Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is the standard treatment for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC). However, the optimal duration of oral AC remains poorly defined.

This study examined newly diagnosed patients between April 2017 and December 2020. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Restricted cubic splines (RCS) and Kaplan-Meier method were used to evaluate the relationship between AC maintenance and survival. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to control for confounding factors.

The RCS demonstrated an L-shaped association between oral AC maintenance and OS. The risk of mortality was relatively flat after 12 months. Patients with oral AC duration >186 days (defined by RCS) had a significantly better OS (HR 0.23 [95% CI 0.10-0.55], log-rank p < 0.001), with a higher 3-year OS rate (98.7% [95% CI 96.8-100.0] vs 88.3% [95% CI 82.5-94.5]). For patients with pretreatment Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA level >4000 copies/mL, mortality risk decreased to 1 at 194 days of AC duration.

The optimal duration of oral AC after CCRT was >186 days (6 months) for LA-NPC. And the maintenance beyond 12 months may not bring additional benefits.

This study aims to assess the therapeutic efficacy and safety of nivolumab combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic gastric cancer, specifically comparing the outcomes of oxaliplatin-based versus albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel)-based therapies.

We retrospectively analyzed 93 patients with advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma treated at the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital from September 2017 to November 2022. Patients were categorized into the nivolumab + oxaliplatin (N-OX group) or nivolumab + nab-paclitaxel (N-AP group) based on the chemotherapy regimen. Progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety were evaluated as endpoints.

At the end of the follow-up period on September 31, 2023, we reported an ORR of 65.6% and DCR of 95.7% across all patients. The median PFS was 8.4 months, with no significant difference between the N-OX and N-AP groups (median, 7.8 vs 9.5 months; P = 0.450). Notably, patients with diffuse gastric cancer in N-AP group showed a 44.7% reduction in tumor progression risk compared with the N-OX group (P = 0.046). The overall safety profile was acceptable in two groups.

Our study suggested that nivolumab combined with chemotherapy was effective and safe as a first-line intervention for advanced gastric cancer. While both oxaliplatin and nab-paclitaxel regimens showed similar efficacy, the nab-paclitaxel may offer additional benefits for patients with diffuse gastric cancer. Further research is encouraged to confirm these findings and refine treatment strategies.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has been approved for the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive gastric cancer and other indications in several countries and is considered moderately or highly emetogenic. The management of nausea and vomiting associated with T-DXd treatment has not been fully evaluated and the effectiveness of conventional prophylaxis remains unknown.

This open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase 2 study aimed to investigate the optimal antiemetic therapy for Japanese patients with gastric cancer undergoing T-DXd treatment. Patients were randomized to a doublet regimen group (dexamethasone and palonosetron) or triplet regimen group (aprepitant, dexamethasone, and palonosetron) at a ratio of one to one, stratified by sex, gastrectomy status, and study institution. Both antiemetic treatments were administered from day 1 before T-DXd administration, and emetic events and nausea were observed for 21 days. The primary endpoint was the antiemetic complete response (CR) rate to assess control for emetic events based on voluntary patient-reported outcomes (PROs) during cycle 1 (1-21 days).

Of the 60 enrolled patients, 58 were eligible for inclusion in this analysis (29 patients in each regimen group). The overall CR rates for the doublet and triplet regimens were 41.4% (12/29 patients) and 37.9% (11/29 patients), respectively, and neither regimen met the pre-specified threshold (> 18/29 patients). The CR rate in the acute phase (0-24 h) was 86.2% (25/29 patients) for both regimens, and the CR rates in the delayed phase (2-21 days) were 41.4% (12/29 patients) and 37.9% (11/29 patients) for the doublet and triplet regimens, respectively.

Given that the primary endpoint was not met, further research is needed to better characterize nausea and vomiting with T-DXd to tailor an anti-emetic regimen that suits the needs of the patients.

The treatment of gastric cancer remains highly challenging, particularly in cases of unresectable locally advanced or metastatic disease. Although chemotherapy and immunotherapy have shown some efficacy in such patients, significant limitations persist in extending survival and enhancing safety. To address these challenges, we designed an innovative first-line quadruple conversion therapy regimen that integrates a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor with chemotherapy, and we successfully implemented this therapy regimen in the treatment of a patient with unresectable locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.

We report the case of a 55-year-old male who was diagnosed with unresectable locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma and presented with intermittent epigastric pain and multiple lymph node metastases in the abdominal cavity, with the metastasis being notably large in size. The tumor tissue was negative for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 by immunohistochemistry. Considering the patient's status, the multidisciplinary team decided to administer sintilimab in combination with albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel), S-1, and oxaliplatin as a quadruple drug conversion therapy. After 4 cycles of conversion therapy, the patient's epigastric pain was significantly alleviated, his stool color normalized, the volume of the primary tumor and lymph node metastases was markedly reduced, and the tumor marker levels decreased to within the normal range. The patient subsequently underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy with abdominal lymph node dissection, and postoperative pathological biopsy revealed a pathological complete response and R0 resection, after which the patient recovered to an excellent physical status.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of unresectable locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma successfully treated with quadruple therapy with a PD-1 inhibitor and chemotherapy as a first-line conversion regimen. This first-line conversion therapy with the quadruple regimen may be effective and safe for unresectable locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) represents a heterogeneous disease spectrum associated with an unfavorable prognosis. A combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy has become a new standard strategy for advanced BTC. However, understanding the association between genomic alterations and outcomes of immunotherapy in BTC is crucial for further improving clinical benefits.

Patients with metastatic BTC were included in this study retrospectively, who received PD-1/PD-L1 (ICI) antibodies combined with chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Additionally, we conducted exploratory analysis of genomic alterations and biomarkers.

Ninety-one patients were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into two groups: albumin paclitaxel + S1 (AS) + PD-1 (n = 56) group and GC + ICI (n = 35) group. There were no significant differences in terms of PFS, ORR, and DCR between the two groups. Regarding biomarker analysis, 44 patients had positive PD-L1 expression, with a mPFS of 4.8 months and an ORR of 15.9%. Surprisingly, 29 patients had negative PD-L1 expression, with a mPFS of 9.9 months and an ORR of 27.6%. The average tumor mutational burden (TMB) was 4.5 mutations per megabase (mut/MB) for patients with microsatellite-stable (MSS) tumors. There was no significant difference in PFS between patients with TMB high and low (cutoff = 4.5 mut/MB). Genomic analysis revealed TP53 (n = 13, 43.3%), KRAS (n = 8, 26.7%), NTRK1/2/3 (n = 8, 26.7%), isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1/2 (n = 6, 20.0%), PIK3CA (n = 6, 20.0%), BRCA2 (n = 5, 16.7%), MDM2/4 (n = 5, 16.7%), and BRAF (n = 4, 13.3%) as the most common gene alterations. MDM2/4 mutations were associated with shorter survival (p < 0.05).

GC plus immunotherapy is still the standard of care for late stage BTC. PD-L1 expression and TMB were not good predictors for selecting patients who would benefit more from immunotherapy plus chemotherapy.

Locally advanced gastric cancer presents significant challenges in treatment, often limiting the effectiveness of surgical interventions. Chemotherapy, especially the SOX regimen (combining oxaliplatin and tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil), has been explored as a potential alternative in the management of advanced gastric cancer. While studies on SOX have been conducted in other regions, its impact on immune function and tumor markers remains inadequately evaluated, particularly in China.

This study aimed to assess the toxicological profile, immune function modulation, and tumor marker reduction of the SOX regimen in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 100 patients diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer, excluding eight ineligible cases. Based on clinical records, patients were grouped into either the oxaliplatin monotherapy group (reference group) or the SOX regimen group (observation group), with 50 patients in each group. The primary endpoint was clinical effectiveness, while secondary endpoints included immune function, tumor marker levels, and chemotherapy-related toxicity.

The SOX regimen demonstrated significantly higher disease control and objective remission rates compared to oxaliplatin monotherapy (P<0.05). In the SOX group, immune function was enhanced, with increased levels of immunoglobulins (IgA, IgG, IgM) and lymphocyte subsets (CD3+, CD4+, NK cells), and a decrease in CD8+ levels (P<0.05). Additionally, tumor markers such as CA125, CEA, MRP14, SDF-1, FSP-1, and CXCR4 showed a significant reduction (P<0.05). The SOX regimen also exhibited a more favorable safety profile, with lower incidences of chemotherapy-related nausea, vomiting, and leukopenia (P<0.05).

The SOX regimen is an effective and promising treatment option for advanced gastric cancer, offering significant improvements in clinical outcomes, immune function, and tumor marker reduction, with fewer chemotherapy-related toxicities. This study provides valuable insights into the application of the SOX regimen in Chinese patients with advanced gastric cancer.

The administration of second-line or subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in previously treated patients with advanced solid cancers has been clinically investigated. However, previous clinical trials lacked an appropriate primary endpoint for efficacy assessment. This systematic review aimed to explore the most optimal early efficacy endpoint for such trials.

Phase 2 or 3 clinical trials involving patients with advanced solid cancers with disease progression following standard first-line therapy receiving second-line or subsequent ICI administration, with adequate survival outcome data, were included from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases before February 2023. Quality assessment was conducted using the Cochrane tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for Cohort Studies for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized trials, respectively. Objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 3, 6, and 9 months were investigated as potential early efficacy endpoint candidates for 12-month overall survival (OS), with a strong correlation defined as Pearson's correlation coefficient r ≥ 0.8.

A total of 64 RCTs comprising 22,725 patients and 106 non-randomized prospective trials involving 10,608 participants were eligible for modeling and external validation, respectively. RCTs examined 15 different cancer types, predominantly non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (17, 28%), melanoma (9, 14%), and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (5, 8%). The median sample size of RCTs was 124 patients, and the median follow-up time was 3.2-57.7 months. The ORR (r = 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.54) and PFS (r = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.14-0.64) exhibited weak trial-level correlations with OS. Within ICI treatment arms, the r values of ORR and 3-, 6-, and 9-month PFS with 12-month OS were 0.61 (95% CI, 0.37-0.79), 0.78 (95% CI, 0.62-0.88), 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.90), and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.79-0.90), respectively. External validation of 6-month PFS indicated an acceptable discrepancy between actual and predicted 12-month OS.

In non-randomized phase 2 trials on second-line or subsequent ICI therapy in patients with advanced solid cancers, 6-month PFS could serve as an early efficacy endpoint. However, early efficacy endpoints are not recommended in RCTs to replace OS.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab in combination with trastuzumab and chemotherapy for HER2-positive advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC).

HER2-positive advanced GC/GEJC patients admitted to our department between January 2018 and October 2024 were included in this study. Patients who received sintilimab in combination with trastuzumab and chemotherapy were assigned to cohort A, while patients who received trastuzumab and chemotherapy alone were assigned to cohort B. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), while the secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), and safety.

A total of 103 patients were analyzed, with 46 in cohort A and 57 in cohort B. The ORR was 65.2% in cohort A compared to 40.4% in cohort B, while the DCR was 87.0% in cohort A and 70.2% in cohort B. The median follow-up duration was 14.0 months. Median PFS (mPFS) was 9.4 months (95% CI: 5.6-13.2) for cohort A and 7.4 months (95% CI: 6.1-8.7) for cohort B (p = 0.089). Median OS (mOS) was 16.4 months (95% CI: 11.5-21.3) in cohort A versus 14.2 months (95% CI: 11.2-17.2) in cohort B (p = 0.069). Adverse events were predominantly mild, and no treatment-related deaths occurred.

Sintilimab combined with trastuzumab and chemotherapy showed promising efficacy and acceptable safety in HER2-positive advanced GC/GEJC. However, no statistically significant improvement in survival outcomes was observed compared to trastuzumab and chemotherapy alone.

Immunotherapy is increasingly significant in treating metastatic gastric cancer. This prospective phase 2 study investigates the efficacy and safety of combining nivolumab with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic gastric cancer co-expressing FGFR2 and PD-L1.

Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, with previously untreated HER-2 negative, PD-L1 positive, and FGFR2 positive metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma. Patients received nivolumab (360 mg every 3 weeks) in combination with chemotherapy (CAPOX: capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1, every 3 weeks). Tumor assessments were conducted using RECIST v1.1 every 8 weeks for 48 weeks, then every 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Secondary endpoints included median PFS, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs).

From June 2022 to October 2023, 194 patients were assessed for eligibility, with 23 patients enrolled and treated. At a median follow-up of 17.3 months, the 1-year PFS rate was 30.4%, with a median PFS of 6.0 months (95% CI, 4.3-7.7). The median OS was 15.1 months (95% CI, 13.2-16.8). The ORR was 21.7%, with one complete response and four partial responses. Grade 3 or higher TRAEs were reported in 34.8% of patients, primarily associated with chemotherapy. No treatment-related deaths occurred.

While the primary endpoint of improved 1-year PFS rate was not met, the study offers valuable insights into the potential benefits of combining nivolumab with chemotherapy in FGFR2 and PD-L1 co-expressing metastatic gastric cancer. Future research should optimize patient selection, assess combined immunotherapy and targeted anti-FGFR2 therapy, and further investigate the role of subsequent treatments to maximize therapeutic benefits.

The occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) seemed to be associated with better outcomes in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients. However, research focusing on the impact of the single-organ irAE (uni-irAE) or multi-organ irAEs (multi-irAEs) on the AGC outcome is relatively limited. In this study, we investigated individually the impact of the different irAEs on AGC survival as well as the co-occurrence patterns of multi-irAEs.

The uni-irAE, multi-irAEs, and non-irAE were identified based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. ICI efficacy for the disease control rate (DCR) and the objective response rate (ORR) was assessed based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1. The association for the irAEs with progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model. We also performed pairwise correlation analysis to identify co-occurrence patterns of multi-organ irAEs.

A total of 288 patients including 175 non-irAE, 73 uni-irAE, and 40 multi-irAE patients were evaluated for their association with AGC outcome. The irAEs patients displayed higher DCR (78.8% vs. 67.4%, p=0.037) when compared with those of non-irAE patients, and both uni-irAE patients (82.2% vs. 67.4%, p=0.019) and multi-irAE patients (72.5% vs. 67.4%, p=0.534) showed higher DCR than that of non-irAE patients. The multivariate analyses revealed that multi-irAEs was an independent risk factor for PFS (hazard ratio [HR] of 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41~0.96, p=0.031) and OS (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.29~0.76, p=0.002), whereas the survival association for uni-irAE was not obtained. The analysis of the co-occurrence patterns for multi-irAEs revealed that the thyroid, adrenal gland, heart, skin, and lung irAEs exhibited a high risk of co-occurrence of multi-irAEs. The multivariate Cox regression analysis for organ-specific irAEs revealed that patients experiencing thyroid, adrenal gland, and skin irAEs had favorable survival outcomes compared with those without these irAEs.

Multi-irAEs and some organ-specific irAEs can be used as predictive indicators for ICI treatment efficacy in AGC patients. The thyroid, adrenal gland, heart, skin, and lung irAEs are often accompanied by multi-irAE occurrence.

Gastric adenocarcinoma is the fourth leading cause of global cancer mortality and leading infection-associated cancer. Gastric cancer has significant geographic variability, with a high incidence in East Asia and mountainous regions of Latin America. In the United States, gastric cancer represents a marked disparity with incidence rates that are two to three times higher in Hispanics compared to non-Hispanic Whites.

We conducted a national retrospective study of incident gastric cancer in El Salvador from to 2000 to 2014 to estimate the age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) by using a combination of pathology and endoscopy databases. A unique multisectorial coalition was formed between the Ministry of Health (MINSAL) and ES Gastroenterology Society (AGEDES), representing public hospitals (n = 5), governmental employee hospitals (ISSS, n = 5), and private facilities (n = 6), accounting for >95% of national endoscopy capacity. HER2 and EBV tumor status was ascertained in a representative sample during 2014 to 2016.

A total of 10,039 unique cases of gastric cancer were identified, 45.5% female, and mean age of 65. 21% and 9.4% were <55 and <45 years old, respectively. ASIRs (M, F) were 18.9 (95% CI, 14.4-20.7) and 12.2 per 100,000 persons (95% CI, 10.9-13.5), respectively, in the period 2010 to 2014 with all centers operational. Intestinal gastric cancer was 2.8 times more common than diffuse gastric cancer; 23.2% had partial or complete pyloric obstruction. The HER2 2+/3+ status was 16.7% and EBV-encoded RNA positivity was 10.2%.

A high incidence of gastric cancer was confirmed in El Salvador and nearly half of the patients were female.

The findings have implications for cancer control in the Central America LMICs and for US Latino populations. See related commentary by Riquelme and Abnet, p. 1550.

Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy is emerging as a promising regimen for patients with locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma. However, it remains unclear whether immunochemotherapy will bring more adverse events (AEs) leading to a delay or even cancellation of surgeries. We aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis of the toxicity profiles for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy among patients with G/GEJ adenocarcinoma.

Published trials up to January 2024 were identified on Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed. Single-group and controlled clinical trials with ICIs in combination with chemotherapy in patients with G/GEJ adenocarcinoma were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data including incidence rate of AEs. The primary outcomes included the proportion of patients with adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation, grade 3 or higher adverse events, and serious adverse events. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023492676).

Twenty studies were included for a total of 6692 patients. In patients receiving immunochemotherapy, 17% (95% confidence interval (CI), 11-23%) had adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation, 23% (95% CI, 19-27%) had serious adverse events, and 64% (95% CI, 58-70%) had grade 3 or higher adverse events. Compared with patients receiving chemotherapy alone, patients with immunochemotherapy were associated with higher rates of adverse events leading to discontinuation (RR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.32-1.60), serious adverse events (RR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.04-1.57), and grade 3 or higher adverse events (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.07-1.23).

In conclusion, the incidence of adverse events leading to discontinuation, serious adverse events, and grade 3 or higher adverse events were higher in patients receiving immunochemotherapy compared to those with chemotherapy.

*CoNivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, has shown promise in treating advanced unresectable gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Nivolumab, alone and in combination with chemotherapy, in this patient population.

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, using data from PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and CNKI up to June 3, 2024. Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 3729 patients were included. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while safety was assessed through adverse events (AEs) and grade ≥ 3 AEs. Effect sizes were measured using mean differences (MD) and relative risks (RR), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Nivolumab significantly extended OS (MD = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.48, 3.09) and PFS (MD = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.32, 1.06) compared to controls. Subgroup analysis showed that both Nivolumab monotherapy (OS: MD = 2.52, 95% CI: 0.81, 4.23; PFS: MD = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.22) and Nivolumab combined with chemotherapy (OS: MD = 2.06, 95% CI: 0.56, 3.57; PFS: MD = 1.53, 95% CI: 0.32, 1.06) improved OS and PFS. While the overall risk of AEs was not significantly increased, Nivolumab monotherapy significantly increased the risk of AEs (RR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.16, 1.87), whereas Nivolumab combined with chemotherapy did not (RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.09). Both treatments increased the risk of grade ≥ 3 AEs (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.12, 1.36).

Nivolumab, both alone and in combination with chemotherapy, improves OS and PFS in patients with advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. However, careful patient monitoring is necessary due to the increased risk of severe AEs, particularly with monotherapy.

Recent advances in tumor immunology and molecular drug development have ushered in a new era of cancer immunotherapy. Immunotherapy has shown promising results for several types of tumors, such as advanced melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, bladder cancers, and refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma. Similarly, efforts have been made to develop immunotherapies such as adoptive T-cell transplantation, peptide vaccines, and dendritic cell vaccines, specifically for gastrointestinal tumors. However, before the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors, immunotherapy did not work as well as expected. In this article, we review immunotherapy, focusing on cancer vaccines for gastrointestinal tumors, which generally target eliciting tumor-specific CD8 + cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). We also review various vaccine therapies and describe the relationship between vaccines and adjuvants. Finally, we discuss prospects for the combination of immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown encouraging treatment efficacy for upper gastrointestinal cancers (UGICs). However, durable clinical responses only existed in a minority of patients. We evaluated evidence predicting survival benefits to identify the optimal population followed by ICI-based therapy.

A comprehensive search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify clinical trials for UGICs with ICI-based therapy. The outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation System (GRADE).

Thirty-six studies comprising 12,440 patients were included for quantitative synthesis. Patients with PD-L1-positive (OR = 2.08, p < 0.00001), EBV+ (OR = 8.47, p = 0.003) tumors were more likely to respond to ICI treatment. Moreover, OS was significantly improved with the statistical subgroup difference concerning sex (p = 0.02) and region (p = 0.02). An exploratory subgroup analysis showed significantly improved OS with ICI plus chemotherapy in patients with CPS ≥ 10 (HR = 0.66, p = 0.001) and CPS ≥ 1 (HR = 0.75, p < 0.00001).

UGIC patients with PD-L1-positive, EBV + status are associated with a better therapeutic response to ICI-based therapy. The male patients and Asian patients could derive more survival benefits following ICI treatment than female and non-Asian ones. A combination of prognostic and predictive factors was suggested to help guide immunotherapy decision-making in UGIC patients.

Oxaliplatin- and fluoropyrimidine-based triplet regimens have demonstrated feasibility and efficacy in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancers. Herein, we evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of biweekly nab-paclitaxel plus oxaliplatin and S-1/leucovorin (SOLAR) in chemonaïve UGI cancers.

A 3 + 3 phase 1 study was conducted to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of oxaliplatin in SOLAR (nab-paclitaxel [150 mg/m2 in D1], oxaliplatin [60, 75, or 85 mg/m2 in D1], and oral S-1/leucovorin [35 mg/m2 and 30 mg bid from D1 to D7]). The secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Thirteen and 6 accruals were in the dose-escalation and MTD expansion cohorts, respectively. One of 6 patients at level III experienced dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 diarrhea), which revealed that the MTD of oxaliplatin was 85 mg/m2. After a mean of 15.9 cycles of treatment, the most common treatment-related grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (57.9%) and diarrhea (21.1%). The ORR was 63.2%. The median PFS and OS were 12.5 and 24.7 months, respectively.

The current study revealed the MTD of oxaliplatin and demonstrated the preliminary efficacy of SOLAR in UGI cancers, which deserves further investigation.

NCT03162510.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors augment the antitumor activity of T cells by inhibiting the negative regulatory pathway of T cells, leading to notable efficacy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, and other malignancies through immunotherapy utilization. However, secondary malignant liver tumors not only lower the liver's sensitivity to immunotherapy but also trigger systemic immune suppression, resulting in reduced overall effectiveness of immune therapy. Patients receiving immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma experience reduced response rates, progression-free survival, and overall survival when secondary malignant tumors develop in the liver. Through Liu's retrospective analysis, valuable insights are provided for the future clinical management of these patients. Therefore, in patients with gastric cancer (GC), the occurrence of liver metastasis might be indicative of reduced efficacy of immunotherapy. Overcoming liver immune tolerance mechanisms and their negative impacts allows for the potential benefits of immunotherapy in patients with GC and liver metastasis.

A multitude of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in both the initial and subsequent treatment settings for patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have provided clinical evidence supporting the efficacy of immunotherapy with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In light of these findings, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has authorized the use of several ICIs in specific subpopulations of mCRC patients. Nevertheless, there remains a dearth of direct comparative RCTs evaluating various treatment options. Consequently, the most effective ICI therapeutic strategy for microsatellite-stable (MSS) subgroup and microsatellite instability (MSI) subgroup in the first- and second-line therapies remains undefined. To address this gap, the present study employs a Bayesian network meta-analysis to ascertain the most effective first- and second-line ICI therapeutic strategies.

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, with the retrieval date ranging from the databases' inception to August 20, 2024. A total of 875 studies were identified, and seven were ultimately included in the analysis after a screening process. A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted on the basis of the search results.

This comprehensive analysis, comprising seven RCTs, evaluated first-line and second-line immunotherapy regimens in 1,358 patients diagnosed with mCRC. The treatments under investigation consisted of five initial treatments, including three focusing on MSS patients and two on MSI patients, as well as two secondary immunotherapy regimens, both focusing on MSS patients. A total of 1051 individuals underwent first-line treatment, while 307 received second-line treatment. The application of ICIs proved to offer varying degrees clinical benefits when compared to standard-of-care therapy alone, both in two subgroups of the first and the second treatment phases. Of particular note is the performance of Nivolumab combination with ipilimumab, which demonstrated superior efficacy in improving progression-free survival (PFS) (HR=0.21; 95% CI, 0.13-0.34),. Moreover, the treatment demonstrated an optimal safety profile, with a relatively low risk of adverse events (OR = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.19-0.56), compared to other first-line treatment modalities for MSI subgroup. Regarding MSS subgroup, the improvement of PFS by Nivolumab plus standard-of-care (SOC) was relatively significant (HR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53-1.02). In the realm of second-line therapies for MSS subgroup, the administration of Atezolizumab plus SOC has proven to be an effective approach for prolonging PFS, exhibiting an HR of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.44-0.99). These findings underscore the clinical benefits and safety profiles of ICIs in the treatment of mCRC across various treatment lines.

The clinical application of ICIs in both first- and second-line treatment strategies for patients with mCRC yields substantial therapeutic benefits. A detailed assessment in this study indicates that first-line treatment with Nivolumab combination with ipilimumab may represent an efficacious and well-tolerated therapeutic approach for MSI subgroup. In terms of MSS subgroup in first-line therapy, Nivolumab plus SOC may be a relative superior choice. In the context of second-line therapy for MSS subgroup, it is evident that a combination of Atezolizumab and SOC represents a preferable option for enhancing PFS. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that other ICIs treatment regimens also exhibit great value in various aspects, with the potential to inform the development of future clinical treatment guidelines and provide a stronger rationale for the selection of ICIs in both first- and second-line therapeutic strategies for mCRC.

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, identifier CRD42024543400.

Nivolumab with chemotherapy has been transformative for metastatic gastric cancer (GC). The potential of this regimen for local tumor control could be utilized for perioperative chemotherapy in locally advanced GC with bulky tumors or lymph node metastasis involving other organs.

Five patients with HER2-negative advanced GC were treated with nivolumab and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. All patients presented with clinical stage III or IVA GC with tumors in contact with either the pancreas or liver. Following chemotherapy, all tumors demonstrated shrinkage, allowing successful radical gastrectomies including four minimally invasive approach without postoperative complications. Four patients avoided combined resection of other organs.

Perioperative chemotherapy with nivolumab was effective for local disease control in this case series. This regimen could be a promising treatment approach for locally advanced GC; however, its survival benefits should be evaluated in clinical trials.

β-glucan has been reported to be a potential natural immune modulator for tumor growth inhibition. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of β-glucan plus immunotherapy and chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.

This is a phase IB, prospective, single-arm, investigator-initiated trail. Advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients received β-glucan, camrelizumab, oxaliplatin, oral S-1 every 3 weeks. The curative effect was evaluated every 2 cycles. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and safety, with secondary endpoints were median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS). The exploratory endpoint explored biomarkers of response to treatment efficacy.

A total of 30 patients had been enrolled, including 20 (66.7%) males and all patients with an ECOG PS score of ≥1. The ORR was 60%, the mPFS was 10.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.52-11.27), the mOS was 14.0 months (95% CI, 11.09-16.91). A total of 19 patients (63.3%) had TRAEs, with 9 patients (30%) with grade ≥ 3. The most common TRAEs were nausea (53.3%). After 2 cycles of treatment, the levels of IL-2, IFN-γ and CD4+ T cells significantly increased (P < 0.05). Furthermore, biomarker analysis indicated that patient with better response and longer OS exhibited lower GZMA expression at baseline serum.

This preliminary study demonstrates that β-glucan plus camrelizumab and SOX chemotherapy offers favorable efficacy and a manageable safety profile in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma, and further studies are needed to verify its efficacy and safety.

Chinese Clinical Trials Registry, identifier ChiCTR2100044088.

In recent years, with the continuous development of molecular immunology, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have also been widely used in the treatment of gastric cancer, but they still face some challenges: The first is that only some people can benefit, the second is the treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) that occur during treatment, and the third is the emergence of varying degrees of drug resistance with long-term use. How to overcome these challenges, combined therapy based on ICIs has become one of the important strategies. This article summarizes the clinical application of ICIs combined with chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiotherapy, photodynamic therapy, thermotherapy, immune adjuvant, and dual immunotherapy and discusses the mechanism, and also summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of the current combination modalities and the potential research value. The aim of this study is to provide more and more optimized combination regimen for ICI combined therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer and to provide reference for clinical and scientific research.

The usefulness of high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) in patients who underwent total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y (R-Y) anastomosis has never been well validated. This study aimed to investigate whether intraesophageal pressure affects quality of life in patients who underwent total gastrectomy with R-Y anastomosis.

The participants comprised 12 patients who underwent total gastrectomy for gastric cancer between October 2014 and July 2022 and underwent a postsurgical HRIM examination. The association between the HRIM data and Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-37 (PGSAS-37) questionnaires was analyzed.

Esophageal body motility was normal in almost all patients. The anastomosis shape (circular stapler and overlap method with linear stapler) did not influence intraesophageal pressure. The integrated relaxation pressure and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) residual pressure during swallowing-induced relaxation were involved in "diarrhea subscale" scores (p = 0.0244 and p = 0.0244, respectively). The average maximum intrabolus pressure was not involved in postgastrectomy symptom. The contractile front velocity correlated with the "indigestion subscale," "diarrhea subscale," and "constipation subscale" (p = 0.0408, p = 0.0143, and p = 0.0060, respectively). The distal latency, i.e., the time from upper esophageal sphincter relaxation to contractile deceleration, was also associated with the "abdominal pain subscale" (p = 0.0399). LES pressure and esophageal body motility affected patients' quality of life after total gastrectomy.

HRIM for the evaluation of intraesophageal pressure is useful for the functional assessment of esophagojejunostomy with the R-Y reconstruction after total gastrectomy.

In controlled phase II trials, major prognostic factors need to be well balanced between arms. The main procedures used are SPBR (Stratified Permuted Block Randomization) and minimization. First, we provide a systematic review of the treatment allocation procedure used in gastrointestinal oncology controlled phase II trials published in 2019. Second, we performed simulations using data from six phase II studies to measure the impacts of imbalances and bias on the efficacy estimations. From the 40 articles analyzed, all mentioned randomization in both the title and abstract, the median number of patients included was 109, and 77.5% were multicenter. Of the 27 studies that reported at least one stratification variable, 10 included the center as a stratification variable, 10 used minimization, 9 used SBR, and 8 were unspecified. In real data studies, the imbalance increased with the number of centers. The total and marginal imbalances were higher with SBR than with minimization, and the difference increased with the number of centers. The efficiency estimates per arm were close to the original trial estimate in both procedures. Minimization is often used in cases of numerous centers and guarantees better similarity between arms for stratification variables for total and marginal imbalances in phase II trials.

The microbiome has emerged as a crucial modulator of host-immune interactions and clearly impacts tumor development and therapy efficacy. The microbiome is a double-edged sword in cancer development and therapy as both pro-tumorigenic and anti-tumorigenic bacterial taxa have been identified. The staggering number of association-based studies in various tumor types has led to an enormous amount of data that makes it difficult to identify bacteria that promote tumor development or modulate therapy efficacy from bystander bacteria. Here we aim to comprehensively summarize the current knowledge of microbiome-host immunity interactions and cancer therapy in various mucosal tissues to find commonalities and thus identify potential functionally relevant bacterial taxa. Moreover, we also review recent studies identifying specific bacteria and mechanisms through which the microbiome modulates cancer development and therapy efficacy.

The expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in tumor cells is a leading cause of tumor immune escape; however, the precise mechanism underlying the regulation of PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer (GC) cells remains unknown. In this study, we aimed to investigate the potential mechanism of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) regulating PD-L1 expression in GC cells.

We evaluated the immunomodulatory effects of CAFs in GC cells in vitro via the transwell co-culture system, cytometric bead array, and Western blotting. We detected the role of interleukin (IL)-8 in affecting underlying pathways in GC cells via transfecting IL-8 small-interfering RNA (siRNA), and the protection effects of CAFs on GC cells exposed to CD8+ T cells via cytotoxicity assays.

The results revealed that CAFs upregulated PD-L1 expression of GC cells. IL-8 expression was increased after KATO III or MKN45 cells co-cultured with CAF. Additionally, CAF-derived IL-8 promoted PD-L1 expression in GC cells through the P38, JNK, and NF-κB pathways. Besides, repertaxin, an IL-8 receptors (CXCR1/2) inhibitor, reduced PD-L1 expression in GC cells by blocking the P38, JNK, and NF-κB pathways. Furthermore, the expressions of p-P38, p-JNK, and p-NF-κB decreased after GC cells co-cultured with siIL-8-treated CAF. Moreover, repertaxin attenuated the protection of CAFs to cancer cells that were resistant to CD8+ T-cell cytotoxicity, and improved the antibody effects of anti-PD-L1 facilitating CD8+ T-cell cytotoxicity by targeting IL-8.

Targeting CAF-derived IL-8 may defeat PD-L1 upregulation-mediated immune resistance in GC cells, which provides a novel approach to improve the immunotherapeutic efficacies of patients with GC.

Cachexia, a multifactorial syndrome, is frequently noticed in cancer patients. A recent study has shown inconsistent findings about the relationship between cachexia and the efficiency of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). To analyze this disparity, we did a meta-analysis.

From the beginning of each database to July 2023, literature describing the association between cachexia and prognosis of ICI-treated patients with solid malignancies was systematically searched in three online databases. Estimates were pooled, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were generated.

We analyzed a total of 12 articles, which included data from 1407 patients. The combined results of our analysis showed that cancer patients with cachexia had significantly worse overall survival (HR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.59-2.22, p < 0.001), progression-free survival (HR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.59-2.12, p < 0.001), and time to treatment failure (HR = 2.15, 95% CI: 1.32-3.50, p = 0.002). These findings were consistent in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Additionally, while not statistically significant, we observed a trend towards a lower objective response rate in cancer patients with cachexia compared to those without cachexia (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.32-1.09, p = 0.093).

Poor survival in cachexia patients suggests a negative relationship between cachexia and ICI efficacy. In clinical practice, the existence of cachexia should be estimated to choose individuals who may benefit from ICIs.

Immunotherapy is a promising therapeutic strategy for cancer. However, it shows limited efficacy against certain tumor types. The activation of innate immunity can suppress tumors by mitigating inflammatory and malignant behaviors through immune surveillance. The tumor microenvironment, which is composed of immune cells and cancer cells, plays a crucial role in determining the outcomes of immunotherapy. Relying solely on immune checkpoint inhibitors is not an optimal approach. Instead, there is a need to consider the use of a combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors with other modulators of the innate immune system to improve the tumor microenvironment. This can be achieved through methods such as immune cell antigen presentation and recognition. In this review, we delve into the significance of innate immune cells in tumor regression, as well as the role of the interaction of tumor cells with innate immune cells in evading host immune surveillance. These findings pave the way for the next chapter in the field of immunotherapy.

In this editorial, we comment on the article entitled "Advances and key focus areas in gastric cancer immunotherapy: A comprehensive scientometric and clinical trial review (1999-2023)," which was published in the recent issue of the World Journal of Gastroenterology. We focused on the results of the authors' bibliometric analysis concerning gastric cancer immunotherapy, which they analyzed in depth by compiling the relevant publications of the last 20 years. Before that, we briefly describe the most recent data concerning the epidemiological parameters of gastric cancer (GC) in different countries, attempting to give an interpretation based on the etiological factors involved in the etiopathogenesis of the neoplasm. We then briefly discuss the conservative treatment (chemotherapy) of the various forms of this malignant neoplasm. We describe the treatment of resectable tumors, locally advanced neoplasms, and unresectable (advanced) cases. Special attention is given to modern therapeutic approaches with emphasis on immunotherapy, which seems to be the future of GC treatment, especially in combination with chemotherapy. There is also a thorough analysis of the results of the study under review in terms of the number of scientific publications, the countries in which the studies were conducted, the authors, and the scientific centers of origin, as well as the clinical studies in progress. Finally, an attempt is made to draw some con-clusions and to point out possible future directions.

HER2 overexpression/amplification is a prevalent driver in various types of cancer, including gastric cancer (GC). Limited options are available for patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastric cancer, particularly those who do not respond to the standard therapy of HER2 antibody trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy. Previous research suggests that combining a PD-1 inhibitor with radiotherapy and granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (PRaG regimen) may enhance the antitumor effects in patients with chemotherapy-resistant metastatic solid tumors. In this case study, we presented a potential treatment strategy of a patient having HER2-positive and PD-L1-negative gastric adenocarcinoma. The patient showed rapid tumor progression even after surgery and multiple trastuzumab plus chemotherapy treatments. To address this, we employed a novel anti-HER2 antibody called RC48 in combination with PRaG regimen therapy (PRaG3.0). The patient demonstrated a positive response after two treatment cycles and achieved a progression-free survival time of 6.5 months. This case highlights the potential of four-combination therapies for treating refractory, multiorgan, HER2-positive, PD-L1-negative metastatic gastric cancer. Additionally, varying radiation doses in targeting dual foci is critical to enhance tumor immunotherapy.

Gastric cancer (GC) ranks third among cancers in terms of mortality rate worldwide. A clear understanding of the mechanisms underlying the genesis and progression of GC will contribute to clinical decision making. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most abundant among diverse mRNA modification types and regulates multiple facets of RNA metabolism. In recent years, emerging studies have shown that m6A modifications are involved in gastric carcinoma tumorigenesis and progression and can potentially be valuable new prospects for diagnosis and prognosis. This article reviews the recent progress regarding m6A in GC.

Recently, the results of gastric cancer treatment have improved; however, its characteristics in adolescents and young adults are not well known. We report the case of a patient with advanced gastric cancer, Fanconi anemia (FA), and primary biliary cholangitis. A 26-year-old woman visited a local physician complaining of epigastralgia. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed edematous changes with poor distension and circumferential thickened folds with erosions in the gastric body. Biopsy results of the lesion specimens revealed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed gastric wall with irregular thickness, several nodules in the peritoneal cavity, and a mass lesion in the right ovary. We diagnosed the patient with T4N2M1 stage IV gastric cancer accompanied by peritoneal and ovarian metastases and initiated nivolumab with S-1 plus oxaliplatin as the first-line treatment regimen. Because of immune-related adverse events after one course of systemic treatment, the regimen was changed to ramucirumab combined with nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy as the second-line treatment. After three cycles of weekly nab-paclitaxel with ramucirumab, the decreased platelet count did not recover, and her general condition gradually deteriorated. Comprehensive genome profiling using next-generation sequencing was performed to determine the feasibility of genotype-matched therapies. Alterations in FA complementation group A (FANCA) F1263del (49.1%) and E484Q (12.3%), which encode a key component of the multiprotein FA complex, were identified. The patient died 10 months after treatment initiation. In conclusion, when treating malignancies in adolescent and young adult patients, the genomic background should be considered.

The impact of sarcopenia on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in gastrointestinal cancer (GIC) patients remains uncertain in clinical practice. Hence, this study aims to investigate the potential correlation between sarcopenia and the clinical outcomes of GIC patients treated with ICIs.

To gather pertinent studies, a systematic literature search was implemented across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. The primary outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), measured with the hazard ratio (HR). And the secondary outcomes, including disease control rate (DCR), overall response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AE), were evaluated with the odd ratio (OR).

A total of 13 articles involving 1294 patients were collected for this analysis. The pooled results revealed that GIC patients with sarcopenia had significantly poorer OS (HR = 1.697, 95% CI = 1.367-2.106, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 1.551, 95% CI: 1.312-1.833, p < 0.001), and lower ORR (OR = 0.594, 95% CI = 0.388-0.909, p = 0.016) and DCR (OR: 0.553, 95% CI: 0.360-0.850, p = 0.007) compared to those without sarcopenia. However, sarcopenia did not increase the incidence of treatment-related adverse events compared with non-sarcopenia (OR = 1.377, 95% CI = 0.693-2.737, p = 0.361). According to subgroup analysis, the association between sarcopenia and the therapeutic effect of ICI on patients with primary liver cancer or gastric cancer was consistent with the above findings.

Sarcopenia is significantly correlated with poorer treatment response and worse long-term efficacy in GIC patients treated with ICIs. Moreover, sarcopenia does not increase the incidence of adverse events.

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death. Unfortunately, patients often present with advanced disease at diagnosis, which is directly related to its high mortality. Numerous trials, as early as the 1980's, have shown that cytotoxic chemotherapy improves survival. This review will focus on targeted therapies and immunotherapies which have emerged as treatment options for metastatic gastric cancer, often used in conjunction with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Here we will review the relevant clinical trials of targeted therapies and immunotherapies in the treatment of metastatic gastric cancer.

We performed an extensive review of articles in the PubMed database pertaining to targeted therapies and immunotherapies in the treatment of metastatic gastric cancer. Additionally, updated guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) were reviewed.

Cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the backbone of treatment of metastatic gastric cancer, but the development of targeted therapies and immunotherapy have revolutionized its treatment with improved survival and outcomes. Therapies have been developed which target human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2), and tyrosine kinase pathways. Novel targeted therapies are currently being investigated with promising results thus far. Immunotherapy, specifically immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has proven to be a significant advancement in the treatment of gastric cancer.

Targeted therapies and immunotherapies have improved survival and outcomes in metastatic gastric cancer, however more research is needed to make even greater strides.

Brain metastases develop in 0.5-0.7% of patients with gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer. Although rare, brain metastasis is often identified when the patient is already symptomatic; hence prognosis is poor. Given the therapeutic developments for G/GEJ cancer, overall survival is prolonged, thereby the incidence of brain metastases is predicted to increase. We retrospectively surveyed the rate of brain metastasis among 1257 patients diagnosed with G/GEJ cancer who received chemotherapy between January 2011 and April 2021. We investigated the time of onset of brain metastasis, treatments administered, and impact of the metastasis on the overall treatment course and prognosis. Of the 741 patients included in the analysis, brain metastasis was confirmed in 16 (2.2%). The median survival time (MST) from G/GEJ cancer diagnosis was 14.9 months in patients with brain metastasis detected during the treatment period, and the MST from the diagnosis of brain metastasis was 2.8 months. Patients who received chemotherapy exhibited prolonged survival compared with those who did not (12.4 months vs 1.0 months, p < 0.001). Our findings suggest that the early detection of brain metastases and local therapy for poor responders to chemotherapy enable the continuation of chemotherapy and prolong survival.

To evaluate the efficacy of SOX combined with a programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor compared with SOX alone in the perioperative management of locally advanced gastric cancer and to explore biomarkers that may predict response to anti-PD-1 therapy.

Data of patients with clinical stage T3-4aN0-3M0 (IIb-III) gastric cancer were reviewed to create a primary database. Patients treated with perioperative SOX combined with sintilimab were included in Group A, while those treated with SOX alone were included in Group B. After one-to-one propensity score matching, pathological response and short-term survival outcomes were compared between the two groups. In addition, potential efficacy-related biomarkers were analyzed.

Between January 2018 and December 2022, a total of 150 patients were included in the analysis, with 75 patients in each group. The rates of pathological complete response (21.3% vs. 4.0%; P = 0.001) and major pathological response (45.3% vs. 22.7%; P = 0.003) in Group A were statistically higher than those in Group B. There was no significant difference in 1-year overall survival (92.8% vs. 92.0%; P = 0.392) and disease-free survival (88.9% vs. 88.0%; P = 0.357) between the two groups. Subgroup analysis of Group A showed that the pathological complete response (40.6% vs. 8.6%; P = 0.002) and major pathological response (65.6% vs. 28.6%; P = 0.002) rates were significantly higher in programmed death ligand-1-positive patients with a combined positive score of ≥ 5. A pathological complete response was achieved in 42.9% patients (3/7) with mismatch repair deficiency. For the two patients confirmed as Epstein-Barr virus-positive, one patient achieved a pathological complete response and the other achieved a major pathological response.

The adoption of SOX combined with a PD-1 inhibitor may improve the pathological response rate of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer, especially those with programmed death ligand-1 combined positive score ≥ 5, Epstein-Barr virus-positivity and mismatch repair deficiency. However, further prospective studies are still warranted to confirm the long-term survival benefit.

Although the incidence rate and mortality of gastric/gastroesophageal cancer (G/GEJC) are declining globally, G/GEJC remains a health issue in East Asia. When diagnosed as advanced stage, treatment after serial lines of chemotherapy is limited, with a median overall survival of less than 1 year. Immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and cellular immunotherapy, has changed the prospects of cancer therapy by reversing immune suppression in the tumor microenvironment. As part of this review, we enumerated the clinical uses of ICIs related to the immunosuppressive signaling axis PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4/B7. ICIs were initially approved as a secondary treatment option for patients with severe pretreating advanced gastric and gastroesophageal cancer (AG/GEJC). Till now, it has become the mainstream therapy in combination with chemotherapy and targeted therapy for patients identified by biomarkers. Numerous evidence showed microsatellite instability (MSI), programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, tumor mutation burden (TMB) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status might be indicative to the use of ICIs. In addition, we discussed the current limitations and prospects of ICIs in AG/GGEJC, as well as the first clinical application of novel CAR-T cell therapies.

S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) and capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP) are standard first-line regimens for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) worldwide. We conducted a meta-analysis using individual participant data (IPD) to investigate which is more suitable.

IPD from three randomized trials were collected. In these trials, patients with AGC were randomly allocated to SP (S-1 80-120 mg for 21 days plus cisplatin 60 mg/m2 (q5w)) or XP (capecitabine 2000 mg/m2 for 14 days plus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 (q3w)).

In 211 eligible patients, median overall survival (OS) for SP versus XP was 13.5 and 11.7 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.787; p = 0.114), progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.2 and 5.1 months (HR, 0.767; P = 0.076), and TTF was 5.1 and 4.0 months (HR, 0.611; P = 0.001). The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events with SP or XP were neutropenia (18% vs. 29%) and anorexia (16% vs.18%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated significant interaction between treatment effect and performance status > 1 (HR, 0.685; P = 0.036), measurable lesion (HR, 0.709; P = 0.049), primary upper third tumor (HR, 0.539; P = 0.040), and differentiated type (HR, 0.549; interaction, 0.236; P = 0.019). For the differentiated type, OS was significantly longer in the SP group (13.2 months) than in the XP group (11.1 months) (HR, 0.549; P = 0.019). For the undifferentiated type, OS was similar in the SP group (14.2 months) and in the XP group (12.4 months) (HR, 0.868; P = 0.476).

SP and XP were both effective and well tolerated. SP might be suitable for the pathological differentiated subtype of AGC.

The HERBIS-2, HERBIS-4A, and XParTS II trials were registered with UMIN-CTR as UMIN000006105, UMIN000006755, and UMIN000006045, respectively.