Although accurate assessment of polyp morphology helps endoscopists select the appropriate management for colorectal polyps, some studies have reported unsatisfactory accuracy in such assessment. This study aimed to clarify the usefulness of a short educational video available on the Internet for accurate polyp morphology assessment.

This was a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned to the pre- or post-education groups after a pre-test comprising images of 42 polyps, including 12 laterally spreading tumors. Participants who scored ≥ 80% on the pre-test were excluded. Only the post-education group completed the diagnostic test after watching an online educational video. The primary outcome was the difference in diagnostic accuracy between the pre-test and diagnostic tests for each group.

Of the 296 endoscopists enrolled from 48 institutions, 34 missed the test deadline, and 29 who scored ≥ 80% in the pre-test were excluded. The primary outcome analysis sets were 117 and 116 in the pre- and post-education groups, respectively. The mean pre-test accuracies in the pre-education and post-education groups were 60.6% and 60.7%, respectively. The difference in diagnostic accuracy between the pre-test and diagnostic test was significantly higher in the post-education than the pre-education group (12.0 points, 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.9-14.1 and 2.3 points, 95% CI 0.9-3.6; p < 0.001).

This multicenter randomized controlled trial demonstrated the usefulness of a short educational video for accurate polyp morphology assessment.

The current landscape of machine learning models in GI endoscopy is fraught with considerable variability in methodologies and quality, posing challenges for validation and generalization. To ensure the effective integration of AI in clinical practice, it is crucial to develop and validate models rigorously across diverse and representative datasets. This involves standardizing reference standards, ensuring thorough external validation, using representative patient populations, and incorporating a range of image qualities. Addressing these methodological discrepancies will enhance the reliability and robustness of AI models, thereby facilitating their adoption and improving patient care in GI endoscopy.

Recently, various endoscopic treatments for colorectal polyps have been reported, including cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR), in addition to EMR. However, a precise treatment strategy for sessile serrated lesions (SSL) has not been established. In this study, we analyzed the clinicopathological features of SSL resected by EMR, CSP, and UEMR to determine the most suitable treatment for SSL.

A total of 92 SSL resected via EMR (n = 11), CSP (n = 36), and UEMR (n = 45) were retrospectively enrolled between February 2021 and October 2022. To evaluate pathological findings, we examined SSL samples, which were stretched before formalin fixation and sectioned at 2-mm intervals. Primary outcomes were the R0 resection rate and thickness of submucosal (SM) tissue specimens for each treatment. In addition, we evaluated SSL with dysplasia (SSLD) and the inverted growth pattern which may affect the vertical margin.

The R0 resection rate significantly differed among the three groups (EMR, 73%; CSP, 42%; UEMR, 87%, p = 0.001). The median thickness of SM tissue resected by CSP (0 µm) was significantly less than that by EMR (362 µm) and UEMR (325 µm; p < 0.001). All four SSLDs were diagnosed endoscopically. Five SSLs with inverted growth patterns were pathologically diagnosed. Of these, two SSLs with inverted growth patterns could not be diagnosed endoscopically.

UEMR is considered to be a suitable treatment option for SSL. CSP results were pathologically insufficient. Therefore, surveillance to evaluate local recurrence is important, and the results of further multicenter prospective studies should be referred.

Endoscopic ampullectomy is the preferred treatment for selected periampullary lesions, yet up to 10.6% of patients may experience delayed bleeding post-procedure. This study aims to identify predictors for bleeding, which remain poorly understood.

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of adult patients who underwent endoscopic ampullectomy (EA) between January 2011 and September 2023. The primary outcome was the risk factors for delayed bleeding, defined as post-procedural bleeding that necessitated either an emergency department visit, hospital admission, blood transfusion, or re-intervention. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, such as perforation and pancreatitis.

A total of 113 patients underwent EA, and 25 (22.1%) experienced delayed bleeding. Of these, 20 (80%) required repeat endoscopy, six (24%) needed blood transfusions, and three (12%) were managed conservatively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified international normalized ratio ≥1.2 (odds ratio [OR] 3.32, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.03-10.74, p = 0.05), presence of high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal cancer (OR 3.76, 95% CI 1.20-11.81, p = 0.03), female sex (OR 3.14, 95% CI 1.11-8.93, p = 0.03), size of lesion (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08, p = 0.03) and procedure duration (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99, p = 0.04) as independent predictors of delayed bleeding.

Several factors, including features of high-grade dysplasia-intramucosal cancer, international normalized ratio ≥1.2, female sex, lesion size, and procedure duration are associated with delayed post-ampullectomy bleeding. These factors should be taken into consideration when strategizing the reduction of post-ampullectomy bleeding.

Pyloric gland adenoma (PGA) is a distinct subtype of duodenal adenoma. PGA has been increasingly recognized as a histologically and molecularly distinct entity; however, its endoscopic features have not been precisely described. This study aims to investigate the endoscopic characteristics of duodenal PGA, including the association of their putative precursors, Brunner's gland hyperplasia (BGH), and gastric epithelial heterotopia/metaplasia (GEM/H).

This study was a single-center, retrospective case series. Fourteen consecutive patients with duodenal PGA were retrieved from the pathological database. PGA was diagnosed according to the World Health Organization classification.

The median tumor size was 22.5 mm (range: 12-40 mm), and 79% of cases were located in the first part of the duodenum. Six PGAs demonstrated high-grade dysplasia. PGA could be classified into two subtypes based on their appearance: villous lobulated type and smoothly protruding type. BGH and GEM/H were identified in the background mucosa in 28% and 7% of the cases, respectively. BGH was more abundant in the background mucosa of the PGA group than in the control group (p < 0.05). Six PGAs (43%) exhibited high-grade dysplasia, and no significant difference was observed in the endoscopic findings between low- and high-grade dysplasia.

The 14 patients with PGA demonstrated characteristic endoscopic findings. BGH and GEM/H might be precursors of PGA.

Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for large tumors is spreading worldwide. Gastric cancer (GC) sometimes occurs after colorectal ESD. However, its status including frequency and risk factors have not been examined well. In this study, we analyzed the detailed status of GC after colorectal ESD.

This was a single-center retrospective study. Patients receiving colorectal ESD between 2010 and 2018 were reviewed. All patients were recommended to receive esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for screening. Finally, 436 patients receiving EGD, who underwent colorectal ESD for lesions of ≥20 mm were analyzed. The primary outcome was the GC rate after colorectal ESD, including intramucosal cancer. As a control, we compared it to the GC rate in matched Japanese national cancer registry data. The secondary outcome was risk factors for developing GC.

The mean age was 66.9 ± 10.6 and 55.3% were males. The GC rate was 5.96% (26/436) with a median observation period of 27 months. It was significantly higher than the mean GC rate in the diagnosed age calculated with the cancer registry (0.26%, observed value/expected value ratio [95% confidence interval]: 22.20 [14.50-32.53], p < 0.01). The comparison between cases with and without GC showed that significant risk factors were male (p = 0.02) and smokers (p < 0.01) and their GC rates were 8.3% and 10.9%. Also, in the limited cases, Helicobacter pylori infection (past and present) and atrophic gastritis were significant and their GC rates were 11.1% and 11.6%.

The GC rate was high after resecting colorectal tumors of ≥20 mm, suggesting the necessity of EGD.

Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is widely performed for small colorectal polyps. However, small colorectal polyps sometimes include high-grade adenomas or carcinomas that require endoscopic resection with electrocautery. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel resection technique, hot snare polypectomy with low-power pure-cut current (LPPC-HSP) for small colorectal polyps, compared with CSP and conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR).

Records of patients who underwent CSP, EMR, or LPPC-HSP for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps less than 10 mm between April 2021 and March 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. We analyzed and compared the treatment outcomes of CSP and EMR with those of LPPC-HSP using propensity score matching.

After propensity score matching of 396 pairs, an analysis of CSP and LPPC-HSP indicated that LPPC-HSP had a significantly higher R0 resection rate (84% vs. 68%; p < 0.01). Delayed bleeding was observed in only two cases treated with CSP before matching. Perforation was not observed with either treatment. After propensity score matching of 176 pairs, an analysis of EMR and LPPC-HSP indicated that their en bloc and R0 resection rates were not significantly different (99.4% vs. 100%, p = 1.00; 79% vs. 81%, p = 0.79). Delayed bleeding and perforation were not observed with either treatment.

The safety of LPPC-HSP was comparable to that of CSP. The treatment outcomes of LPPC-HSP were comparable to those of conventional EMR for small polyps. These results suggest that this technique is a safe and effective treatment for nonpedunculated polyps less than 10 mm.

The diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) associated with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) has a significant impact on clinical management, including colectomy. However, the prognosis of HGD remains unclear due to diagnostic uncertainty and low-quality data on subsequent synchronous and metachronous neoplasia. We aimed to evaluate a diagnostic strategy with dedicated gastrointestinal (GI) pathologist consensus of revised HGD and the impact on synchronous and metachronous neoplasia rates.

In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, we used the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank to identify IBD patients with HGD in seven hospitals. Histopathological specimens of the initial HGD were independently revised by two dedicated GI pathologists. Definitive diagnosis was established in a consensus meeting. Synchronous and metachronous neoplasia incidences were assessed with a competing risk analysis.

We included 54 IBD patients with HGD, of whom 33 (61.1%) with ulcerative colitis and 42 (77.8%) with extensive disease. After consensus, 18 (33.3%) lesions were downgraded to indefinite/low-grade dysplasia, and 6 (11.1%) were revised to colorectal cancer (CRC). Seven patients (13.0%) had synchronous CRC. Patients with downgraded lesions showed a lower cumulative advanced neoplasia (HGD/CRC) incidence compared with confirmed HGD [(Gray's test P < 0.01), 5-year cumulative incidence 0.0% vs. 26.6%].

We demonstrated frequent downgrading of HGD, associated with lower metachronous neoplasia rates. This underlines the potential impact of dedicated GI pathologist consensus meetings. The high and synchronous and metachronous neoplasia rates after HGD underline the need for close surveillance.

Large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps ≥20 mm (LNPCPs) constitute approximately 1% of all colorectal polyps and present a spectrum of risks, including overt and covert submucosal invasive cancer (T1 colorectal cancer (CRC)). Importantly, a curative resection may be achieved for LNPCPs with superficial T1 CRC (T1a or T1b <1000 µm into submucosa), if an enbloc R0 excision (clear margins) with favourable histology is achieved (ie, absence of high-grade tumour budding, lympho-vascular invasion, and poor differentiation). Thus, while consensus recommendations advocate for endoscopic resection as the primary treatment option for LNPCPs, thorough optical assessment is imperative for selecting the most suitable ER strategy. In this review, we highlight the critical components of optical evaluation that assist in predicting the risk of T1 CRC, including morphology (Paris and LST classifications), surface pit/vascular pattern (JNET and Kudo classifications), and lesion location. Different resection modalities, including endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection are discussed, along with important considerations that may influence the resection strategy of choice, such as access to the LNPCP and submucosal fibrosis.

Linear-array endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and narrow-band imaging (NBI) are both used to estimate the invasion depth of nonpedunculated rectal lesions (NPRLs). However, it is unclear which procedure is more accurate. This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of linear EUS and NBI for estimating the invasion depth of NPRLs.

This study is a single-center, randomized, tandem trial. Eligible patients with NPRLs were randomly assigned to A group (assessment with EUS followed by NBI) or B group (assessment with NBI followed by EUS). The invasion depth of each lesion was independently measured by each procedure and categorized as mucosal to slight submucosal (M-SM s , invasion depth <1,000 μm) or deep submucosal (SM d , invasion depth ≥1,000 μm) invasion, with postoperative pathology as the standard of measurement. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy, and secondary outcomes included sensitivity, specificity, and procedure time.

Eighty-six patients with NPRLs were enrolled, and 79 patients were finally analyzed, including 39 cases in the A group and 40 cases in the B group. Comparable diagnostic accuracies were observed between EUS and NBI (96.2% vs 93.7%, P = 0.625). EUS identified lesions with deep submucosal invasion with 81.8% sensitivity while that of NBI was 63.6% ( P = 0.500). The specificity of both EUS and NBI was 98.5%. The procedure time was also similar between EUS and NBI (5.90 ± 3.44 vs 6.4 ± 3.94 minutes, P = 0.450). Furthermore, the combined use of EUS and NBI did not improve diagnostic accuracy compared with EUS or NBI alone (94.9% vs 96.2% vs 93.7%, P = 0.333).

Linear EUS and NBI measure the invasion depth of NPRLs with comparable accuracy. The combination of the 2 methods does not improve the diagnostic accuracy. Single NBI should be preferred, considering its simplicity and convenience in clinical practice.

Additional surgery is considered when deep submucosal (SM) invasion (≥1,000 µm) is pathologically observed following the endoscopic resection of early-stage colorectal cancer (eCRC). The Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) states that the depth of SM invasion be measured from the lower border of the muscularis mucosae (MM) when MM can be identified/estimated and from the lesion's surface when it cannot, irrespective of macroscopic types. In MM-tangled pedunculated eCRC cases, SM invasion depth should be measured from the reference line, which is the boundary between the tumor head and stalk. In the present study, in order to validate these measuring rules compared with the Haggitt classification, 73 consecutive pedunculated eCRC cases were analyzed. Using Elastica-van Gieson and desmin immunostaining, 37, 10, 18 and eight cases were diagnosed as pTis (without SM invasion by JSCCR)/Haggitt level (HL) 0, pTis/HL1-2 (head invasion), pT1b (SM invasion ≥1,000 µm)/HL1-2 and pT1b/HL3 (stalk invasion), respectively. No lymph node metastasis was observed. Recurrence occurred in one pTis/HL1 case; however, no pT1b/HL1-3 cases experienced recurrence. These results suggest that the pedunculated eCRC may be overstaged by the JSCCR rule in terms of adverse outcomes. The Haggitt classification, which evaluates HL1-3 as a shallow SM invasion, may be more useful when considering additional surgery.

Accurate endoscopic characterization of colorectal lesions is essential to predict histology and select the best treatment strategy but remains very difficult. Instead of the recommended endoscopic characterization, many gastroenterologists routinely perform biopsies of the lesion to propose endoscopic resection with or without R0 intent. The aim of this study was to determine which of endoscopic characterization or biopsies, either targeted (TB) or non-targeted (NTB), is the most effective to determine the best treatment strategy for colorectal neoplasia > 2 cm.

We prospectively assessed the best strategy between endoscopic characterization and targeted or non-targeted biopsies, so that the proposed resection technique offered a level of quality of tumor resection adapted to the definitive histology of the lesion on R0-resected specimen.

84 patients with 88 lesions were included. "Adequate treatment" was proposed by endoscopic characterization in 52.3 to 70.5% of cases, "under treatment" in 2.3 to 9.1% and "over treatment" in 20.5 to 45.5%. Two severe events were recorded. "Adequate treatment" was proposed by TB and NTB in respectively 72.7 and 69.3% of cases, "under treatment" in respectively 27.3 and 30.7% and no case of "over treatment" was reported. TB and NTB were ineffective to evaluate the depth of invasion in the submucosa and to differentiate superficial invasive from deep invasive adenocarcinomas.

Biopsies-based strategies are unable to predict depth of cancer invasion and could be associated with a risk of under treatment of large colorectal lesions in near a third of the cases compared to only around 5% with endoscopic characterization. Endoscopic characterization could lead to over treatment, but mainly by endoscopic submucosal dissection with low morbidity. Characterization with the CONECCT classification could decrease the risk of under treatment and avoid surgeries for non-malignant colorectal lesions. Other endoscopic criteria should be determined to better characterize colorectal lesions and to improve the best adapted treatment for each lesion.

Patients with long-standing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) involving the colon are at higher risk of developing colorectal dysplastic or neoplastic lesions. While from sporadic colorectal cancer follows an "adenoma-carcinoma" sequence, IBD colitis-associated carcinogenesis is mainly related to an "inflammation-dysplasia-carcinoma" sequence. Currently, specific endoscopic surveillance strategies involving dye spray and virtual chromoendoscopy have been standardized, aiming for early CRC diagnosis. When detected, colitis-associated dysplasia should be classified according to standard classification, thus allowing for better treatment. Indeed, most IBD-associated dysplastic lesions can be treated with endoscopic resection, even though available procedures are usually more challenging than those in the general population. The higher frequency of severe submucosal fibrosis and the difficulty in the definition of lesions' margins account for this issue. Current endoscopic resection techniques include polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Recent evidence suggests the relevance of en bloc resection, as this may be associated with lower rates of recurrence. Therefore, particularly for larger (>20 mm) lesions, ESD should be preferred, even though it is considered the most difficult technique due to frequent severe submucosal fibrosis. Considering the growing number of new endoscopic resective techniques, including underwater EMR or ESD, which in the general population have been suggested to lower procedure-related risks and may also allow a larger spread of advanced endoscopic resection in IBD. However, additional data are needed to assess the medium- and long-term efficacy of endoscopic resection of visible dysplasia in IBD patients, which are burdened by a high risk of local and, more importantly, metachronous recurrence.

With the widespread use of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, more and more gastric polyps (GPs) are being detected. Traditional management strategies often rely on histopathologic examination, which can be time-consuming and may not guide immediate clinical decisions. This paper aims to introduce a novel classification system for GPs based on their potential risk of malignant transformation, categorizing them as "good", "bad", and "ugly". A review of the literature and clinical case analysis were conducted to explore the clinical implications, management strategies, and the system's application in endoscopic practice. Good polyps, mainly including fundic gland polyps and inflammatory fibrous polyps, have a low risk of malignancy and typically require minimal or no intervention. Bad polyps, mainly including hyperplastic polyps and adenomas, pose an intermediate risk of malignancy, necessitating closer monitoring or removal. Ugly polyps, mainly including type 3 neuroendocrine tumors and early gastric cancer, indicate a high potential for malignancy and require urgent and comprehensive treatment. The new classification system provides a simplified and practical framework for diagnosing and managing GPs, improving diagnostic accuracy, guiding individualized treatment, and promoting advancements in endoscopic techniques. Despite some challenges, such as the risk of misclassification due to similar endoscopic appearances, this system is essential for the standardized management of GPs. It also lays the foundation for future research into biomarkers and the development of personalized medicine.

The pathogenesis of non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (NADETs) is not fully understood. NADETs that express gastric-type mucin phenotypes (G-NADETs) are noteworthy because of their high malignancy. Gastric foveolar metaplasia, from which G-NADETs originate, protects the duodenal mucosa from gastric acidity. As gastric acid secretion is affected by endoscopic gastric mucosal atrophy (EGMA), we hypothesized that EGMA would be associated with G-NADETs.

To evaluate the association between EGMA and the occurrence of G-NADETs.

This cross-sectional retrospective study investigated the relationship between EGMA and NADETs in 134 patients. The duodenum was divided into parts 1 (bulb), 2 (superior duodenal angle to the papilla), and 3 (anal side of the papilla to the horizontal part). The effects of gastric acidity and presence of Brunner's glands were considered. EGMA was divided into types C (no or mild atrophy) and O (severe atrophy). Mucin phenotype expressions in NADETs were divided into gastric, intestinal, gastrointestinal, and unclassifiable.

When NADETs were classified according to EGMA, 105 were classified as type C and 29 as type O. G-NADETs were present in 11.9% (16 cases) of all cases, and all 16 cases were of type C. Among G-NADETs, 93.8% (15 cases) were present in part 1 or 2. There was an association between G-NADETs and type C in part 1, and 50.0% (eight of 16 cases) of G-NADETs were associated with a current or previous Helicobacter pylori infection status. Additionally, all eight cases occurred in part 1.

G-NADETs were significantly associated with type C. Gastric acidity and Brunner's gland growth may be associated with G-NADETs.

In colorectal cancer screening with the fecal immunochemical test (FIT), the optimal follow-up after first-round colonoscopy for a positive FIT, particularly after negative colonoscopy, is unknown. Therefore, using Screening of Swedish Colons (SCREESCO) study data, we aimed to elucidate the risk factors for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in second-round colonoscopy, which can affect recommendations for the optimal follow-up.

We performed a cross-sectional analysis using data from SCREESCO participants undergoing colonoscopy after a positive 2-stool FIT, with a positivity cutoff value of ≥10 μg/g feces, in both the first and second rounds separated by a 2-year interval. We assessed the associations between colorectal neoplasia detection in second-round colonoscopy and participant characteristics, FIT concentrations, first-round colonoscopy results, and endoscopists' adenoma detection rates (ADRs), which were categorized as very low, low, intermediate, and high.

This study included 343 individuals. Despite negative first-round colonoscopies (n = 230), colorectal cancer and advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) were detected in 0.9% and 8.3% of participants in the second-round colonoscopy, respectively. An association was demonstrated between the first-round endoscopists' ADRs and the risk of second-round ACN detection. The multivariable odds ratios of the first-round intermediate and high ADRs, compared with the very low ADR, for second-round ACN detection were 0.17 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.79) and 0.19 (95% CI, 0.04-0.86), respectively.

The impact of endoscopists' ADRs on ACN detection in subsequent-round colonoscopies underscores the importance of considering ADR for optimal follow-up after first-round colonoscopy in an FIT-based screening program.

High-definition virtual chromoendoscopy, along with targeted biopsies, is recommended for dysplasia surveillance in ulcerative colitis patients at risk for colorectal cancer. Computer-aided detection (CADe) systems aim to improve colonic adenoma detection, however their efficacy in detecting polyps and adenomas in this context remains unclear. This study evaluates the CADe Discovery™ system's effectiveness in detecting colonic dysplasia in ulcerative colitis patients at risk for colorectal cancer.

A prospective cross-sectional, non-inferiority, diagnostic test comparison study was conducted on ulcerative colitis patients undergoing colorectal cancer surveillance colonoscopy between January 2021 and April 2021. Patients underwent virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE) with iSCAN 1 and 3 with optical enhancement. One endoscopist, blinded to CADe Discovery™ system results, examined colon sections, while a second endoscopist concurrently reviewed CADe images. Suspicious areas detected by both techniques underwent resection. Proportions of dysplastic lesions and patients with dysplasia detected by VCE or CADe were calculated.

Fifty-two patients were included, and 48 lesions analyzed. VCE and CADe each detected 9 cases of dysplasia (21.4% and 20.0%, respectively; p=0.629) in 8 patients and 7 patients (15.4% vs. 13.5%, respectively; p=0.713). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy for dysplasia detection using VCE or CADe were 90% and 90%, 13% and 5%, 21% and 2%, 83% and 67%, and 29.2% and 22.9%, respectively.

The CADe Discovery™ system shows similar diagnostic performance to VCE with iSCAN in detecting colonic dysplasia in ulcerative colitis patients at risk for colorectal cancer.

Endoscopic resection (ER) of non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (NADETs) is associated with a high incidence of delayed bleeding (DB). While previous reports have identified composite risk factors for delayed adverse events, including both DB and delayed perforation, the specific factors associated with DB remain unclear. This study aimed to identify factors associated with DB after ER of NADETs.

This retrospective study included 335 consecutive patients who underwent ER for a NADET between January 2004 and December 2023. Participants were divided into the DB and non-DB groups. We compared baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes between the two groups to identify factors associated with DB. ER included endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) techniques. DB was defined as bleeding that required endoscopic hemostasis or transfusion after ER. Complete mucosal closure (CMC) was defined as the complete closure of the defect with no endoscopically visible exposure of the defect.

Overall, 128 ESD procedures and 207 non-ESD procedures were performed. DB occurred in 13 patients (3.9%) and its incidence was lower when CMC was achieved (1.1% vs. 13.9%, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed the use of antithrombotic agents (odds ratio (OR) 3.8; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0-14.6, P = 0.048) and a defect circumference ≥ 1/2 (OR 6.2; 95% CI 1.2-30.5, P = 0.029) as risk factors for DB, and CMC (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.038-0.95, P = 0.043) as a protective factor. Among the 66 patients with risk factors, including the use of antithrombotic agents and/or a defect circumference ≥ 1/2, CMC reduced the incidence of DB (4.5% [2/44], vs. 31.8% [7/22], P = 0.005).

We identified significant factors associated with DB after duodenal ER. Particularly, in patients with risk factors for DB, CMC can reduce the incidence of DB.

Postendoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome (PECS) prevention is one of the common postoperative complications of colorectal ESD. Considering the increasing incidence of PECS, it is critical to investigate various prevention methods. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of transrectal drainage tubes (TDTs) in PECS prevention in patients following colorectal ESD.

From July 2022 to July 2023, a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in 3 hospitals in China. Patients with superficial colorectal lesions ≥20 mm who had undergone ESD for a single lesion were enrolled. Initially, 229 patients were included in the study and 5 were excluded. Two hundred twenty-four were randomly assigned to the TDT and non-TDT group in the end. This open-label study utilized a parallel design with a 1:1 allocation ratio, and endoscopists and patients were not blind to the randomization, and a 24 Fr drainage tube was inserted approximately 10-15 cm above the anus after the ESD under the endoscopy and tightly attached to a drainage bag. The TDTs were removed in 1-3 days following the ESD.

A total of 229 eligible patients were enrolled in this study, and 5 patients were excluded. Ultimately, 224 patients were assigned to the TDT group (n = 112) and non-TDT group (n = 112). The median age for the patients was 63.45 years (IQR 57-71; 59 men [52.68%]) in the TDT group and 60.95 years (IQR 54-68; 60 men [53.57%]) in the non-TDT group. Intention-to-treat analysis showed patients in the TDT group had a lower incidence of PECS than patients in the non-TDT group (7 [6.25%] vs 20 [17.86%]; relative risk, 0.350; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.154-0.795; P = 0.008). In the subgroup analysis, TDTs were found to prevent PECS in patients of the female gender (odd ratio, 0.097; 95% CI, 0.021-0.449; P = 0.001), tumor size <4 cm (odd ratio, 0.203; 95% CI, 0.056-0.728; P = 0.011), tumor located in the left-sided colorectum (odd ratio, 0. 339 95% CI, 0.120-0.957; P = 0.035), and shorter procedure time (<45 minutes) (odd ratio, 0.316; 95% CI, 0.113-0.879; P = 0.023). The tube fell off in 1 case (0.89%) accidentally ahead of time. No TDT-related complication was observed.

The results from this randomized clinical study indicate that the application of TDTs effectively reduced the incidence of PECS in patients after colorectal ESD ( chictr.org.cn Identifier: ChiCTR2200062164).

The detection rate of proximal sessile serrated lesion (PSSLDR) is linked to the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer. However, research on second forward view (SFV) examinations for PSSLDR remains limited. This first randomized controlled trial assessed the impact of the proximal SFV on the PSSLDR.

Patients were randomized into 2 groups during proximal colonoscopy: standard colonoscopy (SC) and SFV. The SC group underwent a standard examination, whereas the SFV group underwent a second examination of the proximal colon (cecum to splenic flexure). The primary outcome was PSSLDR, with secondary outcomes, including the proximal polyp detection rate (PPDR), proximal adenoma detection rate (PADR), and lesion miss rate, compared between the 2 groups.

Among 246 patients (SC = 124; SFV = 122), SFV significantly improved the PSSLDR by 7.4% compared with SC (9.8% vs 2.4%, P = 0.017). SFV increased the PPDR by 20.2% (55.7% vs 35.5%, P = 0.002) and PADR by 12.7% (37.7% vs 25%, P = 0.039). Multivariate analysis revealed that sessile serrated lesions (odds ratio [OR] = 7.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.58, 37.59]), inflammatory polyps (OR = 4.24, 95% CI [1.73, 10.39]), and lesion size (OR = 0.76, 95% CI [0.60, 0.96]) were associated with proximal missed lesions. The overall polyp miss rate was 52.9%, with miss rates of 61.0% for polyps <5 mm, 80% for sessile serrated lesions, and 42.2% for adenomas. Furthermore, 12.3% of patients experienced changes in surveillance intervals from SFV examination.

SFV examination of the proximal colon significantly improved the PSSLDR by 7.4%, PPDR by 20.2%, and PADR by 12.7%, while shortening the detection interval by 12.3%, making it a valuable and cost-effective addition to routine colonoscopy.

Special histomorphological subtypes of colorectal low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) with variable prognostic impact were recently described in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) referred to as non-conventional dysplasia. However, they can also be found in patients without IBD. We aimed to analyse the reproducibility, frequency and prognostic impact of non-conventional colorectal LGIN in patients with and without IBD.

Six pathologists evaluated 500 specimens of five different LGIN-cohorts from patients with and without IBD. Non-conventional LGIN included hypermucinous, goblet cell-deficient, Paneth cell-rich and crypt cell dysplasia. A goblet cell-rich type and non-conventional LGIN, not otherwise specified were added. Results were compared with the original expert-consented diagnosis from archived pathology records.

Four or more pathologists agreed in 86.0% of all cases. Non-conventional LGIN was seen in 44.4%, more frequently in patients with IBD (52%; non-IBD: 39.3%, p=0.005). In patients with IBD non-conventional LGIN associated with more frequent and earlier LGIN relapse (p=0.006, p=0.025), high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (p=0.003), larger lesion size (p=0.001), non-polypoid lesions (p=0.019) and additional risk factors (p=0.034). Results were highly comparable with expert-consented diagnoses. In patients without IBD, non-conventional LGIN may indicate a higher risk for concurrent or subsequent colorectal carcinoma (CRC, p=0.056 and p=0.061, respectively). Frequencies and association with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or CRC varied between the different LGIN subtypes.

Non-conventional histomorphology in colorectal LGIN is frequent and highly reproducible. Our results indicate an increased risk for CRC in patients with non-conventional LGIN, probably independent of IBD. We recommend reporting non-conventional LGIN in routine pathology reports.

Gastric polyps are commonly detected during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. They are most often benign and rarely become malignant. Nevertheless, adequate knowledge, diagnostic modalities, and management strategies should be the endoscopist's readily available "weapons" to defeat the potentially malignant "enemies". This article sheds light on the valuable effort by Costa et al to generate a new classification system of gastric polyps as "good", "bad", and "ugly". This comprehensive overview provides clinicians with a simplified decision-making process.

The aim of this study was to clarify the endoscopic characteristics of colorectal hamartomatous polyps, including solitary juvenile polyp (JP) and solitary Peutz-Jeghers polyp (PJP).

We reviewed the clinicopathological and endoscopic findings of 151 colorectal polyps with a diagnosis of solitary JP or solitary PJP. The clinicopathological and endoscopic findings of 119 JPs and 32 PJPs were retrospectively compared.

Endoscopic findings included significantly higher incidences of erosion, whitish exudates, and chicken-skin mucosa in JPs compared with PJPs. A lobular surface was more common in PJPs. Magnified narrow-band imaging endoscopic findings indicated that expanded crypt openings, sparse marginal crypt epithelia, and proliferation of capillary vessels were characteristic of JPs. Branching structures were more prevalent in PJPs. Magnifying chromoendoscopy found a predominance of star-like pit patterns and decreased pit densities in JPs, whereas tubular and branching pit patterns were more frequent in PJPs. Neither type of polyp was found to contain adenomas, dysplasia, or malignant cells. Combinations of specific characteristic endoscopic findings in the JPs and PJPs showed high diagnostic accuracy for those polyps.

Solitary JPs and PJPs in the colorectum manifested characteristic endoscopic findings, and combinations of specific characteristic endoscopic findings may be useful for endoscopic diagnosis of solitary JPs and PJPs.

Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is becoming increasingly popular in Europe. However, development of quality assurance and standardized terminology has not kept pace with clinical integration of this technology. As a result, there are significant variations in reporting standards, highlighting the need for a standardized terminology and framework. We used the RAND process to achieve a consensus of experts to determine the terminology in CCE, bowel cleansing assessment, and quality assurance reporting and future research priorities.

A panel comprising 14 European CCE experts evaluated 45 statements during the international REFLECT symposium (Nyborg, Denmark) through three survey rounds and face-to-face and virtual discussions in the initial two rounds. Participants anonymously rated statement appropriateness.

Twenty-eight consensus statements were developed. Eight statements focus on consistent terminology for confirming CCE-detected polypoid and inflammatory colonic lesions with colonoscopy. To ensure standardization and quality assurance, 13 mandatory fields were recommended for inclusion in a CCE report. Three endorsed reporting methodologies were suggested, emphasizing prompt notification for suspected malignant findings, recommending a generic disclaimer regarding stomach and small bowel visualization intentions, and establishing reporting timelines at an interdepartmental level based on urgency. Four bowel preparation scale-related statements led to the recommendation to adoptithe Colon Capsule CLEansing Assessment and Reporting (CC-CLEAR) scale as the preferred scale.

This study established a framework for terminology, reporting, and assessment of bowel cleansing for CCE. Future research should focus on optimizing bowel preparation regimens and exploring artificial intelligence applications in CCE.

The real-world effectiveness of computer-aided detection (CADe) systems during colonoscopies remains uncertain. We assessed the effectiveness of the novel CADe system, ENdoscopy as AI-powered Device (ENAD), in enhancing the adenoma detection rate (ADR) and other quality indicators in real-world clinical practice.

We enrolled patients who underwent elective colonoscopies between May 2022 and October 2022 at a tertiary healthcare center. Standard colonoscopy (SC) was compared to ENAD-assisted colonoscopy. Eight experienced endoscopists performed the procedures in randomly assigned CADe- and non-CADe-assisted rooms. The primary outcome was a comparison of ADR between the ENAD and SC groups.

A total of 1,758 sex- and age-matched patients were included and evenly distributed into two groups. The ENAD group had a significantly higher ADR (45.1% vs. 38.8%, p=0.010), higher sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SSLDR) (5.7% vs. 2.5%, p=0.001), higher mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy (APC) (0.78±1.17 vs. 0.61±0.99; incidence risk ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.42), and longer withdrawal time (9.0±3.4 vs. 8.3±3.1, p<0.001) than the SC group. However, the mean withdrawal times were not significantly different between the two groups in cases where no polyps were detected (6.9±1.7 vs. 6.7±1.7, p=0.058).

ENAD-assisted colonoscopy significantly improved the ADR, APC, and SSLDR in real-world clinical practice, particularly for smaller and nonpolypoid adenomas.

The prevalence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) is higher than in the general population, in Latin America there is a progressive increase of UC, and information about CRC screening in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is scarce. The aim of this study was to analyze the findings of endoscopic surveillance of CRC in patients with IBD according to available technology.

Multicenter, cross-sectional, analytical study conducted in Latin American countries, in patients with UC, predominantly with more than 8 years of diagnosis and different degrees of disease activity. Surveillance colonoscopies were performed according to available technology. Risk factors for dysplasia detection were analyzed.

One hundred and forty-four patients, 55.5% women, mean age 47.3 (range 17.1 to 90; SD 15.64) years and mean duration of disease 12.71 (range 0.64 to 57.13; SD 8.08) years. Forty-nine lesions were identified, 18 corresponded to dysplasia. The detection rate of dysplasia per lesion and per procedure was 36.7% and 12.5%, respectively. By logistic regression analysis, the duration of disease (OR 1.12;95%CI:1.047 to 1.215, P = .002) and the presence of post-inflammatory polyps (OR 3.4;95%CI:1.11 to 10.36, P = .031) were risk factors for higher detection of dysplasia. Digital chromoendoscopy was associated with greater detection of dysplasia (OR 4.99, 95%CI: 1.092 to 22.864, P = .038).

In our region, the duration of disease and the presence of post-inflammatory polyps were the factors with the highest association for dysplasia detection, and digital chromoendoscopy with directed biopsies was the technique of choice. The implementation of a specific surveillance program in colonoscopy in IBD is an effective strategy to achieve high detection rates.

Segmental colitis associated with diverticulosis (SCAD) is characterized by a chronic inflammatory response involving the inter-diverticular colonic mucosa, sparing the rectum and the right colon.

to assess the prevalence of SCAD in a CRC screening program and to evaluate the differences in terms of oncological outcomes between SCAD and diverticulosis.

retrospective analysis from a prospectively-maintained database including all subjects undergoing first screening colonoscopy.

1518 patients were included (51.8 % male, mean age 63.48 ± 6.39). Adenomas were detected in 638 patients (ADR 42 %), CRC was diagnosed in 5.7 %. Diverticulosis was described in 37.5 %, while SCAD in 4.5 %. Among them, 69.6 % presented crescentic-fold disease, 20.3 % mild-to-moderate UC-like pattern, 8.7 % CD-like pattern and 1.4 % severe UC-like pattern. When SCAD was compared to uncomplicated/asymptomatic diverticulosis (501 patients), we found no differences in terms of gender (p = 0.46) or age (p = 0.47). Interestingly, the use of anticoagulant/antiplatelet (p = 0.79), anti-hypertensive (p = 0.89) or anti-hyperglycaemic drugs (p = 0.52) had no effect on SCAD onset as compared to diverticulosis. SCAD patients had significant lower rate of adenomas (ADR 31.9% vs 47.3 %, p = 0.018, OR 0.52, 95 %CI 0.31-0.89), and lower-but not significant-rate of CRC (1.4% vs 6.2 %, p = 0.14, OR 0.22, 95 %CI 0.02-1.66).

SCAD can be diagnosed in about 5 % of population undergoing screening colonoscopy and in 12 % of those with diverticulosis. SCAD seems to be associated with a reduced rate of adenomas or CRC as compared with diverticulosis.

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains a significant global health challenge, being the sixth leading cause of cancer mortality with pronounced geographic variability. The incidence rates range from 125 per 100,000 in northern China to 1-1.5 per 100,000 in the United States, driven by environmental and lifestyle factors such as tobacco and alcohol use, dietary habits, and pollution. Major modifiable risk factors include tobacco and alcohol consumption, with a synergistic risk increase when combined. Nonmodifiable risk factors include previous diagnoses of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (H&N SCC), achalasia, and prior radiotherapy. Prevention strategies must be tailored to specific regional burdens to efficiently allocate medical and financial resources. Gastrointestinal endoscopy is crucial in reducing ESCC burden through early detection and characterization of neoplastic changes, such as high-grade dysplasia. Early diagnosis significantly improves survival rates, while endoscopic resection of noninvasive dysplasia can prevent ESCC onset, reducing treatment burden for advanced disease. Postresection surveillance can detect high-risk metachronous lesions. Despite these benefits, endoscopic prevention faces challenges, including the lack of high-level evidence supporting its efficacy, opportunity costs, the need for specialized training and techniques, and the requirement for advanced technology investments. This Position Statement from the World Endoscopy Organization (WEO) aims to address these challenges, supplying recommendations for the exploitation of endoscopic resources regarding the possible role of screening, quality, and training for the detection, characterization, resection, and surveillance of ESCC.

Local resection of early rectal cancer is being increasingly used. With invasion of the muscularis propria layer of the rectal wall, the risk of lymph node metastasis becomes too high to consider this the optimal oncological treatment. Therefore, a diagnosis of muscular invasion is important before attempting local resection; however, endoscopic and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images have limitations, such as overstaging (26-31%). We investigated the potential of linear endoscopic ultrasound (L-EUS) in the diagnosis of muscularis propria invasion.

The study consisted of a development phase, in which linear (L)- EUS features, associated with muscular wall invasion were searched and tested, and a validation phase, during which 30 representative videos were assessed by the author F.t.B. and four experienced endosonographists without experience in rectal L-EUS.

The development cohort consisted of 91 patients (2019-2023). Overall, six EUS features were found to be significantly associated with muscular wall invasion: tornado sign, blob sign, massive connection, layer split, extramural deposit, and, most importantly impaired shiftability between the lesion and muscularis propria layer. During the development phase, these findings demonstrated excellent diagnostic features (sensitivity, 94.4%; specificity, 97.9%; and overstaging, 4%). In the validation phase, the sensitivity, specificity, and overstaging by F.t.B. were 88%, 85%, and 12%, respectively. Among the four inexperienced reviewers, the percentages were 65%-71%, 46%-54%, and 33%-39%, respectively. When considering the 27 videos that were considered easy or moderately difficult to assess, only 55% were correctly interpreted by the inexperienced reviewers.

Linear endoscopic ultrasonography may be a valuable tool for the assessment of ingrowth into the muscularis propria in supposedly early rectal cancer, especially using its dynamic potential to assess fixation to the muscular wall by moving the lesion. However, training will be required to achieve satisfactory results.

This study evaluated the impact of differing false positive (FP) rates in two computer-aided detection (CADe) systems on the clinical effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted colonoscopy. The primary outcomes were adenoma detection rate (ADR) and adenomas per colonoscopy (APC). The ADR in the control, system A (3.2% FP rate), and system B (0.6% FP rate) groups were 44.3%, 43.4%, and 50.4%, respectively, with system B showing a significantly higher ADR than the control group. The APC for the control, A, and B groups were 0.75, 0.83, and 0.90, respectively, with system B also showing a higher APC than the control. The non-true lesion resection rates were 23.8%, 29.2%, and 21.3%, with system B having the lowest. The system with lower FP rates demonstrated improved ADR and APC without increasing the resection of non-neoplastic lesions. These findings suggest that higher FP rates negatively affect the clinical performance of AI-assisted colonoscopy.

To compare the pocket-creation method (PCM) with the conventional method of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for cecal and ascending colon lesion resection.

The data of patients who underwent ESD for cecal or ascending colon lesions were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the PCM group and the conventional group according to the method of ESD. Baseline data, endoscopic characteristics, dissection speed, pathological results and adverse events were compared between the two groups. Dissection speed was also analyzed.

Overall, 122 patients were included. The dissection speed in the PCM group was higher than in the conventional group (0.20 [0.11, 0.32] cm2/min vs. 0.12 [0.08, 0.20] cm2/min, Z = -2.813, p = 0.005). The proportion of patients with injury to the muscularis propria layer in the PCM group was lower than in the conventional group, though the difference was not significant (19.4% vs. 29.1%, χ2 = 1.215, p = 0.270). The univariate analysis showed that low body mass index (BMI), use of the PCM, long lesion diameter, large lesion area, and minimal fibrosis were independent risk factors for fast dissection (all p < 0.05). The logistic regression analysis showed that high dissection speed was associated with the choice to use the PCM, longer lesion diameter, and no fibrosis.

For cecal and ascending colon lesions, the PCM is a better choice than the conventional method, especially in patients with fibrosis, and large lesion area.

Artificial intelligence (AI) holds significant potential for enhancing quality of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, but the adoption of AI in clinical practice is hampered by the lack of rigorous standardisation and development methodology ensuring generalisability. The aim of the Quality Assessment of pre-clinical AI studies in Diagnostic Endoscopy (QUAIDE) Explanation and Checklist was to develop recommendations for standardised design and reporting of preclinical AI studies in GI endoscopy.The recommendations were developed based on a formal consensus approach with an international multidisciplinary panel of 32 experts among endoscopists and computer scientists. The Delphi methodology was employed to achieve consensus on statements, with a predetermined threshold of 80% agreement. A maximum three rounds of voting were permitted.Consensus was reached on 18 key recommendations, covering 6 key domains: data acquisition and annotation (6 statements), outcome reporting (3 statements), experimental setup and algorithm architecture (4 statements) and result presentation and interpretation (5 statements). QUAIDE provides recommendations on how to properly design (1. Methods, statements 1-14), present results (2. Results, statements 15-16) and integrate and interpret the obtained results (3. Discussion, statements 17-18).The QUAIDE framework offers practical guidance for authors, readers, editors and reviewers involved in AI preclinical studies in GI endoscopy, aiming at improving design and reporting, thereby promoting research standardisation and accelerating the translation of AI innovations into clinical practice.

To investigate the influence of a micro-enema on diagnostic performance, submucosal width, reader confidence, and tumor conspicuity using MRI to stage early rectal cancers (ERC).

In this single-center study, we consecutively included 50 participants with assumed ERC who all completed MRI with (MRin) and without (MRex) a micro-enema. The diagnostic performance was recorded for two experienced radiologists using histopathology as the gold standard. In addition, the width of the submucosa in the tumor-bearing wall, reader confidence for T-staging, and tumor conspicuity were assessed. Significance levels were calculated using McNemar's test (diagnostic performance) and Wilcoxon's signed-rank test (reader confidence, submucosal width, and conspicuity). Interreader agreement was assessed using kappa statistics.

Sensitivity/specificity were for Reader1 91%/87% for both MRex and MRin and for Reader2 74%/87% and 89%/87%, both readers p > 0.05. The micro-enema induced a significant widening of the submucosa, p < 0.001, with a mean increase of 2.2/2.8 mm measured by Reader1/Reader2. Reader confidence in T-staging and tumor conspicuity increased for both readers, p < 0.005. The proportion of tumors with both correct staging and high reader confidence increased from 58% (29/50) to 80% (40/50) (p = 0.04) for Reader1 and from 42% (21/50) to 72% (36/50) (p = 0.002) for Reader2. Interreader agreement increased from moderate (kappa 0.58) to good (kappa 0.68).

The micro-enema significantly increased the submucosal width in the tumor-bearing wall, reader confidence, and tumor conspicuity and improved interreader agreement from moderate to good. Sensitivity and specificity in T-staging did not improve, but there was a significant increase in the proportion of tumors staged with both high confidence and correct T-stage.