difficult posterosuperior segments and major hepatectomies especially in cirrhosis should only be attempted by surgeons who have acquired a minimum experience with 20 LLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
- Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Jin-Yao Teo
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ser-Yee Lee
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Juinn-Huar Kam
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Peng-Chung Cheow
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Premaraj Jeyaraj
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Pierce K H Chow
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - London L P J Ooi
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Alexander Y F Chung
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chung-Yip Chan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
|
37
|
Li J, Ren H, Du G, Jin B. A systematic surgical procedure: The '7+3' approach to laparoscopic right partial hepatectomy [deep segment (S) VI, S VII or S VIII] in 52 patients with liver tumors. Oncol Lett 2018; 15:7846-7854. [PMID: 29849801 PMCID: PMC5962865 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.8345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2017] [Accepted: 02/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic right partial hepatectomy (LRPH), located in the deep segment (S) VI, S VII or S VIII, is a complicated procedure, due to its poor operative field and high risk of bleeding. The present study aimed to summarize our experience of LRPH and to share our systematic surgical procedure, the ‘7+3’ approach. This approach includes seven key points and three main instruments. A total of 81 cases were included, which were divided into 2 groups [LRPH, n=52; open hepatectomy (OH), n=29]. The demographic profile, intraoperative parameters and postoperative parameters were obtained and analyzed. Blood loss (245.38±268.37 ml) in the LRPH group was not significantly more than in the OH group (230.93±257.62 ml; P=0.936). The durations of surgery, liver parenchyma transection and portal triad clamping were also not significantly more than those in the OH group (145.52±48.29 vs. 129.83±35.04 min; P=0.149 for surgery; 28.52±10.16 vs. 23.97±10.44 min; P=0.059 for liver parenchyma transection; 20.62±9.61 vs. 17.31±10.12 min; P=0.149 for portal triad clamping). However, the number of postoperative hospital days in the LRPH group was smaller (10.67 in LRPH vs. 12.07 in OH; P=0.025). The present study demonstrated the satisfactory surgical outcomes and economic benefits of the systematic ‘7+3’ surgical technique for LRPH. Further studies in larger cohorts and other centers are required to confirm its feasibility and superiority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Li
- Department of Liver Transplantation Surgery, 302 Military Hospital of China, Beijing 100039, P.R. China
| | - Hui Ren
- Department of Liver Transplantation Surgery, 302 Military Hospital of China, Beijing 100039, P.R. China
| | - Gang Du
- Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, P.R. China
| | - Bin Jin
- Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
|
38
|
Efanov MG, Alikhanov RB, Tsvirkun VV, Prostov MY, Kazakov IV, Vankovich AN, Kim PP, Grendal KD. [Early outcomes of robot-assisted liver resection]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2018:24-30. [PMID: 30531749 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia201811124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
AIM To assess an experience of robot-assisted liver resection using CUSUM-test. MATERIAL AND METHODS The results of 46 robot-assisted liver resections were retrospectively analyzed by using of CUSUM-test. RESULTS There were 3 periods in development of the technology. The 1st period - procedures with the lowest index of difficulty (n=16), the 2nd period - expansion of the indications for difficult resections (n=18) and the 3rd period - stabilization of the results (n=12). The dynamics of difficulty index, intraoperative blood loss, duration of procedure and morbidity (Clavien-Dindo Grade II-V) were evaluated. Five liver resections were needed to decrease blood loss and duration of the procedure. Expansion of indications was feasible after 16 procedures. Stable results were obtained after 34 liver resections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M G Efanov
- A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - R B Alikhanov
- A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - V V Tsvirkun
- A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - M Yu Prostov
- A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - I V Kazakov
- A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - A N Vankovich
- A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - P P Kim
- A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - K D Grendal
- A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
|
39
|
Ziogas IA, Tsoulfas G. Advances and challenges in laparoscopic surgery in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Surg 2017; 9:233-245. [PMID: 29359029 PMCID: PMC5752958 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i12.233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2017] [Revised: 11/04/2017] [Accepted: 12/05/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma is the fifth most common malignancy and the third most common cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. From the wide variety of treatment options, surgical resection and liver transplantation are the only therapeutic ones. However, due to shortage of liver grafts, surgical resection is the most common therapeutic modality implemented. Owing to rapid technological development, minimally invasive approaches have been incorporated in liver surgery. Liver laparoscopic resection has been evaluated in comparison to the open technique and has been shown to be superior because of the reported decrease in surgical incision length and trauma, blood loss, operating theatre time, postsurgical pain and complications, R0 resection, length of stay, time to recovery and oral intake. It has been reported that laparoscopic excision is a safe and feasible approach with near zero mortality and oncologic outcomes similar to open resection. Nevertheless, current indications include solid tumors in the periphery < 5 cm, especially in segments II through VI, while according to the consensus laparoscopic major hepatectomy should only be performed by surgeons with high expertise in laparoscopic and hepatobiliary surgery in tertiary centers. It is necessary for a surgeon to surpass the 60-cases learning curve observed in order to accomplish the desirable outcomes and preserve patient safety. In this review, our aim is to thoroughly describe the general principles and current status of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma, as well as future prospects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis A Ziogas
- Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54453, Greece
| | - Georgios Tsoulfas
- Associate Professor of Surgery, 1st Department of Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54453, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
|
40
|
Xu H, Liu F, Li H, Wei Y, Li B. Outcomes following laparoscopic versus open major hepatectomy: a meta-analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2017; 52:1307-1314. [PMID: 28880729 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2017.1373846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The role of laparoscopic major hepatectomy (LMH) remains uncertain in current liver surgery. This meta-analysis aimed to compare surgical and oncological outcomes of LMH versus open major hepatectomy (OMH). METHODS A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library database to identify all relevant publications. The statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager version 5.3. Continuous variables were calculated by standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI), whereas dichotomous variables were calculated by odds ratio (OR) with 95%CI. RESULTS A total of 10 eligible studies with 1130 patients were identified, of which 455 (40.3%) patients in the LMH group and 675 (59.7%) patients in the OMH group. LMH was associated with less blood loss (SMD = -0.30, 95%CI: -0.43 to -0.18, p < .00001), less transfusion requirement (OR = 0.49, 95%CI: 0.29-0.82, p = .007), decreased postoperative morbidity (OR = 0.56, 95%CI: 0.42-0.76, p = .0001), and shorter hospital stay (SMD = -0.46, 95%CI: -0.69 to -0.24, p < .0001) when compared with the OMH group. But the operative time was significantly longer in LMH group (SMD = 0.61, 95%CI: 0.79-1.86, p = .01). Both the two groups achieved similar surgical margin and R0 resection rate for malignant lesions. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis demonstrated that LMH appeared to be feasible and safe in current liver surgery. LMH is associated with less blood loss, decreased postoperative morbidity, shorter hospital stay, and comparable oncological outcomes compared with OMH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongwei Xu
- a Department of Liver Surgery , Center of Liver Transplantation , Chengdu , Sichuan Province , China
| | - Fei Liu
- a Department of Liver Surgery , Center of Liver Transplantation , Chengdu , Sichuan Province , China
| | - Hongyu Li
- b Department of Pancreatic Surgery , West China Hospital of Sichuan University , Chengdu , Sichuan Province , China
| | - Yonggang Wei
- a Department of Liver Surgery , Center of Liver Transplantation , Chengdu , Sichuan Province , China
| | - Bo Li
- a Department of Liver Surgery , Center of Liver Transplantation , Chengdu , Sichuan Province , China
| |
Collapse
|
|
41
|
Berardi G, Van Cleven S, Fretland ÅA, Barkhatov L, Halls M, Cipriani F, Aldrighetti L, Abu Hilal M, Edwin B, Troisi RI. Evolution of Laparoscopic Liver Surgery from Innovation to Implementation to Mastery: Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes of 2,238 Patients from 4 European Specialized Centers. J Am Coll Surg 2017; 225:639-649. [PMID: 28838869 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2017] [Revised: 08/07/2017] [Accepted: 08/07/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND First seen as an innovation for select patients, laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has evolved since its introduction, resulting in worldwide use. Despite this, it is still limited mainly to referral centers. The aim of this study was to evaluate a large cohort undergoing LLR from 2000 to 2015, focusing on the technical approaches, perioperative and oncologic outcomes, and evolution of practice over time. STUDY DESIGN The demographics and indications, intraoperative, perioperative, and oncologic outcomes of 2,238 patients were evaluated. Trends in practice and outcomes over time were assessed. RESULTS The percentage of LLR performed yearly has increased from 5% in 2000 to 43% in 2015. Pure laparoscopy was used in 98.3% of cases. Wedge resections were the most common operation; they were predominant at the beginning of LLR and then decreased and remained steady at approximately 53%. Major hepatectomies were initially uncommon, then increased and reached a stable level at approximately 16%. Overall, 410 patients underwent resection in the posterosuperior segments; these were more frequent with time, and the highest percentage was in 2015 (26%). Blood loss, operative time, and conversion rate improved significantly with time. The 5-year overall survival rates were 73% and 54% for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), respectively. The 5-year, recurrence-free survival rates were 50% and 37% for HCC and CRLM, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Since laparoscopy was introduced, a long implementation process has been necessary to allow for standardization and improvement in surgical care, mastery of the technique, and the ability to obtain good perioperative results with safe oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giammauro Berardi
- Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liver Transplantation Service, Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Stijn Van Cleven
- Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liver Transplantation Service, Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Åsmund Avdem Fretland
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Leonid Barkhatov
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mark Halls
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liver Transplantation Service, Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
|
42
|
Scuderi V, Barkhatov L, Montalti R, Ratti F, Cipriani F, Pardo F, Tranchart H, Dagher I, Rotellar F, Abu Hilal M, Edwin B, Vivarelli M, Aldrighetti L, Troisi RI. Outcome after laparoscopic and open resections of posterosuperior segments of the liver. Br J Surg 2017; 104:751-759. [PMID: 28194774 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2016] [Revised: 09/02/2016] [Accepted: 12/14/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic resection of posterosuperior (PS) segments of the liver is hindered by limited visualization and curvilinear resection planes. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes after open and laparoscopic liver resections of PS segments. METHODS Patients who underwent minor open liver resection (OLR) and laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) between 2006 and 2014 were identified from the institutional databases of seven tertiary referral European hepatobiliary surgical units. Propensity score-matched analysis was used to match groups for known confounders. Perioperative outcomes including complications were assessed using the Dindo-Clavien classification, and the comprehensive complication index was calculated. Survival was analysed with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Some 170 patients underwent OLR and 148 had LLR. After propensity score-matched analysis, 86 patients remained in both groups. Overall postoperative complication rates were significantly higher after OLR compared with LLR: 28 versus 14 per cent respectively (P = 0·039). The mean(s.d.) comprehensive complication index was higher in the OLR group, although the difference was not statistically significant (26·7(16·6) versus 18·3(8·0) in the LLR group; P = 0·108). The mean(s.d.) duration of required analgesia and the median (range) duration of postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the LLR group: 3·0(1·1) days versus 1·6(0·8) days in the OLR group (P < 0·001), and 6 (3-44) versus 4 (1-11) days (P < 0·001), respectively. The 3-year recurrence-free survival rates for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (37 per cent for OLR versus 30 per cent for LLR; P = 0·534) and those with colorectal liver metastases (36 versus 36 per cent respectively; P = 0·440) were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSION LLR of tumours in PS segments is feasible in selected patients. LLR is associated with fewer complications and does not compromise survival compared with OLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Scuderi
- Department of General, Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, Ghent, Belgium
| | - L Barkhatov
- The Intervention Centre, Department of Hepatic, Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo University, Oslo, Norway
| | - R Montalti
- Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - F Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - F Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - F Pardo
- Hepatic, Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, General and Digestive Surgery, University Clinic of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - H Tranchart
- Department of Digestive Minimally Invasive Surgery, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Paris-Saclay University, Clamart, France
| | - I Dagher
- Department of Digestive Minimally Invasive Surgery, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Paris-Saclay University, Clamart, France
| | - F Rotellar
- Hepatic, Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, General and Digestive Surgery, University Clinic of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - M Abu Hilal
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - B Edwin
- The Intervention Centre, Department of Hepatic, Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo University, Oslo, Norway
| | - M Vivarelli
- Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - L Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - R I Troisi
- Department of General, Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|